Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frankenstein is a novel by Mary Shelley (1797-1851). Shelley started writing the story when she
was 18, and the first edition of the novel was published anonymously in London on 1 January
1818, when she was 20. Her name first appeared on the second edition, published in 1823.
Frankenstein is infused with elements of the Gothic novel and the Romantic movement. At the
same time, it is an early example of science fiction. Brian Aldiss has argued that it should be
considered the first true science fiction story because, in contrast to previous stories with
fantastical elements resembling those of later science fiction, the central character "makes a
deliberate decision" and "turns to modern experiments in the laboratory" to achieve fantastic
results. It has had a considerable influence in literature and popular culture and spawned a
Since the novel's publication, the name "Frankenstein" has often been used to refer to the
monster itself. This usage is considered erroneous, but some commentators regard it as well-
established and acceptable. In the novel, Frankenstein's creation is identified by words such as
"creature", "monster", "daemon", "wretch", "abortion", "fiend" and "it". Speaking to Victor
Frankenstein, the monster says "I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel" (which
ties to Lucifer in Paradise Lost, which the monster reads, and which relates to the disobedience
Shelley’s Frankenstein has been put in a lot of genres of the years, but mainly it has been called
science fiction also became popular because the eighteenth century was the time of industrial
revolution and people were excited to find to what technology could do related with science.
The novel explores larger questions about “science, fate, free will, nature, and humanity.” The
novel has been further described as “the origin of species in science fiction”. The novel, very
simply negotiates the relations of negotiation and discretion between the concerns of science and
politics in its language and plot. It is true that the technology found in the novel is not critical to
the novel’s narrative itself, but also to social criticism. The larger impact of Frankenstein is
because of the fact that Shelley combines the gothic genre with an investigation into the
The reason Mary made poor Victor Frankenstein a scientist, therefore, had nothing to do with a
something different from the Gothic novels of supernatural horror which had already become
tedious and passé. The preface to the first edition, which was probably written by Percy Shelley
on his wife's behalf, treads a delicate argumentative line in speaking of such matters.
'I am by no means indifferent to the manner in which whatever moral tendencies exist in the
'Mary' says,
'yet my chief concern in this respect has been limited to avoiding the enervating effects of the
novels of the present day and to the exhibition of the amiableness of domestic affection, and the
excellence of universal virtue.' 'She' further insists that 'the opinions which naturally spring from
the character and situation of the hero are by no means to be conceived as existing always in my
own conviction; nor is any inference justly to be drawn from the following pages as prejudicing
Science fiction is the only literature capable of exploring the macro history of our species, and of
placing our history, and even our daily lives, in a cosmic context. Science fiction (often
and extraterrestrial life. Science fiction often explores the potential consequences of scientific
Isaac Asimov said: “Science fiction can be defined as that branch of literature which deals with
The idea of science fiction comes in when Victor addresses his will to go to a university to study
science, where he starts practicing different experiments surprising his peers and teachers.
Finally, through galvanism and performing an experiment on a dead body by bringing it back to
life and thus creating a monster in real life. A lot of academic interpretations about the monster
came up, the most ingenious of all being how the plot suggest that from this point onwards
much, if not all, of what happens is a hallucination of Victor's and that the monster which
subsequently appears to him is a projection of his own personality, his own doppelgänger.
Although this is superficially the most bizarre of the academic reinterpretations, its adherents
rightly point out that it does make rather more sense than the literal interpretation of the puzzling
There is certainly some self-protective rationalization here - the author of the preface is shrewdly
anticipating and trying cleverly to deflect the charge that the book promotes atheism - but 'she' is
not trying nearly so hard to do that as she was later to attempt in the 1831 introduction, and it
must be noted that 'any philosophical doctrine whatsoever' includes science as well as religion.
What happens in the latter novel makes little sense - rationally or morally - precisely because the
horror of that moment can never be undermined or reduced, and thus can never undergo any kind
of imaginative transformation, no matter how hard the unfortunate monster tries to find a
solution. The machinery of the plot remains the inescapable condition of the key characters, no
matter how they may regret it. Victor and the monster are sealed within it and united by it, all
possible avenues of escape being ruled out by the fact that this is, essentially and definitively, a
horror story. It is only to be expected that the narrative expansion of the crucial moments should
seem to some readers to be akin to a hallucination - especially to the kind of hallucination which
Thus, while the long prelude which precedes and sets up the visionary moment invents - more or
less by accident - the modern genre of science fiction, the long coda which follows and expands
upon it constitutes - again, more or less by accident - a giant leap for the not-so-modern genre of
delusional fantasy which had recently been invented by E. T. A. Hoffman. This double triumph
assured that the book would become a landmark in the evolution of modern imaginative fiction
as well as a popular success. It is a landmark, because rather than in spite of its inherent internal
contradictions; because of its struggle to be something other than it is. It is a great book precisely
because its author could not and would not settle for writing an ordinary book, which would
1. http://knarf.english.upenn.edu
2. https://prezi.com
3. http://frankensteinmirandahousecollege.blogspot.com
4. https://en.wikipedia.org
SUBMITTED BY:
RUPAL ARORA
BA (HONS) ENGLISH
II YEAR, IV SEMESTER
#1404