Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name:
Course:
Institution:
Professor:
Date:
DIVERSIFICATION AS A CORPORATE STRATEGY 2
Introduction
a strategy in business in which an organization ventures in market field that is different from its
main activity, enabling a spread out rather than specialization. In order to advance their
economic progress, most businesses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have incorporated
diversification into their operations. Corporate diversification in business is one vital way
companies in KSA can use to achieve their vision by 2030. The mostly used strategy for
diversification in Saudi Arabia is internal capacity expansion and this is achieved by adding new
products in their line of business. A large percentage of the top corporations are managed on
factors which include acquisition of highly trained operatives, skilled and competent staff,
Resource Based Value (RBV) and finally, ability to work with and retain quality subcontractors
as well as specialists. Common strengths identified among these corporations are majorly based
on the skill and competency of their technical staff. On the other hand, their weaknesses in
diversification are rooted on the grounds of technology and communication, and also
engagement in a variety of activities that are not actually related to the business. This paper
discusses diversification in business with special focus on Saudi Aramco, detailing the
company’s strategic details and the circumstances that motivated the company to diversify. It
also discusses mode of diversification adopted by the firm and how it is relatable to its resources
and capabilities. Finally, it gives the benefits and implications of the chosen strategy for
diversification in the specific industry for the firm’s management systems and decision making.
Also known as Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Saudi Aramco has recently diversified its
operations and brand by venturing into the fast growing market of natural gas. The company’s
strategy was to become the largest International Oil Company (IOC). Aramco saw that natural
gas is an important fuel and it was soon going to be the fuel of the future dominating the realm of
renewable energy. Natural gas provides a cleaner energy source that bridges energy demand
from coal to renewables. Natural gas is a primary source of stocking the chemical industry
providing the country’s the largest ethylene and propylene production. Saudi Arabia is a big
producer of natural gas but has not grown to become an international player in the market. A
company, Saudi Basic Industries Corp (SABIC) operates 100% on production of the commodity.
Aramco was previously a dominant player in the crude oil and petroleum products industry. It
therefore saw the need to also dominate the hydrocarbon business. As the company sought
greater diversification, it struck a merger deal with SABIC. This was a move intended to gain
benefit from the firm’s experience and technology in chemicals, as it also expanded its own
Aramco’s merger with SABIC is a perfect strategy to make the company a bigger IOC. A
large percentage of IOCs internationally have dominance in both the downstream and upstream
gas production. SABIC being a major producer of natural gas, is expected to boost Aramco’s
presence in the chemical industry; not only locally but internationally as well. This strategy of
growing its natural gas market both locally and internationally is expected to allow Aramco to be
viewed in the markets as comparable as or most probably more significant than ExxonMobil.
Additionally, the company would be valued at multiple earnings just as the other major IOCs.
Why ExxonMobil? ExxonMobil is the largest IOC that bases its operations on refining and
diversification rather than internal growth. Acquisition is the most preferred diversification mode
this case takes the form of an unrelated-diversified business. This is because operations of the
two companies are not related in their production; with one of them producing Petroleum and
Crude oil products and the other producing natural gas. Utilization of acquisition and mergers as
a diversification strategy for Aramco worked out to be effective for the company’s growth. It
was a means for the company to reach out to a larger market that is more vibrant with regard to
pricing, availability of resources and cheap labor. Aramco’s readiness for the change served as
In the upstream (refining), Aramco is the largest crude oil producer operating the world’s
largest oil fields. Having the ninth-largest and eighth-largest natural gas reserves and production
respectively, Aramco does not import of export gas nor does it use large volumes for
downstream (chemical processing) activities in production. Most of the natural gas produced is
sold to utility companies which use it to desalinate water and produces electricity. In addition, it
is utilized by SABIC for transformation of chemicals and fertilizers. Aramco is the fourth-largest
refiner in the world in the downstream. It intends to increase its production capacity from 4.9
million to 10 million barrels per day (b/d). Having little investments in chemicals in joint
ventures with foreign firms, the merger with SABIC would make Aramco a major player
worldwide based on the management and technology in Saudi. At its disposal for becoming a
large IOC, Aramco had internal funds that were raised by the initial public offering (IPO).
DIVERSIFICATION AS A CORPORATE STRATEGY 5
However, as this is not enough for the acquisition, Saudi’s leadership would have to sell some of
its existing holdings and also borrow substantial funds from international financial markets to
their areas of expertise. Achieving corporate success is essential and this was possible for
Aramco who by acquiring SABIC, were able to increase their revenue. First of all, the merger
was able to create jobs for Saudi nationals in both the engineering and management departments.
This is in line with the country’s vision to create well-paying and high quality technical jobs for
its nationals. Secondly, Aramco was able to realize even more sophisticated ways to expand its
move in the downstream and additionally bypass overreliance on foreign firms such as
DowDuPont. Thirdly, upon acquisition, SABIC came in with its large department of research
which had issued a total of 12,291 patents. In addition to the strong research and development
team in the oil upstream at Aramco, the merger expanded the company’s research in IOCs with a
new venture in chemicals. Finally, since specialized sales efforts are required for more advanced
chemicals, Aramco got to acquire an already established and extensive worldwide marketing
organization. Technical sales in the chemical industry require salespersons that have a deep
understanding of the industry as well as client needs and extensive chemical manufacturing
experience. Aramco had the advantage of hitting the ground running by getting access to
SABIC’s sales organization and therefore eliminate the need to depend on unnecessary joint
ventures.
The acquisition of SABIC had three major implications on Aramco’s operations. These
implications are a change in management systems, organizational structure and protocol for
making decisions. A 70% acquisition of SABIC meant that Aramco had taken control of the
merged business with its staff being answerable to the management of Aramco. The firm’s CEO
doubles as the minister for energy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Since SABIC had excellent
management practices amongst its team members, Aramco had no option but to retain and even
promote staff members from SABIC and especially its managers. These key decisions were
made by Aramco’s board and its CEO. However, SABIC had major divisions that would bring
about distraction in the management of Aramco. This was expected to cause redundancies in
both companies which would in turn impact the kingdom’s employment opportunities. The main
impact feared was the tension that would be created among the well-educated and well-paid
Conclusion
In the recent past diversification has become an important corporate strategy for many
businesses. The KSA has not been left behind with some of its top companies such as Aramco
diversification. It had several benefits for both companies especially in the chemical industry.
However, it also had implications on the organizational structure and management systems.
DIVERSIFICATION AS A CORPORATE STRATEGY 7
References