Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It is commonly understood that Utah has notoriously unhealthy air, especially during the
colder seasons due to inversions and vehicle car emissions. This is a problem that has been a
struggle for citizens and government officials to find a solution for. If you have driven on any
big highways in Utah during rush hour you probably won’t be surprised that vehicle car
emissions create around 60% of the particulate matter/pollution in the air. Logically, this means
reducing personal vehicle usage would be one of the easiest and quickest ways to improve
Utah’s air quality. However, the convenience of personal cars is something many Utahns find
difficult giving up to help the environment. This means a solution is to make public
A study by the Salt Lake Tribune in 2015 found that only 3.4% of Salt Lake City-metro
workers used public transportation compared to the nation’s average of 5%. On average, only
40% of the seats are taken on public transportation vehicles, so availability isn’t the reason why
Utahns don’t use public transportation. Studies have proven that public transportation is better
for the environment and reduces traffic, yet local residents continue to opt for personal vehicle
transportation. So why aren’t Utahns using public transportation? I believe the biggest reasons
Groups” and worse days, that the fare for TRAX and bus
transportation would free or discounted so that more residents start using public transportation.
In 2018, over one third of Utah days were classified as “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups” and
worse. While the investment for free transportation fare would be high at first, the air quality
would improve, leading to fewer bad air quality days and simultaneously reducing free fare days.
Implementing this plan would not only reduce pollution, but also introduce more people to the
The other main reason people choose to drive personal vehicles is because of
convenience. Free fare days during bad air quality warnings would increase the convenience of
public transportation. Sometimes even simple tasks like buying a ticket can feel inconvenient
and decrease the opinion of the system. Without having to buy a ticket, commuters would be
able to familiarize themselves with the station locations and quickly gain access to transportation
without any hassle. It would essentially act as free trial that people could use to change their
opinion on the convenience or any opinions they might have of public transportation.
Finally, the last reason I believe Utahns aren’t using public transportation is because
stations aren’t always next to where you are planning to travel. While the UTA has been
increasing station locations and optimizing routes in the recent years, unless you’re traveling
downtown you may end up walking miles to your destination and if the air quality is bad, you
risk damaging your health. Unfortunately, this part of the problem will only be resolved through
Public transportation does have upkeep costs, employees, construction costs for
expansion, so money does need to be made to fund a program that provides its service for free.
Around 69% of the Utah Transportation Authority is funded by state taxes—mostly sales tax—
and federal tax grants. Federal funds are allocated to help states decrease pollution, but the
federal government also withholds funds from states that aren’t meeting air quality guidelines.
In 2018, Utah received $12.7 million dollars to fund air quality projects. Then, from 2018-2019
air pollution in Utah increased and in 2019, the EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
gave the state of Utah $9.7 million dollars for air quality projects, a loss of 26.7% of funding
from the EPA. If free fare during bad air quality days proved to be effective, the state of Utah
would be rewarded with more federal grant money to continue improving the environment.