Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[Bedarfsermittlung 2019-2030
Bestätigung, Netzentwicklungsplan Strom]
Geometry
domain
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
Topology, shape, and size optimization of transmission towers
algorithm
Faculty of Civil Engineering / Marat Khodzhaiev
Dresden // 24.02.2020
Slide 6
Design objectives
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm 0 yen/m2 3000 yen/m2 6000 yen/m2
[Taniwaki, 2004
[Mathakary, ]
2007]
Design • Non-parametric
objectives • Parametric
Geometry
domain
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
[Shea, 1997]
Optimization
algorithm
[Kiessling, 2014]
Design Parametrization:
objectives • tower
• segment
Geometry • subsegment
domain • arms
Design • panels
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design Geometry:
objectives • Electrical clearances
Structural:
Geometry • Slenderness
domain • Buckling resistance
Design • Tensile resistance
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design Geometry:
objectives • Electrical clearances
• Angles between members
Geometry Structural:
domain • Slenderness
Design • Buckling resistance
variables • Tensile resistance
Design
constraints
> °
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design Geometry:
objectives • Electrical clearances
• Angles between members
Geometry • Engineering assumptions
domain
Design Structural:
variables • Slenderness
• Buckling resistance
Design • Tensile resistance
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design Geometry:
objectives • Electrical clearances
• Angles between members
Geometry • Engineering assumptions
domain
Design Structural:
variables • Slenderness
• Tensile resistance
Design • Buckling resistance
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design
variables
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Design • Non-convex
objectives • Discrete
Geometry Stochastic optimization:
domain • Genetic algorithm
Design • Simulated annealing
variables
Objective value
Design
constraints
Structural
analysis
Optimization
algorithm
Parameter axis
Topology, shape, and size optimization of transmission towers
Faculty of Civil Engineering / Marat Khodzhaiev Slide 21
Dresden // 24.02.2020
Approach
Start
Design Input
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Size
optimization
Output
optimal
geometry
Finish
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Subproblem 1 Size
optimization
Freeze
Next
optimal
subproblem
geometry
IF next
subproblem
TRUE available
FALSE
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Subproblem 1 Size
optimization
Freeze
Next
optimal
subproblem
geometry
IF next
subproblem
TRUE available
FALSE
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Subproblem 1 Size
optimization
Freeze
Next
optimal
subproblem
geometry
IF next
subproblem
TRUE available
FALSE
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Subproblem 1 Size
optimization
Freeze
Next
optimal
subproblem
geometry
IF next
subproblem
TRUE available
FALSE
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Subproblem 1 Size
optimization
Freeze
Next
optimal
subproblem
geometry
IF next
subproblem
TRUE available
FALSE
Generation
population Setting fittest
individual a
new parent
For each
individual: TRUE
Size IF
optimization the objective
of the fittest is smaller
of the parent
FALSE
Search for
the fittest
individual
Generation
population Setting fittest
individual a
new parent
For each
individual: TRUE
Size IF
optimization the objective
of the fittest is smaller
of the parent
FALSE
Search for 54
the fittest
individual 20 20
1 5
Generation 100
population Setting fittest
individual a
new parent
For each
individual: TRUE
Size IF
optimization the objective
of the fittest is smaller 138 120 103 96 108
of the parent
FALSE
Search for 54
the fittest
individual 20 20
1 5
Generation 96
population Setting fittest
individual a
new parent
For each
individual: TRUE
Size IF
optimization the objective
of the fittest is smaller
of the parent
FALSE
Search for
50
the fittest
individual 20 20
5 5
Generation 96
population Setting fittest
individual a
new parent
For each
individual: TRUE
Size IF
optimization the objective
of the fittest is smaller 118 105 108 109 116
of the parent
FALSE
Search for
50
the fittest
individual 20 20
5 5
Geometry
input
Wind load
generation
Structural
calculation by
FEAPpv
Sizing
optimization of
members
Evaluation
of cost
Cost
output
Start
Design Input
Problem subdividing
Layout
optimization
Size
optimization
Output
optimal
geometry
Finish
• Real-life example
• Double circuit 110 kV
• 40 load combination
• Acceptable initial geometry
Subproblem 5
1
2
3
4
• Number of generations: 10
• Population size: 300
• Execution time: 2 hours
Usage
100%
Initial
80%
60%
40%
Optimized
20%
Initial Optimized
Usage
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
max
Q3
Q2
average
Q1
min max
min
120
550
115
500
110
450
105
400
100
95 350
1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8
1600 1600
1200 1200
800 1790 800 1410
400 10 900 300 400 135 555 690 195 15
0 0
Number of individuals Number of individuals
Topology, shape, and size optimization of transmission towers
Faculty of Civil Engineering / Marat Khodzhaiev Slide 46
Dresden // 24.02.2020
Conclusions
Further research
• Varying outer shape
• More complex topologies
• Member joints
• Multi-processor implementation
• Other optimization algorithms
[pxhere.com]