ISO 50001 Presentation India

30-May-20
Energy Demand Is Increasing With Population
Energy Management & (1956-1998) (1998~2013)

(2013~2019)
ISO 50001:2018
Energy Consumption Rate Lower Energy
Population Increase Rate Higher Consumption
Rate Steeply
Rising
Systems Population
Increase Rate
Same
Energy Consumption Rate Rising
Population Increase Rate Lowers
Down
(Presentation Ver 1.0)
By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 1 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 4
Avg Watt/Person Is Also Increasing
Need For Avg W/ Person

Population Increase Rate Avg W/
Avg W/ Person
Avg Watt/ Person
Of Other
EnMS
Rising
Higher Person Steeply
Population Increase Countries
(1956-1998) Rising
Rate Lowers Down
(1998~2013)
(2014~2019)
Population
ISO 50001:2018
Increase Rate
Same
World
Average
309 W/P
Over Energy Saving Activities
Avg Watt/Person - India
Energy Demand Is Increasing With Growth In All Energy Consumption Increase Is Also
Sectors
Associated With Various Social Issues
(1956-1998) (1998~2013) (2013~2019)

Energy Consumption
Energy Consumption Rate Lower Energy
Poverty
Level
Consumption
Rate Steeply
Rising
Energy Consumption Rate Rising
Urbanization Population Education Lifestyles
1
30-May-20
….Hence Focused & Systematic Approach Was Applicability Of ISO 50001:2018 In A Process
Needed To Conserve Was Felt ISO
45001
Due To… ISO 50001
Emission
Emission Emission
From From
Process Combustion
• Limited Availability Of Energy Resources ISO 9001
Energy
ISO 9001
• Ever Increasing Energy Demand Due To Improved Industrial
Inputs
Water
Output
ISO 50001
Final Products
Lifestyles/ Awareness Chemical Process ISO
45001
Raw Materials
• Fact That Some Day In Future, The Non-renewable ISO
Wastage
ISO 50001
Energy Resources Will Be Exhausted Direct/In
Direct Energy
Effluents –
Solid/ Liquid
45001
Wastage
….Hence Focused & Systematic Approach Was Understanding Of Energy What once was
Needed To Conserve Was Felt managed as a cost, is
increasingly being
..For • Improving Process Efficiency Old Business Model managed as
It Is A Cost Of Doing Business a strategic risk – and
• Improving Lifestyles as a source of new value
and
• Saving Resources opportunities.
• Saving Environment EnMS Model
How Can We Be More Cost-effective In
• Reducing Pollution Energy Performance, Efficiency And
• Improving Bottom Lines Service.
ISO 50001:2018 Is An ISO Standard That:
Though Industries Have Been Working On Specifies Requirements For Establishing,

Energy Conservation Fronts For Long Due To Implementing, Maintaining And Improving An
Its’ Direct Financial Impact On Bottom Lines, Energy Management System
ISO 50001:2018 (EnMS) Provides A
Systematic & Analytical Approach For This With A Purpose Is To Enable An Organization To
Age Old Practice. Achieve Continual Improvement Of Energy
Performance By Following A Systematic Approach
2
30-May-20
Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018 Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018

1. Energy - Energy Can Be Defined As The Capacity Of A System To Produce
External Activity Or Perform Work. Forms - Electricity, Fuels, Steam, Heat, 13. Adjustments To Baseline(s) When:
Compressed Air, And Other Like Media • EnPI No Longer Reflects The Organization’s Energy Use And Consumption
2. Energy Consumption - Quantity Of Energy Applied. • Major Changes To The Processes, Energy Systems, Operations
• According To A Pre-determined Method (Based On Production Level,

3. Energy Use – Application of Energy e.g. Processes, Ventilation; Lighting;
Supply Quality, Seasons Etc.,)
Heating; Cooling; Transportation; Production Lines.
14. Maintain And Record Energy Baseline(s)
4. Energy Efficiency - Ratio Or Other Quantitative Relationship Between An
15. Measure Changes In Energy Performance Against The Energy Baseline(s)
Output Of Performance, Service, Goods Or Energy, And An Input Of Energy.
Imp: If different forms of energy is consumed, convert all forms of energy
consumption to a common unit of kWh or calories and compute EnPI
Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018 ISO 50001’s Linkage With Other Initiatives
5. Energy Performance - Measurable Result(s) Related To Energy Efficiency, Energy
Climate Change &
Use And Energy Consumption
Energy Saving Climate Vulnerably
Cost Saving
6. Energy Review - Analysis Of Energy Efficiency, Energy Use And Energy
Consumption Based On Data And Other Information, Leading To Identification Of Carbon
CSR
SEUs And Opportunities For Energy Performance Improvement Emission ISO 50001 Initiative
7. Energy Performance Indicator - EnPI Measure Or Unit Of Energy Performance, As Labeling
Defined By The Organization. Clean
Emission Carbon
8. Energy Performance Indicator Value - EnPI Value Quantification Of The EnPI At A Development
Point In Or Over A Specified Period Of Time
Trading Neutrality Mechanism
Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018 ISO 50001:2018, Tough Is A Management System, Yet It
9. Energy Performance Improvement - Improvement In Measurable Results Of Energy Efficiency ,
Talks About Mathematical Modelling Of Energy Usage
Or Energy Consumption Related To Energy Use, Compared To The Energy Baseline And THEN Identifying Potential Scope Of Saving.
10.Significant Energy Use (SEU) - Energy Use Accounting For Substantial Energy Consumption And/
Or Offering Considerable Potential For Energy Performance Improvement Hence It Requires Collection Of Wide Range Of Data & It’s
11. Energy Baseline - Quantitative Reference(s) Providing A Basis For Comparison Of Energy For Identifying Losses & Eliminating Them For
Performance. The Energy Baseline Is Also Used For Calculation Of Energy Savings, As A Reference Performance Improvement.
Before And After Implementation Of Energy Performance Improvement Actions
So Let’s Try To Also Understand The
12. Establish An Energy Baseline(s) Importance Of Data Management &
• Using Information In The Initial Energy Review Statistical Tools In Context Of ISO
• Considering A Suitable Data Period 50001:2018
3
30-May-20
Great Quotes On Importance Of Data Management A Little Bit On SPC - The Seven QC Tools
By Legends No. Method Main Use Image
These Are
Singling Out The Really
4 Pareto Diagram
Serious Problems From
Among All The Lesser Some Of The
Ones
Tools Which
Plotting The Shape Of A
Distribution And
Are Used In
5 Histograms
Comparing It With
Specifications.
ISO:50001:
2018 For
Finding Correlation
6 Scatter Diagram Between Paired Sets Of Scientifically
Data.
Analyzing
Checking Whether Or Data.
7 Control Chart Not A Process Is In
Control.
Data & Its Management

Now For A Systematic
What Is Data? To Collect Facts And Use Statistics For Reference
Or Analysis
To Create Data And Generate Controls Limits.

Approach Towards ISO
Why Measure?
For Providing Evidence About The
50001:2018, The First
Why Monitor? Effectiveness, Efficiency, Strengths &
Limitations Step Is To Understand
Energy Use & It’s Flow
For Improving Quality Of Product/ Process,
Why Control? Reducing Waste, Saving Resources etc.
Structure
For Inspecting, Cleansing, Transforming And
Why Analyze? Modelling Data With The Goal Of Discovering Useful
Information To Arrive At Informed Conclusions, And
Improve Decision Making.
A Little Bit On SPC - The Seven QC Tools Energy Flow Structure 1 (Tree)
No. Method Main Use Image Where Are The
General Energy Usage
Simplifying Data These Are Structure
Possibilities
Collection And To Save
1 Check Sheets Ensuring That No Items Some Of The Energy
Are Omitted When Tools Which
Inspecting.
Are Used In
Graphs & ISO:50001:
2 Charges (All Making Data Visual 2018 For
Kind)
Scientifically
Cause & Effect Picking Up And Analyzing
3
Diagram (Fish Arranging All Possible Data.
Bone/ Ishikawa Causes Without Any
Diagram) Omissions.
4
30-May-20
Energy Flow Structure 2 (Sankey) The EnPI Boundary Level 1

Simple Sankey
Complex Diagram
Sankey For A
Diagram Typical
For CA System
A Typical City EnPI Boundary Description And Examples
Sankey
Levels
Diagrams Organizational The EnPI Boundary Can Be Defined Around The
Level (EnMS Physical Perimeter Of Facilities/ Processes/
Are A Type Of Equipment Also Taking Into Account The
Boundary) Responsibility In Energy Management Of
Flow Diagram In
Which The Width Of Individuals, Teams, Groups Or Business Units
The Arrows Is Designated By The Organization
Proportional To The
Proportional To Example: Power/ Steam Purchased For A Factory/
Energy Flows. Factories Or A Department Of The Organization
Significant Energies 1 – @Org. Level

Analyze The Consumption
Identifying Usage & Data Of All Energy Sources

For Last 3 Years To Decide
EnPI At Organization Level
Flows Of Energy Source 2 - 2nd

e.g. 2% Reduction In
Energies Of 1st & 2nd SECs
Takes Us To Second Significant

Source 1 - 1st
Significant
Step
Source 3 - 3rd
Significant
The Three EnPI Boundary Levels The EnPI Boundary Level 2

EnPI Boundary Description And
Level 1
Levels Examples
SEC Facility The EnPI Boundary Can Be Defined Around The
Physical Perimeter Of A Group Of Facilities/
Level Processes/ Equipment Interacting With Each
Level 2 Other That The Organization Wants To Control
And Improve
Example: The Steam Generation, Distribution &

Level 3 Use System, Air Compressor, Compressed Air
Distribution & Utilization System
5
30-May-20
Significant Energies 2 – @SEC Facility Level Significance

Cooling of Relevant
Tower Performance Variables
Monitoring Cooling Tower Performance Monito
Section 2 – 2nd Significant Monthly & Annual Performance Monitoring w.r.t. Daily Trending w.r.t Previous Year & Design
Analyze The Consumption Relevant Variable: Design Ambient Conditions Cooling Tower Perfromance
Section 3 – 3rd Quantifiable Factor
Data Of Energies In Various
4,500.00 5-Jan 5-Jan
30.00 10.00
43.00
25.00 9.00
That Significantly
4,000.00
Significant
11-Jan 20.00 6-Jan 8.00
38.00 15.00
Sections For Last 3 Years To

7.00
3,500.00 10.00 11-Jan 6-Jan
6.00
Impacts Energy
5.00 5.00
33.00
- 4.00
3,000.00
3.00
Decide EnPI At Sectional

10-Jan 7-Jan
28.00 2.00
Performance And
2,500.00 1.00
23.00 -
2,000.00
Level
9-Jan 8-Jan
Routinely Changes 1,500.00

18.00
Ambient-Max (2018) (DegC)
10-Jan 7-Jan
e.g. Ambient Temp.,

1,000.00 13.00 Ambient-Max (2019) (DegC)
8.00
e.g. 5% Reduction In
500.00 5-Jan
RH, Operating
15.00
9-Jan 8-Jan
- 3.00
11-Jan 10.00 6-Jan
Design
Jun-18
Jul-18
Aug-18
Sep-18
Oct-18
Nov-18
Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
Mar-19
Apr-19
Jun-19
Jul-19
Aug-19
Sep-19
Oct-19
Nov-19
Dec-19
Jan-20
May-19
Energies Of Ammonia, Urea, Conditions (Indoor Effect Of Relevant Variance On Cooling
3. Sigma CT (2018)-Range (DegC)
5.00
3. Sigma CT (2019)-Range (DegC)
3. Sigma CT Flo w 3. Sigma CT-Inlet Temp 3. Sigma CT-Outlet Temp 3. Sigma CT-Wet Bulb Temp. - 3. Sigma CT (Design)-Range (10 DegC)
& Cooling Towers Temperature, Light Tower Performance

10-Jan 7-Jan
72.46%
80.00% 5-Jan
10.00
Level, Flow), 9.00
60.54%
70.00% 9-Jan 8-Jan
59.84%
8.00
56.65%
7.00
11-Jan 6-Jan
Working Hours,
52.53%
Targets Can Be Taken For
6.00
60.00% WB Temp (2018) (DegC)
49.81%
48.60%
5.00
46.39%
46.33%
WB Temp (2019) (DegC)
44.20%
4.00
43.82%
43.47%
43.02%
42.51%
40.94%
40.59%
Production Quantity,
50.00% 3.00
Other Sections Also.

5-Jan 2.00
34.38%
90%
33.82%
1.00
33.05%
31.31%
40.00% 85% -
Production Rate,
26.09%
11-Jan 80% 6-Jan
10-Jan 7-Jan
30.00% 75%
Product Mix
70%
20.00% 65%
10-Jan 7-Jan
10.00%
9-Jan 8-Jan
Section 1 - 1st 0.00% 9-Jan 8-Jan
Feb-19
Nov-18
May-19
Nov-19
Design
Jul-18
Sep-18
Jan-19
Jul-19
Sep-19
Jan-20
Jun-18
Aug-18
Oct-18
Dec-18
Mar-19
Apr-19
Jun-19
Aug-19
Oct-19
Dec-19
3. Sigma CT (2018)-Delta T 3. Sigma CT (2019)-Delta T
Significant RH (2018) (%) RH (2019) (%) 3. Sigma CT (Design) -De lta T
The EnPI Boundary Level 3 Norm Chart For Loss Identification

EnPI Boundary Description And
Levels Examples The Norm Chart Is Sequential Plot Of Actual
SEC The EnPI Boundary Can Be Defined Around Consumption Overlaid On A Plot Of Target Consumption.
The Physical Perimeter Of One Facility/ The Target Of Consumption Is Derived From Qty
Equipment Equipment/ Process The Organization Wants Produced And Specific Consumption Of Reference Year,
Level To Control And Improve But Norm Graph Has A Little Value As Analytical Tool
Except That It Can Be Useful For Highlighting Exceptions
And Communicating These The Managers As They Are
Easy To Understand.
Example: The Production Equipment e.g.
Boiler/ Compressor/ Cooling Tower
Significant Energies 3 – @SEC Equipment Level Selecting Significant Variable R-squared Is A Statistical
Measure Of How Close The
Step 2- Plotting Scattered Graph To Trend & R2 Value Data Are To The Fitted
Analyze The Consumption Regression Line. Value Of 1
Indicates That The Model
Priority 1 Data At Equipment Level To Explains All The
Decide EnPI At Equipment Variability Of The
(80%) Level Response Data Around Its
Priority 2 (20%) R2=0.903 Mean
e.g. R2=0.8353
1. Improvement Of p.f. Of
Priority 1 Motors From 0.95
To 0.98
Being Top 80% 2. Motor Loading
For Balance 20% Load, Identify The
Contributors, Optimization For Priority 1
Equipment & Work In In Optimizing
R2=0.179
These Electrical
Their Energy Consumption EitherMotors
Loads Become
Significant Individually And/Or Clubbing Few
Equipment Significant Variable Less Significant Not Significant
Energies
Variable Variable
6
30-May-20
Example Of EnPI Based On Energy (Fuel) Type

(Fuel Efficiency)
• System Specific Power (SSP): This Is A Measurement Of
The Production Efficiency Of An Equipment E.G. For
Compressed Air System, And Is A Ratio Of The Power Input
Now To Third Step Compared To The Compressed Air Output.
• Total Energy Consumption: This Is Simply The Energy
Consumption In Kwh Of A System.
• Specific Energy Consumption: This Is The Ratio Of Energy
Consumption Divided By Specific Production Output.
• Portion Of Non-productive Usage: This Is The Proportion
Of The Energy Usage During Non-productive Periods
The Three Pillars Of EnMS Setting Up At Base Line Figures (EnB) & Target
1. Base Line Period : Dec’17 to Nov’18 Relevant Variables: Weather
conditions, Operating
Energy 2. EnPI: Consumption of RNLG per Unit of Urea Produced
conditions (Condition of
3. EnPI Values: Monthly Figures of Consumption During The
Static Factors:
Catalyst) Facility
, Working size;
hours,
Performance Base Line Period (GCal/MTU) designproduction
of installedoutput
equipment;
number of weekly shifts; range
Normalization: Done In
of products.
-Energy Consumption Averaging of 12 Month’s Data
EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU
Target: 2% Lower 4.67
Gcal/MTU
-Energy Use
-Energy Efficiency
Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI) Norm Chart For Loss Identification

39,000,000.00 7,000.00 48,000.00
They Must Be Appropriate For

46,000.00
37,000,000.00 6,500.00
44,000.00
35,000,000.00
6,000.00
42,000.00
Monitoring And Measuring Energy

33,000,000.00
5,500.00 40,000.00
31,000,000.00
38,000.00
5,000.00
Performance Reviewed With The Baseline

29,000,000.00
36,000.00
4,500.00
27,000,000.00
34,000.00
4,000.00
25,000,000.00 32,000.00
As Appropriate 23,000,000.00
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Regasified LNG-Total (SM3)-2018

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
Regasified LNG-Total (SM3)-2019

3,500.00
Dec Jan Feb Mar
Coal-Total (MT)-2018
Apr May Jun Jul
Coal-Total (MT)-2019
Aug Sep Oct Nov
30,000.00
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Power-Total (MWh)-2018
Jul
Power-Total (MWh)-2019
Aug Sep Oct Nov
RLNG Monthly Quantity-Actual vs Normalized Coal Monthly Quantity-Actual vs Normalized Energy Monthly Quantity-Actual vs Normalized
w.r.t. Previous Year w.r.t. Previous Year w.r.t. Previous Year
39,000,000.00 8,500.00 50,000.00
8,000.00 48,000.00
Methodology For Determining EnPIs

37,000,000.00
46,000.00
7,500.00
Energy Quantities (MWh)
44,000.00
RLNG Quantities (SM3)
35,000,000.00 7,000.00
Coal Quantities (MT)
42,000.00
6,500.00
Must Be Recorded And Regularly

33,000,000.00 40,000.00
6,000.00
38,000.00
31,000,000.00 5,500.00
36,000.00
5,000.00 34,000.00
Reviewed
29,000,000.00
4,500.00 32,000.00
27,000,000.00 4,000.00 30,000.00

Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
Apr-19
May-19
Mar-19
Jun-19
Jul-19
Aug-19
Sep-19
Oct-19
Nov-19
Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
May-19
Mar-19
Apr-19
Jun-19
Jul-19
Aug-19
Sep-19
Oct-19
Nov-19
Apr-19
Jun-19
Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
May-19
Mar-19
Jul-19
Aug-19
Sep-19
Oct-19
Nov-19
RLNG Qty (Sm3)-Actual RLNG Qty (Sm3)-Expected Coal Qty (MT)-Actual Coal Qty (MT)-Expected Energy (MWh)-Actual Energy (MWh)-Expected
7
30-May-20
Selecting Significant Variable Method 2: Comparison Of Monthly Running

Step 1- Plotting The Trend Average EnPI Values With EnB & Target
EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period Nov’17~Dec’18

Target: 2% Lower Than EnB
+Ve: Provides Information Where -Ve: Doesn’t Provides Information About

Are We Heading At Year End Monthly Changes for Improving Control
Method 3: Comparison of EnPI Values (Monthly As

Well As Monthly Running Avg) With EnB & Target
Now Different Ways EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period Nov’17~Dec’18
To Analyze… Target: 2% Lower Than EnB
With Pros & Cons +Ve: Provides Monthly Changes For Regular
Control
-Ve: However it doesn’t
provide information related
Provides Information Where Are We Heading At to monthly comparison
Year End w.r.t. last year
Method 1: Comparison Of Monthly EnPI Values Method 4: Comparison Of Monthly Running

With EnB 1. Base Line Period : Dec’17 to Nov’18 Average EnPI Values With EnB & Target
2. Review Period: Dec’18 to Jan’19 +Ve: Provides Information About Monthly
Changes For Better Control
3. EnPI: Consumption of RNLG per Unit of Urea Produced EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Provided Information Where Are We Heading At
4. EnPI Values: Monthly Figures of Consumption During the Period Nov’17~Dec’18 Year End
Base Line Period (GCal/MTU)a Provides Information Related To Monthly
Target: 2% Lower Than EnB Comparison w.r.t. Last Year
EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period Nov’17~Dec’18
-Ve: Doesn’t Give Where Are We Heading At Year
End
Target: 2% Lower Than EnB
+Ve: Provides Information About -Ve: Doesn’t Give Where Are We

Monthly Changes For Better Control Heading At Year End
8
30-May-20
Method 5: Comparison Of Monthly Running Few Typical EnPIs

+Ve: Provides Monthly Changes For Regular
Average EnPI Values With EnB & Target
Control Base Sl. Head UOM/ Unit
Provided Information Where Are We Heading At
Year End Electricity
EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period
1 Electricity Consumption KWh/year
Based on Energy (Fuel) Type (Fuel

Nov’17~Dec’18 Provides Information Related To Monthly
Comparison w.r.t. Last Year System Power Factor System Power Factor
Target: 2% Lower Than EnB Provides Information Where Are We Heading At Coal / Lignite/ Biomass/ Solid
Year End Fuels
-Ve: Too Much Of Data And May Create 2
a) Calorific Value (CV) KCal/kg
Efficiency)
Confusion/ May Need More Time To b) Quantity Purchased MT/year
Comprehend
Furnace Oil/ High Speed Diesel
(HSD)/ Light Diesel Oil (LDO)
3
a) Calorific Value (CV) KCal/kg
c) Quantity Purchased MT/year
CNG/LNG
4 a) Calorific Value (CV) KCal/SCM
b) Quantity Purchased SCM/year
Method 6: Methodology To Compare Daily Energy Few Typical EnPIs

Performance With That Of Month’s Dynamic Best
Day (& The Excess Spent) Base Sl.
Boilers
Head UOM/ Unit
Efficiency (%) %
Best Day
Best Day 1
Evaporation Ratio Ratio
Equipment Efficiency
MovedOn
To09-03 Best Day
28-03 Moved To Quantity Of Condensate Recovery Kg/hr or KL/Hr
17-03 Compressors
Free Air Delivery (FAD) CFM or NM3/Hr
2 Volumetric Efficiency (%) %
Running Time Running hours/day
Load/ Un Load Durations Hrs
Chillers
3 Coefficient Of Performance (COP) Ratio
Energy Efficiency Ratio %
Method 7: CuSum Methodology For Analysis Few Typical EnPIs

Final Control Chart Of CuSum Analysis with Control Limits
500,000 Summary for All Graph Required for CuSUm Analysis Base Sl. Head UOM/ Unit
400,000 Energy vs Production Scatter Graph Linear Regression Of All Data Linear Regression Of Base Line Data
Electrical Drives
All Data All Data Base Period Data Efficiency %
Improvement,
1 Motor Power Factor Motor Power Factor
3,500,000 3,500,000
300,000 Degradation wherever 1,000,000
3,000,000
wherever there is fall 3,000,000
there is Rise
950,000
900,000
y = 314.45x + 520670
R² = 0.0915
No Load Losses KW
2,500,000 y = 380.32x + 473763 850,000
Equipment Efficiency
2,500,000 R² = 0.9196
2,000,000 800,000
KWh
200,000
KWh
1,500,000 2,000,000 750,000
Motor Loading Ratio %

KWh
1,000,000 700,000
1,500,000 650,000
500,000
600,000
100,000 -
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
1,000,000
500,000
550,000
500,000 Cooling Towers
Production Units 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
-
How to differentiate between "Noise" and "Significant Factor"
-
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Production Units
Hot Water Temp DegC
Apr-98
Jun-98
Aug-98
Oct-98
Dec-98
Feb-99
Apr-99
Jun-99
Aug-99
Oct-99
Dec-99
Feb-00
Apr-00
Jun-00
Aug-00
Oct-00
Dec-00
Feb-01
Apr-01
Jun-01
Aug-01
Oct-01
Dec-01
Feb-02
Apr-02
Jun-02
Aug-02
Oct-02
Dec-02
Feb-03
Apr-03
Jun-03
Aug-03
Oct-03
Dec-03
Feb-04
Apr-04
Jun-04
Aug-04
Oct-04
Dec-04
Feb-05
Apr-05
Jun-05
Aug-05
Oct-05
Dec-05
Feb-06
Apr-06
Jun-06
Aug-06
Oct-06
Dec-06
Feb-07
Cold Water Temp DegC

Production Units First 12 Months Data (Oldest Portion of Data) take as baseline -usually considered
Why do points A & B at same Production have different energy consumption.
as best option
(100,000) CuSum Graph Target Setting Choosing The Better of Best Periods For Baseline Fixation By Linear Regression Of Best Periods
CuSum Energy Graph

Best Period 1 Best Period 2
2 Wet Bulb Temp DegC
Best Period 1 Data (Selected For Better R2) Best Period 2 Data
10,000,000
(200,000)
1,800,800 2,400,000 Cycle of Concentration (COC) Ratio
Evaporation Loss NM3/Hr
8,000,000 1,700,800 y = 352.44x + 664522 2,200,000
1,600,800 R² = 0.9603
(300,000) 2,000,000
y = 238.44x + 976734
R² = 0.8601
Blow Down NM3/Hr
6,000,000 1,500,800
1,400,800
Cumulative KWh
1,800,000
KWh
KWh
4,000,000 1,300,800
(400,000)
1,200,800 1,600,000
Vehicles
2,000,000 1,100,800
Apr-03~Mar-04 Was Best Period Of 12
1,400,000 3
(500,000) -
1,000,800
900,800
Months & Chosen For Base Line
1,200,000 Purpose Mileage KM/Liter of Fuel
Apr-98
Dec-99
Apr-03
Dec-04
Sep-98
Feb-99
Jul-99
Oct-00
Jan-02
Jun-02
Sep-03
Feb-04
Oct-05
Jan-07
Process 1 Melting Process KCal(fuel)/MT

May-00
Mar-01
Aug-01
Nov-02
Jul-04
May-05
Mar-06
Aug-06
800,800 1,000,000
(2,000,000) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
(600,000) Production Units
Efficiency
Production Units
(4,000,000)
Week
Etgt-Eac UCL LCL 2 Processes Using Steam MT of steam/ unit of Production
Best Period 1 is Better than 2 as R2 is more closer to 1 and hence formula y = 443.69x + 58595 to be used for Target Setting
9
30-May-20
Few Typical EnPIs What Does A Standard Do?

Base Sl. Head UOM/ Unit
1 Cement Industries GCal/MT of Cement
2 Automobile Industry GCal/ Unit of Produce
Organization’s Energy Performance
3 Fertilizer Industry GCal/MT of Fertilizer

Hotel/ Hospital
Energy Consumption kWh/occupancy
4
Energy Consumption kWh/square feet
Energy Performance Index Ratio
Offices/ IT/ Building/ Banks
Energy Performance
Energy Consumption kWh/square feet
Improvement
6 Energy Consumption kWh/customer
Energy Consumption kWh/ transaction
Energy Performance Index Ratio Role of ISO
Transportation 50001:2018
Kilometers/ liter of Fuel
5
MT transported/ liter of Fuel
Kilometers/ liter / Ton of Material Energy Performance Improvement
Benefit & Impact of ISO 50001:2018

Implementation
►Continuous Cost Reduction With EnMS
Coming Back To Standard Start
ISO 50001: 2018 Stage 1 Stage 2

Stage 3
Benefits To An Organization For Implementing An

EnMS:
Integration Top …with Other
Management
• Broad Applicability of EnMS Management
• Applies To All Sectors Of Business
Organizational
Systems
• Applies To AllEnd
The Sizes Of Organizations
Product Of The EnMS Standard Is Structure
• LeveragesToExisting
ProvideContinual Improvement
Measurable Processes
Results & Ensure
• Develops AImprovements
Baseline Of Energy Use
Are Achieved In Way Of
• Actively Manages Energy Use And
Managing Costs
Energies. QMS EMS OHSMS EnMS
ISO ISO ISO
• Reduce Emissions Without A Negative Impact On 9001:2015 14001:2015 45001:2018 ISO 50001:2018
OperationsOrganizations Who Have Adopted EnMS
• Continual Improvement
Have Of Energy Energy
Achieved Significant Use Versus Product
Savings & Integration of Targets & Objectives (e.g. Policy)
Output OverImprovement
Time In Energy Performance. Setting-up Of Personnel Structure (e.g. Responsibilities)
• Potential For Savings To Be Used For Emission Credits Integration Of Operating Elements (e.g. Process And Job Description)
10
30-May-20
Institutional Ecosystem & Drivers Of Energy Efficiency 1. Direct Regulation (Command-and-

In Systems
•
Government
Regulators
Advocacy •
Manufacturers
Consulting
Control)
• NGOs • Controls
• EE Agency
• Industry • Building Materials
• Policy Lenders
Associations • Capital Equip.
2. Market-based Instruments
• Municipal Corporations
Research/ Training
Infrastructure
•
•
Academia
Think Tanks
Institutional Ecosystem & Drivers Provider (Economic Instruments), And
• R&D Centers Of Energy Efficiency In Systems • Power
• Transport
• ODA
• Building
Other Private Operators In
3. Soft Instruments (Voluntary
Finance • Agriculture
• Power
• Banks
• Consulting
• Equity Funds
ODA: Official
Development
•
•
Eco-finance
ODA
•
•
ESCOs
EMS Approaches)
Assistance • Demand response etc.
Some Of The Major Drivers For Energy 1. Direct Regulation (Command-and-Control)

Conservation Activities & ISO:50001:2018 In India Regulation
Year Of Entry
Ministry/ Agencies Involved
Into Force
Energy Conservation Act 2001 Ministry of Power (MoP), Central Government, State
MoP, Central Government, State Government, Central Electricity Authority (CEA),
Electricity Act 2003 Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), State Electricity Regulatory
Commission (SERC)
National Electricity Policy 2005 MoP, Central Government, State Government, CEA, CERC,
Integrated Energy Policy 2006 Planning Commission of India, CERC, SERC
Tariff Policy 2006 MoP, Central Government, State Government, CEA, CERC, SERC
MoP, CEA, Ministry of Water Resources, Central Water Commission, Ministry of New and
Hydro Power Policy 2008 Renewable Energy
National Action Plan for Climate Prime Minister‘s Office on Climate Change, Nodal Ministries for each mission and related
2008 Ministries, Ministry of Finance, Planning Commission
Change
National Biofuel Steering Committee, Department of Biotechnology, Bureau of Indian
Standards, Planning Commission, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Ministry of
Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Ministry
National Policy on Biofuels 2009 of Rural Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Ministry of
Science and Technology, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Road, Transport and Highway,
Ministry of Railways, State Governments
National Electricity Plan 2012 CEA, Central Government, State Government
(*) Command And Control
2. Market-Based Instruments (Economic

In India, There Are Several Instruments)
PAT Scheme – Perform, Achieve & Trade
Mechanisms Which Are
PAT scheme is a regulatory instrument (BEE) to reduce specific
Currently Driving This energy consumption in energy intensive industries (DC), &
associated with market based mechanism to enhance the cost
Markets & Can Be Covered effectiveness through certification of excess energy saving which can
be traded.
Under 3 Distinct Categories Under this scheme, reductions in specific energy saving targets are
assigned to Designated Consumers (DCs) for a three year cycle (Of
Sectors Notified).
11
30-May-20
Sectors Covered Under PAT Scheme Energy Conservation Building Code 2017
Sl. PAT-1 PAT-2 PAT-3 PAT-4
From-> 2012~2013 2016~17 2019~20 2022~23 Purpose: The purpose of the Energy Conservation Compliance: The
To-> 2014~2015 2018~19 2021~22 2024~24
1 Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum Aluminum
Building Code 2017 is to provide minimum requirements buildings shall
2 Cement Cement Cement Cement for the energy-efficient design and construction of a) have an Energy
3 Chlor-Alkali Chlor-Alkali Chlor-Alkali Chlor-Alkali
buildings. The Code also provides two additional sets of
4 Fertilizers Fertilizers Fertilizers Fertilizers Performance Index
5 Iron & Steel Iron & Steel Iron & Steel Iron & Steel incremental requirements for buildings to achieve
6 Paper & pulp Paper & pulp Paper & pulp Paper & pulp
enhanced levels of energy efficiency that go beyond Ratio (EPI Ratio) as
7 Textiles Textiles Textiles Textiles
8 Thermal Power Plant Thermal Power Plant Thermal Power Plant Thermal Power Plant the minimum requirements. defined in ECBC that is
9 Railways Railways Railways
10 DISCOMS DISCOMS DISCOMS Scope: The Code is applicable to buildings or building less than or equal to 1
11 Refineries Refineries Refineries complexes that have a connected load of 100 kW or and,
12 Buildings /Hotels
13 Sugar Industry
greater or a contract demand of 120 kVA or greater (b) meet all
14
These and Few More Sectors Are Under
Chemical Industry and are intended to be used for commercial purposes. mandatory
Consideration & May Get Added in Future PAT
15 Schemes Milk Dairy Industry requirements
16 Printing and publishing industry Buildings intended for private residential purposes only
17 …….More mentioned as refereed
are not covered by the Code.
By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 67 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com)
in ECBC 70
3. Soft Instruments (Voluntary Approaches) Energy Conservation Building Code 2017

Table II: Voluntary Programs Related To Energy In India
Program
Year Of
Ministry/ Agencies Involved Energy Efficiency Requirements For
Establishment
Indian Green Building Council (IGBC) 2001 Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)
BEE, Manufacturers‘ Associations of Industries, Bureau of Indian Standards, Consumer
The Code Were Derived After Analyzing
19 Different Non-residential
National Energy Labeling Program 2006 Organizations
Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) 2007 BEE, MoP
Bachat Lamp Yojana
BEE Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) Program
2009
2009
BEE, Electricity Distribution Companies, Households
BEE Building Typologies, That In Turn
Are Broadly Based On Building
State Governments, MoP, BEE, Ministry of Water Resources, Electricity Distribution
BEE Agriculture Demand Side Management Program 2009 Companies, Electricity Service Companies
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the
Members of the India-Brazil- South Africa Dialogue
2006
Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, MoP, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural
Gas, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Rural Development and Ministry of Science and
Classification In The National Building
Forum on establishing a trilateral task team on
biofuels
Technology
Code Of India Considering Spatial
MoU among the Government of the Republic of South
Africa, the Government of the Republic of India and Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, MoP, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Layouts, Material Specifications, Façade
2007 Gas, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Rural Development and Ministry of Science and
the Government of the Federative Republic of Brazil
on Cooperation in Wind Resources
Technology
Characteristics, And Occupancy
MoU among the Government of the Republic of South
Africa, the Government of the Federative Republic of Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, MoP, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Patterns
2010 Gas, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Rural Development and Ministry of Science and
Brazil and the Government of the Republic of India on Technology
Cooperation in the Area of Solar Energy
Energy Conservation Building National Building

Code 2017 Code 2016
IGBC Green Building Rating
System
Few Cases Of Energy

Performances
In India
12
30-May-20
Many Organizations That

Have Adopted Effective
Energy Management
Strategies And Built
Successful Energy Programs
Have Had Beneficial Results.
Few Additional
Information
13
30-May-20
Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements

50001:2018 50001:2011
Clause Wise 6.4 Energy performance indicators
Doc (6.4 para-2): Method for determining and updating EnPIs
Rec (6.4 last para): Review and comparison of EnPI values to their EnBs
4.4.5 Energy performance indicators
Doc (4.4.5 para-1): Methodology for determining and updating EnPIs
Rec: XX
Interrelation Of
6.5 Energy baseline 4.4.4 Energy baseline
Rec (6.5 last para): EnBs, relevant variable data, modifications to EnBs Rec (4.4.4 last para): EnBs
6.6 Planning for collection of energy data 4.6.1 Monitoring, measurement and analysis (part)
Rec (6.6 para-2): Collected energy data about (a) relevant variables for SEUs; (b)
energy consumption related to SEUs and to the organization; (c) operational
ISO 50001:2018 &

criteria related to SEUs; (d) applicable static factors; (e) data specified in Rec: XX (4.6.1 para-4) Calibration and other means of establishing accuracy and
energy data collection plan repeatability of equipment used in monitoring and measurement of key
(6.6 last para) Measurement, monitoring and other means of establishing characteristics
accuracy and repeatability of equipment used for the measurement of key
characteristics
7 SUPPORT 4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
ISO 50001:2011
7.1 Resources -
7.2 Competence 4.5.2 Competence, training & awareness, para-1 & 2
Rec (7.2.d): Competence of persons affecting energy performance and EnMS; Rec (4.5.2 para-2): Competence of persons associated with the control of
viz, (a) determined necessary competence, (b) their appropriate education, significant energy uses and the operation of EnMS; viz, their appropriate
training, skills or experience, and (c) actions taken to acquire necessary education/training/skills/experience, identified training needs, and provided
competence, and evaluation of effectiveness of actions taken training or other actions taken
7.3 Awareness 4.5.2 Competence, training & awareness, para-3
7.4 Communication 4.5.3 Communication
Doc (4.5.3 last para): Decision whether to externally communicate energy policy,
Doc: XX Rec (7.4 last para): Improvements suggested on energy performance and
EnMS and energy performance
EnMS through internal communication
Rec: XX
Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements
50001:2018 50001:2011 50001:2018 50001:2011

7.5 Documented information 4.5.4 Documentation
1 SCOPE 1 SCOPE
7.5.1 General 4.5.4.1 Documentation requirements
2 NORMATIVE REFERENCES 2 NORMATIVE REFERENCES Doc (4.5.4.1 para-1): Description of established core elements of EnMS and their
3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 3 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS XX
interaction
(4.5.4.1.d,e & 4.6.5 para-1) Documentsand records required by ISO 50001, and
4 CONTEXT OF THE ORGANIZATION - documents additionally determined to be necessary
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context - 7.5.2 Creating and updating -
4.2 Understanding the needs & expectations of interested 4.5.4.2 Control of documents
- 7.5.3 Control of documented information
4.6.5 Control of records
parties
Doc (4.5.4.2 para-2): Procedure(s) to control EnMS documents and applicable
4.3 Determining the scope of the EnMS 4.1 General requirements, para-b XX
technical documents
Doc (4.3 last para): Scope and boundaries of EnMS Doc (4.1.b, 4.5.4.1.a): Scope and boundaries of EnMS
8 OPERATION 4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
4.4 Energy management system 4.1 General requirements, para-a & c
XX Doc (4.1.a): The EnMS in accordance with ISO 50001
8.1 Operational planning and control 4.5.5 Operational control
Doc (8.1.d): Processes planned, along with their established criteria, (1) to
5 LEADERSHIP 4.2 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY control SEUs – ref 6.3.b; (2) to implement action plans to achieve objectives
5.1 Leadership and commitment 4.2.1 Top management and energy targets – ref 6.2.3; and (3) to effectively operate and maintain
XX
facilities/equipment/systems/energy-using-processes to prevent significant
5.2 Energy policy 4.3 Energy policy
deviation from intended energy performance
Doc (5.2 para-2): Energy policy Doc (4.3.g, 4.5.4.1.b): Energy policy
Rec (8.1.d): Implementation results of above processes for all above 3
5.3 Organization roles, responsibilities and authorities, 8.2 Design 4.5.6 Design
4.2.2 Management representative, para-f
para-1 Rec (8.2 last para): Results of design activities for new, modified and renovated
Rec (4.5.6 last para): Results of design activity for new/modified/renovated
5.3 Organization roles, responsibilities and authorities, facilities, equipment, systems and energy-using- processes that can have
facilities/equipment/systems/processes that can have significant impacts on
4.2.2 Management representative (all except para-f) significant impact on energy performance over their planned or expected
para-2 energy performance
operating lifetimes
Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements
50001:2018 50001:2011 50001:2018 50001:2011

4.5.7 Procurement of energy services, products,
6 PLANNING 4.4 ENERGY PLANNING 8.3 Procurement
equipment and energy
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities - Doc (4.5.7 last para): Energy purchasing specifications for procurement of energy
XX
6.1.1 (EnMS planning – sentences 1 & 2) 4.4.1 General services, products and equipment
XX Doc (4.4.1 para-1): Energy planning process 9 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 4.6 CHECKING
6.1.1 (Determining risks & opportunities – sentence 3) - 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of
6.1.2 (Planning actions to address risks & opportunities) - -
energy performance and EnMS
6.2 Objectives, energy targets & planning to achieve them - 9.1.1 General 4.6.1 Monitoring, measurement and analysis (part)
4.4.6 Energy objectives, energy targets, and energy Rec (4.6.1 last para): Results of investigation and response on significant
6.2.1 (General) deviations in energy performance; and results of measurement of energy
management action plans, para-1 Rec (9.1.1 para-4): Results of investigation and response to significant deviations performance according to defined energy measurement plans and
4.4.6 Energy objectives, energy targets, and energy in energy performance measurement needs
6.2.2 (Establishing objectives and targets)
management action plans, para-2 & 3 (9.1.1 last para) Results from monitoring and measurement of key characteristics (4.6.1 para-2) Results of monitoring and measurement of key characteristics at
Rec (6.2.2 last para): Established objectives and energy targets Doc (4.4.6 para-1, 4.5.4.1.c): Energy objectives and targets at least for, (1) effectiveness of action plans for achieving objectives and least for, (a) significant energy use and other outputs of energy review; (b)
energy targets; (2) EnPIs; (3) operation of SEUs; and (4) actual versus relevant variables to significant energy use; (c) EnPIs; (d) effectiveness of
4.4.6 Energy objectives, energy targets, and energy expected energy consumption action plans in
6.2.3 (Planning actions to achieve objectives & targets)
management action plans, para-4 & 5 achieving objectives and targets; and (d) evaluation of actual versus expected
Doc (6.2.3 para-1): Action plans for achieving objectives and energy targets Doc (4.4.6 para-4, 4.5.4.1.c): Action plans for achieving objectives and targets energy consumption
Rec (6.2.3 last para): Achievement results of above Action Plans Rec: XX 9.1.2 Evaluation of compliance with legal requirements 4.6.2 Evaluation of compliance with legal requirements
6.3 Energy review 4.4.3 Energy review and other requirements and other requirements
Dec (6.3 last para): Methods and criteria used to develop energy review Rec (9.1.2): Evaluation of compliance, at planned intervals, with legal and other
Dec (4.4.3 para-1): Methodology and criteria used to develop energy review Rec (4.6.2 last para): Evaluation of legal compliance, at planned intervals, related
(including the criteria to identify SEUs – ref 6.3.b and 3.5.6 note-1) requirements relating to energy efficiency, use, consumption and the EnMS;
Rec (4.4.3 para-1): Results of energy review to energy use and consumption
Rec (6.3 last para): Results of energy review (including identified SEUs) and actions taken after evaluation
14
30-May-20
Few Energy & Other Conversion Related Data

Correspondence Between With Changes In Documentation Requirements Some Useful Energy/ Power Unit Conversion
50001:2018 50001:2011 Energy Air-conditioning
From Converted To From Converted To
9.2 Internal audit - 1 1 KWh = 3,600.00 KJ 1 1 EER = 3.412*COP
9.2.1 (General) 4.6.3 Internal audit of the EnMS, para-1
2 1 MWh = 0.085985 TOE 2 1 KW/TR = 12/EER
9.2.2 (Programming and conducting internal audit) 4.6.3 Internal audit of the EnMS, para-2, 3, 4
Doc (9.2.2.a): Established audit program(s) Doc: XX 1 1 BTU = 1.05587 KJ 1 1 TR = 12,000.00 BTU/Hr
Rec (9.2.2.f): Implementation of audit program(s), and results of audit Rec (4.6.3 last para): Audit results 2 1 MBTU (MMBTU) = 0.025219 TOE 2 1 TR = 12670.440 KJ/Hr
9.3 Management review 4.7 Management review 1 1 KCal = 4.18680 KJ 10^x Name Symbol
9.3.1 (General) 4.7.1 General
3 1 GCal = 0.1000 TOE 1 1E+06 mega M
9.3.2 (Considerations) 4.7.2 Input to management review (part)
1 1 GJ = 0.0238846 TOE 2 1E+09 giga G
9.3.3 (Inputs) 4.7.2 Input to management review (part)
9.3.4 (Outputs) 4.7.3 Output from management review Power 3 1E+12 tera T
Rec (9.3.4 last para): Results of management reviews Rec (4.7.1 last para): Results of management review
1 1 KW = 3600.00 KJ/Hr 4 1E+15 peta P
10 IMPROVEMENT - 2 1 HP = 2,684.52 KJ/Hr 5 1E+18 exa E
10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action 4.6.4 NCs, correction, CA and PA 1 1 KCal/Hr = 4.18680 KJ/Hr 6 1E+21 zetta Z
Rec (10.1 last para): Nature of nonconformities, subsequent actions taken, and
Rec (4.6.4.e): Corrective actions and preventive actions 2 1 BTUs/Hr = 1.05587 KJ/Hr 7 1E+24 yotta Y
results of any corrective action
10.2 Continual improvement - A ton of oil equivalent (TOE) is, unit of energy, a conventional value, based on the amount of energy released by burning one tonne
of crude oil, of 41.868 GJ, 11.63 MWh, 1.28 TCE, 39.68 million BTU, or 6.6 - 8.0 actual barrels of oil (depending on actual Plural name
is tonnes of oil equivalent.
Some Of The
Typical
Instruments Used Thank You!
In Energy
Measurements
Some Of The Typical Instruments Used In Energy

Measurements
Ends
15

ISO 50001 Presentation India

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISO 50001 Presentation India

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

30-May-20

Energy Demand Is Increasing With Population

Energy Management & (1956-1998) (1998~2013)

(Presentation Ver 1.0)

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 1 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 4

Avg Watt/Person Is Also Increasing

Need For Avg W/ Person

Avg Watt/Person - India

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 2 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 5

(1956-1998) (1998~2013) (2013~2019)

Energy Consumption Rate Rising

Urbanization Population Education Lifestyles

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 3 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 6

• Fact That Some Day In Future, The Non-renewable ISO

ISO 50001:2018 Is An ISO Standard That:

Though Industries Have Been Working On Specifies Requirements For Establishing,

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 9 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 12

Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018 Specific Terminologies in ISO 50001:2018

• According To A Pre-determined Method (Based On Production Level,

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 19 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 22

Data & Its Management

To Create Data And Generate Controls Limits.

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 21 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 24

Energy Flow Structure 2 (Sankey) The EnPI Boundary Level 1

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 25 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 28

Significant Energies 1 – @Org. Level

Identifying Usage & Data Of All Energy Sources

Flows Of Energy Source 2 - 2nd

Takes Us To Second Significant

The Three EnPI Boundary Levels The EnPI Boundary Level 2

Example: The Steam Generation, Distribution &

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 27 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 30

Significant Energies 2 – @SEC Facility Level Significance

Sections For Last 3 Years To

Decide EnPI At Sectional

Routinely Changes 1,500.00

e.g. Ambient Temp.,

& Cooling Towers Temperature, Light Tower Performance

Level, Flow), 9.00

Other Sections Also.

Section 1 - 1st 0.00% 9-Jan 8-Jan

Significant RH (2018) (%) RH (2019) (%) 3. Sigma CT (Design) -De lta T

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 31 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 34

The EnPI Boundary Level 3 Norm Chart For Loss Identification

Example Of EnPI Based On Energy (Fuel) Type

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 38 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 41

Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI) Norm Chart For Loss Identification

They Must Be Appropriate For

Monitoring And Measuring Energy

Performance Reviewed With The Baseline

Regasified LNG-Total (SM3)-2018

Regasified LNG-Total (SM3)-2019

Methodology For Determining EnPIs

Must Be Recorded And Regularly

27,000,000.00 4,000.00 30,000.00

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 39 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 42

Selecting Significant Variable Method 2: Comparison Of Monthly Running

EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period Nov’17~Dec’18

+Ve: Provides Information Where -Ve: Doesn’t Provides Information About

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 43 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 46

Method 3: Comparison of EnPI Values (Monthly As

Now Different Ways EnB = 4.76 GCal/MTU Based On Period Nov’17~Dec’18

To Analyze… Target: 2% Lower Than EnB

By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 44 By Prabhat Khare (prabhatkhare22695@gmail.com) 47