You are on page 1of 18

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1719-6

ORIGINAL PAPER

The assessment of the genotoxicity of e‑waste leachates from e‑waste


dumpsites in Metro Manila, Philippines
Z. F. Alam1   · A. J. V. Riego1 · J. H. R. P. Samson1 · S. A. V. Valdez1

Received: 30 March 2017 / Revised: 21 July 2017 / Accepted: 9 May 2018


© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2018

Abstract
The extraordinary growth in the usage of electronic gadgets and their improper disposal has led to the massive problem of
electronic waste management in the Philippines. The improper disposal of e-waste can lead to the exposure to the hazardous
substances that can be harmful to the humans as well as to the environment. Genotoxicity of e-waste from three different
e-waste landfills sites in and around Metro Manila was investigated using the Allium cepa bioassay. Morphological modifica-
tions of the Allium cepa roots, inhibition of root growth, mitotic index and the induction of high frequency of chromosomal
aberrations were observed in the Allium cepa roots exposed to e-waste leachates prepared from the soil samples collected
from all three sites tested as compared to the control. Since heavy metals are one of the hazardous components released
during e-waste recycling, environmental contamination was further detected by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy to detect
the presence of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) in the soil samples of the e-waste recycling sites and in the hair of the
informal recyclers. Our results are among the first few in the Philippines that establish the genotoxicity of e-waste as well as
trace the route of the heavy metal component of e-waste into the human subjects through the exposure to the environmental
contamination by e-waste. Hence, a proper e-waste management is an absolute priority to minimize the risk to the Filipino
population and the environment.

Keywords  E-waste · Heavy metals · Philippines · Chromosomal aberrations · Allium cepa · Genotoxicity

Introduction Cambodia, Vietnam, Philippines, Bangladesh and Pakistan


have not only witnessed increase in the domestic e-waste
Electronic waste generation and its management is one of generation but are also the recipients of the e-waste gener-
the global issues that need immediate attention and action. ated in the developed countries due to cheap labor and lack
According to the Solving the E-waste Problem Initiative of stringent regulations.
(StEP) estimation, 49.8 million tons of used electrical and Philippines with the distinction of being known as the
electronic equipment was discarded as e-waste in 2012 and “Texting Capital of the World” has also seen tremendous
the e-waste generation is further estimated to be a stagger- increase in the generation of e-waste in the past few years
ing 65.4 million tons by 2017 (UNU 2013). Many develop- (Alam 2016). The increase in the e-waste is from two
ing economies located in the vast continent of Asia have sources—the locally generated e-waste comprising of the
become the major e-waste contributor to the world with an obsolete electronic gadgets discarded by the end users and
estimated 16 million tons of e-waste generation in the year the foreign e-wastes that end up in Philippines due to the
2014 itself, thereby making the Asian continent the emerg- transboundary movement of the e-waste from developed
ing “E-waste Hotspot.” The countries like China, India, countries for recycling purposes. Though the Basel Conven-
tion treaty has made efforts to provide a legitimate frame-
work to regulate the transboundary movement of hazardous
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
wastes, many developing countries including Philippines end
* Z. F. Alam up as recipients of the hazardous wastes from the developed
zeba.alam@dlsu.edu.ph countries for recycling purposes (Gutierrez and Agarrado
2011).
1
Biology Department, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft
Avenue, Manila, Philippines

13
Vol.:(0123456789)
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Most of these informal e-waste-recycling activities are and mitotic index and induction of chromosomal aberrations.
located at the e-waste dumpsites at the Smoky Mountain, Genotoxicity refers to the capacity of any clastogenic agent
Pier 18 and Tondo in Manila, Dreamland in Rosario, Cavite to cause lesions in the genetic material or mutations in DNA
and Valenzuela cities (Gutierrez and Agarrado 2011). The and thereby interruption in the genetic transmission. The gen-
e-waste consists of over 1000 toxic substances; the more otoxins are any such agents that possess the ability to alter
prevalent are heavy metals like lead, mercury, arsenic, cad- the DNA. The genotoxic potential is vital, as it is a tool to
mium and organic pollutants such as brominated diphenyl determine the magnitude of genetic risk to humans by an envi-
ethers, polybrominated diphenyls, dibenzofurans dioxins, ronmental agent/chemical due to unintentional or accidental
hexavalent chromium besides glass, plastics, wood, iron exposure. Due to ethnic, logistic and practical reasons, often
and steel (Lundgren 2012). Some of these toxic substances it is unfeasible to carry out direct assessment in humans; con-
such as cadmium, hexavalent chromium and beryllium are sequently, other test systems and assay methods are needed.
known to be carcinogenic, and others such as the organic Allium cepa assay has proven to be a fast, very efficient and
pollutants like polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polycyclic sensitive method, which involves both macroscopic and micro-
aromatic hydrocarbons and aluminum cause genotoxicity. scopic parameters to detect environmental genotoxicity. For
The improper e-waste management leads to the exposure of this reason, the Allium cepa assay has been classified as one
human populations to these hazardous substances as well as of the most well-established plant assay systems for environ-
the contamination of the environment. mental biomonitoring by the USEPA (Grant 1982b). However,
In the developing countries including Philippines, a sub- there are very limited studies where the e-waste genotoxicity
stantial portion of recycling of e-waste is carried out by has been established using the Allium cepa assay (Bakare et al.
small junk shop owners or by informal recyclers (scavengers, 2013). The test is also done in vivo, which means data can be
waste pickers and junk shop and scrap dealers) who use very extrapolated to other plants and even animals (Tedesco and
primitive and often-unsafe practices such as segregating and Laughinghouse 2012). For this reason, in this study, we are
sorting by bare hands and thereby getting exposed to the using Allium cepa assay to evaluate the suitability of this assay
dangerous substances present in the e-waste. At the e-waste method to study the e-waste genotoxicity.
landfill sites, the e-waste is either dumped or buried in the Since the heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, chromium,
trenches that are later covered with a thick layer of soil. This mercury, copper, manganese, nickel, arsenic, zinc, iron and
method often leads to the contamination of the surround- aluminum are also reported to be present in the e-waste (Jin-
ing areas including the groundwater due to the leaching out hui et al. 2011), the soil samples and leachates will be sub-
of these hazardous substances and heavy metals, especially jected to Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy to determine their
after the heavy precipitation (Pant et al. 2012). Further, the presence in the soil samples and in the hair of the informal
practice of open burning of e-waste to gather precious metals e-waste recyclers. Leachate is a liquid that contains dissolved
leads to the emission of heavy metals in air that results in and suspended substances that can percolate through soil due
air pollution and contamination of the environment besides to rainfall or surface drainage and contaminate the environ-
causing health issues to the recyclers. ment, for example the groundwater. The Global Environmen-
In order to come up with suitable guidelines and proper tal Monitoring System (GEMS) of the United Nations Envi-
e-waste management practices, it is essential to gather data ronment Program has recommended the use of human hair
and relevant information regarding the full potential of the as one of the important materials for biological monitoring
toxicity impacts of e-waste which at the moment is very of environmental contamination (Dodd 2010). The presence
scant and mainly from the samples and case studies from of heavy metals in the hair of the informal e-waste recyclers
China, India and Nigeria (Li et al. 2007; Caravanos et al. would be indicative of exposure to the e-waste. The data
2011). There is an urgent need to gather data and informa- obtained could be the baseline for any future studies related
tion from e-waste dumpsites located at other countries and to the consequences, toxicity and risk assessment of e-waste
also design new and sensitive models (both in vitro and exposure in the Philippines and elsewhere. The study was
in vivo) to evaluate the efficacy of the existing standard assay conducted during the period of April 2016 to February 2017.
methods to study the full cytotoxic and genotoxic potential
of e-waste. Since Philippines is one of the biodiversity hot
spots, it is of utmost importance to gather relevant infor- Materials and methods
mation regarding the e-waste toxicity if any, so that timely
action can be taken to protect the environment. This research Collection of samples
is one of the very first few attempts to study the genotoxicity
of the e-waste in the Philippines. Soil samples were collected from three different sites in
This study uses the Allium cepa assay to determine the Tondo, Manila, where a substantial amount of e-waste is
genotoxicity of e-waste in terms of inhibition of root growth being dumped before being recycled and processed for

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

further use. After the preliminary survey and extensive 1000 mL of distilled water. The beakers were covered and
discussions with the Barangay chief and the inputs from placed in a shaker with a temperature of 30–60 °C for 48 h.
the Sustainable Project Management personnel operat- Filtration was done 4–5 times or until soil particles were no
ing in Tondo, three sites were selected to carry out our longer observable. All the samples were carefully labeled
experiments. These were the sites where the e-waste was and stored in the refrigerator until further use.
found to be dumped (Fig. 1c, Site 3), the e-waste was burnt
(Fig. 1c, Site 2) and a site which was close to the water body, Preparation of simulated e‑waste
namely—Estero De Vitas (Fig. 1c, Site 1).
For control, the soil samples were collected from sites The simulated e-waste was prepared by collecting several
away from e-waste landfills (Fig. 1a, b). To keep the control old and obsolete electronic devices such as cellular phones,
samples absolutely neutral, the soil samples for control were cameras, MP3 players. These devices were crushed into
taken from two sites—Tagaytay (74.5 km) and Batangas smaller pieces using a hammer and then boiled with distilled
(109 km) away from Metro Manila, respectively. water for 30 min.
Hair samples were collected from the informal e-waste
recyclers located in Tondo as well as from healthy indi- Allium cepa test
viduals belonging to professions where there is no history
of e-waste recycling. All recommended guidelines by the The genotoxicity of the soil samples was assessed using the
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) of De La Salle Univer- standard Allium cepa test described by Tedesco and Laugh-
sity were followed such as explanation about our study and inghouse (2012). Onion bulbs were carefully examined in
use of consent and survey forms to obtain permission from terms of size and condition before being purchased from a
the participants. The interview was conducted face-to-face, local market in Makati. The outermost scales and old roots
and the information regarding their personal details, work of each bulb were eliminated to allow the development of
and health was carefully collected using the questionnaire new roots. All bulbs were placed in approximately 60 mL
(“Appendix I”). plastic containers with tap water ensuring that the basal
stems were completely submerged. After the growth period
of 48 h, the roots of each bulb were measured. The bulbs
Laboratory analysis were then exposed to different concentrations (30, 50, 70,
100%) of the previously prepared e-waste soil leachates from
Preparation of soil leachates different sites. Tap water served as the negative control while
10 ppm of methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) served as the
The soil leachates were prepared using the soil samples col- positive control. Five replicates were used for each set of
lected from the different sites following the standard pro- treatments. After 24 h of exposure to the individual treat-
cedure—the modified American Society for Testing and ments, the root length of the onion bulbs was recorded. The
Materials (ASTM-D 3987-35) method (Bakare et al. 2007). tips of the roots that were observed to be the healthiest were
Exactly 250 g of each soil sample was measured using an cut out and fixed in a 3:1 mixture of ethanol: acetic acid.
analytical balance and then placed in a beaker containing

Fig. 1  a, b Location of control site. c Location of e-waste soil samples (three sites)

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

After 24 h, the fixing solution was replaced with 70% etha- (AAS) following the standard method described by Cortez
nol and stored in the refrigerator until used. and Ching (2014). Samples were put into 30 mL crucibles
For mitotic index and chromosomal aberrations analysis, and oven-dried for 2–3 min. These were ground using mor-
the root tips were treated with 1 N HCl for 12–20 min at tar and pestle, then placed inside the furnace and ignited at
60 °C. After hydrolysis, the roots were rinsed with distilled 450 °C in order to eliminate organic matter. Exactly 0.5 g of
water for 2–3 times and were immersed in acetocarmine stain each sample was weighed in the 30 mL crucibles and then
for 30 min at 60 °C. They were then placed on the glass slides placed on a hot plate inside the fume hood. Samples were
and gently squashed in 45% glacial acetic acid. The slides digested twice with 10 mL of 1:1 mixture of concentrated
were examined under a light microscope with a total magni- ­HNO3 and ­H2O2. Heating was done until the solution was
fication of 100×. Approximately 1000 cells were scored per completely dissolved; then, 20 mL of 2 M ­HNO3 was added
treatment for mitotic index and chromosomal aberrations. to the residue. The contents of each crucible were transferred
The formulas used to calculate for the mitotic index and to 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask, labeled carefully and stored in
the proportion of chromosomal aberrations are as follows: the refrigerator until used for analysis.
P+M+A+T
Mitotic index = , Statistical analysis
Total number of cells
The results were analyzed using the standard open Statis-
Pa + Ma + Aa + Ta
Chromosomal aberrations = . tica software version 13. The differences in the mean ± SE
P+M+A+T values for various treatments were subjected to multivari-
ate and univariate single-factor ANOVA at the 0.05 sig-
Heavy metals analysis
nificance level. The Tukey–Kramer test was carried out
to further arrive at the concentrations of e-waste leachate
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy was carried out using the
causing significant genotoxicity as compared to the negative
available AA-6300 Shimadzu spectrophotometer to check
and positive controls. Linear regression analysis was done
for the presence of heavy metals in the soil and hair samples.
to determine whether there were any trends between root
The metals that were tested include cadmium (Cd), copper
growth, mitotic index and chromosomal aberrations versus
(Cu), lead (Pb), nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn). The multi-element
increasing concentrations of the e-waste leachate treatments.
working solution of 100 ppm and the multi-element stand-
T test was done to compare the means of the control and the
ard solutions (0.5, 1, 5, 7 and 10 ppm) were prepared using
experimental group with the maximum permissible limits
distilled water for dilution.
set by World Health Organization (WHO) for each metal for
soil as well as hair samples.
Preparation of the hair samples

Acid digestion of the hair samples was performed using the


procedure described by Peter et al. (2012). The collected hair
Results and discussions
samples of the healthy individuals (control group) and infor-
Root growth
mal e-waste recyclers were cut into approximately 0.3 cm;
then, exactly 0.1065 g was weighed for every hair specimen.
The absolute concentrations (100%) of e-waste simulated as
The samples were washed once in a mixture of detergent and
well as the e-waste soil leachates collected from the three
water then twice in deionized water. These were placed into
sites induced significant inhibition of root growth in the
30 mL crucibles in which 8 mL of concentrated nitric acid
Allium cepa roots exposed to the leachates for 24 h (Fig. 2,
­(HNO3) was added. The containers were placed on a hot
Graph I), and 72 h (Fig. 2, Graph IV) as compared to the
plate inside the fume hood, and hair samples were digested
negative control (tap water) and the negative control (Batan-
for about 15 min. As the solutions became clear, 1 mL of
gas soil leachate). The maximum inhibition of root growth
30% ­H2O2 was added and heating was done until the volume
observed after 24- and 72-h exposure was comparable to
was decreased to about 2.5 mL. Each digested hair sample
the root growth inhibition induced by the positive control
was transferred to a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask, carefully
(MMS, 10 ppm) at p < 0.05 (Fig. 2, Graph I and Fig. 2,
labeled and stored in the refrigerator until used.
Graph IV). The regression analysis performed for all three
sites shows that there is a concentration-dependent inhibi-
Preparation of the soil samples
tion of root growth upon 24-h exposure with e-waste lea-
chates from site 2 having the highest R2 = 0.83756, followed
Soil samples were digested prior to the analysis of heavy
by site 1 with R2 = 0.76802 and site 3 with R2 = 0.73110,
metal concentration by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
respectively (Fig. 3, Graphs I, II, III). For the 72-h exposure,

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Fig. 2  Comparison between different treatments (100% concentration) from all three sites in terms of inhibition of root growth, mitotic index
and induction of chromosomal aberrations in the Allium cepa root cells upon 24- and 72-h exposure

Fig. 3  Root growth inhibition with increase in e-waste soil leachates concentration treatment from all three sites observed in the Allium cepa
root meristem with 24- and 72-h exposure

site 3 had the highest R2 = 0.94502 followed by site 2 with which is the effective concentrations at which root growth
R2 = 0.92260 and site 1 with R2 = 0.78646 (Fig. 3, Graphs amounts to 50% of the control treatment, was close to 30%
IV, V, VI). Further for 24-h exposure, site 3, and for 72-h concentrations, which is similar to the ­EC50 value of 37.5%
exposure, the site 2 had the lowest slopes for root growth concentration of e-waste leachate reported elsewhere (Baba-
inhibition. From the graphs, it can be inferred that the E
­ C50, tunde and Anabuike 2015). The morphological alterations

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

in the roots upon exposure to absolute concentrations of the as well as to extract the precious metals such as palladium,
e-waste leachates were observed to be very severe (Fig. 4). gold, silver, copper from the discarded mother boards, elec-
tric wires, etc.
Mitotic index
Chromosomal aberrations
The decrease in the mitotic index in the Allium cepa root
cells (which is indicative of the blocked G­ 2 phase in the cell All concentrations of e-waste soil leachates tested as well
cycle) was observed following 24-h exposure (Fig. 2, Graph as the simulated e-waste induced chromosomal aberrations
II) and 72-h exposure (Fig. 2, Graph V) to the absolute con- such as fragments, vagrant chromosomes, anaphase and
centration (100%) of the e-waste leachates from all three telophase bridges and laggards in the Allium cepa root cells
sites as well as the e-waste simulated. The decrease in the exposed to the leachates for 24 and 72 h (Fig. 7, Table 1).
mitotic index induced by 100% concentrations of e-waste The absolute concentration of e-waste leachates from all
leachates from all three sites for 24- and 72-h exposure three sites induced significantly higher percentage of chro-
was almost comparable to the decrease in the mitotic index mosomal aberrations than the positive control at p < 0.05
induced by the positive control (MMS, 10 ppm); however, for 24-h exposure (Fig. 2, Graph III). For 72-h exposure,
the e-waste leachate (100% concentration) from site 2 caused though the extent of chromosomal damage was almost
more inhibition (though statistically insignificant at p < 0.05) comparable, only for site 1 it was statistically significant as
than the other two sites tested in the 24-h exposure period. compared to the positive control (Fig. 2, Graph VI). With
Similar trend was observed in the 72-h exposure; however, regard to the regression analysis for concentration-depend-
there was no significant difference between the levels of ent increase in the chromosomal aberrations performed for
inhibition caused by the e-waste leachates from the three all three sites, no predictable trend was observed for 24-h
sites. With regard to the regression analysis for inhibition exposure as evident by the R2 values where Site 2 had the
of mitotic index performed for all three sites, no predictable highest R2 = 0.62844, followed by Site 1 with R2 = 0.58434
trend was observed as evident by the R2 values. At 24-h and Site 3 with R2 = 0.44316, respectively (Fig. 6, Graphs I,
exposure, Site 1 had the highest R2 = 0.59811, followed II, III). However, for 72-h exposure, a strong concentration-
by Site 2 with R2 = 0.56030 and Site 3 with R2 = 0.55316, dependent correlation was observed as evident by the R2
respectively (Fig. 5, Graphs I, II, III). Conversely, Site 2 values for the e-waste leachates concentrations from all three
was observed to have the highest R2 = 0.85715, followed sites tested with the site 3 being the highest, R2 = 0.89458,
by Site 3 with R2 = 0.78926 and Site 1 with R2 = 0.71973, followed by Site 2 with R 2 = 0.86891 and Site 1 with
respectively, at 72-h exposure (Fig. 5, Graphs IV, V, VI). The R2 = 0.78650, respectively (Fig. 6, IV, V, VI). The positive
Site 1 (24-h exposure) and the Site 2 (72-h exposure) had slope indicates the increase in the chromosomal aberrations
the lowest slopes, which indicates that their mitotic index is with the increase in the concentration of e-waste soil lea-
decreasing at a faster rate compared to the other two sites. chates (Fig. 6).
The observed trends and the E ­ C50 value of 30% concen- Interestingly in our study, the simulated e-waste exposure
tration are calculated for root length point toward the need resulted in the ghost cells in the root meristem of Allium
to further test the concentrations lower than 30% e-waste cepa (Fig. 7). Ghost cell is a dead cell in which outline is
leachates and the extent of induced genotoxicity. It would visible but nucleus and cytoplasmic structures are not stain-
be noteworthy to mention that the site 2 is where the e-waste able and ultimately result in cell death or apoptosis. The
was regularly burnt to minimize the volume of the e-waste high concentrations of genotoxins and cytotoxins have been

Fig. 4  Inhibition of root growth in Allium cepa exposed to various treatments: a negative control—tap water, b control—Batangas soil leachate,
c1–3 e-waste leachates—initial, 24- and 72-h exposure and d positive control—(MMS, 10 ppm)

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Fig. 5  Inhibition of mitotic index for e-waste soil leachates treatments from the three sites for 24- and 72-h exposure. Trend line is for concentra-
tions from 30 to 100% compared to negative- and positive-control treatments

Table 1  Breakdown of Treatment Abnormalities Total Chromosomal


results for total chromosomal abnormali- aberrations (%)
aberrations for three e-waste P M A T ties
sites at different concentrations
of soil leachates tested for 24- Hours of exposure 24 72 24 72 24 72 24 72 24 72 24 72
and 72-h exposure
Negative control (tap water) 21 15 24 9 25 19 4 12 74 55 20.10 17.90
Site 1 (30%) 18 10 32 13 27 20 15 18 92 61 44.90 33.30
Site 2 (30%) 6 58 13 17 25 48 20 12 64 135 40.50 40.80
Site 3 (30%) 18 20 30 14 33 24 24 9 105 67 54.12 36.80
Site 1 (50%) 13 36 49 19 42 23 6 12 110 90 49.50 45.20
Site 2 (50%) 2 11 23 9 36 42 14 12 75 74 46.60 41.80
Site 3 (50%) 23 56 20 22 37 25 4 17 84 120 48.55 51.70
Site 1 (70%) 1 19 35 23 47 28 8 14 91 84 67.40 46.90
Site 2 (70%) 19 41 21 20 44 68 21 22 105 151 53.80 58.10
Site 3 (70%) 29 50 42 19 32 67 22 27 125 163 60.39 63.20
Site 1 (100%) 10 27 49 17 35 29 19 23 113 96 74.30 49.50
Site 2 (100%) 13 49 25 23 37 59 17 10 92 141 62.60 62.90
Site 3 (100%) 15 86 30 20 54 42 13 22 112 170 58.64 66.10
Batangas 4 20 23 16 58 24 4 14 89 74 21.00 20.10
Positive control (MMS, 10 ppm) 11 79 18 8 52 31 18 17 99 135 50.00 79.90

reported to induce the ghost cells (Celik and Aslanturk sticky chromosomes in Allium roots after treatment with
2006). The exposure to toxins also results in the partial dis- various heavy metals such as Hg, Ni and Cu (Fiskesjö 1988).
banding of nucleoproteins, condensation of chromosomes In our study, all e-waste soil leachates from the three sites
and depolymerization of DNA, which result in sticky chro- induced genotoxicity in terms of inhibition of root length
mosomes. Many studies have reported the occurrence of and mitotic index and induction of chromosomal aberra-
tions; hence, we conclude that Allium cepa assay can be

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Fig. 6  Chromosomal aberration increase observed in Allium root cells exposed for 24 h and 72 h to various e-waste leachates treatments

used for environmental biomonitoring of e-waste toxicity concentration of heavy metals present in the control soil
for preliminary screening. samples and the maximum permissible limits set by WHO
with the exception of copper which was above the refer-
Heavy metals analysis ence value (Table 2). The concentration of all the five heavy
metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) was higher in the e-waste
AAS of soil samples soil samples than the control site though statistically insig-
nificant. The concentration of metals in the e-waste site was
The assessment of the Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy found to be in the order of Ni > Cu > Pb > Zn > Cd. The con-
results confirmed the presence of heavy metals tested— centrations of heavy metals in the e-waste soil samples were
Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in the soil samples of the e-waste found to be many folds higher than the permissible values by
dumpsites and e-waste recycling sites located at Tondo, WHO; however, it was statistically insignificant (Table 2).
Metro Manila (Table 2). Since some studies have reported Therefore, AAS results establish the presence of heavy
the heavy metal contamination around Metro Manila and metals in the soil samples of the e-waste, which could be
Manila Bay (Prudente et al. 1994; Sia et al. 2009), the con- one of the probable causative agents for the genotoxicity in
trol soil samples were collected from two sites away from Allium cepa roots exposed to e-waste leachates. Our findings
Manila—namely Batangas and Tagaytay. There is a varia- show trends similar to the ones reported from other e-waste
tion to a certain extent regarding the maximum permissible dumpsites though the concentration of the heavy metals was
limits of heavy metals in the soil samples and suggested found to be less as compared to other such e-waste dump-
thresholds for industrial, residential and agricultural soils, sites (Bakare et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2012). One of the
by various sources such as Dutch pollutant standards, US reasons for low concentrations of heavy metals could be the
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), European presence of organic matter in soil which when combined
Environmental Agency (EEA), World Health Organiza- with the toxic metal cations, reduces the availability of the
tion (WHO) and Department of Environment and Natural heavy metals (Beck et al. 1993). The burning of e-waste
Resources (DENR), which is the local screening authority to minimize the volume as well as to extract the precious
in Philippines. In this study, the maximum permissible limits metals leads to the leakage of heavy metals and toxins into
prescribed by World Health Organization (WHO) were taken the environment, which is evident by the presence of these
into consideration for the comparison of the data, as it is the heavy metals in the soil samples.
most widely accepted. The leaching of heavy metals and other hazardous
The multivariate test (i.e., Wilks, Pillai’s, Hotellng e-waste-associated chemicals can contaminate the ground-
and Roy’s) suggests no significant difference between the water and rivers, thereby posing serious threat to the

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Fig. 7  Chromosomal aberrations observed in Allium cepa root cells in anaphase, e, f sticky chromosomes, g anaphase bridge, h C-mito-
grown in various e-waste leachates treatments. a, b Vagrant chromo- sis, i simulated e-waste treatment-induced Ghost cells—no viable
somes and laggards, c chromosome fragment, d spindle abnormalities cells were observed in e-waste treatment, j normal mitotic cell

Table 2  Distribution and concentration of heavy metals (ppm) observed in the soil samples from control and e-waste sites using Atomic Absorp-
tion Spectroscopy (AAS)

Soil sample Cd Cu Ni Pb Zn
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE

Control 0.00845 ± 0.02005 1.7873 ± 0.078 1.67845 ± 0.42375 − 1.0088 ± 0.904 7.348 ± 2.2618


E-waste 0.3395 ± 0.1998 22.0413 ± 13.2196 63.0374 ± 58.0076 19.7175 ± 14.3591 13.58555 ± 1.24515
Maximum permissible 0.005 0.05 0.5 0.05 5
limit (WHO)
*p value 0.891519 0.028563 0.219752 0.449895 0.488097
**p value 0.342781 0.34457 0.476089 0.401477 0.091689
***p value 0.574052

Bold value refers to statistically significant (P < 0.05)


*p value: difference between the means of control group versus maximum permissible limit
**p value: difference between the means of experimental group versus maximum permissible limit
***p value: difference between the means of the control and the experimental groups

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

environment and to human populations. There are conflict- be above the reference values set by the WHO at p < 0.05.
ing reports regarding the presence of heavy metals in the Levels of all heavy metals in rank order according to their
water samples and soil samples in Philippines. Sia (2008) means were: Zn > Ni > Cd > Cu > Pb for both the control and
reported no significant difference between the heavy metal experimental groups. The concentrations of heavy metals
concentration (Cr, Pb, Cd) in the groundwater samples of found in the hair samples of the informal e-waste recyclers
control and Payatas site, Manila; however, the presence of were comparable to the concentrations in the hair samples
heavy metals such as lead and cadmium in excess of allow- of e-waste recyclers reported in other studies (Wang et al.
able limits set by the US Environmental Protection Agency 2009). However, statistically, there was no significant dif-
was reported in community tap water samples of Manila ference between the concentrations of heavy metals in the
(Solidum and Solidum 2010). High fluctuation in the con- hair samples of informal e-waste recyclers when compared
centration of the heavy metals in the surface and sediment with the control group not exposed to e-wastes (p < 0.05).
samples from the Manila Bay was reported suggesting the Both the control and the e-waste recycler groups showed
inflowing rivers to be the source of pollution (Prudente et al. the concentration of the heavy metals many folds higher
1994). The possible source of these heavy metals could be than the permissible limits recommended by WHO with the
the leaching out of the heavy metals from these e-waste exception of Pb, which was absent in the samples of both
recycling sites and the e-waste dumpsites as suggested by the control and the e-waste recycler groups. The presence
our findings where one of the e-waste dumpsites is located of heavy metals in the control group far in excess than the
close to the Estero De Vitas, which is connected to the other permissible limit suggests the presence of these metals in the
water bodies in Manila. Since these heavy metals can bio- environment and the workplace of these subjects. Our results
accumulate in the aquatic organisms and fish is one of the indicate the absence of Pb in the scalp hair of the control and
main components of the Filipino diet, further investigations the informal e-waste recyclers though some other studies
of the soil leachates from e-waste dumpsites located in other conducted in Philippines have reported high levels of blood
areas such as Cavite and Laguna should be carried out not lead (Pb) in the adult women (Zhang et al. 1998) and chil-
only to detect the presence of heavy metals but also to detect dren (Sharma and Reutergardh 2000). The anomaly in our
the background contamination at various locations far away results could be due to small sample size and the influence
from landfills and industrial zones. of other socio-demographic factors such as gender-specific
differences, consumption of vitamins/mineral tablets and
AAS of hair samples herbal concoctions, use of indoor lead paints, unsafe hair
and cosmetic products and exposure to pollution.
The Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy results confirmed The presence of heavy metals and other toxins in the hair
the presence of heavy metals in the hair samples of the samples is the consequence of direct exposure to these tox-
informal e-waste recyclers (Table 3). Surprisingly, the lev- ins. The acute and chronic exposure to the e-waste toxic-
els of all heavy metals tested (Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn), except ity has been well documented in many studies from China
Pb, in the hair samples of the control group were found to (Wang et al. 2009; India (Eguchi et al. 2012) and Ghana

Table 3  Distribution and concentration of heavy metals (ppm) in the hair samples of control group and informal e-waste recyclers
Hair Sample Cd Cu Ni Pb Zn
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE

Control 0.663442857 ± 0.104718 0.480714286 ± 0.120576 1.430785714 ± 0.204886 − 1.887542857 ± 0.106622 4.972085714 ± 0.737191


E-waste 0.974928571 ± 0.05572 0.369228571 ± 0.065058 0.995285714 ± 0.044538 − 1.262414286 ± 0.702921 3.312142857 ± 0.478714
Maximum permissible 0.06 0.1 0.1 15
limit (WHO)
*p value 0.001191 0.019628 0.000002 0.00001
**p value 0.000003 0.00609 0.10069 0
***p value 0.25751

*p value: difference between the means of control group (per metal) vs maximum permissible limit
**p value: difference between the means of experimental group (per metal) versus maximum permissible limit
***p value: difference between the means of the control and the experimental group

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

(Asante et al. 2012). In Philippines, as anywhere else, the to carry out preliminary screening. The AAS results con-
management of e-waste is carried out by formal sector and firmed the presence of five heavy metals tested—cadmium,
informal sector. According to the Department of Environ- copper, nickel, lead and zinc in the soil samples from the
ment and Natural Resources, 23 registered facilities formally three e-waste recycling and e-waste dumpsites more than the
known as Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD) are sup- control sites as well as the standard permissible limits. The
posedly engaged in handling e-waste; however, most of it presence of heavy metals in the hair samples establishes the
is indirect where it is a part of the industrial or solid waste occupational hazards and the possibility of long-term effects
(Yoshida et al. 2016). The informal sector consists of more of toxicity of these heavy metals on the health of the control
than 2300 registered and unregistered junkshops with the group as well as the e-waste recyclers. In our investigation,
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority; however, the site 2 was deliberately selected for our study as burn-
there are numerous scavengers, waste pickers, women and ing of e-waste is one of the common practices often used
children who are engaged in e-waste recycling although no by informal recyclers to minimize the volume of e-waste
reliable estimate regarding the actual numbers is available and also to extract precious metals in the Philippines. Our
as of now. Our study is the first in Philippines that focuses interaction during the interview with the informal recyclers
on the evaluation of genotoxicity of e-waste using labora- also revealed that most of the recyclers were aware of the
tory data (Allium cepa assay) and establishes the correlation presence of these precious metals and their value. Based
between the possibility of its hazardous impact on humans on our results, it is recommended that the practice of burn-
by determining the presence of heavy metals in the soil sam- ing to manage the e-waste should be strongly discouraged
ples of the e-waste dumpsites as well as in the hair samples to minimize the toxic effects of e-waste to the humans and
of recyclers. Though our investigations involved careful environment. Just like Philippines, many ASEAN (Asso-
selection of the informal recyclers after consultations and ciation of South East Asian countries) member countries
confirmation of the relevant information about the recyclers like Vietnam, Cambodia have shown rapid increase in the
from various stakeholders such as the Barangay chief, some volume of e-waste generation. Malaysia, Hong Kong, China
NGO workers active in the e-waste dumpsites, the study and Singapore are engaged in the import of e-waste from the
also suffers from the limitation of the inability to exclude European Union to be used as source of secondary raw mate-
other such contributory factors toward the genotoxic effects rials (Ibitz 2012). It is important that these ASEAN coun-
induced by e-waste. However, the presence of heavy metals tries should engage in drafting a common policy response to
in the soil and the hair samples of both the control group address the issue especially that can control the transbound-
and the recyclers confirms the possibility of the chronic ary movement of e-waste among these countries. To formu-
exposure to the heavy metals and their possible role in pos- late the guidelines and proper legislation, it is of critical and
ing health risk to the human subjects. Further investigations vital importance that more investigations are carried out at
using AAS and comet assay are being carried out to increase other e-waste locations and reliable and sensitive in vitro
the sample size, including the gender-specific difference and and in vivo assays are designed and tested to detect the full
occupational link criteria for the control group to arrive at a impact and mechanism of the genotoxicity of e-waste. We
baseline value for the frontline heavy metals including lead propose collaboration and coordination between different
(Pb) in the hair and blood samples of the general public as research groups of these countries where similar experi-
well as in the informal and formal e-waste recyclers. ments and assay systems can be devised to generate data
that can be shared and investigated to come up with common
framework to address this issue in this entire region.
Conclusion
Acknowledgements  We would like to thank Ms. Anita Celdran, Direc-
tor, Sustainable Project Management (SPM), Philippines, and Ms. Joyet
The inhibition of root growth, mitotic index and the induc- Castor, Project Manager and Community Liaison, (SPM, Philippines)
tion of chromosomal aberrations in the Allium cepa root for their continuous support and help in our field survey and identify-
meristems exposed and grown in the e-waste leachates col- ing the e-waste recyclers located at Tondo, Manila, Dr. Frumencio Co,
lected from the e-waste dumpsites located in and around Mathematics Department, De La Salle University, for his help in carry-
ing out the statistical analysis of the results and Dr. Maria Carmen Tan,
Metro Manila are indicative of the genotoxic potential of Mr. Michael Dominic Ajero and Mr. Irving Chiong from the Chemistry
the e-waste. Our results confirm the sensitivity of the Allium Department for their assistance in carrying out the AAS. This study
cepa to the hazardous chemicals present in the e-waste tox- was funded by the University Research Coordination Office (URCO),
ins; hence, this plant assay system can be recommended to De La Salle University, Project No-59 FU3TAY14-3TAY15 with Dr
Zeba F. Alam as Principal Investigator.
be used for environmental biomonitoring of e-waste toxicity

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Appendix I

Questionnaire

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

References Ibitz A (2012) Environmental policy coordination in ASEAN: the case


of waste from electrical and electronic equipment. ASEAS – Aus-
trian J South-East Asian Stud 5(1):30–51
Alam Z (2016) The assessment of the of e-waste management gener-
Jinhui L, Huabo D, Pixing S (2011) Heavy metal contamination of
ated from cellular phones, laptops, and personal computers in the
surface soil in electronic waste dismantling area: site investi-
Philippines. Manila J Sci 9:27–42
gation and source-apportionment analysis. Waste Manag Res
Asante K, Agusa T, Biney C, Agyekum W, Bello M, Otsuka M, Itai
29(7):727–738
T, Takahashi S, Tanabe S (2012) Multi-trace element levels and
Li H, Yu L, Sheng G, Fu J, Peng P (2007) Severe PCDD/F and PBDD/F
arsenic speciation in urine of e-waste recycling workers from
pollution in air around an electronic waste dismantling area in
Agbogbloshie, Accra in Ghana. Sci Total Environ 424:63–73
China. Environ Sci Technol 41(16):5641–5646
Babatunde B, Anabuike F (2015) In vivo cytogenotoxicity of electronic
Lundgren K (2012) The global impact of e-waste: addressing the chal-
waste leachate from iloabuchi electronic market, Diobu, Rivers
lenge. International Labour Organization. http://ilo.org/wcmsp​5/
State, Nigeria on Allium cepa. Challenges 6(1):173–187
group​s/publi​c/—ed_dialo​gue/—secto​r/docum​ents/publi​catio​n/
Bakare A, Pandey A, Bajpayee M, Bhargav D, Chowdhuri D, Singh
wcms_19610​5.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
K, Murthy R, Dhawan A (2007) DNA damage induced in human
Pant D, Joshi D, Upreti M, Kotnala K (2012) Chemical and biologi-
peripheral blood lymphocytes by industrial solid waste and munic-
cal extraction of metals present in e-waste: a hybrid technology.
ipal sludge leachates. Environ Mol Mutagen 48(1):30–37
Waste Manag 32(5):979–990
Bakare A, Alabi O, Gbadebo A, Ogunsuyi O, Alimba C (2013) In vivo
Peter O, Eneji I, Ato R (2012) Analysis of heavy metals in human hair
cytogenotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by electronic waste
using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Am J Anal Chem
leachate and contaminated well water. Challenges 4:169–187
3:770–773
Beck A, Jones K, Hayes M, Mingelgrin U (1993) Organic substances
Prudente M, Ichihashi H, Tatsukawa R (1994) Heavy metal concentra-
in soil and water: natural constituents and their influences on con-
tions in sediments from Manila Bay, Philippines and inflowing
taminant behavior. R Soc Chem, Cambridge, p 7
rivers. Environ Pollut 86(1):83–88
Caravanos J, Clark E, Fuller R, Lambertson C (2011) Assessing worker
Sharma K, Reutergardh L (2000) Exposure of preschoolers to lead in
and environmental chemical exposure risks at an e-waste recycling
the Makati area of Metro Manila, the Philippines. Environ Res
and disposal site in Accra, Ghana. J Health Pollut 1:16–25
83:322–332
Celik T, Aslanturk O (2006) Antimitotic and anti-genotoxic effects
Sia Su (2008) Assessing the effect of a dumpsite to groundwater quality
of Plantago lanceolata aqueous extract on Allium cepa root tip
in Payatas, Philippines. Am J Environ Sci 4(4):276–280
meristem cells. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 61:693–697
Sia Su, Martillano K, Alcantara T, Ragragio E, De Jesus J, Hallare
Cortez L, Ching J (2014) Heavy metal concentration of dumpsite soil
A, Ramos G (2009) Assessing heavy metals in the waters, fish
and accumulation in Zea mays (corn) growing in a closed dump-
and macro invertebrates in Manila Bay, Philippines. J Appl Sci
site in Manila, Philippines. Int J Environ Sci Dev 5(1):77–80
Environ Sanit 4(3):187–195
Dodd G (2010) Heavy metal poisoning and hair analysis. Holist Vet.
Solidum J, Solidum G (2010) Assessment and remediation of heavy
https​://holis​ticve​tpetc​are.net/pdf/Heavy​_Metal​_Posio​n_Hair_
metals in community tap water from Manila, Philippines. In:
Analy​sis-2.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
International conference on environment science and engineer-
Eguchi A, Nomiyama K, Devanathan G, Subramanian A, Bulbule K,
ing IPCBEE, vol 32, pp 1–6
Parthasarathy P, Takahashi S, Tanabe S (2012) Different profiles
Tedesco S, Laughinghouse H (2012) Bioindicator of genotoxicity: the
of anthropogenic and naturally produced organohalogen com-
Allium cepa test. In: Srivastava J (ed) Environmental contamina-
pounds in serum from residents living near a coastal area and
tion. InTechOpen. https​://doi.org/10.5772/31371​
e-waste recycling workers in India. Environ Int 47:8–16
United Nations University (2013) StEP launches interactive world
Fiskesjö G (1988) The Allium-test an alternative in environmental stud-
e-WasteMap. U.S. environmental protection. http://unu.edu/media​
ies: the relative toxicity of metal ions. Mutat Res 197:243–260
-relat​ions/relea​ses/step-launc​hes-inter​activ​e-world​-e-waste​-map.
Grant W (1982) Chromosome aberration assays in Allium. A report of
html#info_. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutat
Accessed 16 Mar 2017
Res 99(3):273–291
Wang T, Fu J, Wang Y, Liao C, Tao Y, Jiang G (2009) Use of scalp hair
Gutierrez R, Agarrado G (2011) The vanishing e-wastes of the Phil-
as indicator of human exposure to heavy metals in an electronic
ippines. Ban Toxics. http://banto​xics.org/v2/image​s/downl​oads/
waste recycling area. Environ Pollut 157(8–9):2445–2451
ewast​e_repor​t.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
Yoshida A, Terazono A, Ballesteros F, Nguyen D, Sukandar S, Kojima
M, Sakata S (2016) E-waste recycling processes in Indonesia, the

13
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Philippines, and Vietnam: a case study of cathode ray tube TVs Zhang W, Hua W, Marie-Odile S (2012) Soil contamination due to
and monitors. Resour Conserv Recycl 106:48–58 e-waste disposal and recycling activities: a review with special
Zhang Z, Subida R, Agetano M, Nakatsuka H, Inoguchi N, Watanabe focus on China. Pedosphere 22(21):434–455
T, Shimbo S, Higashikawa K, Ikeda M (1998) Nonoccupational
exposure of adult women in Manila, the Philippines, to lead and
cadmium. Sci Total Environ 215:157–165

13

You might also like