Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. TITLE PAGE
IV. INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Special and Inclusive Education………………
B. Content of the Portfolio……………………………………………….
C. Objective of the Portfolio………………………………………………
V. CONTENT
A. Laws Regarding SPED in the U.S. and in the Philippines………
B. Laws that pertain to:
a. Inclusion of children with special needs in all programs
and concerns of the government
b. The education of children with special needs
c. The home, parents, and community in special
education activities
d. Communication of significant events
C. Public Policies that Support Inclusive Education and
International Legislation on IE…………………………………….
D. Process of Inclusion…………………………………………………
E. E-portfolio………………………………………………………………
A. Definition of Disability
B. Characteristics
VI. SUMMARY
VII. REFERENCES
College of Teacher Education
Definition of Terms
heterogeneous grouping
hidden curriculum- refers to unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons,
values, and perspectives that students learn in school.
higher education
inclusion- a process of addressing and responding to the diversity of needs of all
children, youth and adults trough increasing participation in learning, cultures and
communities, and reducing and eliminating exclusion within and from education.
inclusive assessment - shifts the focus from assessment procedures that focus on
diagnosis and resource allocation, often conducted outside the mainstream school,
to on-going assessment that is conducted by class teachers to organize individual
educational planning.
inclusive education- the unesco ibe (2008) definition states that inclusive education
is: an ongoing process aimed to offering quality education for all while respecting
diversity and the different needs and abilities, characteristics and learning
expectations of the students and communities, eliminating all forms of
discrimination.
inclusive pedagogy- refers to ‘an approach to teaching and learning that supports
teachers to respond to individual differences between learners, but avoids the
marginalization that can occur when some students are treated differently’.
individualization - is led by the teacher, who provides instruction and tasks/activities
to accommodate the learning needs of each learner.
innovation
integration- it carries with it an idea that learners need to be educationally and/or
socially ‘ready’ for transfer from special to ordinary school.
intellectual development
language impairment
leadership- is is defined as a process of providing direction and applying influence.
learning difficulty
mainstream education
mentor
measurement - refers to assessment that is linked to some form of numerical
quantifier (a score, mark or grade).
multi-sensory impairment
multiple disabiities
neuro-psychiatric disorder
normalization
participation
partnership
peer groups
personalization
College of Teacher Education
physical disability
prevention
primary education
provision
proximity
quality
quality assurance
research
resource allocation
school administration
school for all
secondary education
sensory impairment
special education needs
special needs education
special school
speech impairment
support
systemic approach
Talent
Talented learners
Teamwork- a group of people who work together or play a
Theory- an idea or a statement that expalins how or why somethings happens
Values- beliefs and ideas about what is important in their lives
visual impairment
vocational education
Welfare- person’s state of health, happiness, and comfort
The most controversial issue currently regarding the education of children with
special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is that of inclusion Theories of
inclusion and inclusive education have important implications for special education
policies and practices in both developed and developing countries. Inclusive
College of Teacher Education
The term Inclusion generally means ending all separate special education
placement for all students and full time placement in general education with
appropriate special education supports within that classroom. There are some
individuals who by virtue of their physical and mental abilities require a more
relevant or appropriate instruction than is usually available within formal and
informal educational structures. A domain of education has been constructed to
satisfy their learning.
This paper aims to provide a vision and guidelines for policies, procedures and
teaching strategies that will facilitate the provision of effective education for all
children with special educational needs and disabilities. A major goal of the study is
to identify and draw attention to the most critical gaps and deficiencies in legislative
and policy frameworks at the national level in protecting and promoting the human
College of Teacher Education
Special Education Law came into effect in 1975, with the passing of Public Law
94-142, also known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.This law
required schools to protect the rights of, and provide a free appropriate public
education for, all students with disabilities, such as mental retardation, learning
disabilities, emotional problems, etc. Prior to this law, many individuals with a
mental illness or mental retardation were placed in state institutions, quite often
receiving minimal clothing, food and care. Some school districts sent their special
needs students to a special education school or encouraged parents to keep their
children home.
It stipulates a clear definition of this group of persons. People with disability who
are referred to by the law are those who are suffering from physical or mental
impairment that hinders them from pursuing one or more of their pivotal daily
activities. The definition also includes those persons possessing a documentation of
their disability or who are considered as having impairment.
In October 1986, Congress passed Public Law 99-457, the 1986 Amendments to
the Education for All the Handicapped Act. Building on its predecessor, P.L. 94-142,
which mandated special education programs for children 6 to 21 years of age and
provided incentive grants to serve children from the age of 3 years, this new law
represents the first major federal legislation affecting early intervention.
In addition to replacing the preschool incentive grants with a national mandate
that all handicapped children be served from the age of 3 years, these amendments
College of Teacher Education
further extend P.L. 94-142 by offering states the option to serve handicapped or
developmentally delayed children from birth to 3 years of age.
The restructure of the IDEA into four parts, revises some definitions, and
revamps several key components, ranging from funding to disciplining students with
disabilities to how IEP’s are to be developed. This law was signed by President
Clinton way back in 1997 on the 4th day of June.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is a landmark in education reform designed
to improve student achievement and change the culture of America’s schools. This
new law, which President George W. Bush described as “the cornerstone of my
administration,” represents a sweeping overhaul of federal efforts to support
elementary and secondary education in the United States.
“These reforms express my deep belief in our public schools and their mission to
build the mind and character of every child, from every background, in every part of
America,” President Bush said during his first week in office in January 2001.
The act, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, embodies four key
principles-stronger accountability for results; greater flexibility for states, school
districts and schools in the use of federal funds; more choices for parents of children
from disadvantaged backgrounds; and an emphasis on teaching methods that have
been demonstrated to work. The act also places an increased emphasis on reading,
especially for young children, enhancing the quality of our nation’s teachers, and
ensuring that all children in America’s schools learn English.
College of Teacher Education
The Magna Carta for Disabled Persons is the chief policy document for Filipinos
with Disabilities. It incorporate the earlier Batas Pambansa 344 of 19833 or the
Accessibility Law through a provision. In 2006, Republic Act 9442 amended RA 7277,
by adding social and economic provisions like the 20% discount on purchase of
medicine and daily essentials including transportation and recreational services.
the enactment of measures that protect and enhance the right of all the people to
human dignity, reduce social, economic, and political inequalities, and remove
cultural inequities by equitably diffusing wealth and political power for the common
good. To this end, the State shall regulate the acquisition, ownership, use, and
disposition of property and its increments; and 2.The promotion of social justice shall
include the commitment to create economic opportunities based on freedom of
initiative and self-reliance.” These provisions for persons with disabilities are looked
at as allowances for affirmative discrimination aimed to level the playing fields for
the sector. It comes short however to the explicit provision of the CRPD which
mentions not only the enjoyment of the sector of all human rights but “Enjoyment
on an equal basis with the rest” of the population.
The Social Justice Article XII8 provides the areas where affirmative actions on
discrimination may be allowed. To date, there is no specific jurisprudence relative to
issues on Constitutional guarantee on equality of persons with disabilities in the
country. Only 57 complaints on disability-related cases have been filed with the
Commission on Human Rights (C.H.R.). None of these cases have reached the
Supreme Court. The C.H.R. is only a fact-finding body. It has authority to summon all
involved individual and agencies. However, it can only recommend for the
prosecution of cases that are filed with the probable cause and strong evidence.
Republic Act 8425 (The Social Reform and Poverty Alleviation Act
In 1999, the first 25-member Sectoral Council of Persons with Disabilities was
organized. Its structure ensures that all disability groups are represented at the
national level. To ensure geographic representations, all 17 political divisions called
regions are given the opportunity to elect their regional representatives in the
Council.
College of Teacher Education
Republic Act 1179- An Act Creating the Rehabilitation and Vocational Program
for the Blind
In 1954, Republic Act 1179 An Act Creating the Rehabilitation and Vocational
Program for the Blind and other Physically Handicapped 31 was approved. In 1962,
Republic Act 356232 was enacted to declare permanent government commitment to
the training of S.P.E.D. teachers for the blind, the institutionalization of the
residential school program and the establishment of the Philippine Printing House
for the Blind (P.P.H.B.).
Republic Act 525033 specified the 10 year training program for these teachers.
In 1970, the Philippine School for the Deaf and Blind (PS.D.B.) were separated into
two institutions, the Philippine National School for the Blind (P.N.S.B.) and the
Philippine school for the Deaf (P.S.D.).
Even in the period of the dictatorship, Presidential Decree No. 603 of 1974, also
known as the Child and Youth Welfare Code34 abounds with specific provisions for
the welfare of children with disabilities. It entitles them to the right to education as a
means of providing them with proper treatment and competent care required by
their particular situations. Article 74 provides for the creation of special classes,
where needs so warrant. There shall be at least a special class in every province. The
private sector was given the necessary inducement and encouragement to
participate.
Growing social concern for the welfare and integration of PWD voiced by
parents and advocates including legislation led to the enactment of the law in 1968.
Established a 10-year training program for teachers and led to the admission of
children with disabilities into regular public schools.
However, without appropriate school and parental support, these children had
difficulty coping with the regular classes and soon dropped out of school.
Identifies the specific Provisions for the Protection, Promotion, and Participation
of children with special needs
The EFA strategy seeks to address the problems of limited access to basic
College of Teacher Education
education for groups that are at least served by the educational system and those
who enter the system but drop out, or at high risk of dropping out before achieving
basic literacy and numeric skills.
A. The inclusion of children with special needs in all programs and concerns of the
government.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 provides civil rights protections to
individuals with disabilities. The ADA defines an individual with a disability as a
person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or
more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an
impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment.
The ADA does not specifically name all of the impairments that are covered.
Passed by Congress in 1975, this was the first special education law directed at
students with physical and mental disabilities. The law stated that public schools
must provide children with special needs with the same opportunities for education
as other children. It also required any public school that received federal funds to
provide one free meal a day for these children.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA, was created in 1990 and
is a modification of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. This law ensures
that special needs students receive appropriate free public education in the least
restrictive environment necessary to meet those students’ needs. It helps students
receive the extra assistance they need but allows them to participate in the same
activities as children without special needs whenever possible.
In 2001, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, commonly known as the
No Child Left Behind Act, called for schools to be accountable for academic
performance of all students, whether or not they had disabilities. The act requires
schools in every state to develop routine assessments of students’ academic skills.
While it does not stipulate that these assessments meet a national standard, the
law does oblige each state to come up with its own criteria for evaluation. No Child
Left Behind provides incentives for schools to demonstrate progress in students with
special needs. It also allows for students to seek alternative options if schools are not
meeting their academic, social or emotional needs.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
forbid discrimination in schools based on disability. This applies to colleges and
universities as well as elementary, middle and high schools. Many students with
special needs go on to study at the post-secondary level, but the laws are slightly
different for post-secondary schools. The law does not require post-secondary
schools to provide a free appropriate public education to students, but it does oblige
schools to offer suitable academic adjustments and accessible housing to students
with disabilities.
The IDEA maintains that parents and teachers of children who qualify for special
education must develop an Individualized Education Program, or IEP, that helps
establish specific education for a child’s explicit needs. This requires caregivers to
meet initially to determine a child’s eligibility for an IEP and to come together
annually to develop and assess the educational plan.
IDEA is the main law governing the education of students eligible for special
education and related services.
IDEA has eight main principles—most notably that students who qualify for
special education services are to receive a free and appropriate public education
(FAPE).
FERPA is a law that governs who can see documents and files related to students
in schools.
Parents of students with disabilities have extensive rights to help ensure that the
education their child receives is appropriate.
opportunity for every child. The CRPD also emphasizes that this must be provided in
inclusive systems at all levels. It explicitly requires that children with disabilities are
not excluded from the general education system on the basis of disability. They are
entitled to inclusive, free and quality education on an equal basis with others in the
communities in which they live. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities has stressed that “...it is the entire process of inclusive education that
must be accessible, not just buildings, but all information and communication,
including ambient or frequency modulation assistive systems, support services and
reasonable accommodation in schools..... The whole environment of students with
disabilities must be designed in a way that fosters inclusion and guarantees their
equality in the entire process of their education.” Inclusion needs to be understood
as integral to the whole of the education system not just an add-on.
Inclusive education needs to be seen as one part of the wider goal of making
society more just and less discriminatory for all marginalized populations through
education delivery. It is not simply a technical or organizational change, but involves
a cultural and philosophical change of approach based on a commitment to respect
for every child, and recognition of the obligations of the education system to adapt
to accommodate and address her or his needs and rights. Consequently, legislation
across all public sectors should lead to the provision of services that enhance
developments and processes working towards inclusion in education.
Additional policy changes might be required to policies relating to, for example,
enrolment, curriculum, assessment, school governance human resources quality
assurance, self-evaluation, external evaluation, and inspection regimes.
South Africa2
College of Teacher Education
It is intended that by 2021, 500 primary schools will have been converted to
become inclusive, special schools will be converted into resource centers, and
circuit-based and district-based support teams will be established. To date, 30
districts have support teams, teacher training and workshops have been provided,
30 schools have been provided with assistive devices and 10 mainstream schools
have been upgraded into model schools. One of the success factors was the learning
from the past that inclusiveness in society is the only way of living peacefully
together.
Thailand3
• Integrate the Sector Policy on Inclusive Education into all other legal
frameworks and policies of the education sector.
• Raise awareness of the constitutional right to education and foster attitudinal
change.
• Support institutional development by developing human and instructional
resources. • Review the National Curriculum for Basic Education to reflect the
diversity of learning needs of all learners.
• Widen and develop educational support services.
• Develop teacher education and training for paramedical and support staff.
• Strengthen and widen in-service training for stakeholders.
• Develop a mechanism for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of
the Sector Policy on Inclusive Education.
The Right to Education Act was passed in India in 2009. It guarantees every child
between the ages of 6-14 years, including those with disabilities, the right to free
and compulsory education at a neighbourhood school. No direct (school fees) or
indirect cost (uniforms, textbooks, mid-day meals, transportation) must be borne by
the child or the parents as a condition of obtaining elementary education. The
Government will provide schooling free-of-cost until a child’s elementary education
is completed. Its introduction marked a historic step in introducing a national
provision to ensure childcentred, child-friendly education to help all children develop
College of Teacher Education
Moldova
parents, teachers and people in the community, building a more understanding and
integrated society.
The assessment of children who had been reunited with their families and
reintegrated into mainstream schools found that they have become healthier and
achieved better school results. Children who had been previously misdiagnosed with
intellectual disabilities now study together with their peers and get good and very
good marks. Most importantly, they feel happier.
PROCESS OF INCLUSION
College of Teacher Education