Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University of Karachi
December, 2018
Running head: ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 2
Abstract
The purpose of this literature review is to explore attachment patterns in young adults with
study seeks to analyze the relationship between Obsessive-Compulsive traits and insecure
attachment. The present study reviews original theories as well as current research.
Knowledge about association between OCPD traits and attachment would be helpful in
It has been used extensively to explain the etiology of personality disorders (Dozier, Stovall-
McClough, & Albus, 2008). Purpose of this paper is to explore literature that investigates
proposed by attachment theory. Main focus of this paper is attachment patterns in young
attachment theory will be briefly described before reviewing major theoretical perspectives
Literature Review
People with OCPD have impaired interpersonal functioning. They prioritize working
over spending time with family and friends. People with OCPD traits have difficulty
assigning tasks to others and they find it inordinately difficult to work in groups. They need
control over everything (Kring, Johanson, Davidson & Neale, 2012). In addition, people with
Obsessive Compulsive Personality find it difficult to express love and other positive emotions
but they frequently express anger and other negative emotions which scare people away
(Villemarette-Pittman et al., 2004). These traits indicate impaired ability to form and
intricately tied to insecure attachment (Gallo, Smith, & Ruiz, 2003). Insecure attachment
styles are also proposed to be a cause of constant anxiety (Bowlby, 1973) which may explain
certain traits of OCPD such as difficulty discarding useless objects, miserliness and excessive
perfectionism.
Attachment Theory
John Bowlby (1969, 1973) was the first to develop attachment theory of personality
development, which states that early interactions of a child with their caregivers determine
how their personality develops. According to him, responses of caregivers towards the child
shape two basic attitudes: attitude towards self (self-esteem) and attitudes towards caregivers
(interpersonal trust). When the responses of the caregiver show the infant that he or she is
important to them, the child develops high self-esteem. When the caregiver’s behavior shows
that they do not value or love the infant, he or she develops low self-esteem. When the
caregiver is available to the child and fulfills his or her needs, the child develops high
interpersonal trust. When the child perceives that his or her caregiver is unreliable or
untrustworthy, they develop low interpersonal trust. According to Hazan and Shaver (1987),
expect from relationships (Hazan & Shaver, 1987). A person with both high self-esteem and
high interpersonal trust forms a secure attachment style: an attachment pattern low in both
anxiety and avoidance. Having secure attachment mean that the person perceives that they
can rely on their attachment figures to provide feelings of protection, comfort and safety.
(Bowlby, 1973). Persons with high interpersonal trust but low self-esteem develop anxious
attachment style characterized by constant fear and anxiety that they will be abandoned by
their attachment figure. According to Bowlby, such persons are likely to become “guilt
ridden and conscientious”. Opposite of anxious attachment style is avoidant attachment style,
which is characterized by low interpersonal trust but high self-esteem. People with avoidant
attachment style show excessive self-reliance and maintain distance from others (Bowlby,
1979).
Nowadays, attachment styles are not viewed as separate categories, but rather are
understood as existing on two dimensions: avoidance and anxiety. Securely attached people
are low on both dimensions. Individuals with insecure attachment style are high on both or
Low High
Anxiety Anxiety Figure 1. The four
categories of attachment in young adults
Low Anxious-
Avoidanc Secure Preoccupied as described by
Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991)
e
People who are High Fearful- both high in anxiety
Avoidanc Dismissing Avoidant
(low self-esteem: e believing they are not
worthy of love and others will leave them) and high on avoidance (low trust of others)
impaired functioning and psychopathology. In adults, insecure attachment styles have been
affectivity, neuroticism, low self-esteem, and maladaptive strategies for coping with negative
affect (Hazan & Shaver, 1987; Carnelley et al., 1994; Simpson, 1990; Shaver & Brennan,
1992; Brennan & Morris, 1997; Brennan & Shaver, 1995; Thorberg & Lyvers, 2010).
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 6
Theoretical perspectives.
Some authors suggest that insecure attachment in OCPD results when parents provide
affection contingent on child’s performance (Lenzenweger & Clarkin, 2005). This might be
the reason that individuals with OCPD traits focus excessively on work. Guidano and Liotti
(1983) proposed that people with OCPD traits have an ambivalent attachment style
characterized by an unstable sense of self. They believe that they are loved and worthy of
love, and unloved and unworthy of love both at the same time. People with OCPD do not
tolerate uncertainty because maintaining certainty is important for them to have integrated
sense of self. The seek control to resolve inconsistency in sense of self. The authors further
developed due to a parenting style which discourages emotional expression and lacks positive
reward. Parents of persons with OCPD tend to be emotionally unexpressive, set high
standards for their children and only provide positive reward that is conditional (Guidano &
Liotti, 1983).
Kyrios (1988) theorized that individuals acquire five core beliefs through early
whether or not others are trustworthy, 3) perceptions of control over one’s environment, 4)
acquiring roles that make up identity, and 5) abidance to religious, moral or ethical codes that
is important for one’s sense of self. When children are securely attached, they feel trust in
themselves, others and the world around them. This trust makes them feel safe to explore and
discover their environment (Bowlby, 1973). Exploration of environment helps them develop
a sense of control over self and environment. It also facilitates them learn how to deal with
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 7
promotes social and cognitive skills. In people with OCPD, early interactions failed to meet
their basic emotional needs, hence obstructing acquisition of sense of security. People with
OCPD have not developed appropriate trust and dependency on oneself, other and
Aaronson, Bender, Skodol and Gunderson (2006) conducted a study in which they
Disorder. They found that persons with OCPD demonstrate significantly less insecure
mentioned study did not compare attachment style in OCPD with that of other personality
disorders. Also, the study did not include any control group consisting of people without
psychopathology. Furthermore, the test they used to assess attachment style, the Reciprocal
Attachment Questionnaire (RAQ), does not have established test norms to describe what
disorder are found to present with insecure adult attachment style (Bifulco, Moran, Ball &
Bernazzani, 2002; Doron et al., 2011). In addition, people with eating disorders show high
levels OCPD traits. Women with both anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa score higher on
measures of inflexibility, perfectionism, rule following, cautiousness, and drive for order and
symmetry, as compared to healthy control group (Anderluh et al., 2003). Eating disorders
have been found to be strongly associated with insecure attachment style (Amianto, 2016).
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 8
Therefore, it can be reasonably argued that OCPD traits are associated with insecure
attachment.
In a study, self-reports from 28 OCPD patients were acquired to assess parental care
and overprotection patterns. Nordahl and Stiles (1997) found that OCPD was significantly
associated with lower parental care and high parental overprotection as compared to healthy
low interpersonal trust and less secure attachment (van Ingen et al., 2015). Low levels of
parental care are also found to be associated with insecure attachment (Wiseman, Mayseless
& Sharabany, 2005). Hence, it can be reasoned that there might be an association between
Now, narrowing focus on studies that directly assessed correlation of OCPD traits
controls (Wiltgen et al, 2015). Results of their study indicated that the most prevalent
attachment avoidance and some of the OCPD traits across the whole sample (61 OCPD
inpatients and 61 controls). Attachment avoidance had a Pearson’s correlation of .38 with
criterion 3 of DSM-IV excessive devotion to work and prioritizing work over leisure),
correlation of .25 with criterion 6 (reluctance in delegating tasks or working with others
unless other people submit to their standards) and correlation of .27 with criterion 8
(inflexibility and stubbornness). All these correlations had significance levels higher than .
01. The limitation of the mentioned study is that it was conducted on people with severe
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 9
sample consisted of adolescents and young adults enrolled in first year of undergraduate
psychology course. This can be considered a limitation of this study that their sample was
biased: it was not representation of general population as their participants were all
psychology students. Results of Brannen and Shaver’s study indicate that insecure
attachment is connected to all the personality types they investigated. The test they used, a
revised version of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, was very likely to diagnose
people as having a personality disorder who do not actually have it (high rates of false
positives). Therefore, 384 participants out of total sample of 1056 were found to have OCPD
traits (around 27%). See figure 2 to compare the prevalence of different attachment patterns
in people with OCPD traits. The pie chart is made by using data from Brennan and
A more recent study was conducted in Iran by Zakei et al. on 260 college
undergraduate students. All of their participants were young adults: in age range of 21-26.
They found positive Pearson’s correlation of .22 between ambivalent attachment style and
OCPD traits and correlation of .36 between avoidant attachment style and OCPD (P<0.001,
for both). Their results demonstrated absence of any significant relationship between secure
attachment style and OCPD (Zakei et al., 2017). The limitation of this study is that the
reliability and validity of the translated version of the test they used to assess OCPD was not
known. Crucial information is also missing and there are mistakes in the research article that
hint that the study might not have been conducted very professionally.
The importance of these two studies, Brannen and Shaver’s and Zakei et al.’s, is that
the participants did not have any severe mental illness, so the relationship between OCPD
and OCPD traits relied on self reports to assess attachment styles. It is important to consider
the possibility that people with OCPD traits might not have much insight into their
attachment patterns.
Conclusion
relationship between OCPD traits and insecure attachment, especially avoidant and
ambivalent attachment styles. However, number of research studies, that investigate the
relationship between OCPD and attachment, is sparse. More research is needed to determine
conduct research using more recent criteria provided by DSM-5. Majority of researches done
on OCPD and attachment have employed DSM-IV criteria. Criteria for OCPD have since
Knowledge about association between OCPD and attachment patterns can provide
insight into risk factors of OCPD as well as useful solutions to effective treatment for people
with OCPD. Also, people who enter counseling for other reasons often have maladaptive
traits of personality disorders which further impair functioning and cause distress to them
(Kring, Johanson, Davidson & Neale, 2012). Knowledge of more effective treatment can
also be used to help these individuals adjust better to life. According to Baron and
Branscombe, attachment patterns are not fixed in stone; they can be changed (2012).
Cognitive behavioral therapy can be used to help people with OCPD change internalized
beliefs about self and other. Interpersonal therapy can be utilized to improve interpersonal
References
Aaronson, C. J., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006). Comparison of
7962-x
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test
244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
Baron, R. and Branscombe, N. (2014). Social psychology. 13th ed. United States of America:
Pearson Education.
Bifulco, A., Moran, P. M., Ball, C., &Bernazzani, O. (2002). Adult attachment style. I: Its
Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Loss. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Vol. 2 Separation anxiety and anger. New York, NY
Basic Books.
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 13
Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. I. Aetiology and
doi:10.1192/bjp.130.3.201
Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the “big five” personality
traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes.
Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation,
21, 267–283.
Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment Styles and Personality Disorders: Their
Connections to Each Other and to Parental Divorce, Parental Death, and Perceptions
6494.00034
Brennan, K. A., & Morris, K. A. (1997). Attachment styles, self-esteem, and patterns of
23, 23–31.
1556.http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.08m04636
ATTACHMENT STYLES AND OCPD TRAITS IN YOUNG ADULTS 14
Doron, G., Moulding, R., Nedeljkovic, M., Kyrios, M., Mikulincer, M., & Sar-El, D. (2011).
doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02028.x
Press), 497–519
Gallo, L. C., Smith, T. W., & Ruiz, J. M. (2003). An Interpersonal Analysis of Adult
Garyfallos, G., Katsigiannopoulos, K., Adamopoulou, A., Papazisis, G., Karastergiou, A.,
doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.01.006
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Kring, A., Johnson, S., Davison, G. and Neale, J. (2012). Abnormal psychology. Hoboken,
N.J.: Wiley.
and practice (pp. 351-378). New York, NY, US: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Major theories of personality disorder (pp. 1-42). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Nordahl, H. M., & Stiles, T. C. (1997). Perceptions of Parental Bonding in Patients with
Thorberg, F. A., & Lyvers, M. (2010). Attachment in relation to affect regulation and
Van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D.,
20. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2015.00065.x
Wiltgen, A., Adler, H., Smith, R., Rufino, K., Frazier, C., Shepard, C., … Fowler, J. C.
inpatients with serious mental illness. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 411–415.
doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.011
Wiseman, H., Mayseless, O., & Sharabany, R. (2006). Why are they lonely? Perceived
Zakiei, A., Alikhani, M., Farnia, V., Khkian, Z., Shakeri, J., &Golshani, S. (2017).
doi:10.4082/kjfm.2017.38.1.34