Daftar Pustaka PDF

236
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Aiken, L.R. (1994). Psychological Testing and Assessment,(Eight Edition),

Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Akamca, G.O., Ellez, A.M., Hamurcu, H. 2009. Effects Of Computer Aided
Concept Cartoons On Learning Outcomes. Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences 1 (2009) 296–301.
Aknipar, E., Yildiz, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. 2009. Students' attitude toward
science and technology: An investigation of gender, grade level and
academic achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2804-
2808.
Alake, E.M And Ogunseemi, O.E. (2013). Effects of Scaffolding Strategy on

Learners’ Academic Achievement in Integrated Science At The Junior
Secondary School Level. European Scientific Journal Vol.9, No.19.
Alake, E.M. (2007). Effect of concept mapping on students’ performance in the

teaching of controlling the environment. Science Teachers Association of
Nigeria, Integrated Science Education Series 5. p 10-14.
Alber, R. (2014). Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Your Students. USA: George
Lucas Educational Foundation.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science

for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for

Learning,Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of
Educatioanl Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R.I. (2009). Learning to Teach 5th Edition. USA: The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc
Arikunto. S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi VI,

Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Atsnan, M.F., dan Rahmita, T.G. 2013. Penerapan pendekatan Scientific dalam
Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas Vii Materi Bilangan (Pecahan).
Yogyakarta: UNY.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

237
Azevedo, R. & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and

metacognition-implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds.
Instructional Science 33, 367–379.
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. 2008.
Why is externallyfacilitated regulated learning more effective than self-
regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research
and Development, 56(1), 45–72
Azwar, S. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baharom S, Hamid R, Hamzah N. (2012). Development of a Problem Based
Learning in Concrete Technology Laboratory Work. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences 60 p. 8-13.
Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a

metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in
Human Behavior, 25(4), p. 829–835.
Barrow, L.H. 2010. Encouraging Creativity with Scientific Inquiry. Creative

Education 1, p. 1-6.
Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P. (2012). Scaffolding to support learning of

ecology in simulation environments. USA: Vanderbilt University
Bati, K., Erturk, G., & Kaptan, F. (2009). The awareness level of pre-school
education teachers regarding science process skill. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences 2.
Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematic in Secondary School.

Iowa: Win C. Brown Company.
Bell, P., & Davis, E..A. 2000. Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students'
Reflection and Argumentation Using a Cognitive Software Guide. In B.
Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Beydoğan, H. Ö. 2001. Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme. Eser Ofset,

Erzurum. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education (1997). Science
Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. National Academy Press,
Washington. (This report is available on-line at
http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books.
Brill, G and Anat Y. 2003. Learning Biology Through Research Papers: A

Stimulus for Question-Asking by High-School Students. Cell Biology
Education Vol. 2, 266–274

238
Bruner, J. 2001. Conatructivist Theory. http://www. TIP. Htm. Diakses

tanggal 23 November 2013.
Bryan, J. (2006). Technology for physics instruction. Contemporary Issues in

Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), p. 230-245.
Budiningsih, C. A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Carey, S. (2000). Science Education as Conceptual Change. Journal of Applied

Developmental Psy cology, 21 (1): 13-19.
Çepni, S., Ayase, A., Johnson, D., Turgut, M.F. (1996). Teaching Physics.
Ankara: National Education Development Project Pre-Service Teacher
Training Trial Edition.
Chin, C. (2001). Learning in Science: What Do Students’ Questions Tell Us

About Their Thinking? Education Journal Vol. 29, No. 2.
Chin, C. (2002). Student-Generated Questions: Encouraging Inquisitive Minds in

Learning Science. Teaching and Learning, Vol. 23, No. 1 p. 5947.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. 2000. Learning in science: A comparison of deep and
surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–
138.
Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning

strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion.
Instructional Science 33, p. 483–511.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is The Mind Constructivist an Sociocultural Perpective on

Mathematical Development. Educational Research 23 (7) p. 1320.
Costa, J., Caldeira, H., Gallástegui, J. R., and Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of
question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching Volume 37, Issue 6, pages 602–614.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among

Five Approaches, 2nd ed. California : Sage Publication.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test,

Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc
Dabell, J. (2004). The Maths Coordinator’s File- Using Concept Cartoons.

London: PFP Publishing.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga

239
Delismar, Ashyar R, dan Hariyadi B. (2013). Peningkatan Kreativitas dan

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Penerapan Model Group
Investigation. Edu-Sains Volume 1 No 2 tahun 2013
Depdikbud. 2013. Pendekatan Saintifik. http://pengawas madrasah files

wordpress.com /2013/11/10 pendekatan saintifik.pdf
Dewi, dkk. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Circuit Learning Berbantuan

Media Audiovisual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ips Siswa Sd Negeri 1 Pejeng
Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan
Ganesha Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1 Tahun 2014).
Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of

visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science
and technology. Research in Science Education 33 p.189–216,
Dogru, M. 2008. The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science

Teacher Trainees on the Solution of the Environmental Problems. Journal
of Environmental & Science Education, 2008, 3 (1), 9 – 18
Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative.

Education, 19(7), p. 781–799.
Dresner, M., de rivera, C., Fuccillo, K.K., and Chang, C. (2013). Improving
Higher-Order Thinking And Knowledge Retention In Environmental
Science Teaching. BioScience Advance Access publisher
Duncan, G., & Met, M. (2010). STARTALK: From paper to practice. College
Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center at the University of
Maryland.
Eggen, P and Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational Psychology: Classroom

Connections. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan.
El Imane, N.B. (2013). Conceptualizing Essay Tests` Reliability and Validity:

From Research to Theory. Cina: Huazhong Normal University
Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. C. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An

apprenticeship approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4) p. 45-
58
Etemadzadeh, A., Seifi, S., and Far, H.R. (2013). The role of questioning
technique in developing thinking skills: The ongoing effect on writing
skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 p. 1024 – 1031

240
Fadel, C. 2008. Multimodal Learning Through Media: What the Research Says.
Metiri group. Global Lead, Education; Cisco Systems, Inc
Fraenkel, R.J, & Wallen, N.C. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education. London: Mc. Graw Hill, inc
Fretz, E.B., Hsin, K.W., BaoHui, Z., Elizabeth, A.D., Joseph, S.K. (2002). An
investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices.
Research in Science Education 32 p.567–589.
Gaskins, I.Q., Rauch, S., Gensemer, E., Councilli, E., O’Hara, C., Six, L., and
Scott. (1997). Scaffolding the development of intelligence among children
who are delayed in learning to read in K. Hogan and M. Pressly (Eds),
scaffolding students learning. Instructional Aproaches and Issues p.43-73
Gbodi, B.E., and Laleye, A.M. (2006). Effect of videotaped instruction on

learning of integrated science. Journal of Research in Curriculum and
Teaching 1(1) p. 10-19.
Gilbert, J.K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and
teaching of science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and
Teaching, Volume 11, Issue 1
Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S. (1989). The Uses Of Experiment: Studies
In The Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theory and principles of motivation. In D. C.

Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.
63-84). New York: Macmillan.
Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston:

Allyn & Bacon.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments:
foundations, methods, and models. Instructional design theories and
models: Volume II p. 115–140).
Harlen, W. (2013). Effective Teaching of Science. A Review of Research.

Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education
Hayat, B. dan Yusuf, S. 2010. Bechmark International Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta:

Bumi Aksara.
Hess, K. 2008. Developing and using learning progressions as a schema for

measuring progress. Paper presented at 2008 CCSSO Student Assessment

241
Conference, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from

http://www.nciea.org/publications/CCSSO2_KH08.pdf
Hess, K. 2013. Science Teacher Toolkit Grades K-8.

http://www.exemplars.com/resources/alignments
Hinduan, A.A. (2003). “Meningkatkan Kualitas SDM Melalui Pendidikan

IPA”.Makalah pada Seminar Himpunan Sarjana Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,
di Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA UPI Bandung tanggal 1-2 Agustus
2003.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and

achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to
Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–
107.
Hofstein, A. (2012). Teachers’ Professional Development for Inquiry-Based

Learning.. Tbilisi: Ilia State University Georgia.
Hofstein, A. and Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). “The Laboratory in Science

Education: The State of The Art”. Chemistry Education Reserach and
Practice. 8, (2), 105-107.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional

Approaches And Issues. Cambrid: Brookline.
Hohenberg, P. 2010. What is Science? New York: New York University
Holbert, KE and George GK. 2008. Removing an Unsupported Statement in

Engineering Education LiteratureArizona: Arizona State University
Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Scaffolding the Development of an

InquiryBased (Science) Classroom. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-
Divelbiss.
Howe, A. (2006). Development of Science Concept within Vygotskian

Framework. Science Education. Singapore: John Willey and Son.
http://www.21st Centuryskill.org. [19 September 2008].
Hussain Z, Sekuler A B, Bennett PJ. (2011). Superior Identification Of Familiar

Visual Patterns A Year After Learning. Psychol. Sci. 22, 2273– 2284.
Jager, T. (2012). Using Visual Media to Enhance Science Teaching and Learning
in Historically Disadvantaged Secondary Schools. South Africa: Tshwane
University of Technology.

242
Jena AK. (2012). Does Constructivist Approach Applicable Through Concept

Maps To Achieve Meaningful Learning in Science? Asia-Pacific Forum on
Science
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2011). Children’s Question Asking And Curiosity: A
Training Study. SREE Fall 2011 Conference Abstract Template.
Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.).
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kahle, J.B and Damnjanovic, A. (1994). The Effect of Inquiry Activities on

Elementary Students' Enjoyment, Ease, and Confidence in Doing Science:
An Analysis by Sex and Race. Journal of Women and Minorities in
Science and Engineering, vol 1 no 1 p. 17-28
Kane, E.M. (2013). Urban Student Motivation through Inquiry-Based Learning.

Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 3, No. 1
Karar, E. E. & Yenice, N. (2012). The investigation of scientific process skill

level of elementary education 8th grade students in view of demographic
features. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3885–3889.
Kartikasari, R. (2011). Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching

And Learning) dengan Metode Eksperimen Untuk Meningkatkan
Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 14 Surakarta
Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011 (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Keguruan
dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Keeling, E.L., Kelly, M.P., and Ella, L.I. (2009). A statistical analysis of student
questions in a cell biology laboratory. CBE-Life Sciences Education
Kitot, A.K.A., Ahmad, A.R., Seman, A.A. 2010. The Effectiveness of Inquiry
Teaching in Enhancing Students’Critical Thinking. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences 7(C) (2010) 264–273
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific

content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues based
instruction. International Journal of Science Education 32, p.1017-1043.
Knutson, K., Smith. J., Nichols, P., Wallert. M.A., and Provost, J.J. (2010).
Bringing the excitement and motivation of research to students; Using
inquiry and research-based learning in a year-long biochemistry
laboratory. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 38(5) p.324-9.
Kuhn, D and Pease, M. 2015. What Needs to Develop in the Development of

Inquiry Skills? Cognition and Instruction, in press

243
Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (2000). Strategies of
knowledge acquisition.
Kurniasih, A.W. (2012). Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan

Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika Jurnal Kreano, Volume 3 No. 2
Lajoie, S.P. (2005). Extending the scaﬀolding metaphor. Instructional Science 33

p. 541-557
Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Patterns of Scaffolding

In Computermediated Collaborative Inquiry. Mentoring and Tutoring:
Partnerships in Learning, 13(2). p.281–300.
Lati, W., Supasorn, S., and Promarak, V. 2012. Enhancement of learning

achievement and integrated science process skills using science inquiry
learning activities of chemical reaction rates. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 4471 – 4475
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral

participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
LeDoux, J. E. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory: clues from the nrain. Neuro-

Psychoanalysis, 1 p. 44–49
Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity

system for underachieving students. American Educational Research
Journal, 38, 97–141
Lee, C.S. and Kolodner, J.L. (2011). Scaffolding Students’ Development of

Creative Design Skills: A Curriculum Reference Model. Educational
Technology & Society, 14 (1), 3–15.
Lee, T. 2001. Scaffolding To Develop Problem-Solving And Self-Help Skills In

Young Children. Illionis: Texas Child Care.
Leinhardt, G., & Schwarz, B. B. (1997). Seeing the problem: An explanation from
Polya. Cognition and Instruction 15 p.395–434.
Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. 2008. Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case
study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4),
1394-1410.
Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. 1999. Supporting Learning Of Variable Control In A

Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of prompting college

244
students to reﬂect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 36(7), 837–858.
Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., West, A. (2004). Scaffolding. In M. Orey (Ed.),

Emergin perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved
May 25, 2012, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/.
Lu, C.C., Hong, C.J., Tseng Y.C. (2007). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based
Learning by Scaffolding Students to Ask “5 Why” questions. Taipei:
Department of Natural Science Education, National Taipei University of
Education.
Lynch, R. L., Padilla, M. J., Harnish, D., & DiStephano, C. 2001. A Model Of
Excellence For Contextual Teaching And Learning In Preservice Teacher
Education: Final and summative report.(Contract # ED-98-CO-0085,
1998-2001):.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved
from http://www.coe.uga.edu/ctl/ research/toc.pdf
Ma, Yue. 2003. Dual Coding Theory, Cognitive Load Theory and Their
Applications in Computer Based Multimedia Design. Northern Illionis
University. http://cedu.niu/.../642_material/642 lit review /ETT
642_Ma_Literature.pdf. diakses tanggal 19 Juni 2013
Maine, B. 2013. The Learning Pyramid. Stevenson: National Training Lab

Stevenson University
Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for
collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 22(2), p. 87–98.
Maskill, R., & Pedrosa de Jesus, H. 1997. Pupils’ questions, alternative

frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of
Science Education, 19(7), 781–799.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same
instructional design methods across different media. Learning and
Instruction 13 p. 125–139.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson. R.B. (1991). Animations Need narrations: an

experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational
Psychology Vol. 83, No. 4 p.484-490.
Mc Collum 2009. A scientific approach

to teaching.http:/kamccollum .wordpress.com/2009/08/01/a-scientific-
approach-to-teaching/last update januari 2013.

245
McCormick, R. 1996. Instructional methodology. In: Williams J & Williams A

(eds). Technology Education for teachers. Melbourne: MacMillan.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D.J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R.W. (2005). Supporting
Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations By Fading Scaffolds in
Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in

education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and

Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics. A Possible Hidden Variable in
Diagnostic Pretest Score. American Journal Physics. Vol 70. N0. 12
Miao, Y., Jan, E., Adam, G., Stefan & Ulrich, H. (2012). Develoment of a
process-oriented scaffolding agent in an open-ended inquiry learning
environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Vol. 7, No. 2 p. 105-128.
Miller, GA. 2003. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. TRENDS

in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.3 March 2003
Miska, A. (2004). Classroom Modeling: Scaffolding Learning or Stifling? An

Inquiry. https://www.ed.psu.edu/englishpds/inquiry/projects/miska04.htm.
Monica, K.M.M. (2005). Development and Validation of a test of Integrated

Science Process Skills for the Further Education and Training Learners.
Pretoria South Africa (Disertasi the Degree of Master of Science in
Science Education in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences
University tidak diterbitkan).
Mora, JK. 2000.Teaching Conceptual and Vocabulary. San Diego University.

http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/concepts Tch.htm. diakses tanggal 10
April 2013.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). "Cognitive principles of multimedia learning:

The role of modality and contiguity". Journal of Educational
Psychology 91 (2) p. 358–368.
Murwani, S. dan Sudarisman, S. (2010). Perbedaan Pengaruh Pendekatan

Contextual Teaching And Learning Dengan Metode Eksperimen Lapangan
Dan Eksperimen Laboratorium Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik
Klas X Di SMA Negeri 2 Yogyakarta. Surakarta: Prodi P Biologi FKIP
UNS Surakarta.

246
Najjar, L. J. (2005). A Review of the Fundamental Effect of Multimedia Graphic,

Visualization, and Usability Laboratory. Atlanta:Georgia Institute of
Technology. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/. Diakses tanggal 3 Oktober
2012.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education

Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., Van D. Akker (2007).“Educational design research”

dalam Educational design research.New York: Routledge
Novita, G.A.D.L., Sudana, D.N., Riatini, P.N. (2014). Pengaruh Model

Pembelajaran PBL terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas V SD
Di Gugus IV Diponegoro Kecamatan Mendoyo. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Vol: 2 No 1 Tahun 2014.
Nur, M. (2011). Strategi-strategi Belajar. Disadur dari chapter 6. Learning and

Study Strategies Buku Classroom Web-Based Approach In Higher
Education
Nur, M. (2012). Teori-teori Belajar dan Implikasinya dalam Pendekatan

Pengajaran Fisika yang Interaktif. Makalah yang dipresentasikan dalam
Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika di FKIP Universitas Riau 14 Januari
2012.
Nurohman, S. (2009). Penerapan Seven Jump Method Sebagai Upaya

Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa. Skripsi UNY tidak
diterbitkan.
Oh, P. S. (2005). Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students
presenting their science investigations. International Journal of Science
Education, 27, 1825–1851
Ohora, C.J., (2007). Observation: The First Step in the Scientific Method.
Pennsylvania: Academic Standards.
Olsher, G., & Dreyfus, A. (1999). Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing

junior high-school students’ ability to ask meaningful questions about
abstract biological processes. International Journal of Science Education,
21(2), 137–153.
Orion, N. (1993). A practical model for the development and implementation of

field trips, as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science
and Mathematics, 93,325-331.

247
Orion, N. (2007(. A Holistic Approach for Science Education For All. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3(2),
111-118
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ Science Process Skills within a Cognitive Domain

Framework. . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology
Education, 2012, 8(4), 283-292
Padilla, Michael J. (1990). The Scientific Process [Versi Elektronik]. Research

Matters-to the Science Teacher Publication No. 9004, March 1, 1990
Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related
theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. Journal of
the Learning Sciences 13 p. 423–451.
Piaget, J. (1988). Antara Tindakan dan Pikiran. Terjemahan Agus Cremers.

Jakarta: Gramedia.
Polman, J & Roy D P. (2010). Scaffolding Science Inquiry through

Transformative Communication. Northwestern University. Paper
presented at the NARST Annual Meeting Oak Brook.
Powell, K., & Kalina, C. 2009. Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing
tools for any effective classroom. Journal of Education, 130(2), 241-250.
Primarinda, I. (2012). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group

Investigation (GI) Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil
Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 4 Surakarta (Skripsi tidak
diterbitkan) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a

complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we
missed? Educational Psychologist 40 p. 1–12.
Putnam, C., O’Donnell, K., and Bertozzi, N. 2010. Scaffolding And Fading
within and Across A Six-Semester Cdio Design Sequence. Proceedings of
the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal,
June 15-18, 2010
Quintana, C & Barry J. F. (2006). Supporting Science Learning and Teaching

with Software-based Scaffolding. Michigan: Michigan Center for Highly
Interactive Computing, Curricula, and Classrooms in Education School.
Quintana, C., Eng, J., Carra, A., Wu, H., & Soloway, E. (1999). A case study in
extending learner centered Design through process-space analysis. In

248
Proceedings of CHI 99 Conference on human Factors in Computing

Systems (pp. 473–480). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rahayu, I.P., Yulianingsih, U., Septiani, D., Wijaya, A.A., Haryani, S. (2011).
Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Media Transvisi
Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Semarang: Jurusan
Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. The

International Journal of Science Education vol (31) 3. Research in Science
& Technological Education, Vol. 29, No.3 p. 241-255.
Ratumanan, T.G dan Laurens, T. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Surabaya: Unesa
University Press.
Riegler, A. 2001. The Impact Of Radical Constructivism On Science. Part 1: The

Paradigm, biology and cognition. Special issue of Foundations of Science
6(1–3).
Rivet, A.E., and Krajcik, J.S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: leveraging

students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of
middle school science. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching Vol. 45,
NO. 1 p. 79–100.
Rogoff, B. (1993). Children's guided participation and participatory appropriation

in sociocultural activity. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.),
Development in context (pp. 121 - 153). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York:

Oxford University Press.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-
level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7) p.26–33.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., and Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to

generate questions: a review of intervention studies. Rev. Educ. Res. 66,
181–221
Rostika, N.D., (2012). Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap

Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Konsep Ekosistem Di Smp Negeri 2
Ciledug Kabupaten Cirebon (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Jurusan Tadris
Biologi-Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati,
Cirebon
Rudolph, J.L. 2005. Epistemology for the masses: The origins of the scientific
method in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45, 341-376.

249
Rustaman, N. 2007. Kemampuan Dasar Bekerja Ilmiah dalam Pendidikan Sains

dan Assesmennya. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Rustaman, N. (2007). “Basic Scientific Inquiry In Science Education And Its

Assesment”. Seminar Proceeding of The First International Seminar of
Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4),
Serial No. 245.
Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. Washington,
DC: AAAS.
Ryan, M. 2001. The Scientific Method. USA: University of Nevada
Sabahiyah, Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Suastra. I.W. (2013). Pengaruh model

pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan
penguasaan konsep ipa siswa kelas v gugus 03 wanasaba lombok timur. e-
Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program
Studi Pendidikan Dasar. Volume 3 Tahun 2013.
Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In

R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of
th
reading (5 ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Saida, N., Indriwati, S.E., Balqis. (2012). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif

Group Investigation Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Keterampilan
Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Brawijaya Smart
School Malang. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sandoval, W.A. and Reiser B.J. (2003). Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating

Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry. Los Angeles:
Wiley InterScience
Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkowitz NHR. (2004). Teacher Guidance Of

Knowledge Construction. Israel: Tel Aviv University
Seelman, K.D. (1997). Communication and Technology: Women's. Work.

Proceedings of the International Leadership Forum for Women with
Disabilities; Bethesda, MD., p.114-116.
Sepel, L. M. N., Loreto, E. L. S., Rocha, J. B. T. (2009). Using a replica of

Leeuwenhoek’s microscope to teach the history of science and to motivate
students to discover the vision and the contributions of the first
microscopists. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 8, 338-343.

250
Shahali EHM and Halim L. 2010. Development and validation of a test of

integrated science process skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
9 (2010) 142–146.
Sheffer, D.R. (1996). Development Psychology Chilhood and Adolescend.

Georgia: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: student questions as course

curriculum in biology. American Biology Teacher, 57(5) p. 278-281.
Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R., Beasman, J., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2000). Scaffolds for
learning to read in an inclusion classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing
Services in Schools, 31, 265–279.
Siswono, H., Wartono, Supriyono, K.H. (2012). Pengaruh Problem Based

Learning Berbantuan Virtual Laboratory Terhadap Ketrampilan Proses
Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa di SMA. Malang: Program
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang
Slavin, R.E. (2006). Educational Psycology.Theory and Practice. New Jersey:

Pearson Educations Inc.
Smith, B.P. (2010). Instructional strategies in family and consumer sciences:

implementing the contextual teaching and learning pedagogical model.
Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1).
Solso, R.L., Otto, H.M., and Kimberly, M. (2008). Cognitive Psychology. USA:
Pearson Education Inc.
Stephenson, P. and Warwick, P. 2002. Using Concept Cartoons to Support

Progression in Pupils' Understanding of Light,Journal of Physics
Education, 37 (2). pp 145-141
Subali, B. (2010). Bias item test of divergen pattern of science Process skill and
it’s modification as creativity Test. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi
Pendidikan Tahun 14, Nomor 2, 2010
Suparno. Paul. (1997). Filsafat Konstrukivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta:

Kanisius.
Susanti, W. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi (Skripsi tidak
diterbitkan). Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas
Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

251
Tias, I.W.U. (2014). Penerapan Model Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan

Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sekolah
Dasar (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Tuan, H., Chin, C., Tsai, C and Cheng, S. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness
of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles
students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3 p.
541–566
Tytler, R. (1996). Constructivism and conceptual change views of learning in

science. Khazanah Pengajaran IPA. No. 1 (3) hal. 4-20
Utami, W.D., Dasna, I.W., Sulistina, O. (2011). Pengaruh Penerapan Model

Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan
Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali
Kelarutan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Vacca, S.J., & Levitt, R. (2009). Using scaffolding techniques to teach a lesson
about the civil war. International Journal of Humanities and Social
Science. Vol. 1 No. 18.
Van de Pol, J.E. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: exploring,

measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. Amsterdam: University
of Amsterdam.
Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student

Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review.
10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Varelas, M and Ford M. 2009. The scientific method and scientific inquiry:
Tensions in teaching and learning. USA: Wiley InterScience.
Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blote, A. W. (2005). The relation between
intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional
Science, 33(3) p. 193–211.
Veselinovska SS, Liljana KG, and Milena D. 2011. The Effect Of Teaching
Methods on Cognitive Achievement In Biology. Studying. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Sciences 15 p. 2521–2527
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

252
Wakhidah, N. (2014). Implementasi Model 5 M dalam Pendekatan Saintifik pada

Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Surabaya: Laporan Preliminary Research
Wakhidah, N. 2014. Kemampuan Keterampilan Proses Sains Terpadu Mahasiswa

Calon Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Surabaya:
Proseeding Seminar Pendidikan Sains
Wakhidah, N. 2014. Pembelajaran Tematik Kompetensi IPA Dengan Pendekatan

Saintifik (Scientific Approach) Di Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya: Proseesing
Seminar Nasional Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar
Wakhidah, N.(2015) Scaffolding Pendekatan Saintifik. Surabaya: Jaudar Press
Wakhidah,N. (2013). Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa PGMI IAIN Sunan

Ampel Surabaya. Surabaya: Laporan Preliminary Research
Wardana. I.K., Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Nyoman, T. (2013). Pengaruh Model

Kontekstual Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Sains
Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas
Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar Volume 3 Tahun
2013
Weinburgh, M. H. 2003. Changing elementary and college science teaching

through coteaching/co-generative dialogue. In D. Berlin & A. Whites
(Eds). Improving Science and Mathematics Education: Insights for a
Global Community. (pp. 73-74). Columbus, OH: ICRSME.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition:

Making science accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16(1),
3–118.
Wicaksono, S. 2013. Pemahaman Guru Rendah, Tantangan Kurikulum 2013.

Jakarta:
http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2013/12/27/24756
0/Pemahaman-Guru-Rendah-Tantangan-Kurikulum-2013
Wieman, C. (2007a). A Scientific Approach to Science Education? Colorado:

University of British Columbia.
Wieman, C. (2007b). Why Not Try A Scientific Approach To Science Education?

http://www.science20.com/carl_wieman/why_not_try_scientific_approac_
science_education.
Wiggins, Grant and Jay McTighe. (2005) Understanding by Design, 2nd ed.
Alexandria VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

253
Wiratana, I.K., Sadia, I.W., Suma, K. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran

Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok (Group Investigation) Terhadap
Keterampilan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Sains Siswa SMP. e-Journal
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi
IPA. Volume 3 Tahun 2013.
Woolfolk, A. (2008). Psychology in Education. New York: Pearson Education

Limitied.
Woolfolk, A. 2008. Educational Psychology. Active Learning Edition.

Diterjemahkan oleh Helly prayitno Soecipto dan Sri Mulyantini Soecipto.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Xie, K., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2008). Using question prompts to support ill-
structured problem solving in online peer collaborations. International
Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2) p. 148–165.
Xu JP, He ZJ, Ooi TL. 2012. Perceptual Learning To Reduce Sensory Eye
Dominance Beyond The Focus Of Top-Down Visual Attention. Vision
Research 61 (2012) 39–47
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information

age. Computers & Education, 48, 362–382. yelland & master
Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing
writingrelated metacognitions through a computerized writing partner.
American Educational Research Journal, 28(2) p.373–391.
Zhang, J, Johnson K.A, Malin, J.T., & Smith, J.W. (2002). Human Centered
Information Visualization. Proceedings of the International Workshop om
Dynamic Visualization and Learning. Germany: Tubingen. Ed. R.
Ploetzner.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective.

In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-
regulation (pp.13–29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An Overview. Theory

into Practice, 41(2), p. 64–70.
Zirbel, EL. (2005). Teaching To Promote Deep Understanding and Instigate

Conceptual Change for Pre-service Elementary Teachers based on Inquiry

Daftar Pustaka PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daftar Pustaka PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

236

Aiken, L.R. (1994). Psychological Testing and Assessment,(Eight Edition),

Alake, E.M And Ogunseemi, O.E. (2013). Effects of Scaffolding Strategy on

Alake, E.M. (2007). Effect of concept mapping on students’ performance in the

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science

Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for

Arikunto. S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi VI,

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Azevedo, R. & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and

Azwar, S. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a

Barrow, L.H. 2010. Encouraging Creativity with Scientific Inquiry. Creative

Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P. (2012). Scaffolding to support learning of

Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematic in Secondary School.

Beydoğan, H. Ö. 2001. Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme. Eser Ofset,

Brill, G and Anat Y. 2003. Learning Biology Through Research Papers: A

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Bruner, J. 2001. Conatructivist Theory. http://www. TIP. Htm. Diakses

Bryan, J. (2006). Technology for physics instruction. Contemporary Issues in

Budiningsih, C. A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Carey, S. (2000). Science Education as Conceptual Change. Journal of Applied

Chin, C. (2001). Learning in Science: What Do Students’ Questions Tell Us

Chin, C. (2002). Student-Generated Questions: Encouraging Inquisitive Minds in

Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is The Mind Constructivist an Sociocultural Perpective on

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test,

Dabell, J. (2004). The Maths Coordinator’s File- Using Concept Cartoons.

Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Delismar, Ashyar R, dan Hariyadi B. (2013). Peningkatan Kreativitas dan

Depdikbud. 2013. Pendekatan Saintifik. http://pengawas madrasah files

Dewi, dkk. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Circuit Learning Berbantuan

Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of

Dogru, M. 2008. The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science

Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative.

Eggen, P and Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational Psychology: Classroom

El Imane, N.B. (2013). Conceptualizing Essay Tests` Reliability and Validity:

Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. C. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Gbodi, B.E., and Laleye, A.M. (2006). Effect of videotaped instruction on

Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theory and principles of motivation. In D. C.

Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston:

Harlen, W. (2013). Effective Teaching of Science. A Review of Research.

Hayat, B. dan Yusuf, S. 2010. Bechmark International Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta:

Hess, K. 2008. Developing and using learning progressions as a schema for

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Conference, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from

Hess, K. 2013. Science Teacher Toolkit Grades K-8.

Hinduan, A.A. (2003). “Meningkatkan Kualitas SDM Melalui Pendidikan

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and

Hofstein, A. (2012). Teachers’ Professional Development for Inquiry-Based

Hofstein, A. and Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). “The Laboratory in Science

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional

Hohenberg, P. 2010. What is Science? New York: New York University

Holbert, KE and George GK. 2008. Removing an Unsupported Statement in

Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Scaffolding the Development of an

Howe, A. (2006). Development of Science Concept within Vygotskian

Hussain Z, Sekuler A B, Bennett PJ. (2011). Superior Identification Of Familiar

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

Jena AK. (2012). Does Constructivist Approach Applicable Through Concept

Kahle, J.B and Damnjanovic, A. (1994). The Effect of Inquiry Activities on

Kane, E.M. (2013). Urban Student Motivation through Inquiry-Based Learning.