Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.1 Introduction
specific shape factor effect on shear behaviour based on direct shear tests
is investigated. Then, particle shape information for the real sand - Fujian
Standard Sand obtained from MorphologI and the microscope at UCL are
provided. Combined with the numerical particle shape studies results and
particle shape to prepare the numerical direct shear tests for calibration of
pure sand. Finally, the numerical direct shear tests results (stress-strain
1
4.2.1 Sample preparation
The general DEM procedure for the direct shear tests on sand
been introduced in Chapter 3 section 3.5. This section adds some more
shear tests. Details are including information such as the particle size
dry sand with the particle size distribution shown in Figure 4.1 has been
Figure 4.1 Particle size distribution of sand in laboratory tests and in DEM simulations.
sample preparation was 0.95, with a dry density of 1.611 g/cm 3. In order
carry out the numerical direct shear tests. The loose sample with the
3
porosity and inter-particle friction were 0.15 and 0.5 respectively. The
medium dense sample with the porosity and inter-particle friction were
0.15 and 0.2 respectively. And the dense sample (as introduced in Section
3.5) with the porosity and inter-particle friction were 0.15 and 0.0
stress state. The sand-sand particle friction was increased to 0.2 before
compressing the specimen to reach a 5.0 kPa isotropic stress state. During
these tests. The clump with two pebbles is simple. And various particle
shapes will replace it in the following particle shape studies. Figure 4.3
shows the numerical direct shear tests results. As expected, Figure 4.3 (a)
shows that the dense sample has an obvious peak stress at shear strain of
2.5%, while the cases of medium dense and loose samples show lower
display no peak strength, but eventually reaches the same critical shear
4
stress as the initially dense sample. These three cases reach a similar
critical stress which is expected. Figure 4.3 (b) shows the relationship
between volume strain and shear strain. For dense sample, the behaviour
contraction, the lid of the shear-box is moving downward and the sample
dilatancy curve. The vertical axis is the stress ratio, the horizontal axis is
strain with shear strain. This curve can further verifies all samples reach
the same critical stress state, and also proves the correctness of the model
5
Figure 4.2 Particle shape used in testing the dense sample preparation.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 4.3 Numerical direct shear test results of different states of sand.
6
After introducing and verifying the sample preparation procedure, a
shear tests are prepared to dense state. To investigate the elongation effect
flatness index and roundness group follow a similar design concept. For
7
Table 4.1 Sample design chart with different particle shapes
8
materials with different grading uniformities and different roundness
extents and found that the void ratios increase as particles become more
Figure 4.4 which shows that reasonable correlations exist between each
roundness (R), and the maximum and minimum void ratios. For the
elongation effect results shown in Figure 4.4 (a), ellipsoidal particles can
from 0.7 to 1.0. If particles are too elongated, the packing becomes
looser. When the elongation index ranges from 0.25 to 0.7, both emax and
found in previous studies (Altuhafi et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2019). It’s
noted that the range of elongation index (they call aspect ratio, but the
narrow, ranging from 0.7 to 0.8, and from 0.35 to 0.55, respectively. Both
of them used the real soils for investigations, the trend is compatible with
the numerical results. This means particle shape studies using DEM not
9
only disclose the packing abilities but also consider more range of
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
For the flatness effect results shown in Figure 4.4 (b), the change of
both emax and emin along with the flatness index is minimal. The reason
may be the elongation index for this group of particle shapes is 0.6, it’s
10
easier to pack densely according to the results shown in Figure 4.4 (a). It
means that in this situation, elongation index rather than the flatness
ability.
For the convexity effect results shown in Figure 4.4 (c), the void ratio
elongated particle group (EI = 0.25) are higher than those of moderately
elongated particle group (EI = 0.5), which is consistent with the results
particles which will hinder particle mobility and their ability to attain
For the roundness effect results shown in Figure 4.4 (d), it’s shown
that both emax and emin increase as roundness decrease. This trend is
these shape descriptors, such as elongation index (EI), flatness index (FI),
11
convexity (Cx) and roundness (R). A transition point exists in elongation
index results. Too elongated particles bridge the gaps over particles and
create large open voids, which results in higher void ratios. When
particles are moderately elongated (e.g. EI = 0.6), the flatness index may
Figure 4.5 shows the effect of shape factors on the angle of internal
friction at peak and critical state. For the peak state, the shear data may be
the idealized results from shear-box tests on dense and loose samples of
12
soils. Therefore, most researchers analyse the relationship between
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
13
It is shown that the critical friction angle follows a decreasing trend as
flatty particles and those with less convexity increase the irregularity of
studies reported in Altuhafi (2016) and Yang (2019), although the range
to explain this abnormal phenomenon: (1) In Cho’s study, real soils are
14
performance. (2) the description for roundness as the calculation shown
in this study, which is also current popular calculation method may need
deviate the real soil characteristics, because the elongation index and
match of them means the numerical model together with the input
During this process, the peak stresses at different stress levels are often
influence the strain at the peak as shown in Figure 4.6. Here, values for
levels.
15
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 4.6 Effect of particle shape on shear strain at the peak stress level.
16
Specimen scale effects in the direct shear apparatus on the shear
the 1930s, when Parsons (1936) showed the variation of sand friction
angle as a function of the shear box size. Wang and Gutierrez (2010)
affected by the direct shear test scale (specimen length and height scales
in relation to the particle size) using DEM. In this study, we keep the box
size constant while change the particle size scale factor to observe the
Case 1, Case 2, Case 3 and Case 4, respectively) from the sample design
chart shown in Table 4.1. Particle size scale factors of 5, 7, 10 and 12 are
adopted.
Figure 4.7 and Table 4.2 summarised the particle size scale effect on
maximum dilatancy rate, strain at peak, peak friction angle and critical
friction angle for Case 1. Figure 4.8 and Table 4.3, Figure 4.9 and Table
4.4, Figure 4.10 and Table 4.5 provide information for Case 2, Case 3 and
Case 4, respectively. For example, in Case 1, it can be seen that when the
17
scale factor is 5 and 7, the shear stress results are similar. However, when
the scale factor is 10 and 12, the shear stress results become fluctuating. It
means for Case 1, using particle size scale factor of 5 and 7 to do the
(1) Case 1
18
(2) Case 2
19
(3) Case 3
(4) Case 4
20
Figure 4.10 Particle shape and shear information for case 4.
different particle size scale factors for four different particle shapes, it
confirms that the scale factor of 7 used in this PhD project to investigate
21
Table 4.6 Summary of particle size scale effect
10
12
(2) What data u obtain from the MorphologI, how to interpret the data;
(3) Compare the data for Fujian sand with other similar sands. That will
PS: show the excel you have currently; arrange the tests; read the manual
and set clear goals before testing; update this section quickly.
22
4.3.2 Experimental direct shear tests for pure sand
The laboratory tests were carried out using a small direct shear box
Poorly-graded fine sand (effective particle size D10 of 0.25 mm) was
used for the laboratory tests. Table 4.7 shows the physical properties of
sand samples used in direct shear tests. This type of sand is referred to as
Fujian Standard Sand in China. Figure 4.11 shows the particle size
23
distribution of the sand.
al, 2017)
The direct shear box (DSB) consists of upper and lower boxes. The
plan area of DSB was 3600 mm2 (60 mm x 60 mm). The bottom box
24
measured using a horizontal displacement dial gauge (HDDG) attached to
the bottom box. The vertical displacement dial gauge (VDDG) and
horizontal force dial gauge (HFDG) shown in Figure 4.12 were used.
Uniform normal pressure was applied to the top of the shear box with a
lever arm ratio of 1:10 in the process of shearing. The proving ring
For each test, a pre-weighed amount of dry sand was poured into the
shear box and densified in three layers of roughly equal thickness using a
levels of 30 kPa, 50kPa, 100 kPa were used by applying loading of 1.1
kg, 1.84 kg and 3.67 kg for all tests. The HFDG and HDDG were set to
zero before shearing for easy recording and data processing. Readings of
accuracy. Shearing speed was set to 0.5 mm/min for all tests. Shearing
25
occurs by displacing the lower half of the box to the right at a constant
displacement both the peak and the critical state shear resistance were
26
Figure 4.13 Test results for pure sand
The peak and critical state friction angles of the sand measured from
direct shear tests are 42o and 32o, respectively. We could also interpret
27
these test results via the stress-dilatancy curve shown in Figure 4.13. The
vertical axis is the stress ratio, the horizontal axis is about the gradient of
volumetric strain increment and shear strain increment. We used 3(or 5?)
(1) introduce how I link the numerical particle shape studies and
stresses: 50, 100 and 200 kPa, which were identical to those in the
laboratory tests. The basic DEM procedure for direct shear tests on sand
micro input parameters of the DEM investigations are listed in Table 4.8
and the calibration results of the direct shear tests for sand are shown in
28
Figure 4.15. Although the up-scaling factor influences the numerical
results (Achmus and Abdel-Rahman, 2002), the up-scaling factor for sand
is constant throughout the study. The study of the scale effect on the shear
Therefore, the numerical results which have been calibrated with the
29
Table 4.8 Input parameters of sand in numerical direct shear tests
particle shape are studied firstly using DEM. The conclusions show
30
friction and shear strain at the peak stress. In general, the packing
elongated particles bridge the gaps over particles and create large
open voids, which results in higher void ratios. Flatness index and
Fujian sand are provided. Based on these real sand particle shape
calibrate the numerical model for the sand. The calibration results
31
show the numerical model can give a good reproduction of the
tests.
accuracy of the results compared with the 3D real soil particles. (2)
Only one kind of particle shape rather than consider all kinds of
32
particle shape in real soils is adopted during the numerical sample
practices.
Youd, T. (1972). Factors controlling maximum and minimum densities of sands. Evaluation
of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils , E.
T. Selig and R. S. Ladd, eds., ASTM, Los Angeles, 98–112.
33
Altuhafi, F. N., Coop, M. R., & Georgiannou, V. N. (2016). Effect of particle shape on the
mechanical behavior of natural sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, 142(12), 04016071.
Hao, Y. A. N. G., Bo, Z. H. O. U., & WANG, J. J. (2019). Exploring the effect of 3D grain
shape on the packing and mechanical behaviour of sands. Geotechnique Letters, 9(4),
299-304.
Cho, G. C., Dodds, J., & Santamarina, J. C. (2006). Particle shape effects on packing density,
stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. Journal of geotechnical and
geoenvironmental engineering, 132(5), 591-602.
Parsons, J. D. (1936). Progress report on an investigation of the shearing resistance of
cohesionless soils. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. Found. Engng, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 2, 133–138.
Wang, J., & Gutierrez, M. (2010). Discrete element simulations of direct shear specimen scale
effects. Géotechnique, 60(5), 395.
Li, L. H., Chen, Y. J., Ferreira, P., Liu, Y., & Xiao, H. L. (2017). Experimental investigations
on the pull-out behavior of tire strips reinforced sands. Materials, 10(7), 707.
Standard, A. S. T. M. D3080 (2004). Standard test method for direct shear tests of soils under
consolidated drained conditions, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Achmus, M., & Abdel-Rahman, K. (2002). The influence of up-scaling on the results of
particle method calculations of non-cohesive soils. 1 st International PFC Symposium,
Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
34