Professional Documents
Culture Documents
beam; Ee and Ie are the same quantities for the cable; and m This equation originally applies to an external axial com-
·July 1994. Vol. 120. No.7. by M. Saiidi. B. Douglas. and S. Feng pressive force that maintains its original line of action during
(Technical note 4625). the vibration of the member, thus being converted into an ec-
·Res. Asst.• Univ. of Ancona. Via Breece Bianche. 60131. Ancona.
Italy. 6Prof.. Dept of Arch.• Tech. Univ. of Budapest. Budapest. Hungary.
sProf.• Univ. of Ancona. Via Breece Bianche. 60131. Ancona. Italy. H-1521.
installing inaccuracies the tendons, even in such cases, will "COMPRESSION SOFTENING" EFFECT DUE TO
press against the wall of the duct and follow deformations of PRESTRESS FORCE
the member. This way, to the contrary of (1), prestressing force
An externally applied compressive axial force softens a
could not reduce natural frequency of the member in either beam laterally, i.e., the lateral deflections due to lateral loads
case. increase, and the natural frequencies of vibration decrease.
This was corroborated by the tests: in the case of the This is well known. However, the results cannot be applied to
bridge, as the prestress force decreased, natural frequency the situation in which the axial force is applied by prestressing
reduced slightly; in the case of the beam, increasing of the cables that are themselves anchored to the end faces of the
prestressing force went together with the escalating of the beam, making the axial force an internal force of the system.
natural frequency. Perhaps the best way to illustrate the difference in the two
The authors attribute this event to the formation of initial situations is to derive the first natural frequency by the energy
microcracks on the members-principally due to shrinkage. method.
Prestressing force closed these cracks, accordingly increasing As the fundamental mode shape of a simply supported uni-
stiffness of the members. Authors even determined extent of form beam, with and without the axial force, is sinusoidal, one
this on the basis of the measured natural frequency values and can obtain an exact value of fundamental frequency by equat-
by means of (1) (Table 2 and Fig. 6). From the calculated ing the maximum kinetic energy to the maximum potential
results, they developed a linear relationship between prestress energy under free vibration. Consider a simply supported uni-
force and rigidity without setting limits to the validity of such form beam with externally applied axial force, N (Fig. 7), un-
dependence. dergoing free vibration in the first mode. Let E be the modulus
In the opinion of the discusser, this method of calculation of elasticity; I, moment of inertia of the beam cross section;
is erroneous. Fig. 5, demonstrating the relationship between m, mass per unit length; L, span of the beam; and 00, first
prestressing force and deflection under static load, reflects the natural frequency. The beam deflection, v(x, t), under the first
effect of the prestressing force free from distortions. mode may be expressed as
According to the calculations of the discusser, cracks de-
veloped on the test beam prior to prestressing due to shrinkage, v(x, t) =A sin ( ; ) sin wt (11)
weight of the beam, and dynamic action that goes together
with the moving of the unit. (This is also confirmed by the where A = amplitude of vibration at midspan. Kinetic energy
technical note.) With the increase of prestressing force, these during the vibration may be expressed as
cracks gradually closed, the neutral axis moved, and the bend-
1 av()2 1
ing stiffness grew. The middle section reached decompression
L
L
KE = - m - dx = - mw 2A 2L cos2wt (12)
state under self-weight plus 247 N (55.5 lb) concentrated load o 2 at 4
at about 36 kN (8.1 kips) prestressing force, but to close the
Potential energy in the beam is due to flexural deformation
cracks totally required more prestressing force because of the minus the work done by the externally applied force due to
bonding between reinforcing steel and concrete (a reversed the movement of the two ends of the beam (Housner and Vree-
tension stiffening effect) and the uneven face of the cracks. land 1983) and is given by
Beyond 72 kN (16 kips), prestressing force stiffness of the
member did not grow further. PE = LL ! EI (a2~)2 dx _ N LL !2 (av)2 dx
On the strength of the aforerelated, in the opinion of the o 2 ax 0 ax
discusser, the following conclusions can be drawn regarding
members with tendons following deformations of the member.
4 2
2 2
'TT NA ). 2
'TT EIA
In the case of uncracked units or closed cracks, prestressing = ( ~-~ smoot
(13)
force does not seriously control stiffness of the member, con-
sequently, magnitude of the prestressing force cannot be in- Equating maximum kinetic energy to maximum potential en-
ferred from natural frequency. ergy, one obtains
It is, on the other hand, possible to check prestressing force
by measuring the unit's natural frequency in a cracked state. (14)
This, however, requires command of accurate information
about the weight of the member; of the concrete's dynamic Now consider the free vibration of a simply supported beam
modulus of elasticity; and the application of a calculation
method that will determine the position of the neutral axis with 'Visiting Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Mich-
igan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125; On leave from, Dept. of Civ. Engrg.,
great accuracy, considers effect of the tension zone between Indian Inst. of Techno!., Kanpur 208 016, India.
cracks, and allows for the variation of stiffness along the span "Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., 2340 G.G. Brown Bldg., Univ.
of the member. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125.
-x
homogeneous, uncracked elements. The equation by Dall' Asta
and Dezi implies an extreme degree of accuracy by including
even the moment of inertia of the prestressing cable. When
this term is neglected, the equation shows the same trend as
that in (1), although to a lesser extent. The theoretical deri-
FIG. 7. Free Vibration of a Simply Supported Beam with Exter- vation by Jain and Gool shows that vibration frequency of
nally Applied Axial Compression Force
prestressed beams is independent of prestress force, giving the
discussers the impression that compression stiffening cannot
A: . __ --~-t exist.
paper and those reported by Hop (1991) also support the com-
pression stiffening effect. Closing of microcracks is not mod-
(b) eled by the equations presented by the discussers and, for this
reason, the equations presented are more of theoretical nature
FIG. 8. (a) Free Vibration of a Simply Supported Beam with and they cannot explain the observed response.
Prestressing Force; (b) End of Beam with Internal Forces due to
Prestressing
APPENDIX. REFERENCE
with prestress force (Fig. 8). The deflection under first mode Hop, T. (1991). "The effect of degree of prestressing and age of concrete
of vibration is given by (11) and the kinetic energy is same beams on frequency and damping of their free vibration." Mat. and
Struct., 24, 210-220.
as given by (12). Since there is now no externally applied axial
force, the second term in (13), which corresponds to work
done by the external force, does not appear. By equating the
maximum kinetic energy to the maximum potential energy,
one obtains the expression for fundamental natural frequency
of beam with the prestress force as DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF
002 - -rr4EI
_ _ SLAB-TYPE BRIDGES
8
(15)
- mL4