Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
Santhosh M (2016303542)
Of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Guided by ,
S M Mubashera
Teaching fellow
i
S No CONTENTS PAGE NO
ii
1 OBJECTIVE 6
2 INTRODUCTION 6
3 PROPERTIES 8
4 MANUFACTURING PROCESS 12
5 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 12
6 SELECTED METHODOLOGY 15
iii
6.1 JUSTIFICATION 16
6.1.1 ADVANTAGES 16
6.1.2 DISADVANTAGES 17
7 APPLICATION 18
8 PLANT LOCATION 19
10 UTILITY FLOWSHEET 22
12 MATERIAL BALANCE 24
13 ENERGY BALANCE 35
14 SUMMARY 48
iv
15 ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM 50
16 RECYCLE SYSTEM 51
18 MECHANICAL DESIGN 52
20 HAZOP ANALYSIS 80
v
22 FAULT TREE ANALYSIS 90
23 COST ANALYSIS 96
24 REFERENCE 101
vi
1. OBJECTIVE
This proposed work is aimed at development of plant layout and to perform the calculations in
design of unit operation equipments for the production of vinyl chloride.
2. INTRODUCTION
Vinyl chloride (CH2CHCl) by virtue of the wide range of application for its polymer in both flexible
and rigid forms, is one of the largest dollar-volume commodity chemicals in the United States and is
an important item of international commerce. Vinyl chloride (also known as chloroethylene
or chloroethene) is a colourless gas at normal temperature and pressure, but is typically handled as
the liquid (bp-13.4oC). However, no human contact with the liquid is permissible. Vinyl chloride is
an OSHA-regulated material. Vinyl chloride is among the top twenty largest petrochemicals in
world production.
Vinyl chloride has a mild, sweet odour, which may become noticeable at 3000 parts vinyl
chloride per million parts (ppm) of air. It is highly toxic, flammable and carcinogenic. It can be
formed in the environment when soil organisms break down chlorinated solvents. In the past, Vinyl
chloride was used as a coolant, as a propellant, in some spray cans, and in some cosmetics.
However, since the mid-1970s, vinyl chloride mostly has been used in the manufacture of polyvinyl
chloride (PVC).
HISTORY
Growth in vinyl chloride production is directly related to demand for its polymers and, on an
energy-equivalent basis, rigid polyvinylchloride(PVC) is one of the most energy efficient
construction materials available. Initial development of vinyl chloride industry in the 1930s
stemmed from the discovery that, with plasticizers, PVC can be readily processed and converted
into a rubbery product.
However, it was not until after World War II that vinyl chloride production grew rapidly as a result
of the increased volume of PVC products for the consumer market.
Justus von Liebig at the University of the Giessen, Germany, won the distinction of being
the first person to synthesize vinyl chloride when, in the 1830s, he reacted the so-called oil of the
7
Dutch chemists, dichloroethane with alcoholic potash to make vinyl chloride. Liebig’s student,
Victor Regnault, confirmed his discovery and was allowed to publish it as sole author in 1835. In
1872, E.
Baumann observed that white flakes precipitated from vinyl chloride upon prolonged exposure to
sunlight in a sealed tube. This material was further investigated in the early 1900s by Ivan
Ostromislensky, who named it Kauprenchlorid (cauprene chloride), and gave it the empirical
formula (C2H3Cl)16. However, vinyl chloride was of little commercial interest until Waldo Semon’s
work with plasticized PVC for the B. F. Goodrich Company beginning in 1926. Some years earlier,
Fritz Klatte had developed the first practical route to vinyl chloride while looking to find uses for
acetylene for Chemische Fabrik Griesheim-Elektron. This process, in which hydrogen chloride,
HCl, is added to acetylene over a mercuric chloride catalyst, was patented in 1912. By 1926,
Griesheim-Elektron had concluded that the patent held no commercial value and allowed it to lapse.
Klatte’s process eventually formed the basis of the vinyl chloride industry for many years from its
beginnings in the 1930s, but it was ultimately supplanted by a balanced process from ethylene and
chlorine in which vinyl chloride is made by pyrolysis of 1,2-dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride
(EDC)).
New paths to vinyl chloride directly from ethylene have been researched but suffer from
problems of control and operation. Worldwide around 94% of vinyl chloride is produced from
ethylene and the remainder from acetylene.
8
3. PROPERTIES
Structure
H Cl
C=C
H H
Table 3.1
9
3.2. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
a) POLYMERIZATION
The most important reaction of vinyl chloride is its polymerization and copolymerization
in the presence of a radical-generating initiator.
H Cl H Cl
n C=C [ C C ]n
H H H H
c) OXIDATION
Gas phase oxidation of vinyl chloride yields 74% formyl chloride and 25% CO at high
oxygen to chlorine ratio. Complete oxidation of vinyl chloride with oxygen in the gas phase can be
achieved using cobalt chromite catalyst. Oxidation of vinyl chloride with ozone in either liquid
or gas phase gives formic acid and formyl chloride.
Vinyl chloride Cl
Formyl chloride
10
H
Formyl chloride
d) ADDITION
Chlorine adds to vinyl chloride to form 1,1,2 -trichloroethane. Vinyl chloride reacts with
ammonium chloride and oxygen in the vapor phase at 325oC over a cupric chloride catalyst to make
1,1,2- trichloroethane and ammonia.
H H
Cl Cl
1,1,2-trichloroethane
H H
Cl Cl
1,1,2-trichloroethane
e) PYROLYSIS
Vinyl chloride is more stable than saturated chloroalkanes to thermal pyrolysis which is
why nearly all vinyl chloride made commercially comes from thermal dehydrochlorination of
ethylene dichloride.
11
3.3. OTHER PROPERTIES
a) FLAMMABILITY:
OSHA lists vinyl chloride as a Class 1A flammable liquid with a National Fire Protection
Association Flammability rating of 4.
b) INSTABILITY:
Vinyl chloride readily undergoes violent chemical changes at elevated temperatures and
pressures.
c) REACTIVITY:
d) SOLUBILITY:
Vinyl chloride has relatively low solubility. It forms an azeotrope with water. It is
soluble in almost all organic solvents.
4. MANUFACTURING PROCESS
5. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The catalyzed reaction between acetylene and hydrogen chloride can be carried out in liquid or
vapour phase, but the latter is more commonly used. Purified acetylene and hydrogen chloride, in
slight excess are mixed prior to being fed into a fixed bed multi tube reactor containing 2-10 wt %
of mercuric chloride absorbed onto a carrier such as activated carbon.
12
The reaction is highly exothermic and the heat generated is removed by an external coolant. Contact
time is up to 1 second and pressure is maintained at 1-3 bar. The exit gases are cooled before being
compressed. Unreacted acetylene and hydrogen chloride are removed in the gaseous phase by
fractionation. The remaining liquid is distilled in second column and vinyl chloride is collected
overhead. Heavy products from the base of the column are stripped to remove any residual vinyl
chloride and acetylene prior to incineration. Heat treatment are used to recover mercury from the
spent catalyst.
Fig. 5.1
13
Fig 5.2
The ready availability of ethane has resulted in much research to find alternative routes to vinyl
chloride which by pass ethylene. Lummus has introduced a chlorination-oxychlorination-
dehydrochlorination process-the Transcat process-in which ethane is converted to vinyl chloride in a
molten salt reactor with yields of 80%. With the development of new catalysts the ethane route
could become the process of future.
14
Fig 5.3
6. SELECTED METHODOLOGY
After ethylene become plentiful in the early 1950s , commercial processes were developed to
produce vinyl chloride from ethylene and chlorine. These processes include the chlorination of
ethylene in the liquid or vapour phase, the cracking of the ethylene dichloride formed to vinyl
chloride and hydrogen chloride, and finally the oxychlorination of ethylene where the hydrogen
chloride produced is combined with ethylene and oxygen to yield ethylene dichloride and water
provided the so-called balanced process for the production of vinyl chloride from ethylene and
chlorine, with no net consumption or production of HCl.
15
6.1. JUSTIFICATION
Table 6.1
6.1.1 ADVANTAGES:
Ethylene can be converted to vinyl chloride in single stage, i.e., without isolating the
intermediate ethylene dichloride.
This process is a balanced process, i.e., all intermediates and byproducts are recycled in a
way that ensures a tight closure of the material balance to only vinyl chloride monomer as the
final product starting from ethylene, chlorine and oxygen.
Major current vinyl chloride production plants uses this method to produce environmentally
friendly, safe, and economically profitable VCM.
16
6.1.2 DISADVANTAGES:
This method requires a high temperature and a large excess of ethylene to minimize soot
formation.
Substantial production of chlorinated by-products, many of which have no direct
commercial utility.
Stainless steel tubes are required because of the corrosive HCl produced by the reaction
The catalyst is of Lewis acid type, in most cases FeCl 3, in concentrations of 0.1 to 0.5 wt %.
Secondary reactions take place. The most important by-product is the 1,1,2-trichloroethane as
described by:
Slight excess of chlorine is preferred in order to ensure complete ethylene conversion. The
direct chlorination of ethylene may be conducted following two techniques:
In LTC, the reactor operates at temperatures between 50 – 70 0 C below the mixture boiling
point. LTC is advantageous for achieving higher selectivity, over 99%. The disadvantage is
that rejecting the heat of reaction to the environment at low temperature is highly inefficient. In
HTC, the reaction is conducted at the boiling point of EDC at 1.5 to 5 bar and 90 – 150 0 C. In
this manner, the heat of reaction which is 7 times the heat of EDC vapourization, can be used
advantageously for purification.
17
The catalyst widely used is based on copper (Ⅱ) chloride impregnated on alumina. The highly
exothermal reaction is carried at temperatures around 200 0 C and pressures of 1.5-5 bar. The
amount of impurities formed during oxychlorination is much more compared to direct
chlorination. The key impurities are: 1,1,2-trichloroethane, chloral, trichloroethane,1,1-and 1,2-
dichloroethylenes, ethyl chloride and chloromethanes. In particular, chloral needs to be removed
immediately after reaction by washing because of its tendency to polymerization. The formation
of trichloroethylene is undesired because its removal by distillation is very difficult. The
formation of trichloroethylene is due to the acetylene entrained with the HCl byproduct from
cracking. This can be solved by selective catalytic hydrogenation of acetylene in the HCl
recycle stream.
PYROLYSIS
The endothermic reaction takes place at temperatures between 480- 550 0 C and
pressures from 3 to 30 bar. At high temperature, the EDC decomposes into VCM and HCl by
complex reaction mechanism. The reaction device consists of a long tubular coil placed in a
furnace. The first part, hosted in the convection zone, preheats the reactant up to the temperature
where the pyrolysis reaction rate becomes significant. The second part, the reaction zone, is
placed in the radiation chamber. The tube diameter is selected so as to give a superficial gas
velocity between 10 – 20 m/s. The coil length should ensure a space time of 5 to 30 s.
After pyrolysis the mixture is submitted to rapid cooling by quench. This operation
prevents further decomposition of VCM, but also removes the coke and other high molecular
impurities. The exit gas temperature from quench can be such that it preserves a good driving
force for the heat exchanger used for energy recovery by steam generation.
The distillation column separating HCl operates at 10-12 bar. The separation of VCM
takes place in the distillation column at low pressures, usually 4 - 6 bar, for which normal or
slightly refrigerated cooling water can be used.
18
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
Fig 6.1.3
7. APPLICATIONS
The main outlet for vinyl chloride, amounting to 95% of demand, is in the manufacture of
polyvinylchloride, one of the major industrial polymers in the world.
These resins are used in the automotive, building, electrical, packaging and toy industry.
Other small uses, accounting for less than 3% of total demand, are for the production of
chlorinated solvents such as tri-chloromethane.
Future growth of vinyl chloride will depend on the demand for PVC resins; it is forecast to
increase by about 1% per Europe and Japan, with higher rates in South East Asia.
19
8. PLANT LOCATION
GLOBAL MANUFACTURERS:
Plant with capacities greater than 300,000 tonnes per year.
Table 8.1
S. No. Company Location Country
1 LVM Tessenderlo Belgium
2 ATOCHEM Lavara France
3 ICI Wilhelmshaven Germany
4 Vista Chemical Westlake US
5 Kanegafuchi Takasajo Japan
6 B F Goodrich La Porte US
MANUFACTURERS IN INDIA
Table 8.2
S.NO COMPANY LOCATION
20
9. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
Fig 9.1
21
10.UTILITY FLOW SHEET
Fig 10.1
22
11.PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION
23
MATERIAL BALANCE
24
12. MATERIAL BALANCE
Product
Production capacity of Vinyl Chloride Monomer = 1 ton/day
Purity =99.3%
1 ton/day of vinyl chloride monomer with 99.3% = 41.375 kg/hr of vinyl chloride monomer (pure)
=0.663 kmol/hr of vinyl chloride
Distillation Column 3
Assuming % recovery of Vinyl Chloride monomer=98%
Molar flow rate of vinyl chloride in feed =0.663/0.98
=0.676 kmol/hr of vinyl chloride
Mass flow rate of vinyl chloride monomer in feed =42.28 kg/hr
Distillation column 2
Assuming % recovery of vinyl chloride monomer =98%
Molar flow rate of vinyl chloride monomer in feed= 0.676/0.98
= 0.69 kmol/hr 0f vinyl chloride
Mass flow rate of vinyl chloride monomer in feed = 43.125 kg/hr
Molar flow rate of hydrochloric acid from distillate = 0.676 kmol/hr
Furnace
2ClCH2CH2Cl →2CH2=CHCl + 2HCl
2 moles of ethylene dichloride produced = 2 moles of vinyl chloride reacted
0.69 kmoles of vinyl chloride produced =0.69 kmoles of ethylene dichloride reacted
Conversion =55%
Molar flow rate of ethylene dichloride required= 0.69/0.55
= 1.2545 kmoles/hr
Mass flow rate of ethylene dichloride=124.135 kg/hr
Hydrochloric acid produced = 0.69kmol/hr
25
Oxychlorination reactor
C2H4 + 0.5 O2 + 2HCl →ClCH2CH2Cl + H2O
Hydrochloric acid recycled to reactor from distillation column2 =0.6762 kmol/hr
Ethylene required = 0.3381 kmol/hr
Oxygen required = 0.16905 kmol/hr
Conversion=95%
Ethylene dichloride formed= 0.332 kmol/hr
Water formed =0.332 kmol/hr
Reacted ethylene=0.332 kmol/hr
HCl reacted =0.64239 kmol/hr
Oxygen reacted = 0.1606 kmol/hr
Mass flow rate of ethylene dichloride=32.85 kg/hr
Scrubber
Assuming 100% recovery,
Mass flow rate of ethylene dichloride = 32.85 kg/hr
Distillation column 1
Assuming % recovery of distillation column = 98%
Ethylene dichloride in residue= 1.2545 kmol/hr
Ethylene dichloride in feed = 1.2545/0.98
=1.28 kmol/hr
Mass flow rate of ethylene dichloride=126.66 kg/hr
Wash tower
Assuming % recovery =98%
Ethylene dichloride in feed =1.28/0.98
=1.3062 kmol/hr
Mass flow rate of ethylene dichloride in feed= 129.24 kg/hr
26
Direct chlorination reactor
Ethylene dichloride outlet from reactor= EDC entering wash tower – EDC from scrubber
=1.306-0.332
=0.974 kmol/hr
C2H4 + Cl2 → ClCH2CH2Cl
Ethylene reacted = 0.974 kmol/hr
Chlorine reacted= 0.974 kmol/hr
Conversion =99.9%
Ethylene required=chlorine required = 0.9751 kmol/hr
Mass flow rate of ethylene = 27.35 kg/hr
12.1.EQUIPMENT BALANCE
12.1.1.DIRECT CHLORINATION REACTOR
Figure 12.1.1
Figure 12.1.2
12.1.3.SCRUBBER
Figure 12.1.3
28
Assuming recovery to be 100%
12.1.4.WASH TOWER
Figure 12.1.4
29
12.1.5.DISTILLATION COLUMN 1
Figure 12.1.5
12.1.6.FURNACE
Figure 12.1.6
30
Materials Mass in Moles in Mass out Moles out
Kg/hr Kmol/hr Kg/hr Kmol/hr
EDC 124.135 1.254 55.81 0.69
VCM 43.125 0.564
HCl 25.185 0.69
Total 124.135 124.12
Table 12.1.6: furnace
12.1.7.DISTILLATION COLUMN 2
Figure 12.1.7
31
12.1.8.DISTILLATION COLUMN 3
Figure 12.1.8
32
Fig 12.2
33
ENERGY BALANCE
34
13. ENERGY BALANCE
Assumption
Specific heat capacity and latent heat are constant throughout all streams.
No heat loss in streams and equipment.
Table 13
Components Specific heat capacity (J/mol K)
Ethylene 67.4
Oxygen 29.39
EDC 129.4
Water 75.4
Cl2 65.8
HCl 30.49
VCM 89.45
Figure 13.1
Reaction temperature in reactor is 120oC at pressure 15 psig
Reference temperature = 298 K
35
The net heat removed Q ,
Ein - ∆Hr*N = Q+ Eout
Q = 12342620.78 - (-213167717.8) - 11987305.58
= 213523033 J/hr
Coolant (water) required to remove the heat produced,
Q = mCp∆T
213523.033=m*4.184*(90-30)
m = 850.55 kg/hr
13.2.OXYCHLORINATION REACTOR
C2H4 (115.1192kJ/h)
C2H4 (6380.623kJ/h) Oxygen (28.802kJ/h)
HCl (5771.1472kJ/h) REACTOR HCl (288.642kJ/h)
Oxygen (1391.557kJ/h) EDC (12029.024kJ/h)
Water (7009.184 kJ/h)
Figure 13.2
Heat of reaction,
∆Hr@298K = -239000 J/mol
∆Hr@578K = -∑(578 ∫298mCpdT)reactants+∆Hr@298K+∑(298 ∫578mCpdT)products
= -234291.8 J/mol
13.3.COOLER
37
13.4.SCRUBBER
HCl (184.525kJ/h)
Figure 13.4
13.5.MIXING POINT
Enthalpy in = mCp∆T
12289165 + 11987305.58 = 169803.92( T- 293)
Temperature of the stream entering wash tower= 440K
13.6.COOLER
Enthalpy of inlet = 24281960.56
Outlet temperature = 323 K
Enthalpy outlet = 4870917.98 J/hr
Heat removed ,Q = 19411042.59 J/hr
Coolant used ,m = Q/Cp(90-30)
=77.322 kg/hr
38
Components Enthalpy in (J/hr) Enthalpy in (J/hr) Enthalpy out
(from reactor) (from scrubber) (J/hr)
Ethylene 7043.3 73594.06 12132
Oxygen - 18412.835 6245.375
EDC 119873382.1 7689983.2 4224910
Water - 4480871.2 625820
Chlorine 6876.1 - 1809.5
Total 24281960.56 4870917.98
Table 13.6:enthalpy of cooler
13.7.WASH TOWER
Oxygen (6.1205kJ/h)
EDC (97.050kJ/h)
Water (612.625kJ/h)
Figure 13.7
39
13.8.DISTILLATION COLUMN 1
C2H4 (6.976kJ/h)
Oxygen (0.074kJ/h)
EDC (49.689kJ/h)
Water (0.147kJ/h)
C2H4 (1.2132kJ/h) Chlorine (0.014kJ/h)
Oxygen (2.572kJ/h)
EDC (4140.8kJ/h)
Water (1.2441kJ/h)
Chlorine (1809.5kJ/h)
C 2H4 (0.80206kJ/h)
Oxygen (0.00774 kJ/h)
EDC (13792.746 kJ/h)
Water (41.6585kJ/h)
Figure 13.8
Ethylene 13.6
Oxygen 3.41
EDC 35.1
Water 42.34
Cl2 10.2
Table 13.8: table of heat of vapourisation
Reflux ratio ,R =3
No. of theoretical trays = 17
Distillate, D=32.9745 mol/hr
R=L/D
L=98.9235 mol/hr
V=L+D=131.897 mol/hr
Heat load for condenser,
Qc = ∑ni*Hivap
= 28.24*13.6+0.062*1.02+0.664*3.41+0.532*42.34+102.4*35.1
40
= 4003.726 kJ /hr
Amount of coolant required,
Qc = mcCp∆T
mc =15.95 kg/hr
EDC (42410.85kJ/h)
FURNACE VCM (23963.655kJ/h)
EDC (77077.110kJ/h) HCl (9993.0975kJ/h)
Figure 13.9
13.10.QUENCH COLUMN
Figure 13.10
13.11.DISTILLATION COLUMN 2
EDC (94.2032kJ/h)
42
VCM(81.3995kj/h)
HCl (1347.658kJ/h)
EDC (4017.87kJ/h)
VCM (2270.241kJ/h)
HCl (946.7145kJ/h)
EDC (2145.58kJ/h)
VCM (1814.5827kJ/h)
HCl (12.595kJ/h)
Figure 13.11
Coolant required,
Qc = mcCp∆T
43
Water enters at 298K and leaves at 318K
29085.9 = mc*4.184* 288
mc = 463.446 kg/hr
EDC (12.8106kJ/h)
VCM (533.748kJ/h)
HCl (0.074kJ/h)
EDC (357.5969kJ/h)
VCM (302.43045kJ/h)
HCl (2.0992kJ/h)
HCl (17.83665kJ/h)
EDC (3156.066kJ/h)
VCM (54.3408kJ/h)
Fig 13.12
45
Fig 13.13
14.SUMMARY
46
Equipment Mass inlet Mass outlet Energy Energy outlet
kg/hr Kg/hr inlet kJ/hr
kJ/hr
47
15.ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM
The by-products formed in the process are found in waste streams arising from EDC
Purification and Pyrolysis, as well as the Direct Chlorination, Caustic Scrubber, and the
Oxychlorination Reactors. These waste streams come in two forms, liquid and vapor.
The vapor wastes contain more contaminants than the liquid wastes and this is due to the fact
of the high temperatures with which the reactors are run. A treatment method that incorporated
incineration, absorption, and scrubbing technologies was selected.
INCINERATION:
The first step in this treatment method is to send all the liquid and vapor wastes to the
incinerator, where they are all combusted at a temperature of 1127⁰ C. The organic compounds in
the waste streams contain chlorine attached to them. “These elements create complications by
adding extra products of combustion”. By inspection it was found that carbon dioxide (CO 2), water
(H2O), hydrochloric acid (HCl), chlorine gas(Cl2), nitrous oxides (NOx), and chloro oxides (ClOx)
would be formed.
A thermodynamic analysis was then performed on all the combustion reactions to determine
what actual products would form and be present at equilibrium. From here it was determined that
the ClOx would actually be more prevalent than the Cl2 and HCl.
Although this is true, the ClOx will not be present after incineration. This is simply because the
ClOx is very unstable.
Chloro oxides actually dissociate and donate chlorine and oxygen anions. These chlorine and
oxygen anions then attach to hydrogen to form the aforementioned HCl and H2O. Therefore, as a
result of the incineration process, CO2,H2O, HCl, Cl2, and NOx are formed.
ABSORPTION:
These products are then sent to an absorption column. This column uses water as a solvent
and removes HCl and H2O from the stream and can be recycled or sold.
SCRUBBING:
From here the remaining products are sent to another absorption column, this one using
NaOH as the solvent. Here the NaOH removes the Cl2 and forms a solution of sodium chloride and
sodium hypochlorite, which is sold to an industrial bleach production company. The CO2 is then
sent to where it will be sequestered.
D
C
FURNACE
ADSORPTION SCRUBBING
Fig 15.1
48
15.1.DISPOSAL CONSIDERATION
Reuse or reprocess if possible. Dispose in accordance with all applicable Federal, State/Provincial
and local laws and regulations. Subject to disposal regulations: U.S. EPA 40 CFR 262. Hazardous
Waste Number(s): D001. U043. Waste characterization and compliance with applicable laws and
regulations are the responsibility of the waste generator.
RCRA - Commercial grade Vinyl Chloride, if discarded or spilled, would be a listed hazardous
waste under 40 CFR 261.33, specifically U043 - Vinyl Chloride CAS 75-01-4. In addition, Vinyl
Chloride, if discarded or spilled, as well as other wastes generated during use of Vinyl Chloride or
containing Vinyl Chloride may exhibit one or more hazardous waste characteristics under 40 CFR
261.24, including D001 - ignitable and D043 – toxic.
16.RECYCLE STREAM
Hydrochloric acid produced from pyrolysis is recovered from distillation column to oxychlorination
reactor. It helps in complete usage of chlorine input. vinyl chloride monomer yield is improved and
minimising the formation of HCl waste by processing and recycling it. It is also environmentally
friendly to recycle the HCl stream. since HCl has volatile market ,produced HCl is recycled to
increase the vinyl chloride yield and hence this is one of the reason why direct- oxychlorination
method is preferred.
The worldwide market for Oxygen is expected to grow at a CAGR of roughly 3.9% over the next
five years, will reach 48800 million US$ in 2023, from 38800 million US$ in 2017, according to a
new GIR (Global ) study.
Ethylene prices posted US$1,418 per ton in 2014, US$1,098 in 2015, US$1,093 in 2016, US$1,196 in
2017 and US$1,250 last year. In January this year, the price fell below US$1,000 to US$934. After
recovering to US$1,141 in February and US$1,012 in March, it went down to US$996 in April and May,
respectively. On June 7, it marked US$810.
49
MECHANICAL DESIGN
50
18.MECHANICAL DESIGN
18.1. STORAGE VESSEL
Tank dimensions
Diameter (m) 12
Height (m) 8
Density of liquid(kg/m3) 969
Superimposed load(N/m2) 1250
Table 18.1
Material of construction – carbon steel SA516 70
Density(kg/m3) 7850
Permissible stress(N/mm2) 335
Modulus of elasticity(N/mm2) 2*105
Joint efficiency 0.85
Corrosion allowance(mm) 3
Table 18.1.1
18.1.1. SHELL DESIGN
Bottom pressure ,p= ρ * (H-0.3) * 9.807*10-6
= 969* (8-0.3)* 9.807*10-6
=0.0732 N/mm2
Thickness of the shell at the bottom, t=( (p *D)/2*f*J ) + c
=(0.0732*12000/2*335*0.85)+3
=4.542 m
Since the tank diameter is less than 15 m ,the minimum bottom thickness is taken as 5 mm
Assume 8 plates to be used with a gap of 2 mm between the adjacent plates
Total circumference = π*12 - 8*2*10-3
= 37.68 m
Length of each plate = 37.68/8
= 4.7 m
The size of the plate selected from IS 1730 is 4500(l) x 1800(w)
Assume plate thickness to be 4 mm( including corrosion allowance)
Pressure, p = 1*2*335*0.85 / 12000
= 0.0475 N/mm2
51
Height of tank from bottom ,H = (0.0475/ 969*9.807*10-6)+0.3
=5.29 m
Balance height =8-5.29
= 2.71 m is filled with plate of thickness 5mm
Plates of thickness 5 mm should be used at the bottom which would cover the height of
2*1.8= 3.6 m
Assume plate of thickness 3.5mm (including corrosion allowance)
P=0.02375 N/mm2
H=2.8 m
Therefore 1 plate of 4 mm thickness and 1 plate of 3.8 mm thickness should be used.
18.1.2. TANK BOTTOM
The diameter of the bottom tank extends beyond the shell by 50 mm
Diameter of the bottom, Db =12+2*5*10-3+ 2*50*10-3
=12.11 m
Thickness of plate to be used at the bottom
Annular plate = 5 mm
Sketch plate = 6 mm
Minimum width of annular plate=50+300+5+50
=405 mm
Circumference of the bottom = π* Db
=38.045 m
18.1.3. SELF SUPPORTING CONICAL ROOF
Assume thickness of a plate for a roof plates to be 4 mm
Weight per unit area = 7850*4*10-3
= 31.4 kg/m2
Force acting due to load =31.4*9.807
= 307.94 N/m2
Total load= superimposed load +load due to weight
= 1250+307.94
=1557.94 N/m2
52
p =1557.94*10-6 N/mm2
sinϴ =(D/t)*√(p/0.204*E)
= (12000/6)*√(1557.94*10-6/0.204*2*105)
= 0.3908
tanϴ =0.425
slope is greater than permissible stress
assume thickness to be 10 mm
tanϴ =0.497 (greater than permissible stress)
assume thickness to be 20 mm
tanϴ =0.62
the slope is not within the acceptable limit
recommended to use self-supporting roof
therefore column supported roof of thickness 4 mm is used.
18.1.4. NOZZLE
Nozzle diameter at head = 200 mm
Nozzle diameter at shell = 300 mm
nozzle (in the head)
53
Portion of nozzle inside the head is zero
Therefore, area available for compensation = 93.25+800=893.25 mm 2
= 9.5 mm
= 10 mm
54
Portion of nozzle inside the head is zero
55
Average volumetric flow rate = 11.83 m3/hr
CHCl =0.0571kmol/ m3
CC2H2 =0.0286 kmol/ m3
CO2 =0.0143 kmol/ m3
On substituting all the values,
-r = 6.646*10-3
Weight of the catalyst,
W/FAo =0∫Xa(dxa/-r)
FAo =0.3381 kmol/hr
Conversion, xa=0.95
W/FAo =0∫0.95(dxa/-r)
W= FAo*0.95/ -r
= 48.33 kg
Volume of bed,
The catalyst bed used is copper(II) chloride
Bulk density of the catalyst bed = 3390 kg/m3
Volume of catalyst ,Vcat = 48.33/3390
= 0.0148 m3
Bed porosity = 0.35
Hence , volume of bed, Vbed = Vcat/(1-ξ)
= 0.022 m3
Volume of reactor = Vbed + Vfeed
= 0.022 + 11.83
= 11.852 m3/hr
Residence time = 0.05 hr
Volume of reactor = 11.852*0.05
=0.5926 m3
0.5926= height of reactor(H) * π * D2 /4
= H*0.785*(H/3)2
Height of reactor = 1.89 m
56
Reactor pressure = 58 psi
= 4*105 N/m2
Diameter = 0.63 m
Material – stainless steel( shell and nozzle)
Allowable stress at 305oC = 137*106 N/m2
Design pressure = 1.1*operating pressure
= 4.4*105 N/m2
p = 0.44 N/mm2
Shell thickness , t= p*D/(2*f*j) -p
= 4.4*105*0.63/(2*137*106*0.85)-4.4*105
=4 mm
tf = G*√(p/k*f)
k = 1/(0.3+(1.5* Wm*hG/H*G))
H = π/4*G2*p
= 230950 N
B = 835+12+2*16
=880 mm
hG = B-G/2
= 31.25 mm
k = 2.73
tf = 817.5*√(0.44/2.73*137)
= 28 mm
This matches with that of 30mm given in the data.
18.2.3.NOZZLE
Nozzle diameter at head = 200 mm
Nozzle diameter at shell = 300 mm
nozzle (in the head)
58
for sake of rigidity, nozzle thickness is taken as 4mm which is standard size.
12.5 mm
= 10 mm
59
18.3.HEAT EXCHANGER
Material Of Construction :
1. Shell side :
Shell and Head : carbon steel (IS-2062)
Flanges : Carbon steel IS 2002 grade I
Gasket : flat-metal jacketed asbestos filled
Nozzle : carbon steel (IS-2062)
2. Tube side :
Tube: stainless steel (SS 304)
Flanges: stainless steel (SS 304)
Gasket: Steel jacketed asbestos
Nozzle: carbon steel (IS-2062)
18.3.1.SHELL AND HEAD DESIGN
DATA
PARAMETER VALUE UNIT
Operating pressure 0.103 N/mm 2
stress
Joint efficiency 0.85 -
No of pass 2 -
Total no of tubes 24 -
Proportionality factor 0.85 -
Pitch of tube (square) 19.05 mm
60
Table 18.3.1
Shell diameter
D = √ (4*A/π)
i
p-Design Pressure
f-Permissible stress
J-Joint efficiency
t = ( 0.113*150)/((2*.85*95)-0.113) = 0.126 mm
s
Head design
Tori spherical dished head is used .
R = 0.06*Rc
1
t = p R w / 2 f j = ( 0.113*150*1.77/2*95*0.85) = 0.1858 mm
h c
2
Baffle design
61
18.3.2.FLANGE DESIGN (FEMALE)
DATA
PARAMETER VALUE UNIT
Shell inside diameter 150 mm
Shell outside diameter 160 mm
Gasket inside diameter 168 mm
Gasket outside diameter 222 mm
Gasket factor 3.75 -
Seating stress of gasket 53.4 N/mm 2
Table 18.3.2
N = (222-168)/2 = 54 mm
G = (222+168)/2 = 195 mm
b = N/2 = 27
o
b=2.5*√ b = 12.99 mm
o
W = π b G Y = 3.14*12.99*195*53.4 = 424731.7 N
m1 a
W = π 2b G m p + (π/4) G p
m2
2
W ≥ W
m1 m2
62
18.3.3.NOZZLE DESIGN
DATA
PARAMETER VALUE UNIT
Steam in nozzle inside diameter 30 mm
Steam out nozzle inside diameter 30 mm
Vent nozzle inside diameter 20 mm
Design pressure 0.113 N/mm 2
Table 18.3.3
12.50 mm
As the steam out nozzle has the same nozzle diameter as the steam in nozzle, the previous
calculations and results are applicable here.
Vent nozzle (in the shell)
63
for sake of rigidity, nozzle thickness is taken as 3 mm which is standard size.
DATA
stress
Joint efficiency 0.85 -
No of pass 2 -
Total no of tubes 24 -
Table 18.3.4
Tube thickness
t = p D / (2fJ – p)
s i
18.3.5.FLANGE DESIGN
DATA
PARAMETER VALUE UNIT
Shell inside diameter 150 mm
Shell outside diameter 160 mm
Gasket inside diameter 160 mm
Gasket outside diameter 180 mm
Gasket factor 5.5 -
Seating stress of gasket 126.6 N/mm 2
Table 18.3.5
N = (180-160)/2 = 10 mm
G = (180+160)/2 = 170 mm
b = N/2 = 5
o
b= b , b= 5 mm
o
W = π b G Y = 3.14*5*170*126.6 = 337895.4 N
m1 a
W = π 2b G m p + (π/4) G p
m2
2
W ≥ W
m1 m2
65
Thickness of flange = t = G √ p/k*f = 515* √ (0.11/0.009*100.6) = 57.9mm
f
18.4.DISTILLATION COLUMN:
Diameter = 760 mm
Working pressure = 5 bar = 0.5 N/mm2
Design pressure = 0.55 N/mm2
Temperature = 293 K
Material of construction = Carbon steel
Permissible stress = 95 N/mm2
Insulation thickness = 120 mm
Density of Insulation = 80 kg/m3
Corrosion allowance = 3 mm
Permissible stress for bolt = 140 kg/m3
Density of carbon steel = 7850 kg/m3
Insulation thickness = 100 mm
Density of Insulation = 120 kg/m3
No. of trays = 20
Tray spacing = 300 mm
Weight of head = 2500 kg
Weight of liquid and tray = 80 kg/m2
Weight of attachments = 140 kg/m
Wind pressure = 1300 N/m2
18.4.1.HEAD THICKNESS
ts = PD2 + C
2fJ-P
= 0.55 x 760 + 3
.
2x95x1 – 0.55
ts = 5.2 mm
D0 = Di + 2t
D0 = 770 mm
Head,
Elliptical heads are used
th = PDiV
66
2fJ
V = 2 + K2
6
k = major axis = 2 = 2
minor axis 1
V=1
th = 0.55 x 760 x 1 + C
2 x 95 x 1
= 2.2 + 3
th = 5.2 mm
18.4.2.DESIGN OF GASKET AND BOLTS
Nominal diameter of flange = 800 mm
Inside diameter of flange = 826 mm
Outside diameter of flange = 915 mm
Outside diameter of carbon steel lining ring = 828 mm
Bolt circle diameter = 870 mm
Thickness of flange = 85 mm
No. of bolts = 32
Nominal diameter = 20 mm(M 20)
Gasket factor, m = 3.75
Seating stress, Ya= 53.4 N/mm2
bo = 0.5*((828-800)/2)
= 7 mm
b = 2.5* √bo
= 6.61 mm
The minimum bolt load for atmospheric conditions is
Wm1 = π*b*G*Ya
= 3.14*6.61*814*53.4
= 902645 N
The bolt load for operating conditions,
Wm2 = π*2*b*G*m*p + 3.14/4 * G2*p
= 355950 N
67
The number of bolts = G/2.54
= 32 bolts
Area of bolt = bolt load / permissible stress
= 902645 / 140
= 6447.5 mm2
Area per bolt = 6447.5 / 32
= 201.48 mm2
Let us consider M18 bolt with nominal diameter 18 mm
Ab = o.51* 182.09 = 214.5 mm2, just matching
Consider M20 bolt with nominal diameter of 20 mm
Ab = 0.51* 202.09 * = 267.13 mm2 which is 33% higher area than required bolt area
Hence, 32 bolts with nominal diameter of 20mm are adequate
Total bolt area = 8548.16 mm2
Ab = 2* 3.14* Ya * G * N / f
= 2* 3.14* 53.4 * 814* 20 / 140
= 39016 mm2
The bolt area provided is more than the above value bolt size and no of bolts are thus
adequate
Pitch of bolts = 4*20
= 80 mm
Bolt pitch circle diameter
B = 80* 32/3.14
= 814.87 mm
B = outside diameter of gasket + 2* bolt diameter +b12
= 828 + 2*20+12
= 880 mm
This matches with the bolt circle diameter given in data .
The outside diameter of flange = B+ 2* bolt diameter
= 870+ 2*20
= 910 mm
68
18.4.3.FLANGE THICKNESS
tf = G*(√(p/k*f)) + c
k = 1/(0.3+(1.5*Wm*hG)/H*G)
Wm = 902645 N
hG = (880-816)/2
= 33
H = 3.14/4 * G2 * p
= 286220 N
G = 814 mm
k = 3.27
tf = 814*√(0.58/3.27*95)
= 37 mm
This matches with the flange thickness of 35mm given in data.
Let H b the height of the tower
Stresses at a distance H from the top
Axial stresses due to pressure
fap = p*D / 4*(ts – c)
= 0.55 *760 / 4*(6.2-3)
= 47.5 N/mm2
18.4.4.STRESSES DUE TO LOAD
compressive stress due to weight of the shell on height H
fdx= weight of the shell / cross section of shell
= (π/4 * (Do2 – Di2)*H* ρshell) / π/4 * (Do2 – Di2)
= H* ρshell
= 7850 *9.807*10-6*H
= 0.077 * H N/mm2
compressive stress due to the weight of insulation
fd ins = (π* Dins*tins*H* ρins )/ ( π* Dm*(ts -c))
= 770+ 2*100
= 970 mm
Dm = (760+770)/2
69
= 765 mm
fd ins = 970*100*H*120*10-6*9.807 / 765*2.2
= 0.0678 * H N/mm2
compressive stress due t liquid tray etc.,.
The weight in terms of height = (H/0.3)* π/4*0.762*80
= 121 *H
Table 18.4.5
70
Stream in nozzle (in the shell)
As the stream out nozzle has the same nozzle diameter as the stream in nozzle, the previous
calculations and results are applicable here.
71
19.1.1.Pumping terminology
NPSH – Net positive suction head – total head at pump suction branch over and above the vapour
pressure of the liquid being pumped.
NPSHr – NPSH required – is a function of the pump design and is the lowest value of NPSH at
which the pump can be guaranteed to operate without significant cavitation. There is no absolute
criterion for determining what this minimum allowable NPSH should be, but pump manufacturers
normally select an arbitrary drop in total dynamic head (differential head) of 3% as the normal value
for determining NPSHr.
NPSHa — NPSH available – is a function of the system in which the pump operates and is equal to
the absolute pressure head on the liquid surface plus the static liquid level above the pump
centreline (negative for a suction lift) minus the absolute liquid vapour pressure head at pumping
temperature minus the suction friction head losses.
Cavitation – Process in which small bubbles are formed and implode violently; occurs when
NPSHa < NPSHr.
Head – A measure of pressure, expressed in metres for centrifugal pumps. Indicates the height of a
column of water being moved by the pump (without friction losses).
Prime – Charge of liquid required to begin pumping action when liquid source is lower than pump.
Held in pump by a foot valve on the intake line or by a valve or chamber within the pump.
Self/Dry Priming – Pumps that draw liquid up from below pump inlet (suction lift), as opposed to
pumps requiring flooded suction.
Static Discharge Head – Maximum vertical distance (in metres) from pump to point of discharge
with no flow.
Strainer – A device installed in the inlet of a pump to prevent foreign particles from damaging the
internal parts.
Sump – A well or pit in which liquids collect below floor level; sometimes refers to an oil or water
reservoir.
Viscosity – The “thickness” of a liquid or its ability to flow. Most liquids decrease in viscosity and
flow more easily as they get warmer.
Static Head – The hydraulic pressure at a point in a fluid when the liquid is at rest.
Friction Head – The loss in pressure or energy due to frictional losses in flow.
Total Head – The total pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of a pump in operation.
72
Suction Head – The inlet pressure of a pump when above atmospheric pressure.
Suction Lift – The inlet pressure of a pump when below atmospheric pressure.
Where
NPSHa = 44 ft
73
19.1.3.Common problems in centrifugal pumps
Cavitation is a serious operational‐type problem that arises from the low pressure in the pump
suction side.
Erosion caused by the presence of solid particles in the pumped fluid is one of the major sources of
surface damage to the impeller and casing materials. In pumping systems, the term “surge” refers to
pressure variation resulting from sudden (or fast) changes in fluid velocity. The rotating stall
phenomenon is very common in centrifugal and axial‐flow compressors and may also occur in
pumps when the flow rate is much lower than the normal capacity.
Pump vibration is one of the serious problems that can result in complete failure of one or more of
the pump components. The severity of mechanical vibrations can be determined by making standard
vibration measurements.
19.2.COMPRESSORS
A compressor is a mechanical device that increases the pressure of a gas by reducing its volume.
19.2.1.Types
Fig 19.2.1
74
19.2.2.Terminology
Pressure - The existing gauge pressure plus atmospheric pressure measured from absolute zero.
Aftercooler - Device that dissipates heat caused by compression after compression is complete.
This allows for effective removal of moisture from the compressed air or gas.
Air Receiver - Tank into which compressed air is delivered and stored. Proper tank size depends on
mode of operation. Tank should be sized as recommended by manufacturer. Consult your local
Gardner-Denver distributor for assistance.
Atmospheric Pressure - Pressure at a specific altitude. At sea level, atmospheric pressure is 14.7
PSI.
Brake Horsepower - The total power input required to compress and deliver a given quantity of air,
including losses due to slip and friction as well as mechanical losses.
Compression Efficiency - Ratio of the theoretical to the actual work required to compress air.
Takes into account slip leakage and frictional losses.
Compression Ratio - The ratio of the Absolute Discharge Pressure to the Absolute Inlet Pressure.
Compressor - A machine designed for compressing air or gas from an initial pressure to a higher
discharge pressure.
Design Pressure - Maximum continuous operating pressure as designed by the manufacturer. Also
referred to as Maximum Working Pressure.
Design Speed - Maximum continuous operating speed Design Speed - Maximum continuous
operating speed of the compressor as designed by the manufacturer.
Free Air - Air at atmospheric conditions. Be careful with this term because altitude, barometric
pressure and temperature will vary. This term may not mean air at identical conditions.
Inlet Pressure - Total pressure at the inlet flange of the compressor or inlet filter.
Inlet Temperature - Temperature at the inlet flange of the compressor or inlet filter.
Load Factor - The ratio of the average actual compressor output to the maximum rated output of
the compressor for a defined period of time.
Moisture Separator - A device designed to collect and remove moisture from the air during the
cooling process.
75
Speed - Of a compressor is the number of revolutions per minute of the compressor shaft.
Unloaded Horsepower - The power that is consumed to overcome the frictional losses when
operating in an unloaded condition.
Volumetric Efficiency - The ratio of the actual quantity of air delivered to the displacement of the
compressor.
No power — If the compressor lacks electrical power, check the power button and activate the reset
switch if needed. Breakers should also be checked.
Lack of oil — Users sometimes forget to check or change the fluids, and the consequences are often
grievous. If your compressor is failing to work properly, it could simply be from a nearly empty oil
tank.
20.HAZOP ANALYSIS
The purpose of HAZOP studies is to reduce the possibility of work related injuries. Due to the
processing and handling of hazardous materials, the vinyl chloride plant has many inherent dangers.
The first step of the HAZOP study is to subdivide the plant into sections and plan the sequence. The
whole process is divided into small sessions. Each session will have one or two major equipment
such as flask, column, reactor or heat exchanger. The plant will be divided from upstream to
downstream.
Secondly, all the deviations were studied to find out all he causes as well as the consequences.
Knowing the causes and consequences, additional safety equipment might be added to the plant.
All the actions that should be done to improve safety and to guide others in case the
problem happens were also suggested.
Table 20.1. hazop analysis table for equipments
77
Scrubber aqueous flowrate. function. Flow inlet flowrate.
waste, Blocking Don’t have controller, Check the
includin of outlet expected Pressure equipment
g water streams. results. Controller periodically.
and HCl Possible Shut down the
leaking and system when
explosion. pressure goes too
high.
Flow More High inlet Failed Alarm Don't run at high
flowrate. function. , Flow inlet flowrate.
Blocking Don’t have contro Check the
of outlet expected ller. equipment
streams. results. periodically.
Possible Shut down the
leaking and system when
explosion. pressure goes too
high.
No Blocking or Release of Alarm Checking the
Leaking; chemicals to when equipment
Running out surrounding. there's an periodically.
of feed. Pressure increase of Check back the
build up at toxic feed. Shut down
blocking chemicals after 30 minute
region in vented of no flow.
gas or
waste
liquid.
Alarm
when
there's no
flow.
Reverse Blocking No Alarm, flow Immediately shut
controller
in outlet achieveme down the system.
stream, nt of Check the pipes
failure in products, and equipment .
controls pushing
the feed
back,
possible
release
chemicals
to
environme
nt.
21.FMEA ANALYSIS
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic, proactive method for evaluating a
process to identify where and how it might fail and to assess the relative impact of different failures,
82
in order to identify the parts of the process that are most in need of change. It is a bottom- up
approach.
21.1.HEAT EXCHANGER
21.3.DISTILLATION COLUMN
83
FAILURE FAILURE FAILURE CONSEQUENCE PROBABILITY ACTION
MODE CAUSE EFFECT VALUE
Pump Malfunction Poor product 1(Good) High Standby
failure quality pump
Tower base Excessive Flooding 5(Satisfied) High Reliable
liquid rising level
monitoring
Pressure Improper Materials 5(Satisfied) High Proper
relief valve design release due maintenance
to leak
Reboilers Increase in Fire 7(Bad) Moderate Periodic
column inspection
pressure,
corrosion
Table 21.3.
21.4.FURNACE
COMPONE FAILU FAILUR FAILURE EXISTING S O D RPN ADDITIO
NTS RE E CAUSE CONTROL NAL
MODE EFFECT CONTRO
L
Blunder Fail to Explosio Corrosion Reliable 9 2 3 54 Periodic
Valves operate n supplier maintenan
ce
84
Hot blast Stove Fire and Excess Thermocouple 1 4 3 120 Periodic
blower shell explosion heating 0 maintenan
rupture ce and
and monitoring
crack
Table 21.4.
85
22.FAULT TREE ANALYSIS
Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a top-down, deductive failure analysis in which an undesired state of a
system is analysed using Boolean logic to combine a series of lower-level events.
22.1.REACTOR
Fig 22.1.
86
22.2.HEAT EXCHANGER
Fig 22.2.
87
22.3.FURNACE
Fig 22.3.
22.4.DISTILLATION COLUMN
Fig 22.4.
88
Fig 22.4.1.
Fig 22.4.2.
89
Fig 22.4.3.
22.5.PUMPS
90
23.COST ANALYSIS OF VINYL CHLORIDE PLANT
23.1.TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST
Equipment ₹ $
DC vector 3504465 45895.49
Oxy vector 3515634 46041.76
Cooler 1 4796244 62813.00
Scrubber 620000 8119.70
Cooler 2 4796244 62813.00
Wash tower 5887363 77102.61
Furnace 24749815 324130.75
Quench column 6321730 82791.21
Storage tank 6 607425 7955.01
Pump 6 7447275 97531.67
Compressor 3 900000 11786.66
EDC column 19025167 249159.10
HCl column 15468606 202581.35
VC column 17155737 224676.51
Total equipment cost 114795705 1503397.84
Table 23.1.
23.2.TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT
A large sum of money must be supplied to purchase and install the equipment.
Capital investment estimation is necessary to estimate necessary investment
for the vinyl chloride plant. The total capital consists of fixed-capital
investment and working capital.
91
23.2.2.INDIRECT COST(IC)
Variables Description Cost(₹)
Engineering and Supervision 32 % of TEC 36734625
Construction and Expenses 41 % of TEC 47066239
Contractor’s fee 21 % of TEC 24107098
Contingency 42 % of TEC 48214196
Table 23.2.2.
Total indirect cost = ₹156,122,158
23.3. WORKING CAPITALS(WC)
= 86 % of TEC
= ₹98,724,306
23.4. FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMENT (FCI)
= DPC + IC
= ₹412287251
Total capital investment(TCI) = DPC + IC + WC
= ₹511011557
23.5.OPERATING LABOUR COST
Employee No. Salary/Year Total(₹)
Plant Chairman 1 12,50,000 12,50,000
Plant Manager 1 9,50,000 9,50,000
Unit Managers 5 8,00,000 40,00,000
Operational Engineers 25 7,50,000 1,87,50,000
Maintenance Engineers 2 3,00,000 6,00,000
Operators 30 5,00,000 1,50,00,000
Supervision 5 5,50,000 27,50,000
Financial Manager 1 8,40,000 8,40,000
Production Manager 1 8,60,000 8,60,000
Sales Manager 1 8,40,000 8,40,000
Budget Analysts 2 7,20,000 14,40,000
Financial Analysts 1 7,60,000 7,60,000
Auditor 2 4,20,000 8,40,000
Total 48,880,000
Table 23.5
Raw material Cost(₹)/kg kg/day Cost(₹)/da
y
Ethylene 60 883.92 53035.2
Oxygen 15 129.6 1944
Chlorine 20 1659.36 33187.2
Total 88166.4
Table 23.5.1
92
No. of working days = 300
Cost/year = ₹26,449,920
23.6.DIRECT PRODUCT COST(DPC)
Variables Description Cost(₹)
Raw materials 26449920
Operating labour cost 25 % of raw material cost 48880000
Utilities cost 6612480
Maintenance & Repair 2 % of FCI 8245745
Operating supplies 15 % of Maintenance & repair 1236862
Total 91425007
Table 23.6.
23.7.FIX CHARGES(FC)
Variables Description Cost(₹)
Lab charges 15 % of operational cost 7332000
Local Taxes 1 % of FCI 4122872
Insurance 0.8 % of FCI 3298298
Total 14753170
Table 23.7.
23.8.OVERHEAD COST(OC)
=40 % of [Operating labour cost + Maintenance & repair + Operating supplies]
= ₹23345042
23.9.MANUFACTURING COST (MC)
= DPC + FC + OC
= ₹129523299
23.10.GENERAL EXPENSES(GE)
Variables Description Cost(₹)
Administration cost 15 % of operation labour cost 7332000
Distribution and selling cost 0.1 % of DPC 91425
Total 7423425
Table 23.10.
23.11.TOTAL PRODUCT COST
= MC + GE
= ₹136,946,644
23.12.NET PROFIT
Selling price of Vinyl Chloride = ₹800
93
Total production = 300,000 kg/year
94
Summary of Annual Costs along with the Total Product Cost
Working Capital (₹) 98724306
Fix Capital Investment (₹)
412287251
Total Capital Investment (₹) 51101155
7
Manufacturing Cost description
₹ / yr
Direct Product Cost
1 Raw Materials 26449920
2 Operating Labor 48880000
3 Utilities 25 % of raw material cost
Hot Utility 6612480
Cold Utility
4 Maintenance and Repair 15 % of Maintenance & repair 8245745
5 Operating Supplies 2 % of FCI 1236862
Sub Total 91425007
Fix Charges description
1 Capital Cost or 15 % of operational cost 7332000
Depreciation
2 Local Taxes 1 % of FCI 4122872
3 Insurance 0.8 % of FCI 3298298
Sub Total 14753170
Overhead Costs 40 % of [Operating labour cost + 23345042
Maintenance & repair + Operating supplies]
Table 23.18.
95
26.REFERENCES
1. Gel’Perin, E.I., Bakshi, Y.M., Avetisov, A.K. and Geil’Bshtein, A.I., 1983 Kinetic Model of the
oxidative chlorination of ethane to vinyl chloride III. Kinetica I Kataliz 24, 633 to 638
2. Wells, G. Margaret, Handbook of Petrochemicals and Processes.
3. Encyclopaedia of Chemical Engineering ,Vol.25.
4. McPherson R.W.,Starks, C.M., and Fryar, G.J.,1979, Vinyl chloride Monomer. Hydrocarbon
Process. 75,75-88, March 1979
5. Wong, E.W., Ambler, C.P., Baker, W.J., Parks, J.C., Producing high purity VCM product,
Hydrocarbon Processing, 129-134, August 1992.
6. Saeki, Y., Emura, T., Technical progresses for PVC production, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2055-2131,
2002.
7. Clegg, I.M., Hardman, R., Vinyl chloride production process, US Pat 5728905, 1998.
8. Benyahia, F. (2005). VCM Process Design. Chemical Engineering Education J,39:62-67.
9. Pro /Ⅱ Casebook, 1992. Vinyl Chloride Monomer plant, Simulation Sciences Inc.
10. “Vinyl Chloride Polymers”, Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science And Engineering, 1989 ed.
11.Bhatt , B L Vora ,S.M., “Stoichiometry”, 4th edition, tata McGraw-Hill(2004)
12. “ VINYL CHLORIDE PRODUCTION”, Capstone design project, spring 2003,chemical
engineering – university of Oklahoma
13. The NIST WebBook
14. “Perrys chemical engineering handbook”
15. V V Mahajani, S S Umarji, “ Joshi’s process equipment design”, 5th edition
16. Wells, G Margaret , “handbook of petrochemicals and process”
17. Clegg I M, hardman R, vinyl chloride production process US patent 5728905,1998
18. Pro/II case book ,1992. “ vinyl chloride monomer plant”,simulation sciences inc.
19. Benyahia .F (2005) “VCM process design”, chemical engineering education J, 39:62-67
20. McPherson R.W.,Starks, C.M., and Fryar, G.J.,1979,Vinyl chloridemonomer.Hydrocarbon
process.75,75-88,March 1979
21. International journal of scientific & engineering research, volume 8, issue 3, march 2017, risk
assessment of blast furnace.
22. Risk analysis of a distillation unit, Taylor J.R.; Hansen, O; April 18,2020.
23. modelling of an industrial plant for vinyl chloride production, GIVANNI ROSSANESE, pg no
51-62
96
97
PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION
DIRECT CHLORINATION REACTOR
F T F
C C C
S50
S38
FT T T F
RC
T C
V-100 T
F
T S7
S11 S5
R-100
11
S51
S2
S45
98
OXY CHLORINATION REACTOR
T F
F
C C
C
S52
F
T S46
T T
C T
S T
T
4 C S10
T S
F V- 6
T 101 RC F 3
T T
T
S
R-200 S6 E10
3 4
S8
S53 S64
S9 S16
S3
7
PC
PC
PT
99
EDC PURIFICATION SECTION
100
VCM PURIFICATION SECTION
101
Table A1. Stream Definitions for P&ID figures
Stream Description Stream Description
HCl Feed to Oxy
S1 Ethylene S37 Reactor
S2 Chlorine S38 NaCl Solution
S3 Ethylene S39 Purified Water
S4 Oxygen S40 Vapor Waste
S5 DC Reactor Effluent S41 EDC Recycle
S6 Oxy Reactor Effluent S42 Incinerator Flue gas
S7 DC Product S43 Water
S8 Oxy Caustic Wash Effluent S44 CO2 + Cl2 + Nox
S9 Oxy Caustic Wash Effluent S45 Water & HCl
S10 Oxy Product S46 Caustic Solution
S11 Vent S47 Vapor Emissions
S12 Water S48 NaCl Solution
S13 Water Wash Vent S49 Furnace Feed Purge
S14 Water Decant S50 Cooling Water
S15 EDC Purification Feed S51 Cooling Water Return
S16 Light Ends S52 Cooling Water
S17 EDC minus light ends S53 Cooling Water Return
S18 Purified EDC S54 Caustic Solution
S19 Heavy Ends S55 NaCl Solution
S20 Purified EDC (vapor) S56 Caustic Solution
S21 Cracking Furnace Feed S57 NaCl Solution
S22 Furnace Effluent S58 Cooling Water
S23 Furnace Effluent Quech S59 Cooling Water Return
102
S24 Quench Bottoms S60 Steam
S25 Quench Product S61 Condensate
S26 Overhead Quench Product S62 Furnace Fuel
S27 Quench Bottoms S63 Cooling Water
S28 Quench Purge S64 Cooling Water Return
S29 Quench Recycle S65 Cooling Water
S30 VCM Purification Feed S66 Cooling Water Return
VCM Purification Feed
S31 (vapor) S67 Steam
VCM Purification Feed
S32 (liquid) S68 Condensate
S33 HCl Recycle S69 Steam
S34 VCM minus HCl S70 Condensate
S35 VCM Prdouct S71 Incinerator Fuel
S36 EDC Recycle
Tag
Number Equipment
103
V-112 Water Wash
104