Result

The evaluation form allowed the participants in the seminar to evaluate the presenter. The scale is
one (1) to five (5), five (5) being the highest and one is the lowest. Some of the participant rate the
presenter five and says that the presenter are good on mastery of their topic and methodology of delivery
and also can be future builder of advocacy, and other participants rate four (4) three (3), two (2) and one
(1).

The result of evaluation is listed in table 1 from thirty-three (33) evaluators that give five,
four, three, two and one.

FREQUENCY

MASTER OF TOPIC 1 2 3 4 5
Displayed adequate knowledge and
clearly communicated the core 8 21 4
messages of assigned topic.
Provide relevant examples in 4 21 8
relation to assigned topic.
Correctly and adequately responded 1 6 16 10
to questioning and clarifications.

CONTENT AND 1 2 3 4 5
METHODOLOGY OF
DELIVERY
Exhibited confidence during the 7 21 5
presentation.
Able to build rapport with the 7 18 8
participants.
Training methods and materials 7 17 9
were appropriate to the topic.
Topic covered were structured and 5 22 6
enable participants to follow the
discussion
Able to manage his/her time well. 8 15 10
 PERCENTAGE

MASTER OF TOPIC 1 2 3 4 5
Displayed adequate knowledge and
clearly communicated the core 24.24% 63.63% 12.12%
messages of assigned topic.
Provide relevant examples in 12.12% 63.63% 24.24%
relation to assigned topic.
Correctly and adequately responded 3.03% 18.18% 48.48% 30.30%
to questioning and clarifications.

CONTENT AND 1 2 3 4 5
METHODOLOGY OF
DELIVERY
Exhibited confidence during the 21.21% 63.63% 15.15%
presentation.
Able to build rapport with the 21.21% 54.54% 24.24%
participants.
Training methods and materials 21.21% 51.51% 27.27%
were appropriate to the topic.
Topic covered were structured and 15.15% 66.66% 18.18%
enable participants to follow the
discussion
Able to manage his/her time well. 24.24% 45.45% 30.30%