Scribd
Upload
785 views2 pages

Gauge R & R Data Sheet

This document contains data from a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. It includes measurement results from three appraisers measuring ten parts over multiple trials. The data is used to calculate various variation components, including repeatability, reproducibility, and total variation. These values are then used to evaluate the measurement system according to acceptance criteria based on percent variation and number of distinguishable categories.

Uploaded by

sachin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
785 views2 pages

Gauge R & R Data Sheet

This document contains data from a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. It includes measurement results from three appraisers measuring ten parts over multiple trials. The data is used to calculate various variation components, including repeatability, reproducibility, and total variation. These values are then used to evaluate the measurement system according to acceptance criteria based on percent variation and number of distinguishable categories.

Uploaded by

sachin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Sheet1

GAGE REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY DATA SHEET

Analysed by Gage name Appraiser A

Approved by Gage no.& Least count Appraiser B


Part No.
Gage type Appraiser C
Part Name
Characteristic Dia
Trials parts Appraisers Date performed
Specification

APPRAISER/TRIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1.A 1 #DIV/0!

2 2 #DIV/0!

3 3 #DIV/0!

4 AVERAGE #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Xa

5 RANGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 Ra

6 1 #DIV/0!

7 2 #DIV/0!

8 3 #DIV/0!

9 AVERAGE #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Xb

10 RANGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 Rb

11 1 #DIV/0!

12 2 #DIV/0!

13 3 #DIV/0!

14 AVERAGE #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Xc

15 RANGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 Rc
16 PART AVG(Xp) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Rp
17 Avarage (Xa+Xb+Xc)= #DIV/0! X(Avg)
17 Range (Ra+Rb+Rc) of Appraiser= 0.0000 R(Range)
18 (Max X—Min X)= #DIV/0! XDIFF
19 UCLR (R*D4)= 0.0000
20 LCLR (R*D3)= 0.0000

D4=3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials; D3=0 for up to 7 trials. UCL R represents the limit of individual R's.
Circle those that are beyond this limit.Identify the cause and correct. Repeat these reading using the same
Appraiser and unit as oroginally used or discard values and re-average and recompute R and the limit value
from the remaining observations.

Page 1
Sheet1

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS % TOTAL VARIATION (TV)

Repeatability- Trials K1
Equipment variation(EV) Result 2 0.8862 % EV = 100(EV/TV) Result
EV = R * K1 0.00000 3 0.5908 100* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Reproducibility- Appraisers 2 3
Appraiser variation (AV) K2 0.7071 0.5231 % AV = 100(AV/TV) Result
AV = XDIFF * K2 Result 100* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Repeatability & Reproducibility


(R & R) {(EV2 + AV2)}1/2 Result % R & R = 100(R & R/TV) Result
#DIV/0! ½
#DIV/0! 100* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Parts K3
Parp variation (PV) 2 0.7071
PV = R p * K3 Result 3 0.5231 % PV = 100(PV/TV) Result
#DIV/0! 4 0.4467 100* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 0.4030
6 0.3742 Ndc = 1.41(PV/GRR) Result
Total variation (TV) 7 0.3534 1.41* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
TV 2
= (R & R + PV)} 1/2
Result 8 0.3375
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 9 0.3249
#DIV/0! 10 0.3146

FINAL JUDGMENT

Decision Criteria:

Ndc >5

R & R under 10% error – The measurment system is acceptable.

R % R 10% to 30% error – May be acceptable for some application.

Bnased upon importance of application, cost of gage,cost of rework or repaires,should be approved by the customer.

R & R – 30% measurment system unacceptable. Every effort should be made to improve the measurment system.

Page 2

You might also like