Transportation pROCEDURE

IDBC-TS-FRRSK-000003
ODC Transportation Risk Assessment Summary

BANYU URIP Report March 16, 2012
Rev 0
PROJECT MPI: Not Classified Page 2 of 13
REVISION MODIFICATION LOG
Revision Section Description
A All Issued for Review
B All Issued for Approval
0 All Issued for Use
IDBC-TS-FRRSK-000003_Rev 0
Rev 0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Work Process Summary ........................................................................................................... 4
1.2 Results Summary ..................................................................................................................... 5
2. Risk and Action Item Summary ..................................................................................................... 6
3. Individual Scenario ........................................................................................................................ 8

APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................................... 13
Rev 0
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Risk Assessment was held in purpose of managing project risk through the timely identification of
uncertainties, assessment of associated risks, and the identification of potential mitigating and/or
preventive actions for execution phases of Banyu Urip Project related to the Oversized Dimension of
Cargo, including Material, Equipment, and Machinery delivery from Tanjung Perak port (Surabaya) or
Gresik Port to Construction site.
The objective of this Risk Assessment was to:
Identify hazard and project risk issues associated with the Road Obstacle and Limitation of the
existing Bridge Height;
Identify mitigations (if any) to achieve acceptable risk.
1.1 Work Process Summary

Prior to the risk assessment, a charter was approved by the Risk Assessment sponsor. The charter
outlines the objectives, scope, boundaries, methodology, process of the risk assessment, agenda and
also participants for the risk assessment, and is included in Appendix II of this report. Some
information about the transportation arrangement and road obstacles including list of suspected
bridges that need to be strengthen are also included in the charter.
The work process for the risk assessment began with presentations of the following:
Objectives of the risk assessment
Major issues encountered
Transportation route plan
The road obstacles
ODC List and Dimension
Delivery Timeline
Transportation Drawing
Overview the existing Bridge Straightening and Method Available for the suspected Bridges
During the presentations, team members were encouraged to ask questions so that there was a full
understanding of the major issue, the obstacles, and the transportation plan including safety
management of such transportation arrangement. After the presentations, a structured “brainstorming
session” was performed to identify hazards and concerns. The brainstorming results are included in
Appendix V of this report. Following the brainstorming, the hazards and concerns identified were
divided into three categories, as follows:
Scenarios – Hazards / concerns unique to the project and not routinely managed by projects.
These issues were developed into risk scenarios. Action items from these scenarios will be
tracked to closure through the project risk management system.
Project – Hazards / concerns that are routinely managed by projects, and that the team
considered would be adequately addressed as part of the subsequent engineering effort.
These issues do not require formal tracking through the project risk management system.
However, during this risk assessment, there isn’t any risk which included in Project category.
Parking Lot – Hazards / concerns that are outside the scope of the study as defined by the
charter. These issues are included in Appendix V but were not pursued further in the risk
assessment.
The team then developed the risk scenario worksheets. The risk scenario worksheets identify
hypothetical future situations ("potential scenarios") and document the potential scenario causes,
consequences, assumed safeguards and proposed action items. The risk scenario worksheets also
document the assessed risks in terms of health and safety, the environment, public disruption, direct
Rev 0
financial impact and business impact; both before and after the proposed action items. The risk
scenario worksheets are presented in Section 3 of this report.
The risk ranking is based on the information available during the risk assessment and assumes that
the identified safeguards are in place and effective.
1.2 Results Summary

A total of twenty-six (26) hazards and concerns were identified during the brainstorming session of the
Risk Assessment. All hazards were then consolidated into four (4) risk scenarios and some of the
items have been categorized as parking lot items.
The assessed risk level before mitigation action items was:
Four (4) Zone 2 risks
The assessed risk levels after proposed mitigations are put in place are:
Four (4) Zone 2 risks
The role of the Risk Assessment team ends after submission of the report. Risk Assessment sponsor
will assign action item owner/lead to resolve the assessments finding.
It is important to recognize that although the proposed action items may provide adequate safeguards
for the identified hazards, the parties responsible for developing the action plans should not restrict
their planning to the actions or methods presented if additional or other measures are deemed
appropriate.
Rev 0
2. RISK AND ACTION ITEM SUMMARY

Risk Profile before Implementation of Action Items
Probability Category
Consequence A B C D E
I 1F
II 4F 1,3HS
III 2F 1P
IV 1E 2,3P
Risk Ranking Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Risk Profile after Implementation of Action Items
Probability Category
Consequence A B C D E
I 1F
II 3HS 4F 1HS
III 2F 1P
IV 2,3P 1E
Key:
Risk Ranking Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Consequence Type: HS =Health & Safety, P= Public Disruption, F= Financial, E = Environmental
Risk Summary by Scenario
Risk Risk Risk Risk

No. Scenario
Before Zone After Zone
1 Infrastructure failure occurs during transport, including
but not limited to: bridge collapse/failure, road failure, I-D (F) 2 I-E (F) 2
road damage occurs during or remains after transport
2 Obstacles are encountered during transport, causing

a temporary transportation delay of 1 day to several III-C (F) 2 III-C (F) 2
weeks
3 An accident occurs during transport, causing potential

injury to personnel or public and/or damage to II-D (HS) 2 II-D (HS) 2
equipment and potential transportation delay
4 Planning failure causes delay in transport. II-C (F) 2 II-D (F) 2
Rev 0
3. INDIVIDUAL SCENARIO
Hazard Scenario no: 1

Risk Matrix
A B C D E Legend
I FB FA
HS = Health & Safety
II HSB HSA E = Environmental
P = Public Disruption
III PB PA F = Financial
IV EB EA
Scenario Description:
Infrastructure failure occurs during transport, including but not limited to: bridge collapse/failure,
road failure, road damage occurs during or remains after transport
Potential Causes:
Inadequate existing roads and bridges including road shoulders
Failure to identify inadequate roads or bridges
Failure to adequately strengthen inadequate roads or bridges (design or construction)
Design transportation loads are inadvertently exceeded
Lighting conditions hinder driver ability to stay on load-bearing surfaces
Road or bridge condition changes between time of strengthening and project transport activity
(tampering, extreme weather, etc.)
Road or bridge condition changes between time of survey and time of project transport activity
(tampering, extreme weather, etc.)
Factors affecting Consequence or Probability:
None identified
Consequences:
Transportation stoppage leads to project delay
Potential PGA/ PR/ PD problems with government regulators create future permit issuance
problems
Potential PGA/ PR/ PD problems with locals cause demonstrations creating project delay
Potential damage to long-lead equipment items leads to project delay
Potential injury to personnel or the public
Assumed Safeguards
Pre-transportation survey of bridge capacity as-is at the time of the survey
Pre-transportation survey of road condition as-is at the time of the survey
Survey has been analysed to identify inadequate bridges with some consideration of potential
future decay within the life of the transportation activity
Plan to engineer strengthening elements for inadequate bridges (support from below- no
modifications to steel) using a third party
Vendor is required to list as-build dimensions on delivery paperwork
Vendor paperwork (shipping manifest) will be inspected at delivery by the transport company
Using standard (ACI and AISC) engineering design procedures (i.e., no additional safety factor
prescribed)
Competent heavy-haul contractor- assume appropriate use of lights, escorts, trailer condition, etc.
Risk Before
HS= II-D E= IV-D P= III-D F= I-D
Action Items Actionee
Rev 0
1. Survey the shoulders of the transport route

2. Require TS-witnessed weighing of equipment that exceeds 80% of bridge
capacity prior to transport (80% value is a suggested value of the loads to be
weighed and may be revised with explanation by the action item owner)
3. Consider additional safety factor in engineering calculations
4. Re-survey roads and bridges 1-2 weeks prior to transport to ensure road and
bridge conditions have not changed
Risk After
HS= II-E E= IV-E P= III-E F= I-E
Comments:
Several possible scenarios
1. Total bridge failure during transport results in loss of load, negative publicity, inability to obtain
permits, and project delay up to 3 months
2. Total road failure during transport results in overturning of load / transport vehicle (requires
repair to equipment, repair of road, replacement of vehicle), negative publicity, project delay
up to 2 weeks
3. Partial road or bridge failure during transport results in repair requirements after transport
Rev 0

Risk Matrix
A B C D E Legend
I HS = Health & Safety
II E = Environmental
III FBA F = Financial
IV PBA
Obstacles are encountered during transport, causing a temporary transportation delay of 1 day to
several weeks
Potential Causes:
Obstacles appear after the survey (new construction, pothole, etc)
Measurement error of road obstacle including allowable weight capacity, width, height, turning
radius
As-shipped equipment dimension (including trailer and any packaging) exceeds any route
capacity including weight
Government maintenance of the road during project’s transport
Demonstration block the road
Accident on the road
Failure to coordinate removal of small obstacles prior to transport
Obstacles not considered during the survey
Traffic control
Flood, lightning, wind
Emergency traffic
None identified
Consequences:
Transportation delay as a result of stuck load which can’t go through the road/bridge
Potential for delayed load to become more stuck if stored in an inappropriate place (soft ground,
etc)
Potential project delay for critical items if delay exceeds transport window
Potential public disruption caused by load blocking a road or bridge
Assumed Safeguards
Plan to build and drive a mock-up through the transport route to confirm obstacles have been
identified
Plan to inspect the route 1-2 weeks before transport to prep the route
Vendor is required to list as-build dimensions on delivery paperwork
Vendor paperwork (shipping manifest) will be inspected at delivery by the transport company
Incident response procedure for demonstrations and road blockages
Police escort
Transport is planned for night hours to minimize impact on traffic patterns
Risk Before
HS= N/A E= N/A P= IV-D F= III-C
Ensure local governments coordinate road maintenance with our transport
schedule
Risk After
HS= N/A E= N/A P= IV-D F= III-C
Comments:
No additional actions seen reasonable or required to reduce risk further
Rev 0

Risk Matrix
A B C D E Legend
E = Environmental
II HSBA
III F = Financial
IV PBA
An accident occurs during transport, causing potential injury to personnel or public and/or damage
to equipment and potential transportation delay
Potential Causes:
Truck/vessel breakdown (delay)
Lashing failures (equipment damage and potential injury)
Human error i.e.: driver, flagmen, escort (potential injury)
Accident between project vehicle and public vehicle (potential injury)

None identified
Consequences:
Potential injury to project personnel or the public
Potential equipment damage
Overnight delay causes inability to reach staging area/temporary parking area by daylight
Assumed Safeguards
Transportation procedure includes emergency response provisions
Competent heavy-haul contractor- assume appropriate use of lights, escorts, trailer condition, etc.
Police escort
Equipment vendors required to provide equipment shipping fixtures
Plan to build and drive a mock-up through the transport route to confirm obstacles have been
identified
Risk Before
HS= II-D E= N/A P= IV-D F= N/A
Action Items Action
None Identified
Risk After
HS= II-D E= N/A P= IV-D F= N/A
Comments:
Fatality is possible during transport but considered significantly less likely than a less severe
injury- vehicle movement is slow, will generally be in a forward direction, will be coordinated
among many individuals, will bring appropriate lighting with the transport.
Rev 0

Risk Matrix
A B C D E Legend
II FB FA E = Environmental
III F = Financial
IV
Planning failure causes delay in transport.
Potential Causes:
Permit issues/delays
Rainy season causes delay in bridge strengthening or other route construction
Required trailer not available at required time
Unforeseen obstacle requires modification or rental of land at time of transport
None identified
Consequences:
Delay in transport up to several weeks or months
Potential project delay up to several weeks or months
Assumed Safeguards
Project document review process
TS engineering controls
Third party public works engineering and construction specialists will design and execute bridge
modifications
Formal RA
Risk Before
HS= NA E= NA P= NA F= II-C/D
Add ODC transport deliverables to Construction Readiness Tracker, including:
Individual permits
Engineering bridge designs
Critical fabrication items
Completion of bridge upgrades
Risk After
HS= NA E= NA P= NA F= II-D
Comments:
Rev 0
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I RISK MATRIX

APPENDIX II CHARTER
APPENDIX III ATTENDANCE LIST
APPENDIX IV PRESENTATIONS
APPENDIX V BRAINSTORMING SESSIONS
APPENDIX I - RISK MATRIX
PROBABILITY Probability Definitions
A B C D E Category Definition Working Definition
C A Possibility of 20 or more times per facility

O I 1 1 1 2 2 Repeated life or 5 or more times during
N Incidents PROJECT/D&C
S B Possibility of 5 times in facility life or once
E II 1 1 2 2 2 Isolated during PROJECT/D&C
Q Incidents
U C Possibility of Once in facility life cycle or
E III 1 2 2 3 3 Occurring 10% likelihood during
N Sometime PROJECT/D&C
C D Not Likely to 10% likelihood of occurring
E IV 2 3 3 3 3 Occur once in facility life or 1%
S likelihood during
PROJECT/D&C
E Practically Once in 100 or more facility
Impossible lives or 0.1% likelihood during
PROJECT/D&C
Consequence Health/Safety Environmental Public Disruption Financial Impact

Category
Fatalities/Serious Potential Widespread, Significant Public Corporate
I Impact on Public Disruption
Long Term, Significant More than 50 USMD
One or more fatality Adverse Effect. Impact on a large scale loss of assets or 4
and communicated by month delay
national/international
media.
Serious Injury to Potential Localized, Small Public Disruption Region/Affiliate
II Personnel/Limited Medium Term, Impact on public is Between 2 and 50
Impact on Public Significant Adverse limited, attracts national USMD, or 2 month delay
Severe but non-fatal Effect. media.
Medical Treatment Potential Short Term Public complaint. Division/Site

III for Personnel/No Minor Adverse Effect.
Isolated impact, one time Between 2 USMD and
Impact on Public
local media coverage. 500 USKD, or 2 week
Lost Time Incident delay
(LTI)
Minor Impact on Inconsequential or No Public Compliant without Other

IV
Personnel adverse Effect. local media coverage. Less than 500 USKD or
First aid only
less than a week delay
APPENDIX II – CHARTER
(Please see next page)
IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005
Charter for ODC Transportation Risk
BANYU URIP 23 February 2012
Assessment
Rev B
REVISION MODIFICATION LOG
Revision Section Description
A All Issued for Internal Review
B All Issued for Approval
IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

Assessment
Rev B
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 4
2. OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................ 4
3. SCOPE .................................................................................................................................. 4
4. BOUNDARIES ....................................................................................................................... 4
5. RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................ 4
5.1 Participating Project Team Members ...................................................................................... 4
5.2 External Participants .............................................................................................................. 5
5.3 Reference Documents............................................................................................................ 5
6. DATE AND LOCATION ......................................................................................................... 5
7. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................................ 5
8. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................................................................... 6
9. AGENDA ............................................................................................................................... 7
10. DELIVERABLES ................................................................................................................... 7
Attachment 1 – GENERAL LAYOUT FOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTE.......................................... 8

Attachment 2 – ROAD OBSTACLE .................................................................................................. 9
Attachment 3 – LIST SUSPECTED BRIDGE THAT NEED TO BE COMPLETED BY TEMPORARY
SUPPORT ........................................................................................................................................ 11
Attachment 4 – PRELIMINARY DRAWING FOR ODC TRANSPORTATION ARRANGEMENT ...... 12
Attachment 5 – RISK MATRIX ........................................................................................................ 21
Attachment 6 – SCENARIO WORKSHEET ..................................................................................... 22

Assessment
Rev B
1. PURPOSE
To manage project risk through the timely identification of uncertainties, assessment of
associated risks, and the identification of potential mitigating and/or preventive actions for
execution phases of Banyu Urip Project related to the Oversized Dimension of
Material/Equipment/Machinery delivery from the Tanjung Perak port (Surabaya) or Gresik Port to
Construction site.
2. OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this Risk Assessment are to:
Identify hazard and project risk issues associated with the Road Obstacle and Limitation of
the existing Bridge Height;
Identify mitigations (if any) to achieve acceptable risk.
Propose the mitigation plan to ensure the safety transportation method.
Overview the existing Bridge Straightening and Method Available for the suspected Bridges
3. SCOPE
This Risk Assessment covers Inland Transportation activity in relation to the equipment that be
classified as Critical Over Dimension and Weight Cargo in “Banyu Urip Project”, is taken as the
most critical equipment for inland transport from Gresik Port or Tanjung Perak Port (Surabaya) to
Banyu Urip Project Site.
4. BOUNDARIES
Discussion of the following topics is not included within the study scope:
Political issues;
Commercial issues;
Project schedule risk due to regulatory approvals;
Environmental and Regulatory.
5. RESOURCES
5.1 Participating Project Team Members
1. Stan Kancewick,MCL Site Mgr
2. Randy Breeden,MCL Construction Supt.
3. Liam Steadman,MCL Safety Lead
4. Richard Curnow,MCL Eng. Lead
5. Daniel Turner, MCL Risk & Loss Prevention Specialist
6. Asri Marwah, MCL Risk & Loss Prevention Coordinator
7. Larry Lutz,MCL Safety
8. Donald. K. Reeves, MCL Security Manager
9. Joko Sulistianto, TS Business & Risk Manager
10. Ian John Scott McPhie, TS Construction Manager

Assessment
Rev B
11. Bagus Himawasto, TSConstruction Manager

12. R. Joko Herlambang, TSSite Manager
13. Sarngadharan Raju, TSSafety Manager
14. G. Suharto, Field Service Manager
15. Januar Bramoenantyo, Project Engineer
16. Win AndriansyahYahya, Procurement Leader
17. M. Setiyo Wahyudi, TS Static Engineer Leader
18. Prima Aribowo, TS Electrical Engineer Leader
19. Angelique Sutanto, Civil engineer Leader
20. Filycia R. Wangke, TS Contract/Risk Admin Engineer
5.2 External Participants
-
5.3 Reference Documents

1. IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00003 Transportation Route and Infrastructure Baseline survey Report
2. IDBC-TS-KPZZZC03017- Inland Transport Study For Odc Equipment
6. DATE AND LOCATION

The Risk Assessment session will be held on February 29, 2012 at Tripatra Jakarta Office.
Session hours will be last tentatively from 8.30 am to 4.00 pm.
7. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Sponsor, Bernard T. Bilyk (MCL EPC1 Project Manager)/ Raymond N. Rasfuldi (TS Project
Manager)
1. Approves the Charter.
2. Sponsor or his delegate will assign a responsible person to each action item.
3. Ensure that risk assessment is resourced and performed.
4. Ensure that risk assessment findings are stewarded to closure.
Risk Assessment Leader, Joko Sulistianto (TS Business & Risk Manager/BRM)
1. Obtain Approval of Risk Assessment Charter.
2. As Risk Assessment Facilitator.
3. Distribute pre-reading information to team members.
4. Completion of draft and final reports.
5. Review all final reports and recommendations before approval by Sponsor.
Risk Assessment Facilitator,Joko Sulistianto and Daniel Turner

1. Provide methodology expertise.
2. Facilitate RA process, including issue identification and risk ranking.
3. Promote active participation in the session to ensure comprehensive evaluation.
4. Keep focus, maintain progress.

Assessment
Rev B
5. Support completion of draft and final reports.
Team Members
1. Provide technical expert participation.
8. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Prior to the Risk Assessment Session
Prepare and gain endorsement of Charter from Management.
Prepare and send the presentation, all reference documents including drawings etc to the
Risk Assessment team.
Risk Assessment Session

Review Risk Assessment Objectives.
Review risk assessment process, and techniques to be used. Define risk assessment terms
and level of events to be captured.
Present an overview of the risk assessment matrix. The EMDC risk matrix to be used
(including definitions of Higher, Medium, and Low).
Brainstorm potential impacts.
Develop risk scenario worksheets.
Preliminary draft scenarios will be consolidated, rationalized, modified or deleted.
Scenarios will be risk assessed using a scenario based qualitative risk assessment.
Action items identified by the risk assessment team will be documented to capture any
potential prevention or mitigating measures identified for each scenario.
The risk will be reassessed assuming all action items are implemented.Scenario will then be
risk re-assessed using a scenario based qualitative risk assessment.
Action Items from the risk assessment team will be documented to capture the prevention or
mitigating measures identified for each scenario.
After the Risk Assessment Session

Facilitator will work with RA Lead to complete and distribute draft risk worksheet of scenario
issue.
Facilitator will work with RA Lead to prepare and issue a final report to the Sponsor.
Facilitator will communicate any Zone 1 scenario to Project Executive and Project VP within
30 days after completion of Risk Assessment.
The Sponsor or his delegate will distribute the report to effected parties.
Sponsor or his delegate will assign a responsible person to each action item.
Development of action plans by Project Team as appropriate. The mitigating action plan,
once finalized, will require the approval of higher level risks (Zone 1 risk) by the Project
Executive and medium level risks (Zone 2 risks) by the Senior Project Manager.
A copy of the action plans will be circulated back to Banyu Urip Project stakeholders and
also TS Stakeholders after approval.

Assessment
Rev B
9. AGENDA
TOPIC Presenter Start Time
1. Welcome 08:30 am
Safety Moment Safety
Individual members of team introduce themselves ALL
Present Charter, Review Process, Review Agenda
2. Overview Discussion items/presentations [overview of the
Issues]
3. Risk Assessment Process [30 mins for Overview about the
Risk Assessment]
4. Identifying Hazards/initiating events to be developed into
Scenarios
5. Screening
6. Develop Scenario Sheets
7. Risk Ranking, Action items, Re-assess Risks 4:00 pm
10. DELIVERABLES
Risk Assessment Summary Report (RASR), including:
Executive summary, conclusions;
Risk Assessment scenario sheets with suggested mitigation measures;
Appendices (e.g. basic assumptions, Risk matrix definitions, attendees list, references, risk
assessment charter).
Risk Management Closeout Report (RMCR), including:

The issued RASR for reference;
Approved Action Plans Sign off Sheets With Cover Page, Contents Listing, and Any Overall
Comments
Risk Management Closeout Report (RMCR), Including:

The issued RASR for reference;
Action plans that have been approved by the appropriate level of management;
Risk Assessment Scenario Worksheets with verification that all action items have been
closed.

Assessment
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 1 – GENERAL LAYOUT FOR TRANSPORTATION

ROUTE

Assessment
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 2 – ROAD OBSTACLE

a. CLEARANCE HEIGHT OF BRIDGE
KALITUDU BRIDGE
SEMAR MENDEM BRIDGE

Assessment
Rev B
b. Extreme Turning Radius
Turning extreme at BABAT ROAD
Turning extreme at BABAT ROAD

Assessment
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 3 – LIST SUSPECTED BRIDGE THAT NEED TO BE

COMPLETED BY TEMPORARY SUPPORT
Updated 16 February 2012

Assessment
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 4 – PRELIMINARY DRAWING FOR ODC

TRANSPORTATION ARRANGEMENT
1. Transportation Plan Of Over Dimension Cargo
Updated 16 November 2012

Assessment
Rev B
Update 16 February 2012

Charter for ODC Transportation Risk Assessment
23 February 2012
BANYU URIP PROJECT Rev B
MPI: Not Classified Page 14 of 22
2. Example for equipment transportation arrangement
Substation Building < 9 M

23 February 2012

Back Up Power Generator

23 February 2012

Sulfur Degassing

23 February 2012
HP Production Separator

23 February 2012
HP KO Drum

23 February 2012
Package Boiler

23 February 2012
Substation Building < 9 M

Charter for ODC Transportation Risk IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005
Assessment 23 February 2012
BANYU URIP
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 5 – RISK MATRIX
PROBABILITY Probability Definitions
A B C D E Category Definition Working Definition
C A Possibility of 20 or more times per facility

O I 1 1 1 2 2 Repeated life or 5 or more times during
N Incidents PROJECT/D&C
S B
E Possibility of 5 times in facility life or once
II 1 1 2 2 2 Isolated during PROJECT/D&C
Q
U Incidents
E C Possibility of Once in facility life cycle or
N III 1 2 2 3 3 Occurring 10% likelihood during
C Sometime PROJECT/D&C
E D Not Likely to 10% likelihood of occurring
S IV 2 3 3 3 3 Occur once in facility life or 1%
likelihood during
PROJECT/D&C
E Practically Once in 100 or more facility
Impossible lives or 0.1% likelihood during
PROJECT/D&C
Consequence Health/Safety Environmental Public Disruption Financial Impact

Category
I Fatalities/Serious Potential Widespread, Significant Public Corporate
Impact on Public Long Term, Significant Disruption More than 50 USMD
One or more fatality Adverse Effect. Impact on a large scale loss of assets or 4
and communicated by month delay
national/international
media.
II Serious Injury to Potential Localized, Small Public Disruption Region/Affiliate

Personnel/Limited Medium Term, Impact on public is Between 2 and 50
Impact on Public Significant Adverse limited, attracts national USMD, or 2 month delay
Severe but non-fatal Effect. media.
Medical Treatment for Potential Short Term Public complaint. Division/Site

III Minor Adverse Effect.
Personnel/No Impact Isolated impact, one time Between 2 USMD and
on Public local media coverage. 500 USKD, or 2 week
Lost Time Incident delay
(LTI)
Minor Impact on Inconsequential or No Public Compliant without Other

IV adverse Effect.
Personnel local media coverage. Less than 500 USKD or
First aid only less than a week delay

Charter for ODC Transportation Risk IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005
Assessment 23 February 2012
BANYU URIP
Rev B
ATTACHMENT 6 – SCENARIO WORKSHEET

Hazard Scenario no:
Risk Matrix
A B C D E Legend
II E = Environmental
III P= Public Disruption
F = Financial
IV
No action items recommended

Potential Causes:
Consequences:
Assumed Safeguards
Risk Before
HS= E= P= F=
Risk After
HS= E= P= F=
Comments:

APPENDIX III – LIST OF PARTICIPANT
APPENDIX IV – PRESENTATIONS
APPENDIX V – BRAINSTORMING SESSIONS
1. Bridges collapse/failures
2. Stuck load which can’t go through the road/bridge
3. Permit issues/delays
4. Truck/vessel breakdown
5. Lashing failures
6. Human error i.e.: driver, flagmen, escort
7. Obstacles appear after the survey
8. Measurement error includes weight capacity, length and height
9. As built equipment dimension exceeds drawing dimension includes weight, length
10. Government maintenance of the road during project’s transport
11. Road failures ie: road weight limit is less than transport ground pressure
12. Demonstration block the road
13. Rainy season causes problem on bridges strengthening/construction
14. Flood, lightning, wind
15. Accident on the road
16. Traffic control
17. Emergency traffic
18. Modification of affected houses or required purchase/rent land
19. Overnight delay cause not reached staging area/temporary parking area
20. Failure to coordinate removal of obstacle prior to transport
21. Sabotage/terrorist attack
22. Public disruption during transport
23. Unavailable specific vessel/trailer
24. Obstacles not considered during the survey
25. Emergency response
26. Accident with our vehicles
Brainstorm hazards categorized into potential scenarios:
Infrastructure failures
1. Bridges collapse/failures
2. Road failures i.e.: road weight limit is less than transport ground pressure
3. Damages the road
Obstacles encountered during transport

4. Obstacles appear after the survey
5. Measurement error includes weight capacity, length and height
6. As built equipment dimension exceeds drawing dimension includes weight, length
7. Government maintenance of the road during project’s transport
8. Demonstration block the road
9. Accident on the road
10. Stuck load which can’t go through the road/bridge – (consequence)
11. Failure to coordinate removal of obstacle prior to transport
12. Obstacles not considered during the survey
13. Traffic control
14. Flood, lightning, wind
15. Emergency traffic
Accidents
16. Truck/vessel breakdown
17. Lashing failures
18. Human error i.e.: driver, flagmen, escort
19. Accident with our vehicles
20. Overnight delay cause not reached staging area/temporary parking area – (consequence)
21. Emergency response – (safeguards)
Planning
22. Permit issues/delays
23. Rainy season causes problem on bridges strengthening/construction
24. Unavailable specific vessel/trailer
25. Modification of affected houses or required purchase/rent land
Parking Lot
1. Jl. Gotong Royong intersection needs to be worked, to avoid the need to relocate residents
2. To details schedule and prioritize the strengthening of the bridges:
a. Permit issues and validity of permit i.e.: 6-12 months? and allow for permit extension.
b. Permit approval process is not expected to begin until engineering design/drawing is
complete. Ensure sufficient time is allowed for approval.
c. To confirm whether TS or 3rd party or government to calculate the bridges modification
design.
d. Timing of the rainy season for the construction/strengthening.
e. Acceptability of modification remaining in place for a long time.
f. Piling in dry season and modification in different season.
g. Why is the material fabrication duration so long?
h. Prioritize the bridges do the weakest first.
i. Add to the schedule of rebuild/reconstruction for affected houses/public facilities.
3. To get latest information on the equipments from procurement prior to issue PO to selected
vendor.
4. Terrorist attack – security needs to be aware of project activities.

Transportation pROCEDURE

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Transportation pROCEDURE

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IDBC-TS-FRRSK-000003

ODC Transportation Risk Assessment Summary

REVISION MODIFICATION LOG

Revision Section Description

A All Issued for Review

B All Issued for Approval

0 All Issued for Use

1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4

3. Individual Scenario ........................................................................................................................ 8

1.1 Work Process Summary

1.2 Results Summary

2. RISK AND ACTION ITEM SUMMARY

Risk Ranking Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Risk Profile after Implementation of Action Items

Risk Summary by Scenario

Risk Risk Risk Risk

2 Obstacles are encountered during transport, causing

3 An accident occurs during transport, causing potential

4 Planning failure causes delay in transport. II-C (F) 2 II-D (F) 2

Hazard Scenario no: 1

1. Survey the shoulders of the transport route

Hazard Scenario no: 2

Hazard Scenario no: 3

Factors affecting Consequence or Probability:

Hazard Scenario no: 4

APPENDIX I RISK MATRIX

PROBABILITY Probability Definitions

A B C D E Category Definition Working Definition

C A Possibility of 20 or more times per facility

Consequence Health/Safety Environmental Public Disruption Financial Impact

Medical Treatment Potential Short Term Public complaint. Division/Site

Minor Impact on Inconsequential or No Public Compliant without Other

REVISION MODIFICATION LOG

Revision Section Description

A All Issued for Internal Review

B All Issued for Approval

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

Attachment 1 – GENERAL LAYOUT FOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTE.......................................... 8

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

11. Bagus Himawasto, TSConstruction Manager

5.3 Reference Documents

6. DATE AND LOCATION

7. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Risk Assessment Facilitator,Joko Sulistianto and Daniel Turner

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

5. Support completion of draft and final reports.

8. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Risk Assessment Session

After the Risk Assessment Session

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

Risk Management Closeout Report (RMCR), including:

Risk Management Closeout Report (RMCR), Including:

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

ATTACHMENT 1 – GENERAL LAYOUT FOR TRANSPORTATION

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

ATTACHMENT 2 – ROAD OBSTACLE

SEMAR MENDEM BRIDGE

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

b. Extreme Turning Radius

Turning extreme at BABAT ROAD

Turning extreme at BABAT ROAD

IDBC-TS-KRZZZ-C00005 Charter For ODC Transportation Risk Assessment

ATTACHMENT 3 – LIST SUSPECTED BRIDGE THAT NEED TO BE