Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOLIDS
COURSE PROJECT
YOUNG’S MODULUS
OF DIFFERENT DUCTILE
MATERIALS
MEMBERS INVOLVED
17071A0301
17071A0302
17071A0303
17071A0304
17071A0305
17071A0306
INDEX
CHAPTER 1 : Abstract
CHAPTER 2 : Introduction
CHAPTER 3 : Literature review
CHAPTER 4 : Methodology
CHAPTER 5 : Experimentation
CHAPTER 6 : Results & Discussions
CHAPTER 7 : Conclusion &References
Aerospace Industry
Automotive Industry
Beverage Industry
Construction Industry
Electrical and Electronics Industry
Medical Device Industry
Packaging Industry
Paper and Board Industry
Pharmaceuticals Industry
Plastics, Rubber and Elastomers Industry
Safety, Health, Fitness and Leisure Industry
Textiles Industry
LITERATURE REVIEW
The knowledge of elastic constant of materials is
indispensable for structure design and quality control
purposes. Thus its determination is of utmost
importance to all engineering applications. The Young’s
modulus or modulus of elasticity E is the property
which describes the deformation behavior of a
material or structure under loading. Materials deform
differently when loads are applied, and the
relationship between stress and strain is typically
defined by the Young’s modulus. The ability of any
material to resist or transmit load is important, and
this property is often used to determine if a particular
material is suitable for a specific purpose. The value of
elastic constants can be experimentally determined by
different methods. But whereas we find it by using
universal tensile testing machine. For general
engineering applications static methods are widely
utilized by engineers and scientist. Mostly, the Young’s
modulus E is derived from the slope of the linear part
of the stress-strain curve during uniaxial tensile testing.
For getting accurate values of E, the strain data should
be reasonably accurate which is generally obtained
from either using foil strain gages or clip-on
extensometers. However, the use of strain gages and
extensometers is sometimes limited because of cost
involved, and the size and shape of specimen under
test. Beside this traditional technique, several other
methods are documented in literature for accurate
determination of Young’s modulus (E) of materials.
One is ultrasonic pulse-echo technique [1]-[3]. In this
method, an ultrasonic beam is generated by a
transducer which is attached to the measured
materials. By measuring the sound velocity in the
medium, the elastic properties can be determined. The
other is the resonance method [4], [5]. By measuring
the resonant frequency, elastic properties can be
calculated because resonant frequency is related to
the structure’s geometry as well as the elastic
properties. Indentation methods (micro and nano) are
also widely adopted for determining young’s modulus
where value of E is determined directly from
indentation load and displacement data obtained
during one cycle of loading and unloading [6]-[11]. This
method is very famous because relatively small
amounts of testing materials are needed and there are
no strict requirements for sample shape. Some authors
have also successfully used nondestructive Eddy
Current technique (combined a/c and d/c magnetic
fields) to evaluate Young’s modulus of solids .
METHODOLOGY
A universal testing machine was used to conduct the
tests on the given specimens. we took a gauge length
of 20cm (from center offset a distance of 10cm to the
right and left)and left a equal length on both sides. A
high precision load cell with a capacity of 20 kN is
used for recording the load. The ends of the
specimens were carefully mounted in the wedge grips
of the machine to make sure that the specimen is
aligned and centered .The specimens were loaded in
tension to failure at a crosshead strain rate to ensure
steady deformation and recorded easily. When
loading, the whole test process was carefully recorded
by the force/displacement curves and final damage
pictures were obtained using manual photographing.
After the completion of the experiment we measured
the diameter of the specimen, elongation and necking
diameter too.
Generally a manual UTM having two operating valves,
the left valve is used to release the hydraulic oil
pressure after conducting every test and the right
valve is used to gradually increase the hydraulic oil
pressure.
.
EXPERIMENTATION
The specimens used are mild steel, copper &
aluminium.
The specimen of mild steel contains
0.05%carbon making it malleable and ductile.
young’s modulus of mild steel is about 190-
210GPa.Length of the specimen taken is
50cm.
The specimen of copper is ductile and electric
conductivity. The young’s modulus of copper
is 115-130GPa. Length of the specimen taken
is 49cm
The specimen of aluminium have high thermal
conductivity, low density. Young’s modulus of
aluminium is about 70GPa .The length of
specimen taken is 43cm.
We took about 200 mm gauge length and
remaining to fit in jaws.
Now the gauge length is 20 cm so divide it
into 10 parts each of 2cm.mark them with the
dot punch.
Now place the specimen in the grips.
Hold the grips tightly , and apply the load
uniformly such that the rate of increase of
stress on the specimen is not more than
1kg/mm2 .
Now on further loading the specimen reaches
the yield load indicated by stopping of load on
dial of the machine.
The yield stress is noted on further loading
the load reaches maximum value called
ultimate load.
After reaching the ultimate load ,the load
pointer moves back very fast and the
specimen breaks at some point called
breaking load ,which is to be noted on hearing
,the breaking sound of the specimen.
References ;
[1] N. Parveen and G. V. S. Murthy, “Determination of elastic
modulus in nickel alloy from ultrasonic measurements”, Bull.
Mater. Sci., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 323–326, April 2011
[2] Q. M. Wang and L. Eric Cross, “Determination of Young’s
modulus of the reduced layer of a piezoelectric RAINBOW
actuator”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 5358-5363, 1998
[3] L. kiesewetter, J.M. Zhang, D. Houdeau and A.
Steckenborn, “Determination of Young’s Moduli of
micromechanical thin films using the resonance method”,
Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 153-159, Dec. 1992
[4] J. Gubicza, “Determination of Young’s Modulus from
depth sensing Vickers Indentation Tests”, Solid. State.
Phenom, vol. 56, pp. 195- 200, 1997
[5] T. Rio, Go´mez-Del, P. Poza and J. Rodrı´guez,
“Micromechanical characterization of Al 8090/SiC composites
by nanoindentation”, J. Mater. Sci., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1513-
1515, 2005
[6] T. Kwaaitaal and A. J. G. Schoofs, “Determination of
Young's Modulus or Poisson's Ratio Using Eddy Currents”,
Exp. Mech., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 450-455, March 1979