The document discusses the reasons for and against the effectiveness of Oplan Tokhang, the Philippines' war on drugs. Three key points are:
1) Supporters argue that it deters drug crimes and addiction by instilling fear of consequences. However, critics say it promotes impunity among officials and fails to target big drug networks.
2) While it aims to create a drug-free country, the supply of drugs continues and the war does not seem to be preventing it. Tactics also risk human rights violations and increase dangers for police and citizens.
3) Overall the plan had good intentions but was executed poorly, favoring those in power and convicting the powerless without due process. The main
The document discusses the reasons for and against the effectiveness of Oplan Tokhang, the Philippines' war on drugs. Three key points are:
1) Supporters argue that it deters drug crimes and addiction by instilling fear of consequences. However, critics say it promotes impunity among officials and fails to target big drug networks.
2) While it aims to create a drug-free country, the supply of drugs continues and the war does not seem to be preventing it. Tactics also risk human rights violations and increase dangers for police and citizens.
3) Overall the plan had good intentions but was executed poorly, favoring those in power and convicting the powerless without due process. The main
The document discusses the reasons for and against the effectiveness of Oplan Tokhang, the Philippines' war on drugs. Three key points are:
1) Supporters argue that it deters drug crimes and addiction by instilling fear of consequences. However, critics say it promotes impunity among officials and fails to target big drug networks.
2) While it aims to create a drug-free country, the supply of drugs continues and the war does not seem to be preventing it. Tactics also risk human rights violations and increase dangers for police and citizens.
3) Overall the plan had good intentions but was executed poorly, favoring those in power and convicting the powerless without due process. The main
Done right, it deters and It promoted a culture of
lessen drug crimes as impunity and high dealers will not have ranking officials and easy access to drugs as officers had abused long as the project is their power as they effective. stray away from their “War on drugs: Is Oplan Tokhang main goal. It instills fear to the effective?” The method being used people not to use, is not sustainable as it deliver, and produce seems only after small drugs for recreational time drug dealers, use as they fear the producers, and runners. consequences as crime The project seem to not including drugs lessen. have captured big time owners and it isn’t as As long as it is in effect Conclusion and progressive as the first we will eventually live in Justification year. a Drug Free country. The war on drugs project, Oplan The supply keeps It has prevented small coming and doesn’t Tokhang had provided time crimes such as look like the war is good intention to robbery that is preventing it. Funnily, eradicate the spread of attributed to those most war tactics tend to manufacturing, selling, citizens who are cut off the supply lines and usage of addicted to illegal of the enemy prohibited drugs. It’s drugs. supposed to be a road It violates human rights It convicts who broke to victory as it was for as police had killed the law. Those who are good intentions, but multiple “suspects” under the influence of the plans ran down claiming that they are prohibited drugs are and they had executed one the list of the drug given the level of the project poorly as it dealers in the place, not punishment they favored those who are giving them a chance to deserve. in power and convicted redeem themselves and those who are not and fight for their rights. others did not make it out alive as as they are It increased risk for both not given the chance military/policemen and to fight for themselves. our countrymen. It also It seems like the main increased prejudice to issue is not solved. those who have no power to fight back.