Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It would be needless to say that quicker and more accurate tsunami fore-
casting (information) is important for mitigating the loss of life and injury.
If when and where a tsunami will come can be known in advance, tak-
ing appropriate evacuation action would become easy. Conversely, without
this kind of information, mistaken actions can easily occur. Because the
behavior of tsunamis changes in a complex manner due to effect of coastal
topography, numerical models obtained analytically on the basis of simple
assumptions are inadequate. In order to know the actual behavior of a tsu-
nami and estimate the height of the tsunami, it is necessary to predict the
propagation of the tsunami in a way that fully incorporates the seafloor
topography. The only method for achieving this is a simulation using the
actual initial waveform of the tsunami and topographical data. Research
activities which are conscious of tsunami forecasting have been carried out
since around 1983, and the possibility of practical tsunami simulations was
first pointed out after seafloor topographical data was started to be col-
lected off Japan’s Sanriku coast. One work has shown that the maximum
water level distribution can be reproduced with accuracy within an error
of 20% when the rupture process (fault model) in past earthquakes is rela-
tively well understood (Shuto et al., 1988).
b.
439
tion time becomes an important study item, on the same level as accuracy.
Another approach to tsunami prediction is to perform computations for a
large number of cases giving initial values in advance, rather than attempt-
ing to predict the tsunami in real time, and to accumulate the results in a
database for future utilization. Because simulations are performed before
an earthquake occurs, this approach relieves the constraint of computa-
tional speed, and there is a plenty of time for calculation. Information on a
variety of behaviors can be obtained by simulations, including the time of
arrival at object areas, the height of the 1st wave, the maximum wave, the
duration of the tsunami, the flow velocity field, and so on. These informa-
tions are quite useful not only for evacuations but also for mitigating vari-
ous tsunami disasters.
On the other hand, the earthquake and tsunami observation network
has gradually been expanded, making it possible to carry out detailed
investigations of the actual condition of tsunamis. As a result, it has gradu-
ally been pointed out that the tsunami wave source estimated from a fault
model by seismic wave analysis does not necessarily coincide with the wave
source estimated from tsunami observation or investigation. Recently, the
importance of dynamic fault motion, which had been ignored until now in
tsunami simulations, has also been pointed out. Furthermore, precise esti-
b.
mation of the tsunami source area in real time is also a difficult task. Study
of a real-time method of tsunami forecasting which integrates simulation
and the tsunami observation network was begun in order to solve these
problems. Provided that the attacking tsunami can actually be captured
directly by offshore observation, it should be possible to use that data as
input information for a reliable tsunami simulation, even when the fault
motion and wave source have some unknown factors, and further even
when it is a tsunami caused by phenomena other than earthquakes. This
requires that numerical forecast is performed simultaneously with real-
time observation using an advanced tsunami monitoring system, where
much more improvement is made with regard to the location of tsunami
meters (GPS buoys), their number, and so forth.
References
Imamura, F. and Goto, C. (1986): Truncation error in numerical simulation by the finite
Tsunami Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
difference method, Journals of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, No. 375/II-6,
pp. 241–250. (in Japanese)
Imamura, F. and Goto, C. (1988): Truncation error in numerical simulation by the finite
difference method, Coastal Engineering in Japan, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 245–263.
Shuto, N., Goto, C. and Imamura, F. (1988): Use of numerical simulation in tsunami fore-
casting and warning, Journals of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, No. 393/II-9,
pp. 181–189. (in Japanese)
IOC (1997): Numerical method of tsunami simulation with the leap-frog scheme, IUGG/
IOC TIME Project, Manual and Guides 35, SC-97/WS-37.
b.
nami propagated across the Pacific Ocean, reaching Japan on the opposite
side, it was a “remote tsunami.” Because local tsunamis occur close to the
focus of the earthquake, the ground motion caused by the earthquake can
frequently be felt by residents along the coast, whereas in remote tsunamis,
it is impossible to feel the ground motion due to the distance from the
center of the earthquake.
In local tsunamis, rapid evacuation is indispensable because the time
from occurrence to arrival of the tsunami is short. Therefore, in forecasts
for local tsunamis, the response from the occurrence of the earthquake to
issuance and transmission of the tsunami forecast must be rapid. The key
point is how to minimize the time required for this.
On the other hand, in the case of remote tsunamis, there is a consider-
able time between the occurrence of the tsunami and its arrival. Therefore,
in forecasts for remote tsunamis, the highest priority is not to shorten the
time required to issue the forecast. Rather, because remote tsunamis prop-
agate over an extremely large area, it is critically important to strengthen
the earthquake observation system and create a network that evaluates the
risk of tsunamis more accurately and based thereon, ensures proper trans-
mission of warnings by cooperation between coastal nations, correspond-
ing to the process of occurrence and propagation of tsunamis.
b.
giant tsunamis in the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster of March 2011,
which caused an unprecedented disaster, and will also introduce the efforts
to improve tsunami warning based on those issues.
Agency). In the initial stage of forecasting work, the arrival times of earth-
quake P and S waves observed at various earthquake monitoring points
were transmitted by telephone or telegram to the central tsunami forecast-
ing office, where the focus and magnitude of the earthquake were deter-
mined manually using maps, charts, pencils, compasses, rulers, and certain
types of calculators. The person in charge then judged whether or not a
tsunami would occur by referring to a “Tsunami forecasting diagram” pre-
pared empirically based on past data in such a way that the possibility of a
tsunami could be judged from the relationship among the intensity of the
earthquake, duration of the initial tremor, and total amplitude. On aver-
age, the time until forecasts were issued was around 17 minutes. Further,
only means available to communicate the resultant judgment to the region
where the tsunami attack was expected were telegram and telephone.
To shorten the time required to issue tsunami forecasts, first, the Japan
Meteorological Agency (JMA) improved the communications network for
collecting earthquake observation data, automated data processing, etc. in
order to speed up the process of determining the focus and magnitude of
earthquakes as far as possible. As a result, the time required for tsunami
forecasts was reduced to approximately 14 minutes in 1980. Three years
later, when the Nihonkai-Chubu Earthquake occurred on May 26, 1983,
b.
(3) Problems of tsunami warnings during the 2011 off the Pacific
Tsunami Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Number of classes of tsunami height used in Height of tsunami is expressed by a qualitative Higher value in the forecast class is used as the
tsunami warnings was changed from 8 to 5 (not numerical) expression when there is large forecast tsunami height.
levels. uncertainty in estimation of earthquake scale.
Fig. 6.2 Classification of tsunami warnings and expressions/classes used in tsunami height forecasts
Tsunami Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Transmission of data
Seismic intensity data
Data processing/transmission system
Seismic intensity observation facilities ○ Collection of observation data
○ Preparation/announcement of
Approx. 240 locations emergency earthquake bulletins
Seismic
Emergency earthquake
5 hours after the earthquake, residents did not feel the earthquake in any
way, and did not know (i.e., were not informed) that a large earthquake had
occurred in the Aleutian Islands. Children playing along the coast sensed
that something was strange about the sea and immediately told their par-
ents, but because it was April Fool’s Day, their parents did not heed the
warning. It is said that this contributed to the heavy loss of life.
As a result of this experience, the United States established the Pacific
Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) in 1949 as a tsunami warning orga-
nization, centering on the Coast and Geodetic Survey (CGS). However,
because this was a domestic system in the US, there was no cooperation
among the various countries around the Pacific Ocean during the Chilean
Tsunami Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
was approved at the 1999 meeting of the ICG/ITSU. Since March 2005, the
JMA has provided “northwestern Pacific tsunami information” to the vari-
ous related countries around the northwestern Pacific Ocean as the North-
west Pacific Tsunami Advisory Center (NWPTAC). NWPTAC provides
information to 11 nations as of August 2012. This “northwestern Pacific
tsunami information” is issued when an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or
greater occurs in the northwestern Pacific region, and comprises the time
when the earthquake occurred, the location of the earthquake focus, the
magnitude of the earthquake, the estimated possibility of a tsunami, and
when there is a possibility of a tsunami, the estimated arrival time and
predicted height of the tsunami at points on the coast. The “northwest-
Tsunami Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
ern Pacific tsunami information” issued by the JMA is used by the recipi-
ent nations to take emergency tsunami disaster prevention action, such as
issuing domestic tsunami warnings for the predicted tsunami in the coun-
try concerned, advising residents to evacuate, and similar actions. In this
connection, it may be noted that the tsunami information issued by the
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center does not include the predicted height of
tsunamis.
The flow of the provision of tsunami information in the northwestern
Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean, for example which the Japan Meteoro-
logical Agency is responsible, as discussed in the following, is shown in
Fig. 6.4.
The Great Indian Ocean Tsunami, which was caused by the 2004
Indian Ocean Earthquake on December 26, 2004, was an unprecedented
disaster, claiming more than 200,000 lives in coastal countries across the
entire Indian Ocean region. As one factor in the large-scale damage, it has
been pointed out that no tsunami warning system like that in the Pacific
Ocean had been created for the Indian Ocean. Utilizing its experience in
issuing tsunami information in the Pacific region, the Japan Meteorological
Agency, in cooperation with the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, began
providing tsunami monitoring information in March 2005 to nations
b.
around the Indian Ocean which requested this service (information was
being provided to 24 nations as of August 2012). This is being carried out
as a provisional action until an actual Indian Ocean tsunami warning sys-
tem is constructed. “Indian Ocean tsunami information” is issued when
an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or greater occurs in the Indian Ocean
M6.5 or higher
Domestic Japanese earthquake/tsunami observation data Japan Meteorological
Agency (JMA) Northwestern Pacific Northwestern
tsunami information Pacific Ocean and
Indian Ocean countries
Indian Ocean tsunami
monitoring information
Fig. 6.4 Flow of northwestern Pacific tsunami information and Indian Ocean tsunami monitoring
information
region, and comprises the time, location of the focus, and magnitude of the
earthquake, the possibility of a tsunami, and when a tsunami is possible,
the predicted value of the time until arrival of the tsunami at designated
coastlines.
In June 2005, the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the
Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/IOTWS)
was established with the participation of the Indian Ocean nations, the
members of UNESCO/IOC, and others. ICG/IOTWS started to study for
constructing the Indian Ocean tsunami warning system. Through this
study, operation of the tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean began
in October 2011. As of August 2012, three organizations, the Bureau of
Meteorology of Australia, the Indian National Centre for Ocean Informa-
tion Services (INCOIS), and Indonesia’s Agency for Meteorology, Clima-
tology and Geophysics (BMKG) were providing information to nations
b.
producing only small tremors, and there are non-seismic tsunamis which
attack even when no tremors occur in the area, as exemplified by remote
tsunamis. In order to increase accuracy and reliability of techniques for
predicting these phenomena, it is important to monitor actual tsunamis
quickly further out to sea, and to use the results to correct the predicted
References
Japan Meteorological Agency (2007): Earthquake Early Warning System and Forecasts/
Warnings, http://www.seisvol.kishou.go.jp/eq/EEW/kaisetsu/eew_naiyou/html (accessed
August 22, 2012) (in Japanese)