Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/340460304
CITATIONS READS
0 17
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Theoretical Analysis of Seepage through Homogeneous and Non-homogeneous Saturated-Unsaturated Soil View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Mahmood Gazey Jassam on 06 April 2020.
111
place and vice versa. Therefore, the location of the Table (1) coordinates of the study area for dam
leakage line in the downstream shell is efficiently
pulled off, it is necessary that at least permeability has Name East Northing
some hundred equivalent permeability. (Karampoor
A 540940 3797320
and Riazi, 2015).
The soil on the downstream sides of some hydraulic B 540613 3796029
structures get lifted up under effect of piping
phenomena, that’s due to excess pressure of water
exert from the soil as a result of water seepage.The Figure (1) location of reservoir of Al wand dam
interaction between soils and percolating water has
many valuable affecting in the following actions:
1- Design of foundations and earth slope.
2- Volume of water loss from a dam by
percolation, or fail of sub soil foundation due
to piping which are quite common. In case of
slope stability, the seepage force is a very
important, shear strengths of soils reduced
with respect to increase of neutral stress
(pore pressures).
Therefore, well understanding of hydraulic conditions
is essential for structure design. The computation of
seepage loss via a dam includes uplift pressures The overall features for ALWand dam according to
caused by the water on the base of a dam, and effect of table (2)
seepage on the stability of earth slopes, which can be Table (2): overall features to Al Wand dam.
studied by constructing flow nets (Murthy, 2003).
111
Shell Dry density 2.11
gm/cm3
Hydraulic 0.072
conductivity m/days
16
14
Gypsum 0.91%
Elevation
12
10 4m
8 6m
Cobbles 10% 6
4
2
Gravel 60%
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Distance
Sand 25%
Figure (3) phreatic line and seepage quantity to
Silt 3% Al Wand dam for 14 m water head
Clay 2%
111
20 20
8m 8m
18 18
1.4565e-006 m³/days
1.2081e-006 m³/days
16
16
14
Elevation
14
Elevation
12
12 10 4m
10 4m 8 6m
8 6m 6
6 4
4 2
2 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Distance
Distance Figure (7) Velocity vectors and seepage line when
Figure (4) phreatic line and seepage quantity to Al reduced a core thickness (5 m) and water head 11 m
Wand dam for 14 m water head
20
8m
18
20
5.948e-007 m³/days
16
8m
18 14
Elevation
4.7228e-007 m³/days
16 12
14 10 4m
Elevation
12 8 6m
10 4m 6
8 6m 4
6 2
0
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
2
0
Distance
Distance
reduced a core thickness (5 m) and water head 7 m
Figure (5) phreatic line and seepage quantity to Al
Wand dam for 14 m water head
12
10
8 6m
4m and change the water levels in the reservoir. It can
conclude from the results that are a small change in
6
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
the seepage discharge due to replacing the filter by the
Distance
shell.
Figure (6) Velocity vectors and seepage line when
reduced a core thickness (5 m) and water head 14 m
111
20
8m
The program SEEP/W (which is a sub-program of Geo-
18
Studio) version 2012 used to calculate amount of
1.5918e-005 m³/days
16
14
seepage through dam body for steady state case to
Elevation
12
10 4m different water head in upstream. It is concluded that
8 6m
6 the quantity of seepage was small affected when
reducing the thickness of core. In addition, the seepage
4
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 discharge is a small change when replacing the filter
Distance by the shell.
Figure (10) seepage quantity when the dam is
without filters and the head of water at (14 m) REFERENCES
16
14
Journal of advanced structures and
Elevation
12
10
8 6m
4m
Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 4,
6
4
No.03, pp158- 164.
2 2- Mohammadi, M., Barani, G. A.,
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Ghaderi, k. and Haghighatandish, S.
Distance (2013), "Optimization of earth dams
Figure (11) seepage quantity when the dam is
clay core dimensions using
without filters and the head of water at (11 m) evolutionary algorithms" European
20
8m
Journal of Experimental Vol. 3, No. 3,
PP. 350-361
18
4.8489e-007 m³/days
16
14
3- Murth, V. N. S., (2003), "Principles
Elevation
12
10
8 6m
4m
and practices of soil mechanic and
6
4
foundation engineering" 10th edition
2
0
publishing in the United States of
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
America.
Distance
4- Majeed, Q. G., (2015), "Flow and
Figure (12) seepage quantity when the dam is
deformation analysis of zoned earth
without filters and the head of water at (7m) dam by the finite element method"
Diyala Journal of Engineering
Sciences, Vol. 08, No. 03, PP. 38-62
5- Karampoor, F. and Riazi, R. (2015) ,
" investigation the effect of clay core
in seepage from non-homogenous
earth dams using SEEP/W Model"
Journal of scientific research and
development 2(5) pp. 280 285.
6- Irzooki, R. H., (2016), ″Computation
of Seepage through homogenous
Figure (13) Relationship between seepage quantity & earth dam with horizontal Toe drain
head of water in the reservoir when the dam is with & ״Eng. and Tech. Journal. Vol. 34, No.
without core 3, PP. 430-440.
121