Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phenotypic Patterns
Gonzalo Albornoz, MD, Michael A. Coady, MD, Michele Roberts, MD, PhD,
Ryan R. Davies, MD, Maryann Tranquilli, RN, John A. Rizzo, PhD, and
John A. Elefteriades, MD
Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Background. We examined the genetic nature and phe- Among all 197 probands and kindred with aneurysm, 131
notypic features of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and (66.5%) had TAA, 49 (24.9%) had abdominal aortic aneu-
dissections in a large cohort of patients. rysm (AAA), and 17 (8.6%) had cerebral or other aneu-
Methods. Interviews were conducted with 520 patients rysms. Ascending aneurysm paired most commonly with
with TAAs and their pedigrees were compiled to identify ascending, and descending with abdominal. Abdominal
family members with aneurysms. Study patients were aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and hypertension were more
divided into three groups: 101 non-Marfan patients, in 88 often associated with descending than with ascending
pedigrees, had a family pattern for TAA (familial group), TAAs (p < 0.001). Aortic growth rate was highest for the
369 had no family pattern (sporadic group), and 50 had familial group (0.21cm/y), intermediate for the sporadic
Marfan syndrome (MFS). We determined incidence of group (0.16 cm/y), and lowest for the Marfan group (0.1
familial clustering, age at presentation, rate of aneurysm cm/y; p < 0.01).
growth, incidence of hypertension, correlation of aneu- Conclusions. TAAs are frequently familial diseases.
rysm sites among kindred, and pedigree inheritance The predominant mode of inheritance is autosomal dom-
patterns. inant. Familial TAAs have a relatively early age of onset.
Results. An inherited pattern for TAA was present in Aneurysms in relatives may be seen in the thoracic aorta,
21.5% of non-MFS patients. The predominant inheritance the abdominal aorta, or the cerebral circulation. Screen-
pattern was autosomal dominant (76.9%), with varying ing of first-order relatives of probands with TAA is
degrees of penetrance and expressivity. The familial essential. Familial TAAs tend to grow at a higher rate,
TAA group was significantly younger than the sporadic exemplifying a more aggressive clinical entity.
group (p < 0.0001), but not as young as the MFS group (p (Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1400 – 6)
< 0.0001) (mean ages, 58.2 versus 65.7 versus 27.4 years). © 2006 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
CARDIOVASCULAR
either ascending or descending, and the site of the
arterial aneurysms among their kindred, including TAAs,
abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and cerebral arte-
rial aneurysms. In the remaining 15 pedigrees, a family
member was known to have had an aneurysm, but the
aneurysm site was unknown and could not be
determined.
The presence of antecedent hypertension was deter-
mined in 74 familial pedigrees, permitting analysis of the
difference in prevalence between ascending and de-
Fig 1. Flow diagram of pedigrees created.
scending TAA involvement by using the nondirectional
Yates 2 analysis.
The interviewees consented to be interviewed. Selec- Rates of aneurysm growth for 160 non-Marfan pro-
tion of patients for interview was essentially random and bands (31 familials and 129 sporadics) were calculated
not based on any clinical patient characteristics. Inter- from the change in the measured aneurysm size on
viewers tended to select for contact, from the overall lists successive imaging studies. The method for calculating
they were provided, patients recently seen rather than this rate of growth was published earlier [10]. The rate of
remotely seen, with regards to the time of interview. The growth of 39 MFS patients analyzed in our prior study is
labor-intensive interview process was conducted episod- included in the analysis. The mode of inheritance is
ically over nearly 10 years, however, so we did not described for the 88 familial pedigrees and confirmed by
anticipate significant selection bias, temporal or other. a clinical geneticist (MR).
Among all patients in all groups, 22% had presented to
Yale or to another institution with a complication (rup-
ture or dissection), and the rest were diagnosed after an
Results
imaging study. Incidence of Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
When a proband reported a positive family history for Familial clustering of TAA was evident in 101 (21.5%) of
aneurysm disease or sudden cardiac death, detailed the 470 non-MFS patients.
investigations were undertaken to determine if the sus-
pect family member(s) indeed harbored aneurysms. With Sex of Probands
few exceptions, the kindred’s having an aortic aneurysm Males predominated in the three groups. This was most
was confirmed either by direct interview of the kindred, pronounced in the familial group (2.5:1) and least in the
by obtaining a corroborating imaging study, or by veri- MFS group (1.6:1).
fying surgery for correction of an aortic aneurysm.
Merely anecdotal cases were excluded. Family screening Age at Presentation
was strongly recommended but was not performed as a A statistically significant difference was noted in the
formal part of this study. When family members were mean age at presentation among the three groups
screened at their local centers, the results were for-
warded to us by the proband and incorporated into our
spreadsheets.
No evidence of a named syndromic connective tissue
disorder was found in 470 of the 520 patients, and 50 were
classified as having Marfan syndrome (MFS) in accor-
dance with the Gent criteria [9]. The evaluation for
Marfan disease was done by the surgical team, with
formal genetic consultation only when the clinical picture
appeared ambiguous. Of the non-Marfan patients, 101
exhibited familial clustering of TAAs (familial group), and
369 had no family member with TAA (sporadic group). In
the familial group, 23 patients had a relative who was also
a proband in the group, resulting in 88 separate familial
pedigrees. See Figure 1 for a patient flow diagram.
For each group, the age at presentation, site of aneu-
rysm or dissection, and rate of aneurysm growth were
determined. The two-tailed, unpaired Student t test was
used to evaluate for difference in the mean age at Fig 2. Rate of aneurysm growth in different groups.
1402 ALBORNOZ ET AL Ann Thorac Surg
FAMILIAL THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSMS 2006;82:1400 – 6
CARDIOVASCULAR
Fig 3. Modes of inheritance. Round symbols represent females and square symbols males. Black symbols indicate individuals affected by aneu-
rysm, and open symbols indicate those free of aneurysm. A crossed line through a symbol indicates that the individual represented has died.
An arrow indicates the proband. Partial blackening indicates an aneurysm other than thoracic (ie, abdominal or cerebral). The alternate aneu-
rysms sites (abdominal, cerebral, other) are represented by blackening in the different corners of the box (right upper, right lower, left lower,
respectively). See the illustrated legend accompanying the illustrations.
studied. Age at presentation refers either to the age at Nature and Anatomic Location of Aneurysm Disease
which a symptomatic patient presented with a compli- For the 520 patients in the three study groups, the
cation or the age at which an asymptomatic patient had ascending aorta was affected with an aneurysm or
an incidental finding of aneurysm on radiographic dissection in 413 cases (79.4%) and the descending
imaging. The MFS patients were significantly younger aorta in 107 cases (20.6%). Arch aneurysms cases were
than the familial group (27.4 years versus 55.4 years, p grouped with the portion of the aorta, ascending or
⬍ 0.0001), and the familial group was significantly descending, most closely related anatomically to the
younger than the sporadic group (58.2 years versus 65.7 arch aneurysm.
years; p ⬍ 0.0001). For the familial group, 63 (79.7%) of 79 ascending
Ann Thorac Surg ALBORNOZ ET AL 1403
2006;82:1400 – 6 FAMILIAL THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSMS
CARDIOVASCULAR
aneurysm. Fifty-eight of these had a TAA, yielding 131
family members with TAA, 105 with ascending, and 26
with descending aneurysms. Sixty-six family members
had aneurysms at sites other than the thorax, yielding a
total of 197 probands and kindred with aneurysm in
some site; of these, 131 (66.5%) had TAA, 49 (24.9%) had
AAA, and 17 (8.6%) had cerebral or other arterial
aneurysms.
To determine the nature and prevalence of other
arterial aneurysms in kindred of family members with
TAA, we generated all possible pairings of aneurysm
sites for the 131 family members with TAA and their 66
kindred with other arterial aneurysms. This resulted in
193 proband-kindred pairs, 148 pairs involving family
Fig 4. Distribution of sites of arterial aneurysms and dissections in members with ascending TAAs and 45 involving family
kindred of familial probands. AAA ⫽ abdominal aortic aneurysm;
members with descending TAAs.
asc ⫽ ascending; desc ⫽ descending.
It was seen that the pairing of ascending TAAs with
ascending TAAs, 90 (60.8%) of 148 pairs, was signifi-
aortas affected had aneurysms and 16 (20.3%) had dissec- cantly more common than for descending TAAs with
tions. Of 22 descending aortas, an equal number (11, ascending TAAs, 7 (15.6%) of 45 pairs (p ⬍ 0.0001).
50%) were affected with aneurysms as with dissections. Similarly, it was seen that the pairing of descending
For the sporadic group, 235 (82.1%) of 287 ascending TAAs with AAAs, 27 (60.0%) of 45 paired sites, was
aortas affected had aneurysms and 52 (17.9%) had dissec- significantly more common than for ascending TAAs
tions. Of 82 descending aortas affected, 43 (52.5%) had and AAAs, 34 (30.0%) of 148 paired sites (p ⬍ 0.0001),
aneurysms and 39 (47.5%) had dissections. using the nondirectional Yates 2 method. As can be
For the MFS group, 41 (87.2%) of 47 ascending aortas seen in Figure 4, the kindred could harbor the aneu-
affected had aneurysms and 6 (12.8%) had dissections. Of rysm in any site, but ascending paired most commonly
3 descending aortas, all were affected with dissections. with ascending and descending paired most commonly
For the three groups, the presented data reveals that with AAA.
the proportion of dissections in the descending aorta was
significantly greater than in the ascending (familial, p ⬍ Hypertension in Ascending Versus Descending
0.05; sporadic, p ⬍ 0.0005; MFS, p ⬍ 0.005) Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
Of 74 probands and kindred in the familial group for
Rate of Aneurysm Growth whom a history of antecedent hypertension could be
Growth rate determinations were done using two mea- ascertained, a statistically higher prevalence was found
surements for each patient, determined a mean of 21
months apart. The weighted average rate of growth was
0.21 cm/y for 31 familial probands, 0.16 cm/y for 129
sporadics, and 0.10 cm/y for 39 Marfan patients (p ⬍ 0.01;
Fig 2).
Mode of Inheritance
Of 88 familial pedigrees evaluated, 70 (79.5%) had an
inheritance pattern that was most consistent with a
dominant mode of inheritance: 30 were autosomal dom-
inant, 24 were autosomal dominant versus X-linked dom-
inant, 15 were autosomal dominant with decreased pen-
etrance, and there was one pair of monozygotic probands
with a likely autosomal dominant spontaneous mutation.
A nondominant pattern could not be excluded in several
of these pedigrees (see Fig 3). The other 18 pedigrees
(20.5%) were most consistent with a recessive inheritance
pattern, eight being autosomal recessive versus X-linked
recessive, five autosomal recessive, and five autosomal
recessive versus autosomal dominant with decreased Figure 5. Hypertension (htn) in ascending (asc) versus descending
penetrance. (desc) familial probands.
1404 ALBORNOZ ET AL Ann Thorac Surg
FAMILIAL THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSMS 2006;82:1400 – 6
among patients with descending TAAs, 13 (86.7%) of first-order family members of patients with aneurysms of
15, compared with patients with ascending TAAs, 15 any type should be screened for TAA and AAA. We use
(25.4%) of 59 (p ⬍ 0.001), using the nondirectional Yates cardiac echocardiography for younger individuals (age ⬍
2 method (Fig 5). 40) and echocardiography plus computed tomography
(CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the
CARDIOVASCULAR
patients, clearly confirms the genetic nature of thoracic 10. Rizzo JA, Coady MA, Elefteriades JA. Procedures for esti-
aortic aneurysm and dissection. We look forward to the mating growth rates in thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Clin
Epidemiol 1998;51:747–54.
day when complete identification of errant genes has 11. Francke U, Berg MA, Tynan K, et al. A Gly1127Ser mutation
been accomplished and specific blood tests can be in an EGF-like domain of the fibrillin-1 gene is a risk factor
developed for clinical screening purposes. for ascending aortic aneurysm and dissection. Am J Hum
CARDIOVASCULAR
Genet 1995;56:1287–96.
12. Biddinger A, Rocklin M, Coselli J, et al. Familial thoracic
References aortic dilatations and dissections: a case control study. J Vasc
Surg 1997;25:506 –11.
1. Coady MA, Davies RR, Roberts M, et al. Familial patterns of 13. Milewicz DM, Chen H, Park ES, et al. Reduced penetrance
thoracic aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg 1999;134:361–7. and variable expressivity of familial thoracic aortic aneu-
2. Biddinger A, Rocklin M, Coselli J, Milewicz DM. Familial rysms/dissections. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:474 –9.
thoracic aortic dilatations and dissections: a case control 14. Muller BT, Modlich O, Prisack HB, et al. Gene expression
study. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:506 –11. profiles in the acutely dissected human aorta. Eur J Vasc
3. Hasham SN, Lewin MR, Tran VT, et al. Nonsyndromic Endovasc Surg 2002;24:356 – 64.
genetic predisposition to aortic dissection: a newly recog- 15. Jondeau G, Muti C, Boileau C. Aortic aneurysms excluding
nized, diagnosable, and preventable occurrence in families. Marfan’s syndrome. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2003;96:1074 – 80.
Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:79 – 82. 16. Horike K, Kanoh M, Kurushima A, et al. Familial aortic
4. Cannon Albright LA, Camp NJ, Farnham JM, MacDonald J, dissection; cases involving a father, mother, and son. Kyobu
Abtin K, Rowe KG. A genealogical assessment of heritable Geka 2003;56:445–7.
predisposition to aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2003;99:637– 43. 17. Kuivaniemi H. Are there genes for aneurysm in the blue-
5. Vaughan CJ, Casey M, He J, et al. Identification of a chro- print of the human genome? Ann Vasc Surg 2004;18:2–3.
18. Hasham SN, Lewin MR, Tran VT, et al. Nonsyndromic
mosome 11q23.2-q24 locus for familial aortic aneurysm dis-
genetic predisposition to aortic dissection: a newly recog-
ease, a genetically heterogeneous disorder. Circulation 2001;
nized, diagnosable, and preventable occurrence in families.
103:2469 –75.
Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:79 – 82.
6. Hasham SN, Guo DC, Milewicz DM. Genetic basis of tho- 19. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or
racic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Curr Opin Cardiol dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple pre-
2002;17:677– 83. diction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:17–28.
7. Kakko S, Raisanen T, Tamminen M, et al. Candidate locus 20. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Goldstein LJ, Elefteriades JA. Natural
analysis of familial ascending aortic aneurysms and dis- history, pathogenesis, and etiology of thoracic aortic aneu-
sections confirms the linkage to the chromosome 5q13-14 rysms and dissections. Cardiol Clin 1999;17:615–35;vii.
in Finnish families. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126: 21. Absi TS, Sundt TM 3rd, Tung WS, et al. Altered patterns of
106 –13. gene expression distinguishing ascending aortic aneurysms
8. Pannu H, Fadulu VT, Chang J, et al. Mutations in transforming from abdominal aortic aneurysms: complementary DNA
growth factor- receptor type ii cause familial thoracic aortic expression profiling in the molecular characterization of
aneurysms and dissections. Circulation 2005;112:513–20. aortic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:344 –57;
9. De Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC, Hennekam RC, Pyeritz discussion 357.
RE. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. 22. Elefteriades JA. Beating a sudden killer. Sci Am
Am J Med Genet 1996;62:417–26. 2005;293:64 –71.
INVITED COMMENTARY
The study by Elefteriades and colleagues at Yale is yet that for sporadic or MFS patients; and these aneurysms
another in the series of seminal contributions his occur at a younger age than sporadic aneurysms,
group has made to the study of thoracic aortic disease suggesting a more aggressive pathophysiology. The
[1]. This study is particularly important because it authors also report that the most common pattern of
highlights the common occurrence of familial patterns inheritance is autosomal dominant with a correlation
of inheritance in thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and between ascending aneurysms in the patients (pro-
dissections occurring in patients without defined ge- bands) and ascending aneurysms in the kindreds (fam-
netic syndromes as well as the nature and natural ily members). Similarly, those with descending aneu-
history of these aneurysms. Although this concept is rysms are more likely to have descending thoracic or
not entirely new to this report, there have been re- abdominal aortic aneurysms in family members, sug-
markably few previous studies documenting nonsyn- gesting disparate genetic bases for non-MFS familial
dromic familial predisposition to thoracic aortic dissec- aneurysms in these two locations.
tion and aortic aneurysm disease. In fact, one of the Although the familial occurrence of abdominal aortic
earliest reports documenting a familial pattern of in- aneurysms was first described nearly 30 years ago [3],
heritance for TAA was also published by the Yale the appreciation for the importance of familial inheri-
group [2] in 1999. The findings of the current study tance for thoracic aneurysms is quite recent. As the
confirm and extend the preliminary conclusions of the authors of the current report discuss, the actual inci-
earlier study in a much larger cohort of patients. The dence of familial TAA is likely to be higher than the
key findings of both articles are that approximately 20% estimate due to variable penetrance, the large
20% of non-Marfan’s (MFS) syndrome patients with number of asymptomatic aneurysms likely to be found
TAA have an inherited pattern; the growth rate for in kindreds and the relatively advanced age at presen-
familial non-MFS patients is significantly greater than tation. Thus, in contrast to MFS patients, many first-