Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pavement
Inspection & Assessment
CS 229
Data for pavement assessment
(formerly HD 29/08)
Revision 0
Summary
This document describes the technical requirements for undertaking detailed scheme-level
pavement investigations on the UK motorway and all-purpose trunk roads. It does not cover
network-level surveys which are described in CS 230. This document is complemented by CD
227 which sets out the requirements for determining the need for maintenance and for designing
maintenance treatments.
Contents
Release notes 4
Foreword 5
Publishing information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Contractual and legal considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Introduction 6
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Assumptions made in the preparation of the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Mutual Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Abbreviations 7
1. Scope 9
Aspects covered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Use of GG 101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3. Deflectograph 11
Calibration, accreditation and quality assurance (QA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Survey category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Survey procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Pavement temperature measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Direct measurement method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Contactless measurement method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Processing of deflectograph data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1
CS 229 Revision 0 Contents
6. Invasive testing 32
Location referencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Coring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Determining which asphalt layers are responsible for rutting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Core logging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Test pits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Test pit log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
DCP test procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) reporting and analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
7. Normative references 40
8. Informative references 41
Appendix A. Deflectograph 42
A1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
A2 Deflectograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
A2.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
A2.2 Factors affecting dynamic response of the deflectograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2
CS 229 Revision 0 Contents
3
CS 229 Revision 0 Release notes
Release notes
Version Date Details of amendments
0 Mar 2020 CS 229 replaces HD 29/08. The full document has been re-written to make it
compliant with the new Highways England drafting rules.
4
CS 229 Revision 0 Foreword
Foreword
Publishing information
This document is published by Highways England.
This document, along with CS 230 and CD 227, supersedes HD 29/08 which is withdrawn.
5
CS 229 Revision 0 Introduction
Introduction
Background
Road pavements do not last indefinitely. At some stage in their lives signs of wear such as polishing,
rutting, fretting and cracking may show on the surface. Maintenance is required when these signs of
wear are judged to affect the standards of service provided to the road user and the integrity of the
pavement structure.
The Overseeing Organisations use a hierarchical approach to assessing the needs of the motorways
and all-purpose trunk roads.
Network-level surveys, undertaken on a regular or routine basis, are used to identify lengths of
pavement that potentially require maintenance. Wherever possible these surveys are undertaken at
traffic speed. The requirements for this process are set out in CS 230 [Ref 8.I].
Once a length of road has been identified as requiring maintenance then a detailed investigation is
required to determine the maintenance need and to provide the information required to design the
appropriate maintenance treatments. The requirements for this process are set out in CD 227 [Ref 2.I].
This document sets out the technical requirements and associated advice for collecting the
scheme-level data required to support this process.
Mutual Recognition
Where there is a requirement in this document for compliance with any part of a "British Standard" or
other technical specification, that requirement may be met by compliance with the Mutual Recognition
clause in GG 101 [Ref 7.N].
6
CS 229 Revision 0 Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
AMD Absolute mean deviation
CBR California bearing ratio
CDH Crack detection head
CWSF Continuous wave stepped frequency
CRCB Continuously reinforced concrete base
DCP Dynamic cone penetrometer
DPT Dynamic plate tester
ESBM Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material
EXIF Exchangeable image file format
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
GPR Ground-penetrating radar
GPS Global Positioning System
HBM Hydraulically bound mixture
IRT Infra-red thermometer
LTE Load transfer efficiency
OFCOM Office of communications
PAK Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon [marker]
RMS Root mean squared deviation
TTBM Total thickness of bituminous material
UWB Ultra wide band
VCS Visual condition survey
VI Void intercept
7
CS 229 Revision 0 Terms and definitions
Terms
Terms Definitions
A method of predicting the pavement temperature using the
Contactless method
pavement surface temperature and ambient air temperature.
(of determining
Different approaches are used for predicting 40 mm and 100 mm
pavement temperature)
depth temperatures.
Cusum (or cumulative sum) is a sequential analysis technique
Cusum analysis
used for monitoring change detection.
The deflectograph is a self-contained lorry-mounted device
Deflectograph capable of taking deflection measurements at approximately 4 m
intervals in both wheel paths.
Direct measurement method A method of measuring pavement temperature by drilling holes
(of determining pavement into the pavement and inserting a probe into the hole and
temperature) recording the temperature.
The FWD is a dynamic plate test (DPT) device for measuring the
deflection response of road pavements. A load is applied to the
Falling weight deflectometer
pavement by dropping a mass onto a plate. Deflections are
(FWD)
measured by sensors located at various positions relative to the
load plate.
GPR is a non-destructive tool that can be used to obtain
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) information about the construction of a pavement and its internal
features.
8
CS 229 Revision 0 1. Scope
1. Scope
Aspects covered
1.1 The requirements in this document shall be used when undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement
surveys and investigations on the Overseeing Organisations' motorway and all-purpose trunk roads.
NOTE 1 This document does not cover the routine traffic-speed surveys or skidding resistance surveys
described in CS 230 [Ref 8.I] and CS 228 [Ref 9.I] respectively.
NOTE 2 Requirements for developing an investigation plan, interpreting data and designing renewal treatments
are set out in CD 227 [Ref 2.I].
Implementation
1.2 This document shall be implemented forthwith on all schemes involving the design of pavement
renewals on the Overseeing Organisations' motorway and all-purpose trunk roads according to the
implementation requirements of GG 101 [Ref 7.N].
Use of GG 101
1.3 The requirements contained in GG 101 [Ref 7.N] shall be followed in respect of activities covered by
this document.
9
CS 229 Revision 0 2. Visual condition surveys (VCS)
10
CS 229 Revision 0 3. Deflectograph
3. Deflectograph
3.1 This section sets out the requirements that shall be followed when undertaking and analysing
deflectograph surveys.
NOTE 1 The deflectograph is a self-contained lorry-mounted device capable of taking deflection measurements
at approximately 4 m intervals in both wheel paths.
NOTE 2 The deflectograph can be used to assess the structural condition of flexible pavements with asphalt or
hydraulically bound mixture (HBM) bases. It works on the principle that as a loaded wheel passes over
the pavement, the pavement deflects and the size of the deflection is related to the strength of the
pavement layers and subgrade.
NOTE 3 More information on the deflectograph is given in Appendix A. A detailed description of the equipment
is given in TRL LR834 [Ref 7.I].
Survey category
3.3 The categories for deflectograph surveys, defined by time of year and pavement temperature at a
depth of 40 mm in Table 3.3, shall be used to define the permitted usage of the data.
NOTE 1 Deflection of flexible pavements varies with temperature. The parameter equivalent thickness of sound
bituminous material (ESBM) is used both for defining survey temperature limits and for adjusting
deflectograph deflections to the standard temperature of 20oC. ESBM is automatically calculated by the
Overseeing Organisations' approved deflectograph processing software. Details of the approved
software are provided in the National Application Annexes for each Overseeing Organisation.
NOTE 2 The deflection behaviour with temperature of pavements with strong hydraulically-bound layers
covered by asphalt can be significantly different from that of all asphalt construction. As the pavement
temperature of a composite pavement increases, the pavement deflection can decrease rather than
11
CS 229 Revision 0 3. Deflectograph
increase, as is normally observed in flexible pavements with asphalt base. This effect is due to the
hydraulically bound layer expanding with increasing temperature causing the cracks to close and the
slabs to start locking together so stiffening the structure. Although the stiffness of any asphalt layers
can reduce, at the same time, the overall effect can be an increase of the total pavement stiffness and
hence a reduction in measured deflection to relatively low values.
NOTE 3 The pavement temperature and time of year limits used to define deflectograph survey categories are
set out in the National Application Annexes for each Overseeing Organisation.
3.3.1 Prior to surveying, ESBM values for the lengths of road to be surveyed should be used to define the
appropriate temperature ranges for the survey category required.
3.4 Surveys carried out within two years of a pavement being constructed or reconstructed shall not be
used to determine residual life or strengthening requirements.
NOTE Early life deflections can be more variable and are not a reliable indicator of future structural strength of
a pavement until the pavement layers and the foundation have stabilised.
Survey procedure
3.5 The deflectograph shall be positioned so that the nearside beam-tip follows the centre of the nearside
wheel path of the lane to be surveyed.
3.6 The deflectograph shall operate at a constant speed within the range 2.4 km/h ± 0.1 km/h.
3.7 The survey data collected by the deflectograph shall be referenced to the Overseeing Organisation's
network referencing system.
3.7.1 The location of easily identifiable features may be recorded so that deflection values can subsequently
be related to their positions on the road.
3.7.2 The recorded output should be monitored for inconsistent data.
NOTE Inconsistent data includes erratic data, unusually high or low deflection data or large differences in
deflection between the nearside and offside wheel paths where this is not normally expected to be
observed.
3.8 Where inconsistencies occur, the deflectograph shall be checked immediately.
3.9 Where a fault is found, the survey shall be discontinued until the deflectograph is repaired.
12
CS 229 Revision 0 3. Deflectograph
NOTE Different surface characteristics include a change in the colour of the asphalt such as moving from a
thin surface course to a light coloured high friction surfacing.
3.13 Surveys shall not continue where the pavement temperature at any one point is changing at a rate
exceeding 2.5oC per hour, measured over a period of at least 15 minutes.
NOTE The limiting rate of change of temperature is set to ensure that the correction of deflections to the
standard temperature of 20oC remains valid.
13
CS 229 Revision 0 3. Deflectograph
14
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
NOTE 3 This section applies to DPT equipment in categories B, C and D only. For ease of reference, this
equipment is referred to as the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) throughout this section.
NOTE 4 The FWD can be a trailer mounted device, towed behind a vehicle or can be mounted within a van.
NOTE 5 FWD deflection measurements can be used for assessing the structural characteristics of flexible and
rigid pavements. FWD measurements allow the deflected shape of the pavement surface to be
derived. Estimates of layer stiffness can be made from knowledge of the deflected shape and the layer
thicknesses.
NOTE 6 The primary use of the FWD on jointed rigid pavements is to assess the performance of joints or cracks.
The tests most commonly used are the load transfer efficiency (LTE) test and void intercept (VI) test.
NOTE 7 The set up of the FWD depends on whether it is being used to assess layer stiffness or for the
assessment of joints/cracks.
NOTE 8 More information on FWDs is given in Appendix B.
15
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Table 4.4 Temperature categories for FWD stiffness evaluation testing on flexible pavements
Cate-
Confidence Usage
gory
Highest level of
1 Providing data to be used for the design of renewal treatments
confidence
Medium level of Data in this category shall be limited to allowing relative assessment of
2
confidence condition within a site
Lowest level of
3 Not recommended
confidence
4.5 For flexible pavements, the temperature ranges for each category in Table 4.4 shall be as defined in
Table 4.5.
Table 4.5 Temperature range for stiffness evaluation testing on flexible pavements
Temperature range (oC)
Pavement type
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
≥ 5 to < 10
Flexible with an asphalt base ≥ 10 to ≤ 25 and <5 or >30
> 25 to ≤ 30
Flexible with an HBM base (where
the primary aim of the survey is to ≥ 5 to ≤ 15 > 15 to ≤ 25 <5 or >25
assess the condition of the HBM base)
NOTE 1 At very low temperatures (<5oC), ice can be present in the unbound materials which can significantly
affect the results.
NOTE 2 Since the stiffness of asphalt layers needs to be adjusted to the standard reference temperature of 20o
C, additional uncertainty is introduced when testing takes place at temperatures significantly above or
below 20oC. In addition, at high temperatures (>30oC) the response of asphalt becomes increasingly
viscous and it is more difficult to distinguish between sound and unsound materials.
NOTE 3 The effective stiffness of hydraulically bound bases can increase with temperature due to cracks locking
together and stiffening the structure. This effect is dependent upon the extent of cracking present and
is difficult to predict. However it is not very significant on severely cracked hydraulically bound bases.
4.6 On jointed rigid pavements, layer stiffness evaluation testing shall not be undertaken where
temperature gradients have caused hogging or warping of the slabs.
4.6.1 Where the conditions suggest that there can be a temperature gradient which can contribute to hogging
or warping, additional temperature measurements should be taken to assess the risk.
16
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
4.8 Joint performance testing shall not be undertaken where temperature gradients have caused hogging
or warping of the slabs.
4.8.1 Where the conditions suggest that there can be a temperature gradient that can contribute to hogging
or warping, additional temperature measurements should be taken to assess the risk.
NOTE 1 The temperature condition of the pavement has a major effect on the measured LTE on jointed rigid
pavements. Generally, higher LTE values are obtained at high temperatures as the slabs expand and
lock together.
NOTE 2 At low temperature, the widths of the joints and/or cracks are greater and the relative movement is
larger.
NOTE 3 The locking effect depends on the roughness and nominal width of the joints or cracks and the
coefficient of thermal expansion of the slabs. This can therefore affect the appropriate temperature
range for load transfer testing.
NOTE 4 Higher VI values can be obtained on slabs which are warping ("curling up"). This can occur when the
surface temperature is lower than the temperature at the bottom of the slab.
Survey procedure
4.9 The loading plate shall be located in one of the wheel paths of the lane to be surveyed.
NOTE FWD testing is normally carried out in the nearside wheel path in order to assess the line of greatest
deterioration. Requirements and recommendations for test lane and frequency of testing are contained
in CD 227 [Ref 2.I].
4.10 The load shall be recorded to a resolution of 0.1 kN (or better).
4.10.1 The load pulse should have a rise time from start of pulse to peak of between 5 and 15 milliseconds.
4.11 The load pulse shall be applied through a circular plate, 300 mm in diameter.
4.11.1 Where the FWD has a 60 Hz smoothing filter option, it should be activated.
4.12 The pavement surface directly beneath the loading plate shall be free of standing water.
4.13 Deflections shall be measured to a resolution of 1 micron (or better) over the range 0 to 2 mm by a
minimum of 7 sensors situated at radii up to a distance of 2.25 m from the centre of the loading plate.
4.14 At least 3 drops, plus a small initial drop for settling the load plate, shall be made at each test point.
NOTE Where LTE and VI testing are both being undertaken, one drop at each of the load levels can be used.
4.15 The recorded data shall be monitored for inconsistencies.
NOTE 1 Inconsistent data includes large differences in the recorded deflections for the three drops,
non-decreasing deflections (with radial position) and failure to achieve the target load.
NOTE 2 Most FWDs have diagnostic software that monitors the data output and flags inconsistent data.
4.16 Where inconsistencies in the recorderd data occur, the device shall be checked immediately.
4.17 Where a fault is found, the survey shall be discontinued until the device is repaired.
4.18 The data collected shall be referenced to the Overseeing Organisation's network referencing system.
4.19 GPS co-ordinates shall be recorded and used to provide additional confirmation of the location of each
test point.
NOTE The performance of GPS location referencing systems is assessed as part of the annual FWD
accreditation trial. The requirements for individual Overseeing Organisations are given in the National
Application Annexes.
4.20 When testing on jointed rigid pavements, the location of the load plate relative to the joints shall also be
recorded.
17
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
18
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Equation 4.32 Equation to be used to calculate the predicted temperature at a depth of 100mm
( [ ( )])
T ime − 18
T100 = 1.195 + (0.611 × TIRT ) + (0.418 × Tair−pd ) + 0.361 × sin 2π +
( [ ( )]) 24
T ime − 14
0.121 × TIRT × sin 2π
24
where:
T100 is the predicted pavement temperature at a depth of 100 mm
TIRT is the surface temperature measured by the IRT (oC)
Tair-pd is the average air temperature for the previous day (oC)
is the time that surface temperature is taken (in hours), i.e. decimal time using the 2
Time
4-hour clock
4.34 Where layer stiffness evaluation measurements are being taken on a jointed rigid pavement, the
measurements shall be taken in mid-slab locations and away from cracks.
19
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Figure 4.35.1 Load transfer efficiency FWD arrangement ("leave" side test)
NOTE Figure 4.35.1 shows the recommended arrangement for testing a transverse joint. Ideally the centre of
the plate, d2 and d3 form a straight line perpendicular to the joint or crack. However this is not always
possible, for example, when testing a diagonal crack.
4.35.2 The load level should be set to 75 kN ± 10 percent.
4.35.3 Where LTE testing and VI testing are both to be undertaken, the testing should be done simultaneously
and the load levels used for VI testing employed for the LTE testing.
4.35.4 When testing transverse joints, the downstream side ("leave" side) of the joint should be loaded.
NOTE The load transfer efficiency can depend on the support under the edge of the discontinuity. The
downstream side ("leave" side) of the discontinuity is often the weaker side.
4.36 The sensors shall be positioned to avoid spalled material around the discontinuity.
NOTE Where spalled material is present around a number of the discontinuities, the sensor spacings can be
adjusted to allow for this.
20
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
NOTE 1 The central deflection d1 gives an indication of overall pavement stiffness. The deflection difference
(d1-d4) relates to the stiffness and thickness of the bound pavement layers. Deflection d6 is an
indication of foundation condition.
NOTE 2 Plots show relative differences in the condition of the layers, allow lengths of road with similar behaviour
to be identified and can provide an indication of where structural weakness is likely to be present.
1) model the pavement structure as a number of horizontally infinite linear elastic layers;
2) use elastic multi-layer analysis based on Burmister's Burmister [Ref 11.N] equations with all layers
modelled linearly including an infinite depth subgrade and no slip between layers;
3) be able to model at least three independent layers;
4) be able to handle at least seven deflection sensors;
5) be able to report the computed surface deflection values.
21
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
NOTE 1 "Back -analysis" is an iterative procedure which uses multi-layered linear elastic modelling of the
pavement to match the computed deflections to the values measured by the FWD. The layer
stiffnesses are adjusted in this process until a reasonable match is obtained.
NOTE 2 The results of back analysis are strongly influenced by the type of program used and the way in which
the pavement is modelled (including the number of layers used and the assumed properties of those
layers).
4.40 The following standard rules shall be applied when undertaking back-analysis of FWD data:
NOTE The use of this procedure is expected to produce reasonably consistent results independent of who is
performing the analysis.
4.41 Where an alternative back-analysis procedure is used, this shall be in addition to the standard
procedure.
4.42 The reasons for using an alternative back-analysis procedure shall be clearly stated.
NOTE There can be occasions where the standard back-analysis procedure does not produce representative
or realistic estimates of stiffness. Table 4.42N lists some example scenarios where alternative analysis
procedures can sometimes produce more realistic estimates of layer stiffness.
22
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Table 4.42N Some example situations where alternative (additional) back-analysis models can
be appropriate
Problem Possible alternative analysis methods
A non-linear (i.e. stress-dependent) subgrade or
the presence of bedrock is indicated by surface A layered subgrade model or a model using a
modulus plots. (Refer to Appendix B for stiff-layer at depth can be appropriate.
information on surface modulus analysis.)
Use a two-layer model combining all the bound
materials and use forward-analysis to determine
revised guide limits for the quality of the materials
On a flexible pavement with HBM base or an (supplementary testing needs to identify which
overlaid rigid pavement or a CRCB modelled layer is responsible for any low stiffnesses).
using a three-layer model, the stiffness of the Or
asphalt layer is unrealistically high (or low) or the Fix the stiffness of the asphalt layer in the
stiffness of the HBM/concrete is unrealistically analysis. This needs to be determined from a
low (or high). number of indirect tensile tests undertaken on the
main asphalt layers and adjusted to the FWD
loading time and temperature at the time of the
survey.
Presence of poor quality bound materials, i.e. a
It can be appropriate to sub-divide the bound
sub-layer of bound material is known to be in a
layers into two (intact and poor) layers or, in
severely deteriorated condition and to have very
extreme cases, to combine the poor materials
low stiffness (e.g. cracked/stripped lower bound
with the foundation layers.
layers in an evolved pavement).
23
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
4.44.3 For sections where there is a continuous change in thickness, separate thicknesses may be used for
the back-analysis of each deflection bowl.
NOTE 1 Stiffnesses derived from back-analysis represent estimates of the in situ values at the time of testing.
The stiffness of asphalt is very dependent on temperature. Therefore, in order to compare the
stiffnesses of asphalt layers obtained with those expected from standard materials, it is necessary to
first adjust them to the standard reference temperature of 20oC.
NOTE 2 The susceptibility of asphalt stiffness to temperature can vary quite considerably and is a function of a
number of different material properties. This relationship can be used to provide adjustment of asphalt
layer stiffnesses provided that testing is carried out within the preferred range (for flexible pavements
with an asphalt base) of 10 to 25oC.
NOTE 3 The relationship can also be used where measurements are taken at other temperatures although the
absolute values of the adjusted asphalt layer stiffnesses need to be treated with caution.
4.45.1 The temperature dependency of the stiffness of severely cracked asphalt tends to be far less than that
of intact materials. Therefore, where a layer is known to be severely cracked throughout its depth,
temperature adjustment should not normally be applied.
4.46 When an alternative relationship is used to adjust the asphalt stiffness for temperature, this shall be in
addition to the standard relationship.
4.47 The reasons for using an alternative relationship for adjusting asphalt stiffness for temperature shall be
clearly stated.
Goodness of fit
4.48 When back-analysis of FWD data is undertaken, the goodness of fit parameters "absolute mean
deviation" (AMD) and "root mean squared deviation" (RMS) shall be calculated using the following
equations:
24
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
where:
dmi are the measured deflections in microns at positions i =1 to n
dci are the calculated deflections in microns at positions i =1 to n
n is the total number of sensor positions used in the analysis (normally seven).
NOTE 1 The AMD indicates whether or not there is an overall bias to the calculated deflection bowl relative to
the measured bowl. The RMS indicates how well, on average, the calculated bowl matches the
measured bowl.
NOTE 2 A good fit does not in itself indicate that a correct solution has been obtained. However a poor fit does
indicate that the solution found is suspect.
4.48.1 Table 4.48.1 contains guide values for AMD and RMS for pavements modelled with a total of two or
three layers (with the foundation counted as a layer). Back-analysed stiffnesses from bowls for which
the AMD or RMS exceed these values are suspect and should be treated with caution.
NOTE Back-analysis programs vary in their ability to match calculated to measured deflections. Poor fits can
also be obtained where cracks or other discontinuities are present in the pavement, where incorrect
assumptions about layer thicknesses or material types are made, or where layer de-bonding is present.
Increasing the number of layers normally improves the level of fit but does not necessarily lead to more
realistic estimates of layer stiffness.
4.49 Isolated results which exceed these limits shall be discounted when assessing the overall condition of a
section.
25
CS 229 Revision 0 4. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
4.54 Any additional reporting and/or processing of FWD data shall be undertaken in accordance with the
relevant National Application Annex.
26
CS 229 Revision 0 5. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Legislation
5.2 GPR surveys shall be undertaken in accordance with OfCOM's Requirements and Guidance Notes for
Ground Probing Radar' ( OfW 350 [Ref 10.N]), and the European GPR Association Code of Practice
ETSI EG 202 730 [Ref 5.N].
Location referencing
5.3 All GPR surveys shall be referenced against the appropriate Overseeing Organisation's network
referencing system.
NOTE Accurate location referencing is essential to allow reliable comparison between each type of data.
5.4 The location of GPR surveys undertaken at slow speed shall be recorded to an accuracy of ± 1 m, or
better.
5.5 The location of GPR surveys undertaken at traffic speed shall be recorded to an accuracy of ± 5 m, or
better.
5.5.1 The location of GPR surveys undertaken at traffic speed should be recorded to an accuracy of ± 1 m, or
better.
NOTE For traffic speed surveys, this level of accuracy is likely to require the use of a sophisticated GPS and
inertial measurement unit.
Survey limitations
5.7 GPR surveys shall not be carried out when standing water is present on the surface of the pavement.
27
CS 229 Revision 0 5. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
NOTE A film of surface water can affect the radar signal making interpretation of the data more difficult.
5.8 GPR surveys shall not be carried out on recently salted (de-iced) roads.
NOTE There is a risk of penetration of saltwater into the subsurface layers. Salt increases the conductivity of
pavement materials which attenuates the radar signal and reduces the depth of penetration of the radar.
Table 5.9 Categories for defining accuracy and reliability of GPR data
Category Definition
Routine. Surveys in this category have sufficient accuracy and reliability to be used
A
regularly for pavement assessment.
Confirmation. Surveys in this category can be used to confirm that this pavement
B
condition exists with the assistance of evidence from other techniques.
Caution. Surveys in this category are only to be used as a guide and together with
C
other data to indicate the possible construction or condition of the pavement.
Unproven. Surveys in this category are unproven and have yet to be demonstrated as
D
suitable for use on the network.
GPR applications
5.11 GPR surveys shall only be undertaken for the applications listed in Table 5.11.
28
CS 229 Revision 0 5. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
NOTE 1 For items marked * the use of 3D-GPR can improve the quality of data or improve the productivity
and/or coverage of the survey but does not change the category of the survey.
NOTE 2 The scan spacing of a GPR survey influences the size of feature that can be detected. Scan spacing
depends largely on the equipment used and the method of deployment, in particular survey speed.
This is mainly why surveys that detect discrete features in the pavement, such as voids or cracks, have
been given different classifications depending on survey speed.
NOTE 3 Ongoing developments in GPR systems make it likely that more features can be detected accurately
and reliably in future. This advice on the limitations of the technique can be kept under review and any
significant developments can be incorporated when they are ready for implementation.
NOTE 4 Additional information on the application of GPR is given in Appendix C.
Layer thickness
5.12 Where the depth of a reinforced concrete layer needs to be determined, the survey shall employ a scan
spacing which is less than the reinforcing bars spacing.
NOTE GPR cannot penetrate metal, closely spaced reinforcement or highly conducting materials.
29
CS 229 Revision 0 5. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Method statement
5.15 Prior to commencement of GPR surveys, a method statement shall be produced.
NOTE The method statement contains details that can be used by the Overseeing Organisation to ensure that
the information produced by a GPR survey is sufficiently accurate and reliable.
5.16 The method statement shall be followed throughout the execution and analysis of the GPR survey(s).
5.17 The method statement shall include the following information:
1) equipment specification;
2) OFCOM licence number;
3) serial number of GPR equipment;
4) details of the calibration of the radar system;
5) quality control procedures for both survey and analysis;
6) work programme;
7) survey procedure;
8) risk assessment of the site work;
9) form of presentation to be used for reporting the results.
30
CS 229 Revision 0 5. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
7) lane surveyed and track – nearside or offside wheel-track and/or between wheel-tracks;
8) survey length;
9) reporting interval and GPR scan interval (where different) and any averaging used;
10) surface moisture condition;
11) location of any construction changes and broad identification of materials;
12) pavement layer interface depth in millimetres;
13) location and size of subsurface defects (where appropriate);
14) location of roadside features where this aids location referencing of the survey data;
15) location of cores, core details, and corresponding radar depths.
NOTE An example of GPR reporting is included in Appendix C.
31
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
6. Invasive testing
6.1 This section sets out the requirements that shall be followed when undertaking invasive testing of road
pavements.
NOTE Invasive testing covers coring, test pits and dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) testing.
Location referencing
6.2 The locations of cores, test pits, and DCP tests shall be referenced against the appropriate Overseeing
Organisation's network referencing system.
NOTE Accurate location referencing is essential to allow reliable comparison between each type of data.
6.3 The locations shall be recorded to an accuracy of ± 1 m longitudinally and ± 0.1 m transversely from the
lane edge, or better.
6.3.1 The lane edge used for transverse location should be the nearside.
NOTE Traffic management requirements can sometimes prevent access to the nearside lane edge so the
offside lane edge can be used as the datum.
6.4 GPS co-ordinates shall be recorded, using a device capable of sub-metre accuracy, in order to provide
additional confirmation of the location of each test point.
Coring
General
6.5 When coring is undertaken, it shall be undertaken in accordance with BS EN 12697-27 [Ref 4.N].
NOTE Coring of road pavements is normally undertaken for one or more of the following reasons:
1) to determine the thickness of bound layers and total pavement thickness;
2) to determine the type and condition of the bound layers;
3) to determine the depth of defects such as cracking;
4) to determine the presence and location of steel reinforcement in rigid pavements;
5) to provide samples of bound material for testing;
6) to allow access to the unbound layers to allow DCP testing;
7) to determine which asphalt layers are responsible for rutting.
6.5.1 150 mm diameter cores should be extracted as they normally provide sufficient material for any
laboratory testing and, if sited on cracks, are more likely to be successfully extracted.
NOTE Coring through cracks is usually slower and more difficult than coring through sound material as the
core pieces can jam in the core barrel. Where some of the layers are both cracked and de-bonded from
each other, it can be very difficult to remove the core from the barrel without damaging the material
further.
6.5.2 Where the sole purpose of coring is to determine layer thicknesses in a pavement in sound condition
then 100 mm diameter or smaller cores may be extracted.
6.6 Coring activities and the cutting lubricant shall not be a hazard to other road users.
NOTE Coring of road pavements normally uses water to lubricate the drill and the process generates a slurry.
A wet vacuum system can be used to collect the coring slurry.
6.7 Unless the sole purpose of the coring is to provide information about the upper pavement layers, cores
shall be extracted to the full depth of the bound layers.
NOTE Where disintegrated material is encountered, recovery of all material can be impractical.
6.7.1 Where pavement material has disintegrated during coring and there is only partial recovery of material,
the layer thicknesses should be determined from the core hole.
32
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
NOTE Determining the layer thicknesses can be difficult where the disintegrated layer is near the bottom of
the core hole.
6.8 On-site photographs shall be taken of:
1) the pavement surface before coring;
2) down the core hole showing the bottom of the core and a ruler showing the full depth of the core hole;
3) the core after it has been extracted.
Core logging
6.11 Cores extracted where an asphalt material is present shall be PAK tested to detect the possible
presence of tar.
NOTE PAK testing involves spraying the core with a spray marker product specifically designed to detect
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Kohlenwasserstoffe is German for Hydrocarbons hence "PAK").
Further details on PAK testing are given in Managing Reclaimed Asphalt – Highways & Pavements
(ADEPT, 2016) Managing Reclaimed Asphalt [Ref 5.I] .
6.12 For each core, a full record of the core details shall be made in the form of a core log.
6.13 The core log shall include a good quality colour photograph showing the side of the core with a scale
strip and the core reference clearly visible, and a photograph of the top (surface) of the core showing
the orientation of the core in the road.
NOTE 1 Locating the scale strip half way up the side of the core can reduce the apparent error in measurement
in the photograph due to perspective.
NOTE 2 A good quality photograph is to be in focus, evenly lit, shot with a high resolution camera so that the
detail of the aggregate and defects can be clearly seen. Natural lighting usually produces the best
detail in the photographs. Flash photography, particularly when the core surface is wet, can produce
strong highlights which obscure the details.
6.14 Where a defect is apparent in the core (for example cracking), the face with the defect shall be shown
in the photograph.
6.14.1 Where the defect obscures other details of the core then an additional photograph taken of another
side of the core should be included.
33
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
6.15 Where a layer is missing from a core because it was disintegrated, the photograph shall show the intact
layers of the core with a gap left for the missing layer.
6.16 A photograph showing the material from any disintegrated layer shall be included.
6.17 The core log shall also include photographs of the pavement surface before coring, down the core hole
and of the core shortly after it has been extracted.
6.17.1 The core log should include a photograph of the reinstated core hole.
6.18 The following reference information shall be included on the log sheet for each core:
6.19 The following details shall be included on the log sheet for each core:
1) thickness of each bound layer;
2) any missing layers;
3) for each layer:
a) type of material present;
b) possible presence of tar bound layers (from PAK test);
c) condition of the material, such as sound, cracked, friable etc;
d) stripping of binder from the aggregate (if present);
e) condition of the bonding between layers;
f) presence of detritus where there is a lack of bond between layers;
g) voiding and segregation (if present);
h) crack depth and severity, soft or otherwise deleterious aggregate, bleeding and any other
peculiarities (if present).
4) the total depth of cracking (if present and applicable);
5) the nature of the material at the bottom of the core hole (for example, crushed stone, gravel or
further bound material).
6.20 Cores shall be retained for a minimum of three months after the reporting of the core log.
NOTE Core retention allows a decision to be made on whether the core is to be tested following the review of
the core log.
Test pits
6.21 Where a test pit is required, it shall be excavated in accordance with the requirements in this section.
NOTE 1 Excavating and reinstating test pits is a much slower and more disruptive method of obtaining
pavement information than coring.
NOTE 2 Test pitting can be used for one or more of the following purposes:
1) obtaining bulk samples of the bound or unbound layers for laboratory testing;
2) detailed examination of the unbound layers or subgrade including in situ testing;
34
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
35
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
4) traffic direction;
5) lane and offset (and datum used e.g. nearside lane edge);
6) date and time of excavation and reinstatement;
7) pavement condition at pit location;
8) the reason why the test pit was excavated.
6.30 The following details shall be included on the test pit log:
36
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
6.35 The depth of penetration shall be recorded at approximately 10 mm increments, together with the
number of blows to achieve this.
NOTE 1 The number of blows between readings can vary depending on the strength of the layer being
penetrated.
NOTE 2 The DCP can penetrate most types of granular or lightly stabilised materials fairly easily. However, in
strongly stabilised layers, very dense, high quality crushed stone and granular materials with large
particles progress is much slower or negligible.
6.35.1 Where there is less than 4 mm measurable penetration after 40 consecutive blows it should be
assumed that the DCP cannot penetrate the material and the test terminated.
6.36 The cone shall be inspected before use.
6.37 The cone shall be replaced if there are signs of visible damage or when its diameter is reduced by 10%.
NOTE 1 A mechanical extractor mechanism can be used to remove the cone and shaft from within the
pavement. This reduces both manual handling and stress on the apparatus.
NOTE 2 The use of push fit (sacrificial) cones can also ease removal of the shaft.
37
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
NOTE 1 Note that the y axis shows the depth below the surface of the pavement.
NOTE 2 A change in slope of the plotted data indicates a change of strength and/or material type. The
thicknesses of different strength layers are usually determined by inspection and the average
penetration rate, in mm per blow, calculated for each.
38
CS 229 Revision 0 6. Invasive testing
6.39.3 The penetration rate may be converted to a nominal California bearing ratio (CBR) value using the
following relationship developed by the Transport Research Laboratory given in Overseas Road Note 8
[Ref 1.I]:
CBR = 10(2.48−1.057×Log10 P )
where:
P is the penetration rate in mm per blow.
NOTE The accuracy of this relationship reduces for CBR values below 10%.
39
CS 229 Revision 0 7. Normative references
7. Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normative references for this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
Ref 1.N Transport Research Laboratory. ORN18, 'A guide to the pavement evaluation and
maintenance of bitumen-surfaced roads in tropical and sub-tropical countries'
Ref 2.N UK Roads Liaison Group. TRL. AQA DSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance of
Deflectograph Survey Devices'
Ref 3.N UK Roads Liaison Group . TRL. AQA DPTSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance
of Dynamic Plate Test Survey Devices'
Ref 4.N BSI. BS EN 12697-27, 'Bituminous mixtures. Test methods. Sampling'
Ref 5.N ETSI . ETSI EG 202 730, 'Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters
(ERM); Code of Practice in respect of the control, use and application of Ground
Probing Radar (GPR) and Wall Probing Radar (WPR) systems and equipment'
Ref 6.N UK Roads Liaison Group. UKRLG (Deflectograph), 'http://www.ukroadsliaisongroup.-
org/en/asset-condition/road-condition-information/data-collection/deflectograph/'
Ref 7.N Highways England. GG 101, 'Introduction to the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges'
Ref 8.N Highways England. MCHW, 'Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works'
Ref 9.N BSI. BS 8420, 'Methods of measuring irregularities on surfaces of roads, footways
and other paved areas using straightedges and wedges'
Ref 10.N OFCOM. OfW 350, 'Requirements and Guidance Notes for Ground Probing Radar'
Ref 11.N American Institutue of Physics, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol 23, pp 126-128.
Burmister, DM. Burmister, 'The General Theory of Stresses and Displacements in
Layered Soil Systems III'
40
CS 229 Revision 0 8. Informative references
8. Informative references
The following documents are informative references for this document and provide supporting
information.
Ref 1.I TRRL. Overseas Road Note 8, 'A users manual for a program to analyse dynamic
cone penetrometer data'
Ref 2.I Highways England. CD 227, 'Design for pavement maintenance'
Ref 3.I Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories. FEHRL Report
1996/1, 'Harmonisation of the Use of the Falling Weight Deflectometer on Pavements
Part 1 – Harmonisation of FWD Measurements and Data Processing for Flexible
Road Pavement Evaluation'
Ref 4.I UK Roads Liaison Group. UKRLG (DPTD),
'http://www.ukroadsliaisongroup.org/en/asset-condition/road-condition-information/d-
ata-collection/dynamic-plate-test-devices-dpt/'
Ref 5.I ADEPT. Managing Reclaimed Asphalt, 'Managing Reclaimed Asphalt – Highways &
Pavements'
Ref 6.I Highways England. CS 464, 'Non-destructive testing of highways structures'
Ref 7.I Transport Research Laboratory. Kennedy, C.K., Fevre, P. and Clarke, C.S. TRL
LR834, 'Pavement deflection: equipment for measurement in the United Kingdom'
Ref 8.I Highways England. CS 230, 'Pavement maintenance assessment procedure'
Ref 9.I Highways England. CS 228, 'Skidding resistance'
Ref 10.I New York: Dover. Blackman, R. B. and Tukey, J. W.. Blackman & Tukey, 'The
Measurement of Power Spectra : From the Point of View of Communications
Engineering'
41
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix A. Deflectograph
Appendix A. Deflectograph
A1 Introduction
This appendix provides a brief introduction to the deflectograph.
A2 Deflectograph
A2.1 Description
The deflectograph is an automated deflection measuring system and is regarded by the Overseeing
Organisations as the standard deflection measuring device for use on flexible pavements i.e. flexible
with an asphalt base and flexible with an HBM base. The equipment is a fully self-contained
lorry-mounted system, whereby measurements of deflection are taken at approximately 4 m intervals in
both wheel-tracks while the machine is in motion. A photograph of a deflectograph is shown in Figure
A.2 and a close up of the near-side measuring beam is shown in Figure A.1. The transient deflection is
measured as the deflectograph travels slowly along the line of twin measurement beams which are
attached to a reference frame. The measurement is not an absolute value of surface deflection since
the reference frame sits within the wheelbase of the lorry and is itself influenced by the load. It
represents a repeatable measure but since the analysis method is empirical, it is important that the
procedures for the use of the deflectograph are closely followed.
42
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix A. Deflectograph
The details and dimensions for the chassis of the vehicle are shown in Figure A.3 and for the beam
assembly in Figure A.4. Further details are given in TRL LR834 [Ref 7.I].
43
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix A. Deflectograph
44
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix A. Deflectograph
within the deflection bowl generated by the front wheels of the machine. The shape of this bowl varies
depending on the type of pavement material used and the magnitude of the deflection.
Components which operate during the recording cycle, i.e. pivot bearings, transducers and
amplification are critical to the performance of the deflectograph and should be well maintained.
Requirements for static calibration are set out in the Accreditation and Quality Assurance of
Deflectograph Survey Devices document ( AQA DSD [Ref 2.N]).
45
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix B. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
B2 FWD
The FWD generates a load pulse by dropping a mass onto a circular loading plate. A set of buffers
located between the plate and the falling weight are used to spread the impact and produce a particular
load pulse shape from the impact. The mass and drop height can be adjusted to achieve the desired
impact loading. Peak vertical deflections are measured at the centre of the loading plate and at several
radial positions by a series of sensors, usually geophones. A load cell measures the peak impact load
applied to the plate. Figure B.1 shows a representation of a typical deflection bowl (with the FWD
configured for evaluating layer stiffness). The deflections and the peak impact load are stored
electronically.
The impact method of load application used by the FWD is fundamentally different from the rolling
wheel system employed by the deflectograph. As yet, no satisfactory relationship has been found to
convert FWD deflections to equivalent deflectograph deflections. Whereas the deflectograph system
normally only uses the maximum deflection recorded at each measurement point, FWD measurements
allow the deflected shape of the pavement surface to be derived. Estimates of layer stiffness can be
made from knowledge of this deflected shape and the layer thicknesses.
B3 Surface modulus
Deflection measurements can be used to produce surface modulus plots. These plots can be used to
study the profile of stiffness with depth and can be used to identify situation where it may be
appropriate to use an alternative back-analysis model.
46
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix B. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
The surface modulus at a point, distance r from the centre of the loaded area, is roughly equal to the
"weighted mean elastic stiffness" below a depth R on the load centre line. Note that the depth R is
based on the "equivalent pavement thickness", where the thickness of the pavement layers is converted
to an equivalent thickness of a material with an elastic stiffness equal to the subgrade stiffness. At a
point sufficiently far from the loaded area, the deflection is not influenced by the upper pavement layers.
Therefore the surface modulus calculated at the outer points on the deflection bowl is approximately
equal to the subgrade modulus. Such plots give an indication of the stiffness of the pavement at
different equivalent depths and can be used as guidance for the selection of further investigation and
analysis methods. Further details of this method are given in FEHRL Report 1996/1 [Ref 3.I].
The surface modulus at the top of the pavement (equivalent depth = 0 mm) is calculated as follows:
For surface modulus analysis, it is normal to assume a value of 0.35 for Poisson's ratio. Five common
examples of surface modulus plots are shown in Figure B.2. Graph i) shows a continuously decreasing
value of surface modulus with increasing distance. This indicates that the outermost deflection
measurement points were not far enough away from the load.
47
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix B. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Graph ii) shows a decreasing value which becomes constant. This indicates a normal pavement
structure overlying a linear elastic subgrade.
48
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix B. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
Graph iii) shows a decreasing value which starts to gradually increase for the outer deflection
measurement points. This indicates a normal pavement structure on a non-linear elastic subgrade, or a
layered subgrade which increases in stiffness with depth.
Graph iv) shows a decreasing value with a sudden large increase for the outermost measurement
points. This indicates that a very stiff subgrade layer underlies the pavement (e.g. bedrock).
Graph v) shows a minimum value close to the surface. This indicates a weak interlayer somewhere in
the upper bound layers.
49
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
50
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Figure C.1 Reflection of radar signal at pavement interfaces and signal waveform
By moving the radar along or across the pavement, transmitting at fixed distance intervals, and
recording and storing digitally the reflected waveforms, a waveform graph representing the pavement
structure is built up. Figure C.2 is an example of a sequence of reflected waveforms recorded as a
GPR system is moved along a pavement.
Electronic distance measuring devices are used to make GPR systems transmit at fixed distance
intervals rather than time intervals.
51
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
The waveform is made up of a number of measured amplitude points (known as samples) equally
spaced down the time axis (the sampling interval); generally the more samples used to record the
waveform, the better the data quality. Conversely, however, increasing the number of measured points
places increased demand on the GPR system and may mean a reduction in survey speed or scan
spacing. Therefore it is important that at least the minimum number of samples required to construct a
true waveform from the highest frequency antenna is used; this can be determined from Nyquist
sampling theorem Blackman & Tukey [Ref 10.I].
Interpretation of the pavement structure and features from a waveform graph requires the wavelets to
be correctly related to changes in material or other features and the signal travel time interval between
the wavelets to be converted to thickness using signal velocity. Note that the signal velocity depends on
the material the wavelets are passing through.
1) single frequency, where a single antenna transmits a pulse of relatively short bandwidth;
52
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
2) multi-frequency, where antenna elements which are capable of transmitting short bandwidth pulses
over two or more frequency are contained within the same housing and have the same mid-point;
3) ultra wide band (UWB), where a signal antenna transmits a long bandwidth pulse which can be
converted into short bandwidth pulses during post processing;
4) continuous wave stepped frequency (CWSF); where a single antenna element can transmit a
sinusoidal signal over a range of frequencies which can be isolated in post processing.
In addition to these four main types, GPR measuring systems can also be generally defined by the:
1) sample points per waveform;
2) scan rate;
3) antenna operating frequency;
4) antenna signal coupling (ground coupled or air launched);
5) antenna type (dipolar or horn antenna).
The surface area, or footprint, that a radar signal examines depends mainly on the antenna central
frequency; a higher frequency antenna has a smaller footprint as the physical dimensions of the
antenna can be less. Multi-channel systems allow a wide range of data collection options ranging from
one measuring line being scanned with antennas operating at different frequencies in one run, to a
number of parallel measuring lines being scanned with antennas operating at the same frequency in
one run. The first option is useful for network level surveys where data is only gathered from one line
(generally the nearside wheel-track) and the second option is useful where large areas need to be
surveyed in detail. 3D-GPR takes this a step further and is described below.
The scan interval in the direction of travel depends on the capability and configuration of the system
and the speed of travel. The scan interval effects the size of pavement features that the radar can
detect. For example, a single channel radar or a single channel on a multi-channel radar may record at
up to 500 (varying with manufacturer) scans per second using 512 samples per waveform. At a typical
traffic-speed survey velocity of 80 km/h, this scanning rate gives a minimum measurement interval of
44 mm of travel. It is necessary to select an appropriate scan interval for the size of features that need
to be detected which may govern whether the survey can be carried out at traffic speed or has to be
carried out at slow speed with traffic management.
The operating frequency affects the depth of penetration and the resolution of the radar as shown in
Table C.1.
53
CS 229 Revision 0
Table C.1 Typical values of penetration and resolution for various radar frequencies
450 MHz 900 MHz
Dielectric Wavelength Depth of resolution Min. depth of Wavelength Depth of resolution Min. depth of
constant (mm) (mm) penetration (mm) (mm) penetration
(mm) (mm)
5 298 75 894 149 37 447
6 272 68 816 136 34 408
7 252 63 756 126 31 378
8 235 59 705 118 29 353
9 222 56 666 111 28 333
10 211 53 632 105 26 316
11 201 50 603 101 25 302
12 192 48 577 96 24 289
1 GHz 1.5 GHz
Min. depth of Min. depth of
Dielectric Wavelength Depth of resolution Wavelength Depth of resolution
penetration penetration
constant (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
54
(mm) (mm)
5 134 34 402 89 22 267
6 122 31 366 82 20 245
7 113 28 339 76 19 227
C1.6 3D-GPR
3D-GPR is a mode of deployment where numerous closely spaced parallel profiles are collected. Most
often the profile spacing is the same as the longitudinal scan interval but this is not always the case as
asymmetrical 3D surveys are also used when either the longitudinal or transverse spacing is higher.
3D-GPR allows data to be presented in such a way that patterns caused by structural features such as
joints and reinforcement bar, as well as defects such as voids and delamination become much clearer
and can be more easily presented. Specific GPR systems are available for 3D surveys. These consist
of many individual antenna elements equally and closely spaced in a single wide array. They are
typically UWB or stepped frequency antennas so a large frequency range can be covered. 3D-GPR
surveys should be considered when cross-carriageway pavement information is required as well as
longitudinal pavement information. 3D-GPR systems also allow transverse, cross-carriageway profiles
to be analysed from the data without specific transverse scans.
1) changes in primary construction type i.e. from flexible to rigid pavement and vice versa;
2) changes in base type i.e. from hydraulically bound to asphalt base and vice versa;
3) persistent step changes in layer thickness;
4) location of repairs such as haunches or patches;
5) hidden trenches covered by asphalt.
Where the construction changes are outside the line of the survey or of a short length they may not be
detected.
56
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
C2.6 Depth and gross misalignment of joint dowel bars and details of reinforcement
GPR can measure the depth of the dowel bars in jointed rigid pavements and whether they are grossly
misaligned. If a survey is required, it is advised that very precise location referencing techniques be
used to give greatest accuracy. Surveys aimed at providing details of the reinforcement in the
pavement, such as depth and spacing, should be carried out with a very small scan spacing (≤50 mm,
but ideally ≤10 mm).
Transverse scans are required along the line of the joint to assess dowel and tie bars. One scan is
required just beside the joint, and two further scans each side of the joint on a line just above the ends
of the dowel or tie bars. This type of survey also allows the determination of the depth and spacing of
reinforcing steel mesh where present.
57
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
sub-base material produces a similar variation in velocity and attenuation so in order to eliminate this
effect a second survey on the same section should be undertaken and the results of two surveys
compared.
One survey should preferably be carried out in a prolonged spell of wet weather, when the sub-base
moisture content is likely to be at its highest. The other survey should preferably be carried out one
during a prolonged spell of dry weather, when the sub-base moisture content is likely to be at its lowest.
Areas where there are significant differences between the signal velocities and/or the signal attenuation
measured during the two surveys are likely to indicate that water may be present. Trial pits or dry
coring should be undertaken to confirm the findings of the GPR results.
58
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
2) using the times between the wavelets to calculate the layer thicknesses.
Equation C.1 Relationship between layer thickness, velocity and travel time
( )
T
D=V
2
where:
D is the layer thickness (mm)
V is the velocity of radar signal in layer (mm/s)
T is the 2-way travel time of the signal in layer (ns).
Two way travel time of the signal in the layer is the time interval on the GPR record between the
wavelets occurring at the layer's lower and upper interfaces at the same location along the pavement.
The velocity of the radar signal within a layer is related to the layer material's dielectric constant by
Equation C.2:
Equation C.2 Relationship between signal velocity in a material and dielectric constant
VAir
V = √
ϵ
where:
V is the velocity of radar signal in layer (mm/ns)
VAir is the velocity of radar signal in air (mm/ns) (see Table C.2)
ϵ is the dielectric constant of the layer material.
59
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
3) calculate velocity from recorded radar signal using 'common mid point' method;
4) calculate velocity from recorded radar signal using 'reflection coefficient' method.
Typical velocities for different pavement materials are given in Table C.2. These have been calculated
from the materials' dielectric constant using Equation C.2. Any moisture in the material alters the
dielectric constant and hence affect the signal velocity greatly.
Table C.2 Range of velocities and dielectric constants for various pavement materials
Pavement material Velocity (mm/ns) Dielectric constant
Air 299 1
Asphalt 90 – 160 4 – 10
Pavement
100 – 130 5–9
quality concrete
Hydraulically
100 – 120 6–9
bound mixture
Granular 70 – 120 6 – 18
Capping 70 – 110 7 – 18
Water 33 81
The 'core method', enables velocities to be accurately calculated if done with care. Aspects requiring
particular attention are:
1) ensuring that the core position is accurately located within the GPR data;
2) correctly estimating the layer thicknesses from a core;
3) ensuring that the complete core is extracted from the pavement.
It is most common to use a combination of two or more of the above calibration techniques, for example
using the common mid point method results in a new velocity for every measurement. Just slight
inconsistencies in the layer interface interpretation can lead to large errors in the calculated velocity
therefore it is advisable that the published velocity data is used to quality check the velocities and
exclude those outside the published values. Similarly where cores are available for only part of the
survey, there may not be a sufficient number of them to fully represent the variability in construction.
Therefore other methods can be used to aid interpolation or extrapolation of velocities calculated at
core locations.
It is known that layer thicknesses can change significantly over longitudinal distances of as little as a
metre. If a core is not located on the radar data to an accuracy better than a metre it is possible that the
wrong layer thickness can be used to calculate the signal velocities.
Often the interface between pavement layers is quite rough. This means that it can be quite difficult to
measure, on a core, the layer thickness. Typically, the accuracy with which the actual thicknesses may
be measured from a core is ± 5 mm if the core is fully extracted and not damaged.
The common mid point method is based on calculating the velocity using a common depth point and
requires a multi-dipole antenna system. With this system, the various return signals for the different
antennas, which have different travel times through a layer, are analysed to obtain values for the
velocities in each layer. The method is illustrated in Figure C.3 and Equation C.3 for the surface layer of
the pavement.
60
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Equation C.3 Common depth point method for signal velocity in surface layer of pavement
√
S22 − S12
V =
T22 − T12
where:
V is the signal velocity in the surface layer of the pavement (mm/ns)
T1 is the signal travel time along path XOY (ns)
T2 is the signal travel time along path WOZ (ns)
S1 is the antenna spacing XY (mm)
S2 is the antenna spacing WZ (mm).
Figure C.3 Common depth point method for signal velocity in surface layer of
pavement
It can be seen that, for a fixed antenna spacing, as the thickness of the layer increases and also as the
layer being measured moves lower in the pavement structure, T1 approaches T2 thus decreasing the
accuracy of the method. This can be compensated for by increasing the antenna separation but
accepting that shallow layer boundaries can then be difficult to resolve. Care should be taken when
moving down the pavement to ensure that each dipole pair samples the same spot.
The reflection coefficient method is based on calculating the velocity using the reflection coefficient and
requires a horn antenna. Before making measurements a metal plate is placed on the pavement
surface to determine the amplitude of the signal returned from a perfect reflector. This amplitude is
compared with the amplitude of the signal returned from the pavement surface and the other layer
interfaces in the construction to obtain the velocity at the top of each layer. The method is illustrated in
Figure C.4 and Equation C.4 for the surface layer.
61
CS 229 Revision 0 Appendix C. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Equation C.4 Reflection coefficient method for signal velocity in surface layer of pavement
(A1 − A2 )
V = 299
(A1 + A2 )
where:
V is the signal velocity in the surface of pavement (mm/ns)
A1 is the signal amplitude reflected from metal plate
A2 is the signal amplitude reflected from pavement surface
299 is the signal velocity in air (mm/ns).
Figure C.4 Reflection coefficient method for signal velocity in surface layer of
pavement
The method assumes that the receiving antenna collects all the transmitted energy. This assumption
becomes less valid with increasing depth due to the combination of the horn's narrower receiving
aperture and the increasing scatter and absorption of the radar signal by the pavement materials. For
this method it is particularly important that conditions where there is standing water on the pavement
surface be avoided as the water layer may affect the calibration. This method should be used with care
as it is only viable for certain situations, for example it may only be appropriate for newly laid thin layers.
62
Figure C.5 Example graph showing the longitudinal depth profile of the bound and granular layers of a pavement
CS 229 Revision 0
63
Pavement
Inspection & Assessment
CS 229
England National Application Annex to CS 229
Data for pavement assessment
(formerly HD 29/08)
Revision 0
Summary
This National Application Annex gives the Highways England-specific requirements for
undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations. Specifically, it covers
visual condition surveys (VCS), the temperature and seasonal limits used to define deflectograph
survey categories, GPS accuracy requirements for falling weight deflectometers (FWD) and
processing requirements for deflectograph and FWD data.
Contents
Release notes 2
Foreword 3
Publishing information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Contractual and legal considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction 4
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Assumptions made in the preparation of the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Mutual recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Abbreviations 5
E/2. Deflectograph 12
Survey category (CS229, 3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Processing of deflectograph data (CS229, 3.23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1
CS 229 Revision 0 Release notes
Release notes
Version Date Details of amendments
0 Mar 2020 Highways England National Application Annex to CS 229.
2
CS 229 Revision 0 Foreword
Foreword
Publishing information
This document is published by Highways England.
This document gives the Highways England-specific requirements for undertaking detailed,
scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations. Along with CS 230 [Ref 1.I] and CD 227 [Ref 3.N],
it supersedes HD 29/08 which is withdrawn.
3
CS 229 Revision 0 Introduction
Introduction
Background
This National Application Annex gives the Highways England-specific requirements for undertaking
detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Specifically, it covers visual condition surveys (VCS), the temperature and seasonal limits used to
define deflectograph survey categories, GPS accuracy requirements for falling weight deflectometers
(FWD) and processing requirements for deflectograph and FWD data.
Mutual recognition
Where there is a requirement in this document for compliance with any part of a "British Standard" or
other technical specification, that requirement may be met by compliance with the mutual recognition
clause in GG 101 [Ref 5.N].
4
CS 229 Revision 0 Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
CRCP Continuously reinforced concrete pavement
ESBM Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
GPS Global Positioning System
HAPMS Highways England Pavement Management System
OSGR Ordnance Survey grid reference
TRACS4 TRAffic-speed condition survey contract 4
VCS Visual condition survey
5
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
Rigid pavements
E/1.9 On rigid pavements, the VCS shall assign defects and condition using the definitions and symbols
listed in Table E/1.9.
Table E/1.9 Standard symbols for recording the condition of rigid pavements
Condition Symbol
Cracks:
6
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
Table E/1.9 Standard symbols for recording the condition of rigid pavements (continued)
Bifurcated cracks
Scaling
7
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
Table E/1.9 Standard symbols for recording the condition of rigid pavements (continued)
Fatting up (bleeding)
Edge defect
Repairs:
Asphalt - B
Cementitious - C
Epoxy - E
8
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
Table E/1.9 Standard symbols for recording the condition of rigid pavements (continued)
Rust staining
9
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
Table E/1.9 Standard symbols for recording the condition of rigid pavements (continued)
Evidence of pumping
Settlement
10
CS 229 Revision 0 E/1. Visual condition surveys (CS 229, 2.1)
NOTE 3 Significant defects, indicating a weakened structure or need for maintenance, include:
E/1.13 At CRCP ground anchors (terminations), all features including "normal" cracking, shall be recorded for
the adjacent 100 m of the pavement.
11
CS 229 Revision 0 E/2. Deflectograph
E/2. Deflectograph
Survey category (CS229, 3.3)
E/2.1 The temperature and time of year limits set out in Figure E/2.1a and Figure E/2.1b shall be used to
define the deflectograph survey category.
12
CS 229 Revision 0 E/2. Deflectograph
NOTE 2 Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material (ESBM) is calculated automatically by HAPMS.
NOTE 3 The shaded areas in Figure E/2.1b represent the permitted periods for each survey category period.
13
CS 229 Revision 0 E/3. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
14
CS 229 Revision 0 E/4. Normative references
Ref 1.N UK Roads Liaison Group . TRL. AQA DPTSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance
of Dynamic Plate Test Survey Devices'
Ref 2.N Concrete Society (on behalf of Highways England and Britpave). CS CPMM,
'Concrete Pavement Maintenance Manual'
Ref 3.N Highways England. CD 227, 'Design for pavement maintenance'
Ref 4.N Highways England. HAPMS VSM, 'HAPMS Visual Survey Manual V2.04'
Ref 5.N Highways England. GG 101, 'Introduction to the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges'
15
CS 229 Revision 0 E/5. Informative references
16
© Crown copyright 2020.
You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the
Open Government Licence. To view this licence:
visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/,
write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU,
or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
Pavement
Inspection & Assessment
CS 229
Northern Ireland National Application Annex to
CS 229 Data for pavement assessment
(formerly HD 29/08)
Revision 0
Summary
This National Application Annex gives the Department for Infrastructure, Northern Ireland-specific
requirements for undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Contents
Release notes 2
Foreword 3
Publishing information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Contractual and legal considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction 4
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Assumptions made in the preparation of the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Mutual Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Abbreviations 5
NI/2. Deflectograph 11
Survey category (CS229, 3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Processing of deflectograph data (CS229, 3.23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1
CS 229 Revision 0 Release notes
Release notes
Version Date Details of amendments
0 Mar 2020 Department for Infrastructure, Northern Ireland National Application Annex to
CS 229.
2
CS 229 Revision 0 Foreword
Foreword
Publishing information
This document is published by Highways England on behalf of the Department for Infrastructure,
Northern Ireland.
This document, along with CS 230 and CD 227, supersede HD29/08 which is withdrawn.
3
CS 229 Revision 0 Introduction
Introduction
Background
This National Application Annex sets out the Department for Infrastructure Northern Ireland-specific
requirements for undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Specifically, it covers visual condition surveys (VCS), the temperature and seasonal limits used to
define deflectograph survey categories, GPS accuracy requirements for falling weight deflectometers
(FWD) and processing requirements for deflectograph and FWD data.
Mutual Recognition
Where there is a requirement in this document for compliance with any part of a "British Standard" or
other technical specification, that requirement may be met by compliance with the Mutual Recognition
clause in GG 101 [Ref 4.N].
4
CS 229 Revision 0 Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
CRCP Continuously reinforced concrete pavement
ESBM Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
GPS Global Positioning System
PMS Pavement management system
OSGR Ordnance Survey grid reference
VCS Visual condition survey
5
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
6
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
Minor surface Loss of material from the wearing course to a degree that the
10
defectiveness original surface is still discernible.
Single or multiple cracks ( > 0.1 m spaced), cracks > 1 mm
11 Major transverse crack
wide, at right angles to the centre line.
Single or multiple cracks ( > 0.1 m spaced), cracks ≤ 1 mm
12 Minor transverse crack
wide, at right angles to the centre line.
NI/1.9 The PMS visual survey defect definitions shall be used for all flexible pavements and for overlaid rigid
pavements with more than 50 mm of asphalt cover.
NOTE Overlaid rigid pavements with up to 50 mm of asphalt overlay are regarded as rigid.
NI/1.9.1 Visual survey data may be loaded into the PMS.
Rigid pavements
NI/1.10 On rigid pavements, the VCS shall assign defects and condition using the definitions and symbols
listed in Figure NI1.10a & Figure NI1.10b.
7
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
8
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
9
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
NI/1.11 The air temperature and weather conditions at the time of the VCS shall be recorded.
NI/1.11.1 Surveys of concrete roads should be carried out in the cooler months of the year between mid-October
and mid-April.
NOTE 1 Cracks are more noticeable and the efficiency of joint seals can be better assessed at low
temperatures.
NOTE 2 Cracks are most readily visible when the pavement surface is drying out after wet conditions.
NI/1.12 The occurrence of alkali-silica reaction shall be recorded.
NOTE Alkali-silica reaction can be inferred from the presence of areas of crazing containing a white or creamy
powdery material which streaks the surface after heavy rainfall.
10
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/2. Deflectograph
NI/2. Deflectograph
Survey category (CS229, 3.3)
NI/2.1 The temperature and time of year limits set out in Figure NI/2.1 and Figure NI/2.2 shall be used to
define the deflectograph survey category.
11
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/2. Deflectograph
NOTE 2 Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material (ESBM) is calculated automatically by PMS.
NOTE 3 The shaded areas in Figure NI/2.1b represent the permitted periods for each survey category period.
12
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/3. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
13
CS 229 Revision 0 NI/4. Normative references
Ref 1.N UK Roads Liaison Group. TRL. AQA DSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance of
Deflectograph Survey Devices'
Ref 2.N Concrete Society (on behalf of Highways England and Britpave). CS CPMM,
'Concrete Pavement Maintenance Manual'
Ref 3.N Highways England. CD 227, 'Design for pavement maintenance'
Ref 4.N Highways England. GG 101, 'Introduction to the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges'
14
© Crown copyright 2020.
You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the
Open Government Licence. To view this licence:
visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/,
write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU,
or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
Pavement
Inspection & Assessment
CS 229
Scotland National Application Annex to CS
229 Data for pavement assessment
(formerly HD 29/15)
Revision 0
Summary
This National Application Annex gives the Transport Scotland-specific requirements for
undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Contents
Release notes 2
Foreword 3
Publishing information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Contractual and legal considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction 4
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Assumptions made in the preparation of the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Mutual Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Abbreviations 5
S/2. Deflectograph 7
Survey category (CS229, 3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Processing of deflectograph data (CS229, 3.23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1
CS 229 Revision 0 Release notes
Release notes
Version Date Details of amendments
0 Mar 2020 Transport Scotland National Application Annex to CS 229.
2
CS 229 Revision 0 Foreword
Foreword
Publishing information
This document is published by Highways England on behalf of Transport Scotland.
This document, along with CS 230 and CD 227, supersedes HD29/08 which is withdrawn.
3
CS 229 Revision 0 Introduction
Introduction
Background
This National Application Annex gives the Transport Scotland-specific requirements for undertaking
detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Specifically, it covers visual condition surveys (VCS), the temperature and seasonal limits used to
define deflectograph survey categories, GPS accuracy requirements for falling weight deflectometers
(FWD) and processing requirements for deflectograph and FWD data.
Mutual Recognition
Where there is a requirement in this document for compliance with any part of a "British Standard" or
other technical specification, that requirement may be met by compliance with the Mutual Recognition
clause in GG 101 [Ref 3.N].
4
CS 229 Revision 0 Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
VCS Visual condition survey
CRCP Continually reinforced concrete pavement
GPS Global Positioning System
OSGR Ordinance Survey grid reference
PMS Pavement management system
5
CS 229 Revision 0 S/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
Rigid pavements
S/1.9 On rigid pavements, the VCS shall assign defects and condition using the definitions and symbols
listed in the Transport Scotland trunk road inspection manual.
NOTE 1 Detailed descriptions and photographs of each type of defect are included in the Transport Scotland
trunk road inspection manual.
NOTE 2 Additional guidance is given in the Concrete Pavement Maintenance Manual CS CPMM [Ref 1.I].
S/1.10 The occurrence of alkali-silica reaction shall be recorded.
NOTE Alkali-silica reaction can be inferred from the presence of areas of crazing containing a white or creamy
powdery material which streaks the surface after heavy rainfall.
6
CS 229 Revision 0 S/2. Deflectograph
S/2. Deflectograph
Survey category (CS229, 3.3)
S/2.1 The temperature and time of year limits set out in Figure S/2.1a and Figure S/2.1b shall be used to
define the deflectograph survey category.
7
CS 229 Revision 0 S/2. Deflectograph
NOTE 2 Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material (ESBM) is calculated automatically in the pavement
management system (PMS).
NOTE 3 The shaded areas in Figure S/2.1b represent the permitted periods for each survey category period.
S/2.1.1 It is accepted that weather conditions can vary appreciably in different regions and from year to year.
Also unusual conditions such as prolonged hot dry weather may occur during periods of the year
specified for category 1.
S/2.2 Where there is a case for reclassifying a survey, either up or down, by one category Transport Scotland
shall be given details, including a description of the weather conditions prevailing in the period prior to
the survey.
NOTE Due to the weather conditions generally associated with the more northerly latitudes of Scotland the
last two weeks of June are included in survey category 1 for this Region.
8
CS 229 Revision 0 S/3. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
9
CS 229 Revision 0 S/4. Normative references
Ref 1.N UK Roads Liaison Group . TRL. AQA DPTSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance
of Dynamic Plate Test Survey Devices'
Ref 2.N Highways England. CD 227, 'Design for pavement maintenance'
Ref 3.N Highways England. GG 101, 'Introduction to the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges'
Ref 4.N Transport Scotland. TS TRIM, 'Trunk Road Inspection Manual'
10
CS 229 Revision 0 S/5. Informative references
Ref 1.I Concrete Society (on behalf of Highways England and Britpave). CS CPMM,
'Concrete Pavement Maintenance Manual'
11
© Crown copyright 2020.
You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the
Open Government Licence. To view this licence:
visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/,
write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU,
or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
Pavement
Inspection & Assessment
CS 229
Wales National Application Annex to CS 229
Data for pavement assessment
(formerly HD 29/08)
Revision 0
Summary
This National Application Annex gives the Welsh Government-specific requirements for
undertaking detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Contents
Release notes 2
Foreword 3
Publishing information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Contractual and legal considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction 4
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Assumptions made in the preparation of the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Mutual Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Abbreviations 5
Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
W/2. Deflectograph 10
Survey category (CS229, 3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Processing of deflectograph data (CS229, 3.23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1
CS 229 Revision 0 Release notes
Release notes
Version Date Details of amendments
0 Mar 2020 Welsh Government National Application Annex to CS 229.
2
CS 229 Revision 0 Foreword
Foreword
Publishing information
This document is published by Highways England on behalf of the Welsh Government.
This document, along with CS 230 and CD 227, supersede HD29/08 which is withdrawn.
3
CS 229 Revision 0 Introduction
Introduction
Background
This National Application Annex sets out the Welsh Government-specific requirements for undertaking
detailed, scheme-level pavement surveys and investigations.
Specifically, it covers visual condition surveys (VCS), the temperature and seasonal limits used to
define deflectograph survey categories, GPS accuracy requirements for falling weight deflectometers
(FWD) and processing requirements for deflectograph and FWD data.
Mutual Recognition
Where there is a requirement in this document for compliance with any part of a "British Standard" or
other technical specification, that requirement may be met by compliance with the Mutual Recognition
clause in GG 101 [Ref 4.N].
4
CS 229 Revision 0 Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
WG Welsh Government
CRCP Continuously reinforced concrete pavement
ESBM Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
GPS Global Positioning System
IRIS Integrated roads information system
OSGR Ordnance Survey grid reference
PMS Pavement management system
SCANNER Surface condition assessment for the national network of roads
SCRIM Sideways force routine investigation machine
VCS Visual condition survey
5
CS 229 Revision 0 W/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
NOTE 1 More information regarding the IRIS contract is available from Welsh Government (WG).
NOTE 2 The SCANNER specification for imaging is available from WG.
W/1.3 All VCS data shall be referenced against the IRIS PMS network referencing system.
W/1.4 On jointed rigid pavements, the IRIS PMS referencing shall be supplemented by numbering of the bays.
W/1.5 The results of the VCS shall be set out in the form of a strip plan to be provided in electronic format.
W/1.6 The strip plan shall record defects (as described in Section W/1) and other road surface features
including surface type, construction types and temporary repairs.
Rigid pavements
W/1.9 On rigid pavements, the VCS shall assign defects and condition using the definitions and symbols
listed in Figure W/1.9a and W/1.9b.
6
CS 229 Revision 0 W/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
7
CS 229 Revision 0 W/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
8
CS 229 Revision 0 W/1. Visual condition surveys (CS229, 2.1)
W/1.10 The air temperature and weather conditions at the time of the VCS shall be recorded.
W/1.10.1 Surveys of concrete roads should be carried out in the cooler months of the year between mid-October
and mid-April.
NOTE 1 Cracks are more noticeable and the efficiency of joint seals can be better assessed at low
temperatures.
NOTE 2 Cracks are most readily visible when the pavement surface is drying out after wet conditions.
W/1.11 The occurrence of alkali-silica reaction shall be recorded.
NOTE Alkali-silica reaction can be inferred from the presence of areas of crazing containing a white or creamy
powdery material which streaks the surface after heavy rainfall.
9
CS 229 Revision 0 W/2. Deflectograph
W/2. Deflectograph
Survey category (CS229, 3.3)
W/2.1 The temperature and time of year limits set out in Figure W/2.1 and Figure W/2.2 shall be used to
define the deflectograph survey category.
10
CS 229 Revision 0 W/2. Deflectograph
NOTE 2 Equivalent thickness of sound bituminous material (ESBM) is calculated automatically by IRIS PMS.
NOTE 3 The shaded areas in Figure W/2.1b represent the permitted periods for each survey category period.
11
CS 229 Revision 0 W/3. Falling weight deflectometer (FWD)
12
CS 229 Revision 0 W/4. Normative references
Ref 1.N UK Roads Liaison Group . TRL. AQA DPTSD, 'Accreditation and Quality Assurance
of Dynamic Plate Test Survey Devices'
Ref 2.N Concrete Society (on behalf of Highways England and Britpave). CS CPMM,
'Concrete Pavement Maintenance Manual'
Ref 3.N Highways England. CD 227, 'Design for pavement maintenance'
Ref 4.N Highways England. GG 101, 'Introduction to the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges'
13
© Crown copyright 2020.
You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the
Open Government Licence. To view this licence:
visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/,
write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU,
or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.