ASSIGNMENT NO.

1. Read the following cases and note the doctrines therein.

 REPUBLIC V. ORBECIDO, G.R. NO. 154380, OCT. 5,

2005
 CORPUZ V. STO. TOMAS, G.R. NO. 186571, AUG. 11,
2010
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner, vs. MARELYN
TANEDO MANALO (Republic v. Manalo, G.R. No. 221029,
|||

[April 24, 2018])

 MARLYN MONTON NULLADA, petitioner, vs. THE HON. CIVIL
REGISTRAR OF MANILA (Nullada v. Civil Registrar of Manila,
|||

G.R. No. 224548, [January 23, 2019])

 JULIET RENDORA MORAÑA, petitioner, vs. REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES (Moraña v. Republic, G.R. No. 227605,
|||

[December 5, 2019])
 RHODORA ILUMIN RACHO, a.k.a. "RHODORA RACHO
TANAKA," petitioner,vs. SEIICHI TANAKA, (Racho v. Seiichi
|||

Tanaka, G.R. No. 199515, [June 25, 2018])

2. Note the procedure for recognition of foreign divorce before our courts, the specific
examples on how to prove a divorce decree and foreign law.

3. What is the collective effect of these decisions on the nationality principle pertaining
to marriage?