Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16 April 2003
Thermal insulation —
Determination of
steady-state thermal
transmission
properties —
Calibrated and guarded
hot box
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
ICS 27.220
BS EN ISO 8990:1996
The following bodies were also represented in the drafting of the standard,
through subcommittees and panels:
Contents
Page
Committees responsible Inside front cover
National foreword ii
Foreword 2
Text of EN ISO 8990 3
List of references Inside back cover
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
© BSI 10-1998 i
BS EN ISO 8990:1996
National foreword
This British Standard has been prepared by Technical Committee RHE/9 and is
the English language version of EN ISO 8990 Thermal insulation —
Determination of steady-state thermal transmission properties — Calibrated and
guarded hot box, published by the European Committee for Standardization
(CEN).
EN ISO 8990 was produced as a result of international discussions in which the
United Kingdom took an active part.
Cross-reference
Publication referred to Corresponding British Standard
EN ISO 7345:1995 BS EN ISO 7345:1996 Thermal insulation — Physical
quantities and definitions
A British Standard does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a
contract. Users of British Standards are responsible for their correct application.
Compliance with a British Standard does not of itself confer immunity
from legal obligations.
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i and ii,
the EN title page, pages 2 to 20, an inside back cover and a back cover.
This standard has been updated (see copyright date) and may have had
amendments incorporated. This will be indicated in the amendment table on
the inside front cover.
ii © BSI 10-1998
EUROPEAN STANDARD EN ISO 8990
NORME EUROPÉENNE
August 1996
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 27.220
Descriptors: Thermal insulation, thermal insulating materials, tests, determination, thermal conductivity, thermal resistance, test
equipment
English version
CEN
European Committee for Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation
Europäisches Komitee für Normung
Foreword Contents
The text of the International Standard from Page
Technical Committee ISO/TC 163, Thermal Foreword 2
insulation, of the International Organization for
Introduction 3
Standardization (ISO) has been taken over as a
European Standard by Technical Committee Section 1. General
CEN/TC 89, Thermal performance of buildings 1.1 Scope 3
components, the secretariat of which is held by SIS. 1.2 Normative reference 4
This European Standard shall be given the status of 1.3 Definitions 4
a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by 1.4 Symbols, units and relationships 4
February 1997, and conflicting national standards 1.5 Principle 4
shall be withdrawn at the latest by February 1997. 1.6 Limitations and sources of errors 5
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Section 2. Apparatus
Regulations, the national standards organizations 2.1 Introduction 9
of the following countries are bound to implement
this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, 2.2 Design requirements 9
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, 2.3 Metering box 10
Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, 2.4 Guard box 10
Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
2 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
Section 1. General
conditions, specimen dimensions, direction of heat of moisture transfer on the accuracy and the
transfer, temperatures, temperature differences, air relevance of test results. The properties which can
velocities, and relative humidity. In consequence, be measured are thermal transmittance and
the test conditions must replicate those of the thermal resistance. Two alternative methods are
intended application, or be evaluated if the result is included: the calibrated hot box method and the
to be meaningful. guarded hot box method. Both are suitable for
It should also be borne in mind that a property can vertical specimens such as walls and for horizontal
only be assessed as useful to characterize a specimens such as ceilings and floors. The
material, product or system if the measurement of apparatus can be sufficiently large to study
the steady-state thermal transmission properties of full-scale components.
the specimen and the calculation or interpretation The methods are primarily intended for laboratory
of the thermal transmission characteristics measurements of large, inhomogeneous specimens,
represent the actual performance of the product or although homogeneous specimens can, of course,
system. also be tested, and these are necessary for
Further, a property can only be characteristic of a calibration and validation.
material, product or system if the results of a series When testing homogeneous specimens in
of measurements on a number of specimens from accordance with this International Standard,
several samples provide sufficient reproducibility. experience has shown that an accuracy within ± 5 %
The design and operation of the guarded or can generally be achieved. However, the accuracy of
calibrated hot box is a complex subject. It is each individual apparatus shall be estimated with
essential that the designer and user of such reference homogeneous specimens of thermal
apparatus has a thorough background knowledge of conductance extending over the range to be
heat transfer, and has experience of precision measured using the apparatus.
measurement techniques. The estimation of accuracy for nonhomogeneous
Many different designs of the calibrated and the specimens will be more complex and involve an
guarded hot box exist worldwide conforming to analysis of the heat flow mechanism in the
national standards. Continuing research and particular types of inhomogeneous specimens being
development is in progress to improve apparatus tested. Such analyses are not covered by this
and measurement techniques. Also the variation of International Standard.
structures to be tested may be so great, and the The method does not provide for measurements
requirements for test conditions so different, that it where there is mass transfer through the specimen
would be a mistake to restrict the test method during the test.
unnecessarily and to confine all measurements to a
single arrangement. Thus it is not practical to
mandate a specific design or size of apparatus.
© BSI 10-1998 3
EN ISO 8990:1996
For the purposes of this International Standard, the Ts Surface temperature [K]
following definitions apply. Rs = A(Tsi – Tse)/Í1
1.3.1 Rs = 1/h
mean radiant temperature, Tr Rsi = A(Tni – Tsi)/Í1
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
4 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
Measurements are made at steady-state of air and In practice, for each equipment and each specimen
surface temperatures and of the power input to the under test, there will be a limit in detecting
hot side chamber. From these measurements the imbalance (imbalance resolution, see 1.6.1.1).
thermal transfer properties of the specimen are 1.5.3 Calibrated hot box
calculated. Heat exchange at the surfaces of the test
specimen involves both convective and radiative The calibrated hot box (see Figure 2) is surrounded
components. The former depends upon air by a temperature-controlled space not necessarily at
temperature and air velocity, and the latter depends the same air temperature as that inside the
upon the temperatures and the total hemispherical metering box. The heat losses through the box walls,
emittances of specimen surfaces and of surfaces Í3, are kept low by using a construction of high
“seen” by the test specimen surface. The effects of thermal resistance. The total power input, Íp, shall
the heat transfer by convection and radiation are be corrected for the wall losses, Í3, and for the
combined in the concept of an “environmental flanking losses, Í4. The flanking heat flow path is
temperature” and a surface heat transfer illustrated in Figure 3, which shows details of the
coefficient. specimen and specimen frame with the adjacent hot
and cold side box walls. The correction for box wall
Thermal transmittance is defined between two losses and flanking losses are determined by tests
environmental temperatures, and therefore suitable on calibration specimens of known thermal
temperature measurements are required to enable
resistance. For flanking loss calibration, the
these to be determined. This is particularly
calibration specimens should cover the same
important with test specimens of low thermal
thickness and thermal resistance range as the
resistance for which the surface coefficients of heat
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
© BSI 10-1998 5
EN ISO 8990:1996
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
6 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
© BSI 10-1998 7
EN ISO 8990:1996
1.6.2 Limitations and errors due to specimen d) cavities within the specimen. Natural
1.6.2.1 convection can create an unknown imbalance
heat flow rate, Í2. The effect of installing barriers
shall be evaluated.
For a given apparatus design, specimen thickness
can be limited for reasons depending upon specimen It is not possible to provide immediate solutions to
all types of problems. The operator is advised to be
properties and boundary conditions, an upper limit
fully aware of te effects of anomalies.
for the thickness is due to edge losses, Í5, or
flanking losses, Í4, which, although decreasing Calculations of the importance and effects if
with increasing specimen thickness, can become inhomogeneities are of great help to predict the
significant in comparison to Í1 and degrade thermal performance of the test specimen. If
measurement accuracy. significant differences exist between predicted and
measured specimen performance which cannot be
1.6.2.2
explained, as a minimum requirement, where such
Most test specimens representative of building and divergences exist, a careful inspection of the
industrial components will generally be specimen should be performed to identify any
inhomogeneous. Inhomogeneities in the test difference between actual and specified sizes,
specimen will affect the pattern of the density of dimensions, materials, etc. Any irregularities from
heat flowrate in such a manner that it is neither the original specification shall be reported.
one-dimensional nor uniform. Also variations of the
1.6.2.3
thickness throughout the specimen can cause
significant local modifications of the pattern of the Moisture transfer during the test may have a
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
density of heat flowrate. The effects of these are significant effect on test results. It is not possible to
nonuniformities in temperatures and local transfer specify a standard pre-test conditioning. As a
coefficients making the following more difficult or minimum requirement, the method of conditioning
even impossible: shall be reported. For most specimens, it is normally
impossible, without derating measurement
a) the definition of a mean surface temperature;
accuracy to an unacceptable level, to reduce
b) the detection of imbalance in the guarded hot temperature differences so much that moisture
box apparatus; transfer is so slow that steady-state mass transfer
c) the definition of the metering area; can be assumed during measurement time. It
d) the error analysis of test results for a given should also be realized that not only moisture
in-homogeneous specimen. transfer through the specimen, but also moisture
redistribution in the specimen and phase change,
Specific examples include:
will affect the results.
a) facings having a high thermal conductivity.
These form easy paths for imbalance heat flow 1.6.2.4
rate, Í2, and flanking heat losses, Í4. It can help Specimen thermal resistances or thermal
to cut the facing along the metering box transmittances are often a function of temperature
periphery. When layers are homogeneous, an differences across the specimen itself. Care shall
alternative solution is to run independent tests then be taken in reporting and interpreting
on each layer with test methods using a guarded measurement results.
hot plate or a heat flow meter;
b) horizontal and vertical structural members
like studs. Their effect is in most cases
symmetrical;
c) sections of the specimen made of different
materials. The temperature differences through
the materials are not the same. A heat flow exists
close to the interface of the different materials.
When this interface is not far from the metering
box periphery, this implies a temperature
nonuniformity that affects both imbalance
detection and the ambiguity in the definition of
the metering area. Also, local heat transfer
coefficients are affected by these
inhomogeneities;
8 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
Section 2. Apparatus
2.1 Introduction
As stated in 1.1, it is impractical to impose specific
design details for an apparatus. However, this
section gives mandatory requirements and the
aspects which must be considered.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show typical arrangements of
the test specimen and major elements of the
apparatus. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show alternative
arrangements. Other arrangements, accomplishing
the same purpose, may be used. The effect on the
heat transfer through the specimen of the box walls
in Figure 1 and of the frame in Figure 2 depends
upon the wall or frame shape and material, upon the
specimen thickness and resistance and such test
conditions as temperature differences and air
velocities. The apparatus design and construction
should be made compatible with the expected types
of specimen to be tested and expected testing
conditions. Figure 4
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
© BSI 10-1998 9
EN ISO 8990:1996
The low emissivity environment requires a greater It is recommended that a baffle be positioned in the
convective component, such as higher velocities, to metering box, parallel to the surface of the specimen
achieve conventional surface coefficients. This when forced convection is used. The baffle should
produces a substantial change in the distribution of extend to the full width of the metering box and
the surface coefficient which can give better have gaps at each end to allow air circulation. The
temperature uniformity, but this situation can baffle may be moveable, perpendicular to its
produce an artificial thermal behaviour surface, to aid in adjusting the air velocity parallel
substantially different from actual use. In to its surface. When natural convection is used, a
particular, it is unsuitable for specimens with baffle may be necessary to shield specimen surfaces
permeable surfaces. from radiative heat transfer of heaters.
The considerations in 2.2 regarding emissivity of
2.3 Metering box surfaces also apply to the baffle.
2.3.1 Box wall construction When testing in a vertical position, the circulation
The insulation of the box wall shall be chosen resulting from natural convection can be sufficient
considering the intended range of specimen to ensure temperature uniformity and the desired
resistance and temperature difference so that an surface coefficients. When air movement is due to
error in the evaluation of the metering box losses natural convection, the distance between specimen
does not affect the determination of the specimen and baffle should be larger than the boundary layer
heat flow by more than 0,5 %. Box walls shall be thickness, or no baffle should be used. When it is
thermally uniform to aid in achieving uniform impossible to achieve the desired conditions with
natural convection, circulating fans should be
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
10 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
2.5 Specimen frame The number of sensors for air temperature and
surface temperature measurement shall be at least
In the calibrated hot box, the specimen frame is a
two per square metre and not less than nine, unless
critical component due to the flanking losses which
other information on the temperature distribution
for the sake of accuracy should be kept at a
is available.
minimum. There is a compromise between
load-carrying capacity, e.g. support of the specimen, Air and surface temperature differences over the
and high thermal resistance. The facing towards the specimen and surface temperature differences over
specimen should have low thermal transmission. the metering box walls can be determined by
differential measurement in order to improve
In the typical configuration of the guarded hot box
accuracy.
the specimen frame is omitted and lateral heat flow
is minimized by edge insulation. If, however, a 2.7.1 Specimen surface temperature
specimen frame is used it shall minimize lateral measurement
heat flow, as required in 2.4. These measurements shall be made with sensors
chosen and applied to the surface in such a way that
2.6 Cold side chamber the sensors do not change the temperature at the
The size of cold side chamber is governed by the size measuring point.
of the metering box in the case of the calibrated hot This requirement can be met by thermocouples of
box, or the guard box in the case of the guarded hot wire diameter less than 0,25 mm, with junctions
box; arrangements may be as illustrated in Figure 1, and at least 100 mm of adjoining wire in thermal
Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5. contact with the surface, along the most isothermal
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
The chamber walls should be constructed to reduce path, using cement or tape of emissivity close to that
the load of the refrigeration equipment and prevent of the surface.
moisture condensation. The inside surfaces of the Surface coefficients should be as close as possible to
chamber shall have an emittance in accordance with end use conditions. Information on surface
the desired radiative heat exchange. The coefficients may be obtained from a test on
requirements concerning emittance, shielding of homogeneous specimens tested in similar
heaters, temperature stability and temperature conditions. Particular care shall be taken in all
uniformity are in principle the same as for the cases, in interpreting results.
metering box. In the case of nonhomogeneous specimens, the
For fine tuning of the cold side temperature, electric indicated number of sensors will not ensure reliable
resistance heaters in the outlet from the evaporator mean surface temperatures. For moderately
are often useful. As mentioned under the metering inhomogeneous specimens, supplementary sensors
box, a baffle may also be advantageous to achieve shall be applied to each region of varying
uniform air distribution. Air flow direction temperature. The mean surface temperature of each
corresponding to natural convection is suggested. region shall then be weighted proportionally to the
Motors, fans, evaporators and heaters shall be area of that region to obtain the mean surface
radiation-shielded. temperature of the specimen.
Air velocities should be adjustable to meet the For very inhomogeneous specimens, this is not
required surface coefficients of the test and should possible. In this case, specimen thermal resistance,
be measured. In simulating natural conditions for Rs, cannot be measured, as only the thermal
building components, the range can be from 0,1 m/s transmittance, U, based on the environmental
to 10 m/s. temperature difference across the specimen, can be
defined.
2.7 Temperature measurements As a guideline to compare nonhomogeneous and
If possible, the sensors for the measurement of air very inhomogeneous specimens, the following is
temperature and specimen surface temperature proposed. Local differences in surface temperature
should be evenly spaced over the specimen area and caused by inhomogeneities exceeding 20 % of the
located opposite each other on the hot and cold side. mean surface-to-surface temperature difference
should be taken as evidence of such inhomogeneity.
Surface temperatures of the equipment “seen” by
the specimen shall be investigated to calculate the
mean radiant temperature.
© BSI 10-1998 11
EN ISO 8990:1996
12 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
© BSI 10-1998 13
EN ISO 8990:1996
or core samples shall be taken before and after the whether continuous cavities in the specimen require
test. barriers, and whether high conductivity facings
should be cut at the perimeter of the metering box.
3.3 Specimen selection and mounting If the specimen surface is uneven, it may be
The test specimen shall be selected or constructed in necessary to smooth with plaster, caulking or other
such a way that it is representative. In the case of suitable material, at the area of contact with the
inhomogeneous specimens, the following shall be perimeter seal of the metering box, to ensure an
considered. For the guarded hot box, a decision shall airtight seal between metering and guard box.
be taken on the most accurate way of detecting If the test specimen is smaller than the size
imbalance (air-to-air or air-to-surface). When provided for the specimen by the metering box, the
surface temperatures are very uniform close to the specimen is mounted in a mast, e.g. a wall in which
periphery of the metering area, the specimen the specimen is fitted.
surface imbalance detection and the evaluation of The heat flow in the border region between mask
heat flow through the box, Í3, can be the most and specimen will not be unidirectional; this
accurate solution. However, when problem can be minimized by choosing mask and
nonhomogeneities are present close to the periphery specimen of the same thermal resistance and
of the metering area, air-to-air balance solution can thickness. In some instances this is not possible, for
be the only possible solution and imbalance heat example in window testing. In this case, when the
flow, Í2, is then an unknown source of error. In the resistance of the mask is different from that of the
guarded hot box, when possible, thermal bridges wall where the window will be mounted, and the
should be placed symmetrically over the borderline flow lines in the frame of the window are different
between metering and guard area, so that half of the from those in end use, the accuracy will be hard to
area of the thermal bridge is in the metering box predict. These problems call for test conventions for
and the other half is in the guard box. the specimen mounting to allow comparison and
If the specimen is modular, the metering box interpretation of results. These are outside of the
dimensions should be a suitable multiple of the scope of this International Standard.
module. The perimeter of the metering box should
either coincide with the module lines or fall in the
middle between the module lines.
If it is impossible to fulfil these requirements,
several tests may have to be made with different
positions of the metering area: the results shall be
considered very carefully, and, if applicable,
supplemented with temperature and heat flow
measurements and computations.
14 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
© BSI 10-1998 15
EN ISO 8990:1996
p) other information relevant to the test, e.g. any s) the calculated thermal transmittance and the
significant or unexplained divergence between surface coefficients of heat transfer from a
test results and tentative estimates in accordance homogeneous specimen;
with 3.1, results of the consequent inspection of t) the estimated accuracy;
the specimen and possible interpretation of
u) test duration;
divergences.
v) complementary measurements, e.g. the
The test report for the determination of thermal
thermal conductivity and the moisture content of
transmittance, U, in accordance with 3.6.2 shall
the materials that are part of the specimen;
in addition to items a) to h) include the
information in items q) to w). w) other information relevant to the test, e.g. any
NOTE 3 The values to be reported under items q) to t) are
significant or unexplained divergence between
the mean values of all readings or measurement periods after test results and tentative estimates in accordance
the initial transient periods. with 3.1, results of the consequent inspection of
q) the air temperatures on the hot and the cold the specimen and possible interpretation of
side; divergences.
r) the calculated environmental temperature for
the hot and cold side;
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
16 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
© BSI 10-1998 17
EN ISO 8990:1996
...(A.5)
18 © BSI 10-1998
EN ISO 8990:1996
Annex B (informative)
Bibliography
[1] ISO 8301:1991, Thermal insulation — Determination of steady-state thermal resistance and related
properties — Heat flow meter apparatus.
[2] ISO 8302:1991, Thermal insulation — Determination of steady-state thermal resistance and related
properties — Guarded hot plate apparatus.
[3] ISO 9251:1987, Thermal insulation — Heat transfer conditions and properties of materials —
Vocabulary.
[4] ISO 9288:1989, Thermal insulation — Heat transfer by radiation — Physical quantities and definitions.
[5] ASTM C 236, Test method for steady-state thermal performance of building assemblies by means of a
guarded hot box.
[6] ASTM C 976, Test method for thermal performance of building assemblies by means of a calibrated hot
box.
[7] BS 874:1973, Methods for determining thermal insulating properties with definitions of thermal
insulating terms.
[8] Nordtest NT Building 119, Determination of thermal resistance by means of a hot box.
[9] ASTM STP 544, MUMAW, J.R. Calibrated hot box: an effective means for measuring thermal conductance
in large wall sections.
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
[10] ASTM STP 789, ORLAND, R.D., HOWANSKI, J.W., DERDERIAN, G.D. and SHU, L.S. Development of a
testing procedure for a guarded hot box facility.
[11] ASTM STP 789, Goss, W.P. and OLPAK, Ahmet Design and calibration of a rotatable thermal test
facility.
[12] ASTM STP 789, LAVINE, A.G., RUCKER, J.L. and WILKES, K.E. Flanking loss calibration for a
calibrated hot box.
[13] GUY and NIXON, A detailed verification procedure for a guarded hot box.
[14] ONEGA, R.J. and BURNS, P.J. Thermal flanking loss.
© BSI 10-1998 19
EN ISO 8990:1996
Annex ZA (normative)
Normative references to international publications with their relevant
European publications
This European Standard incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications.
These normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications apply
to this European Standard only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references
the latest edition of the publication referred to applies.
20 © BSI 10-1998
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI
© BSI 10-1998
See national foreword.
List of references
BS EN ISO 8990:1996
Licensed Copy: , University of Loughborough, 16 April 2003, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI