Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESPONSES OF SAVANNAS TO
STRESS AND DISTURBANCE
A Proposal for a collaborative Programme of Research
edited by
P. Frost, E. Medina, J.-C. Menaut,
O. Solbrig, M. Swift and B. Walker
9 - 13 December, 1985
Harare, Zimbabwe
Edi t e d by
Peter F r o s t
Jean-Cl aude Menaut
B r i an Wal k e r
Ernesto Medi na
O t t o T. S o l b r i g
Michael Swi f t
SPECIAL ISSUE - 10
BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
OVERVIEW 1
DEFINITIONS
Savanna
Stress
D i sturbance
S t a b i 1it y and Resi 1ience
RATIONALE 4
INTRODUCTION 7
INTERACTIONS
E f f e c t s o f vegetation on water and n u t r i e n t dynamics
E f f e c t s o f animals on water and n u t r i e n t dynamics
Soi1 moisture and t h e tree:grass e q u i l ibrium
Species composition and coexistence
Phenol ogy and coexistence
P l an t production
P l a n t qua1 it y
Vegetation dynamics
HUMAN INFLUENCES 36
SECTION III:HYPOTHESES ABOUT THE RESPONSES OF SAVANNAS
TO STRESS AND DISTURBANCE
INTRODUCTION
HYPOTHESES
0 M ECTIVES
PROCEDURE
1. Improving communication between savanna researchers
2. Promotion o f short term c o l 1 aborative p r o j e c t s
3. I n t e r c o n t i n e n t a l compari sons
4. Incorporation o f research resul t s i n t o management
ORGANIZATION
FUTURE ACTIVITIES
REFERENCES
SECTION
- - - 1: INTRODUCTION -
AND OBJECTIVES
OVERV 1EW
To devel op a p r e d i c t i ve unders t a n d i ng --
- o f the
i n whTch savannas r e s p o n d & n a t u r a l
ways ----
and
- man-made s t r e s s e-
s -
and d i s t ! r r b a n c e s .
T h i s can b e s t be achieved t h r o u g h a c o m p a r a t i v e , in t e r c o n t i n e n t a l
a n a l y s i s o f some s e l e c t e d aspects o f t r o p i c a l savannas i n v o l v i n g a
d i v e r s i t y o f research inputs.
W h i l e t h e s c i e n t i f i c r e s u l t s a r e i m p o r t a n t i n t h e i r own r i g h t , i t i s
v i t a l t h a t t h e m a j o r i n s i g h t s and f i n d i n g s o f t h e programme should
u l t i m a t e l y b e a p p l i e d t o t h e p r o b l e m s o f savanna u t i l i z a t i o n and
management. It i s n o t enough t o suppose t h a t t h e f i n d i n g s pub1 i s h e d
i n t h e s c i e n t i f i c l i t e r a t u r e w i l l b e p i c k e d u p and a p p l i e d b y
d e c i s i o n makers and managers, o r t h a t they w i l l be u s e f u l t o them i n
t h a t form. A more a c t i v e extension p o l i c y i s t h e r e f o r e envisaged i n
which larid managers and extension o f f i c e r s w i l l be i n v o l v e d i n t h e
programme a t an e a r l y stage, b o t h t o h e l p evaluate t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e
o f r e s u l t s as t h e y appear, and t o a s s i s t i n d e v e l o p i n g s t r a t e g i e s
f o r t r a n s l a t i ng r e s e a r c h r e s u l t s and e i n e r g i ng c o n c e p t s in t o
management d e c i s i o n s and a c t i o n s i n t h e f i e l d .
DEFINITIONS
Savanna
F o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h i s programme, c o r e savannas w i l l be d e f i n e d
v e r y b r o a d l y t o i n c l ude a l 1 t h o s e t r o p i c a l and soine n e a r - t r o p i c a l
ecosystems c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a c o n t i nuous herbaceous cover consi s t i ng
+
m o s t l y o f h e l i o p h i l o u s C4 g r a s s e s and sedges t h a t show c l e a r
s e a s o n a l i t r e l a t e d t o water stress. Woody species (shrubs, trees,
palms occur b u t s e l dom form a continuous cover p a r a l l e l l i n g t h a t o f
t h e g r a s s y 1 ayer. Mary ina1 savanna s y s t e m s i n w h i c h e i t h e r one o f
these two v e g e t a t i o n components has an i n s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t can be
in c l uded f o r t h e i r c o m p a r a t i v e v a l ue. Savannas encompassed by Our
d e f i n i t i o n c o v e r e x t e n s i v e a r e a s o f S o u t h America, A f r i c a and
A u s t r a l i a , and a l so occur i n Central America and I n d i a (Figure 1).
Figure -
1. World d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t r o p i c a l savannas ( f r o m Lamotte
and Hadley (1984) a f t e r B o u r l i k r e (1983))
Stress
I n t h i s d o c u m e n t we u s e t h e w o r d " s t r e s s " i n i t s a c c e p t e d
p h y s i o l o g i c a 1 sense t o d e s c r i be a c o n s t r a i n i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a 1
i n f l u e n c e t h a t r e s t r i c t s t h e p r o d u c t i v i t y and e f f i c i e n c y o f an
i n d i v i d u a l and, by extension, t h e ecosystem. Such stresses usual ly
operate when an environmental variable, such as temperature, l i g h t ,
water, n u t r i e n t s o r defo lia t i on, deviates marked ly f rom it s norma 1
range o f v a l u e s i n t h e system. S t r e s s i s seldom accompanied by
m o r t a l i t y . As s t r e s s becomes more severe i t may cause a disturbance.
D i sturbance
As used here, a ' d i s t u r b a n c e " i s a change i n t h e s t r u c t u r e o f a
system w h i c h u s u a l l y a f f e c t s it s f u n c t i o n i n g . Disturbances a r e
o f t e n caused by a p e r i o d i c events, such as f.loods, p a r t i c u l a r l y
severe storms, p r o l o n g e d d r o u g h t s , e x c e s s i v e h e r b i v o r y , o r
a c t i v i t i e s such as b u s h - c l e a r i n g and c u l t i v a t i o n . Disturbance may
resu lt f r o a one, b u t more o f t e n a combination o r sequence o f extreme
v a l u e s o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l v a r i a b l e s . These may o r may n o t cause
m o r t a l i t y o f i n d i v i d u a l s . O p p o r t u n i t i e s a r e c r e a t e d f o r new
i n d i v i d u a l s o f t h e same o r d i f f e r e n t species t o become established.
Increasing ly, d i sturbances are t h e reçu lt o f human a c t i v i t i e s .
The s p a t i a l e x t e n t o f d i f f e r e n t phenomena i s a l s o i m p o r t a n t . A
h e r b i v o r e ' s b i t e i s v e r y l o c a l i z e d , a f i r e may cover hundreds o f
hectares, whi l e drought i s experienced a i a regional l e v e l o r above.
Moreover, a t a l o c a l scale, i t i s o n l y p o s s i b l e t o d e t e c t t h e
response o f one o r a few individuals. As the s p a t i a l scale expands,
so t o o does t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n a l l e v e l a t which a response i s
observed. Given t h e marked tempora 1 and s p a t i a l heterogenei t y o f
savannas, it w i 11 be p a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t t o c h o o s e t h e
appropriate observationa 1 scale f o r the problems being studied.
RAT1ONALE
4. F i r e , f r e q u e n t l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h human a c t i v i t i e s , i s a
p r o m i n e n t f e a t u r e o f most t r o p i c a l savannas. I t a f f e c t s t h e
f u n c t i o n i n g o f these systems i n a v a r i e t y o f ways and i n t e r a c t s w i t h
o t h e r processes, such as h e r b i v o r y , n u t r i e n t c y c l i n g and p l a n t
r e c r u i tment. S i n c e f i r e can be managed, a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f
i t s e c o l o g i c a l effects, and how these can be integrated w i t h other,
less managab l e ecosystem processes, WOU l d be extreme ly va luab le.
5. I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e p o s s i b l e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t h a t t h i s programme
might make t o t h e b e t t e r management o f savannas, f u r t h e r advances i n
ecological theory can be expected i n view o f the uniqueness o f the
s e t o f ecologica 1 i n t e r a c t i o n s t h a t determine the existence o f these
sy stems .
APPROACH AND KEY QUESTIONS
The a p p r o a c h o f t h i s programme i s t h e r e f o r e t o d e v e l o p a
c o l l a b o r a t i v e i n t e r n a t i o n a 1 r e s e a r c h e f f o r t w h i ch, t h r o u g h
comparative and i n d i v i dua 1 studies, w i 11 improve our understandi ng
o f b o t h n a t u r a l and managed savannas and t h e i r responses t o
d i f f e r e n t kinds o f stress and disturbance. The major problems t o be
addressed by the programme are encompassed i n the f o l l o w i n g two key
questions :
1. W h a t a r e t h e s t r u c t u r a l and f u n c t i o n a l p r o p e r t i e s o f savannas
t h a t render them stable and/or r e s i l i e n t t o seasonal and aseasonal
natura 1 stresses and d i sturbance (e.g. f i re, drought)?
2. Are t h e r e c r i t i c a l l i m i t s (i.e. t h r e s h o l d s ) o f d i s t u r b a n c e
beyond which savanna ecosystems do n o t recover a f t e r the disturbance
f a c t o r i s removed?
INTRODUCTION
Rainfall
Soi 1s
Although t h e l e v e l s o f p l a n t - a v a i l a b l e n u t r i e n t s i n savanna s o i l s
a r e r e l a t i v e l y low, t h e g r e a t e r p r o p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l n u t r i e n t
p o o l l i e s i n t h e s o i 1 and s o i l o r g a n i c m a t t e r r a t h e r t h a n i n t h e
v e g e t a t i o n and l i t t e r (Nye and Green land, 1961; Abbadie, 1983;
Sarmiento, 1984; F r o s t , 1985). I n t h e d r i e r savannas, t h i s l a r g e l y
r e f l e c t s the r e l a t i v e l y low p l a n t biomass and the c o n s t r a i n t imposed
by t h e seasonal shortage o f w a t e r on p l a n t g r o w t h and n u t r i e n t
uptake. I n t h e more m o i s t savannas i t r e f l e c t s t h e s l o w r a t e o f
release o f n u t r i e n t s from s o i 1 organic matter.
The r a t e a t which n u t r i e n t s c y c l e t h r o u g h savanna v e g e t a t i o n i s
r e l a t i v e l y rapid, p a r t i c u l a r l y through the herbaceous layer where
n u t r i e n t s turnover 2 - 4 t i m e s f a s t e r t h a n through woody p l a n t s
( F r o s t , 1985). The d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e r a t e s o f n u t r i e n t t u r n o v e r i n
woody p l a n t s and grasses extends also t o l i t t e r decomposition. Grass
l i t t e r , i n t h e absence o f f i r e and under t h e same c o n d i t i o n s ,
decomposes 2-7 times f a s t e r than woody l e a f l i t t e r , and many times
f a s t e r than wood i t s e l f ( M o r r i s e t al., 1982; M o t t e t al., 1985).
Where annual f i r e s occur, much o f t h e grass and some o f t h e woody
l i t t e r g e t s b u r n t r a t h e r t h a n decomposed (Hopkins, 1966; Sanford,
1982; F r o s t , 1985). T h i s tends t o reduce b u t does n o t e n t i r e l y
e l i m i n a t e the d i f f e r e n c e i n r a t e s since most o f the grass m a t e r i a l
t h a t i s b u r n t WOU l d norma 1ly decompose w i t h i n a year, whi l e woody
l i t t e r takes much longer.
The i n c i d e n c e o f f i r e i s l a r g e l y a f u n c t i o n o f t h e dry-season
s t a n d i n g c r o p o f grass, i t s e l f a p r o d u c t b o t h o f t h e amount o f
r a i n f a l l and p l a n t production during t h e previous wet season and t h e
e x t e n t o f herbivory. F i r e i n t e n s i t y i s v a r i a b l e and depends l a r g e l y
on t h e amount and s t r u c t u r e o f t h e f u e l , i t s degree o f c u r i n g , and
p r e v a i ling a m b i e n t c o n d i t i o n s . Because o f t h e i r h i g h e r f u e 1 load,
f i r e s i n m o i s t savannas a r e u s u a l l y more i n t e n s e t h a n t h o s e
occurring i n t h e dry savannas.
B u r n i n g may speed up t h e r a t e o f n u t r i e n t c y c l i n g by r e d u c i n g
l i t t e r , e s p e c i a l l y components such as woody l e a f lit t e r and dead
wood which decompose s lowly. Nitrogen, carbon and sulphur are l o s t
t h r o u g h v o l a t i l i z a t i o n and removal i n smoke and ash. However, t h e
o v e r a l l s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e s e l o s s e s has n o t been assessed. By
reducing l i t t e r and herbaceous p l a n t cover, f i r e also bares the soi 1
surface, exposing i t t o raindrop impact, wind and Sun. The length o f
t i m e t h a t t h e soi 1 remains bare i s v a r i a b l e and depends l a r g e l y on
the time o f the f i r e , t h e r a t e o f regrowth o f the vegetation and t h e
t i m i n g o f subsequent r a i n f a 11.
Herbi vory
I n c o n t r a s t , t h e t r a n s p i r a t i o n r a t e s o f t r e e s i n t h e d r y savannas
appear t o be determined more by s o i 1 moisture avai l a b i l i t y than by
atmospheric demand. As t h e s o i l d r i e s out, t h e trees regulate t h e i r
water-use by lowering t r a n s p i r a t i o n r a t e s through stomata 1 c losure.
o r by r e d u c i n g l e a f area t h r o u g h shedding leaves. Trees t h e r e f o r e
deplete the s o i 1 moisture s t o r e less r a p i d l y and completely than do
t h e grasses. The resu l t i s t h a t where r a i n f a l l i s low and grasses
predominate, t h e v e g e t a t i o n aggravates t h e shortage o f w a t e r by
e x t r a c t i n g moisture from below t h e zone i n the soi 1 where i t can be
removed by evaporation a lone. T h i s h e i ghtens t h e c o n t r a s t between
t h e w e t and d r y phases o f t h e s o i 1. On t h e o t h e r hand, where
r a i n f a l l i s high and t r e e growth i s favoured, soi 1 moisture tends t o
be conserved
T r e e s a l s o i n f l u e n c e t h e s t a t u s and d i s t r i b u t i o n o f n u t r i e n t s i n
savanna soi 1s. Woodland regeneration, f o l lowi ng p r o t e c t i o n against
sustained heavy browsing and grazing, r e s u l t s i n an improvement i n
.
s o i 1 n u t r i e n t status (Hatton and Smart, 1984) Soi 1 organic matter,
pH, a v a i l a b l e phosphorus, and t h e l e v e l o f exchangeable c a t i o n s
( e x c e p t i n g Mn) a l 1 increase. T h i s i s because trees, w i t h t h e i r
r e l a t i v e l y deep r o o t systems, are able t o e x t r a c t n u t r i e n t s a t depth
i n the s o i 1 and so counter the e f f e c t s o f leaching (Kellman, 1979).
D i f f e r e n c e s i n s o i l m o i s t u r e r e g i m e s and i n t h e r e l a t i v e
a v a i l a b i l i t y o f m o i s w r e and n u t r i e n t s t o plants are major f a c t o r s
d e t e r m i n i n g t h e wide v a r i a t i o n i n t h e s t r u c t u r e o f savanna
vegetation. Savannas encompass a range o f physiognomic types, from
grassy shrublands a t t h e i n t e r f a c e w i t h deserts, t h r o u g h open
woodlands and t r e e l e s s edaphic grasslands, t o a l m o s t c l o s e d
woodlands w i t h a h e l i o p h y t i c grass understory i n the t r a n s i t i o n zone
t o semi-deciduous and evergreen f o r e s t s (Huntley and Walker, 1982).
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c f e a t u r e s e r v i n g t o l i n k t h i s d i v e r s i t y o f
vegetation types is the norma 1ly stab l e coexistence o f grasses and
t r e e s , components which i n t h e o t h e r m a j o r biomes t e n d t o r e p l a c e
one another.
A s h o r t a g e o f w a t e r i s t h e r e f o r e u n l i k e l y t o be t h e main factor
lim i c i ng t r e e d e n s i t i e s i n these savannas. Soi 1 n u t r i e n t l e v e 1s
though a r e e x t r e m e l y low (Lopes and Cox, 1977; Sarmiento, 1984).
T h i s i s m a n i f e s t e d i n t h e s l o w g r o w t h and s c l e r o m o r p h i sm o f the
woody vegetation which, together w i t h the large investment made by
these p l a n t s i n t h e i r r o o t systems, l i m i t s the r a t e o f development
o f a closed t r e e canopy. Grasses can therefore c o e x i s t alongside t h e
t r e e s d e s p i t e b e i n g dormant f o r most o f t h e d r y season. Moreover,
because t h e y a r e s h a l l o w - r o o t e d and r e l a t i v e l y f a s t growing, t h e
grasses a r e a b l e t o t a k e up n u t r i e n t s r a p i d l y when t h e s e a r e
minera l i z e d i n the surface s o i 1 during the wet season. This probab ly
f u r t h e r l i m i t s the avai l a b i l i t y o f n u t r i e n t s t o trees.
F i r e may also be a f a c t o r since i t l i m i t s the establishment o f t r e e s
and shrubs and retards the development o f a closed canopy, enabling
grasses t o c o e x i s t a l o n g s i d e t r e e s . P l a n t s on i n f e r t i l e s o i 1s a r e
p a r t i c u l a r l y prone t o f i r e . The slowness w i t h which closed t r e e and
shrub canopies develop enables the grasses, which f u e l the f i r e s , t o
p e r s i s t under t r e e s f o r l o n g e r (Kellman, 1984). Most o f t h e f i r e s
o c c u r d u r i n g t h e d r y season when t h e grasses and o t h e r herbaceous
p l a n t s are dormant and therefore r e l a t i v e l y unaffected by f i r e .
I n contrast, most woody plants, even those species which tend t o be
f i r e - t o l e r a n t as a d u l t s , a r e s e n s i t i v e t o b e i n g b u r n t d u r i n g t h e
e a r l y stages o f establishment and growth, p a r t i c u l a r l y by i n t e n s e
l a t e dry-season f i r e s ( S i l v a and Castro, 1985). The biomass o f
e s t a b l i s h e d woody p l a n t s i s a l s o reduced as f i r e damages t h e
aboveground p a r t s and retards t h e i r growth. F i re, therefore, favours
g r a s s p r o d u c t i o n and t h i s , i n t u r n , f u e l s f u t u r e f i r e s , t h e r e b y
s e t t i n g up a p o s i t i v e feedback which maintains both grass and f i r e
i n t h e system. Under c o n d i t i o n s f a v o u r i n g r a p i d and s u b s t a n t i a l
grass growth, f i r e s may even be s u f f i c i e n t l y intense t o maintain an
open grass land.
Not a l 1 grasslands i n the high r a i n f a l l savannas owe t h e i r o r i g i n t o
r e g u l a r f i r e s . Pure grass lands a l s o o c c u r wherever t h e r e i s poor
s i t e d r a i n a g e and/or where a s h a l l o w s o i 1 p r o f i l e o v e r l i e s an
impermeable c l a y h o r i z o n o r l a t e r i t e l a y e r (Michelmore, 1939;
Sarmiento and Monasterio, 1975; Tinley, 1982). The moisture regime
o f t h e s e s o i 1s f l u c t u a t e s between an excess o f w a t e r d u r i n g t h e
r a i n s and exteme w a t e r d e f i c i t i n t h e d r y season. T h i s does n o t
a f f e c t s h a l l o w - r o o t e d grasses and sedges b u t i s i n i m i c a l t o t h e
growth o f the deeper-rooted trees. I n some areas, such as the llanos
o f c e n t r a l Venezuela, t h e s c a t t e r e d occurrence o f t r e e s r e f l e c t s
l o c a l differences i n soi 1 depth and t h e s t r u c t u r e o f the underlying
l a t e r i t e layer. The trees occur where the s o i 1 i s s u f f i c i e n t l y deep
and porous so t h a t waterlogging doesn't occur, o r where t h e i r r o o t s
are able t o penetrate cracks i n t h e l a t e r i t e and thereby gain access
t o groundwater d u r i n g t h e d r y season ( M o n a s t e r i o and Sarmiento,
1968; San Josb and Farinas, 1983). C o r n p e t i t i o n between t r e e s and
grasses i s n o t a f a c t o r i n t h i s case.
Changes i n t h e abundance o f t r e e s and grasses a t a s i t e i m p l y
d i f f e r e n t i a l morta l i t y o r s u r v i v a l o f i n d i v i d u a l s o f d i f f e r e n t
species. M a t e r s t r e s s , f i r e and h e r b i v o r y appear t o be t h e main
causes o f s e e d l i n g m o r t a l i t y ( S i lva, 1973; Penning de V r i e s and
D j i t k e , 1982; Belsky, 1984). L i t t l e i s known about the processes o f
seed g e r m i n a t i o n and s e e d l i ng establishment i n savannas, o r about
the r o l e o f competi tion, p a r t i c u l a r l y from estab lished plants. Both
grasses and t r e e s can i n h i b i t t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f woody p l a n t
seedlings, b u t the precise mechanisms are n o t known (Strang, 1969;
Knoop and Walker, 1985). Competition f o r water and n u t r i e n t s may be
i n d i r e c t l y invo lved. Since sma 1l e r seedli ngs are general ly the most
s u s c e p t i b l e t o w a t e r s t r e s s , o r t o b e i n g b u r n t o r eaten, any
l i m i t a t i o n s on g r o w t h w i 11 i n c r e a s e t h e r i s k o f m o r t a l i t y . It i s
therefore important t o learn what f a c t o r s favour the recruitment o f
new i n d i v i d u a l s t o a p o p u l a t i o n . Does an i n c r e a s e i n p e r c o l a t i o n
f a v o u r an i n c r e a s e i n seed p r o d u c t i o n o f a d u l t p l a n t s , o r does i t
r e s u l t i n improved s e e d l i n g g r o w t h and s u r v i v a l ? S t u d i e s o f t h e
p o p u l a t i o n b i o l o g y o f s e l e c t e d t r e e and grass species w i l l be
essentia 1 i n order t o understand the mechani sms invo lved.
P l a n t production
O r g a n i c i n a t t e r p r o d u c t i o n and p l a n t q u a l i t y i n savannas depend on
t h e t o t a l amount and seasonal d i s t r i b u t i o n o f r a i n f a l l , and on t h e
a v a i l a b i lit y o f n u t r i e n t s , p a r t i c u l a r l y n i t r o g e n and phosphorus
(San Jose and Medina, 1976; Penning de Vries and D j i t b e , 1982; M o t t
e t al., 1985). The influence o f water avai l a b i l i t y i s most apparent
i n t h e d r i e r savannas, as i n d i c a t e d by t h e p o s i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n s
between annua 1 r a i n f a 11 and, f o r examp le, herbaceous aboveground
biomass ( W a l t e r 1971; San J o s é a n d Medina, 1976; R u t h e r f o r d , 1981;
Deshmukh, 1984; Singh e t al., 1985). However, t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p i s
o n l y very general and i s a f f e c t e d by f a c t o r s such as t h e d u r a t i o n o f
t h e w e t season, s o i 1 t y p e and t e x t u r e , n u t r i e n t a v a i l a b i l i t y ,
t e m p e r a t u r e , f i r e and s p e c i e s c o m p o s i t i o n (San Jose and Medina,
1975; Rutherford, 1981; Penning de Vries and D j i t b e , 1982; Singh e t
al., 1985).
The d i f f e r e n t patterns o f p l a n t production on clayey and sandy s o i l s
o c c u r r i ng a long r a i n f a l 1 gradients, o r i n response t o f l u c t u a t i o n s
i n annual r a i n f a 11 a t a s i te, c l e a r l y i1l u s t r a t e s the influence o f
s o i 1 t e x t u r e on water avai l a b i lity and production. When r a i n f a l l i s
low, p r o d u c t i o n on c l a y s may be as low as, o r even l o u e r t h a n t h a t
on sandy soi 1s under the same r a i n f a l l , despite the generally higher
n u t r i e n t s t a t u s o f clays. However, p r o d u c t i o n on c l a y s i n c r e a s e s
more r a p i d l y w i t h i n c r e a s i n g r a i n f a l l (Dye and Spear, 1982). The
r e s u l t i s t h a t , i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e same f l u c t u a t i o n s i n r a i n f a l l ,
production on clayey s o i 1s i s much more v a r i a b l e than on sands.
i n c o n t r a s t , d e f o l i a t i o n by f i r e d u r i n g t h e l a t t e r p a r t o f t h e d r y
season r e s u l t s i n e q u i l i b r a t i o n o f p l a n t and s o i 1 water potentials,
a l l o w i n g p l a n t s t o grow. P r o v i d e d t h a t t h e s o i 1 m o i s t u r e s t o r e i s
replenished by e a r l y wet season r a i n s before i t i s again depleted by
t h e grasses, t h i s e a r l y s t a r t t o t h e g r o w i n g season r e s u l t s i n a
h i g h e r p r o d u c t i o n by b u r n t p l a n t s (San Jose and Medina, 1975).
Depending on the amount o f herbivory, the dry season standing crop
o f g r a s s on r e g u l a r l y b u r n t areas can be h i g h e r t h a n on u n b u r n t
plots. This increases the probabi l i t y o f f i r e , s e t t i n g up a p o s i t i v e
feedback loop t h a t serves t o maintain a high f i r e frequency and high
g r a s s production.
Plant q u a l i t y
Vegetati on dynamics
A l a r g e p r o p o r t i o n o f t h e annual above-ground p r o d u c t i o n i s
consumed. F o r example, on t h e S e r e n g e t i p l a i n s , an average o f 66%,
and u p t o 94%, o f n e t aboveground r i m a r y p r o d u c t i o n i s consumed
f
annual ly by large herbivores alone McNaughton, 1985). I n t h i s case,
t h e a n i m a l s a r e i n d u c i n g s u b s t a n t i a 1 compensatory g r o w t h i n t h e
p l a n t s thereby c r e a t i ng a h i gh n u t r i e n t demand and promoting h i gh
n u t r i e n t uptake r a t e s ( ~ ~ N a u g h t o n1983b, , 1985). Because o f t h i s
compensatory growth, the energy f low t o consumers is a d d i t i v e and
can, i n some cases, be m a i n t a i n e d w i t h l i t t l e o r no r e d u c t i o n i n
p l a n t biomass (McNaughton e t al., 1983).
R e g u l a r d e f o l i a t i o n a p p e a r s t o be one o f t h e m a i n f a c t o r s
maintaining the high number o f coexisting grass species. Changes i n
s p e c i e s c o m p o s i t i o n and a d e c l i n e i n d i v e r s i t y come about when an
area i s protected from grazing o r f i r e . Para1l e 1 changes, i n v o l v i n g
a d i f f e r e n t s u i t e o f species, occur i n areas t h a t a r e exposed t o
very heavy o r very f requent defo 1ia t i on (McNaughton, 1979, 1983a).
However, t h i s does n o t n e c e s s a r i l y i m p l y t h a t t h e most d i v e r s e
community is t h e most moderate ly grazed (McNaughton, 1983a1, though
t h i s can happen (Singh, 1976). O v e r a l l , f i r e i s p r o b a b l y l e s s
important than grazing, p a r t l y because i t i s a dry season phenomenon
occurring a t a t i m e when the grasses are dormant, and p a r t l y because
t h e l e v e l s o f consumption a r e u s u a l l y so h i g h t h a t t h e r e i s
i n s u f f i c i e n t g r a s s biomass l e f t d u r i n g t h e d r y season t o f u e l a
f i r e . The i n c i d e n c e o f f i r e i s t h e r e f o r e low, o t h e r t h a n a f t e r
exceptional l y wet years. Overa 11, these systems can be characterized
as being high l y v a r i a b l e b u t r e s i l i e n t (Norton-Griffiths 1979).
Where c o n d i t i o n s do n o t f a v o u r t h e r a p i d g r o w t h o f woody p l a n t s ,
browsers a lone can someti mes check t h e i r increase. More usua 1ly,
browsers and f i r e i n t e r a c t . Regular f i r e s m a i n t a i n woody p l a n t s
w i t h i n the reach o f browsers and i n a n u t r i t i o n a l l y acceptable s t a t e
(Trollope 1974). The low biomass o f woody p l a n t s favours the growth
o f grasses which i n t u r n provide f u e l f o r l a t e r f i r e s . Occasionally,
f i r e and b r o w s i n g a r e unable t o check t h e i n c r e a s e i n woody p l a n t
biomass, f o r example, d u r i n g a s e r i e s o f v e r y d r y years. Woody
p l a n t s may then increase t o the p o i n t where they can suppress grass
growth, thereby reducing both f u e l loads and f i r e i n t e n s i t i e s .
HUMAN INFLUENCES
e
MINIMUM Protected Nomadism Timber Shi f t i n g
c>
4 Areas (eg. Transhumance Fue 1 CU l t i v a t i o n
U
N a t i ona 1
Z
.#- Parks)
-
?Y
O
MEDIUM Game Ranching Timber Conventi ona 1
m
E Ranching Charcoa 1 agriculture
V)
4
- dry land
aJ
L croppi ng
U
fi MAXIMUM Domestication Cultivated Afforest- Irrigated
I
I
I
pastures: ation crop
v
I z e r o p r o d u c t i o n
g r a z i ng
....................................................................
Increasing development--------- +
INTRODUCTION
The underlying m o t i v a t i o n f o r t h i s programme i s t h e need t o improve
savanna management. Two issues are o f major concern: (1) a l t e r a t i o n s
t o t h e e c o l o g i c a l s t r u c t u r e o f savanna communities, i n v o l v i n g
changes i n species composition, r e l a t i v e abundance and r e l a t i o n s h i p s
between species; and, (2) changes i n f u n c t i o n i n g , p r i n c i p a l l y
d e c l i n e s i n p r o d u c t i v i t y , r e s u l t i n g f r o m changes i n w a t e r and
n u t r i e n t a v a i l a b i l i t y . To understand t h e i m p l i c a z i o n s o f t h e s e
changes f o r t h e dynamics o f savannas, and t h e r e f o r e f o r t h e i r
management, f o u r k e y q u e s t i o n s have been posed. I n a t t e m p t i n g t o
answer these questions, we propose t h a t t h e main research programme
be c o n c e n t r a t e d on t e s t i n g a number o f r e l a t e d hypotheses. These
w i l l s e r v e t o f o c u s t h e r e s e a r c h e f f o r t r a t h e r t h a n have i t
d i s s i p a t e d a c r o s s a spectrum o f u n r e l a t e d p r o j e c t s which, w h i l e
i n t e r e s t i n g i n t h e i r own r i g h t , do n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y advance o u r
u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f savanna dynamics i n ways which would l e a d t o
improved management.
The l i s t o f hypotheses i s c l e a r l y incomplete. I t i s l i k e l y t h a t some
important aspects o f savanna eco logy have not been inc luded because
we c u r r e n t l y do n o t know enough about them. These p o o r l y understood
components and processes w i 11 need t o be i n v e s t i g a t e d w i t h i n t h e
broader frarnework o f the programme. The r e s u l t i n g knowledge can then
be used t o r e f i n e t h e e x i s t i n g hypotheses o r t o propose new ones.
The r e v i s i o n and f o r m u l a t i o n o f hypotheses i n t h e l i g h t o f new
o b s e r v a t i o n s and i n s i g h t s w i l l be one o f t h e o b j e c t i v e s o f t h e
s e r i e s o f workshops t o be h e l d during the course o f the programme.
We c o n s i d e r t h a t s o i 1 m o i s t u r e and n u t r i e n t a v a i l a b i l i t y a r e t h e
primary determi nants o f savanna f u n c t i oning. Thei r wide v a r i a t i o n i s
probably a major reason f o r the d i v e r s i t y o f savanna types. However,
simple i n d i c e s o f moisture and n u t r i e n t a v a i l a b i l i t y based on, f o r
example, mean a n n u a l r a i n f a l l and s o i 1 type, do n o t a d e q u a t e l y
e x p l a i n a l 1 o f t h i s d i v e r s i ty. B e t t e r measures o f p l a n t - a v a i l a b l e
moisture and n u t r i e n t s a r e t h e r e f o r e needed b e f o r e a s t r u c t u r a l -
f u n c t i o n a l c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f savannas can be produced. Some o f t h e
f a c t o r s t h a t should be taken i n t o account are: s o l a r radiation; a i r
temperature; s e a s o n a l i ty, p r e d i c t a b i lit y a n d v a r i a b i 1it y o f
r a i n f a l l ; s o i l t e x t u r e ; pH; c a t i o n exchange c a p a c i t y ; n u t r i e n t
minera l i z a t i o n rates; topography, and land-use h i s t o r y .
A p o s s i b l e i n d e x o f m o i s t u r e a v a i l a b i l i t y i s t h e degree t o w h i c h
e v a p o r a t i v e demand is m e t b y s o i 1 water: t h e r a t i O o f a c t u a 1 t o
p o t e n t i a l e v a p o t r a n s p i r a t i o n m i g h t be a p p r o p r i a t e . Such an i n d e x
would i n t e g r a t e s o l a r r a d i a t i o n , a i r temperature, r a i n f a l l , s o i 1
t e x t u r e , topography and s e a s o n a l i t y . An i n d e x o f s o i l n u t r i e n t
avai l a b i lit y cou l d be t h e m i n e r a l i z a b l e capaci ty o f the s o i 1, w i t h
special emphasis on n i t r o g e n and phosphorus. A l lowance may have t o
be made f o r o t h e r s o i 1 f a c t o r s which c o u l d a f f e c t t h e v e g e t a t i o n
(e.g. exchangeab l e a lumi n i um and sodium percentages, the presence o f
heavy metals, and shortages o f micronutrients).
I n t h e c u r r e n t absence o f a s a t i s f a c t o r y c l a s s i f i c a t i o n , we have
used the f o 1l o w i ng hypothetica 1 arrangement o f savanna types w i t h i n
t h e P l a n t Avai l a b l e M o i s t u r e (PAM) and Avai l a b l e N u t r i e n t s (AN)
plane (Figure 2) as a basis f o r f o r m u l a t i n g some o f the hypotheses.
I
HIGH LOW/HIGH I HIGH/HIGH
1
(cerrado)
(monsoona i t a 1 bgra;s)
(wet miombo) ; ( v a l ley and escarpment
( 1lanos I w o d lands
( d r y miombo)
I
I
LOW HIGH
Avai lab l e N u t r i e n t s
Figure 2. Hypothetical d i s t r i b u t i o n o f savanna types i n r e l a t i o n t o
the m a i l determinants o f savannas (modified from Bell, 1984)
HYPOTHESES
Each o f the f o l l o w i n g hypotheses i s presented i n three parts: ( i l a
s t a t e m e n t o f t h e h y p o t h e s i s , w i t h b r i e f a m p l i f i c a t i o n where
necessary; ( i i ) a statement o f i t s i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r management; and
( i i i ) an i n d i c a t i o n as t o how the hypothesis might be tested.
Hypothesis 1
Implication
The main i m p l i c a t i o n f o r management i s t h a t actions which a f f e c t the
a v a i l a b i l i t y o f w a t e r a n d / o r n u t r i e n t s a r e g o i n g t o have
proportionately greater e f f e c t i n those systems i n which PAM and AN
are most l i m i t i n g . These e f f e c t s w i 11 r e s u l t n o t only from actions
which increase PAM and AN, such as i r r i g a t i o n and f e r t i l i z a t i o n , b u t
a lso from ones which in d i r e c t l y lower them, f o r examp le, harvesting,
the use o f f i r e , and overstocking. There are also i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r
monitoring. A t t e n t i o n needs t o be focussed on the possible e f f e c t s
o f management actions on the physical envi ronment, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n
strongly water- and n u t r i e n t - l i m i t e d systems.
Test
The hypothesis can be tested by comparing the responses o f d i f f e r e n t
savanna types i n the PAMIAN plane t o changes i n water and n u t r i e n t
avai l a b i lity (e.g. through i r r i g a t i o n and f e r t i l i z a t i o n , both s i n g l y
and i n combination) and monitoring the r e s u l t i n g changes i n species
c o m p o s i t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n i n each case. The h y p o t h e s i s p r e d i c t s
t h a t t h e magnitude of change w i 11 be g r e a t e s t i n those systems i n
which both water and n u t r i e n t s are most l i m i t i n g .
Hypothesis 2
The co-occurrence o f two o r more independant events (e
a b o v e - a v e r a g e raTnfall,frost,
synergi s t i c e f f e c t s -
- -+
an
P
f i re, h e r b i v o r
i n changi ng savanna s t r u c t u r e pro=
drought,
w i 11 have
o r
I n t e r m s o f t h i s hypothesis, marked s h i f t s i n c o m p o s i t i o n o r
abundance are o f t e n caused by the co-occurrence, o r close sequence,
o f events w i t h compoundi ng effects. For example, t h e establishment
o f woody p l a n t s may depend on t h e co-occurrence o f (ila p e r i o d o f
exceptionally high o r out-of-season r a i n f a l l ; ( i i reduced
competi t i o n f rom p e r e n n i a 1 grasses; (i i i ) low herbivore pressure;
and ( i v ) a p e r i o d w i t h o u t f i r e . From a management perspective, some
o f these events are managable (e.g f i r e , herbivory); others a r e n o t
(e.g. above-average r a i n f a 11, droughts, f r o s t ) .
Implications
I f t h i s hypothesis i s valid, then management aimed a t inducing, o r
a v o i d i n g , m a j o r changes i n community c o m p o s i t i o n may o n l y be
possible when two o r more independent events c o i n c i de. Addi t i o n a 1ly,
events w h i c h co-occur in f r e q u e n t l y a r e like l y t o i n d u c e g r e a t e r
shi f t s i n vegetation composition and production. Understanding the
e f f e c t s on key species o f i n t e r a c t i o n s between p a r t i c u l a r c l i m a t i c ,
f i r e and h e r b i v o r y events, and knowing t h e p r o b a b i l i t i e s o f co-
occurrence o f these, i s a p r e r e q u i s i t e f o r e f f e c t i v e management.
Test
A t e s t o f t h i s hypothesis would be t o impose a v a r i e t y o f stresses
o r disturbances on a communi ty, s i n g l y and i n combination, and then
moni t o r t h e subsequent changes i n s p e c i e s c o m p o s i t i o n , r e l a t i v e
abundance and production. Since any changes t h a t occur are going t o
r e f l e c t d i f f e r e n c e s between s p e c i e s i n e s t a b l i s h m e n t , growth,
r e c r u i t m e n t and m o r t a lit y , a s t u d y o f these processes w i 11 be
e s s e n t i a l f o r u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e mechanisms o f change. I n any
between-si t e comparisons, the h i s t o r y o f each s i t e w i 11 have t o be
taken i n t o account.
Hypothesis 3
Test
The hypothesis can be tested experimentally by changing v a r i a b l e and
f i xed herbi vory o r f i r e r e g i mes and monitoring the resu lting changes
i n species composition and production. The hypoth'esis p r e d i c t s t h a t
t h e g r e a t e s t change w i 11 o c c u r i n those cases where a r e g i m e has
been most r i g i d l y a p p l i e d and where t h e d i f f e r e n c e between t h e
o r i g i n a l and the new regime i s greatest.
Hypothesis 4
Implications
This introduces the element o f the t i m i n g o f events as a f a c t o r i n
savanna dynamics. The e f f e c t s o f s t r e s s e s such as f i r e , f r o s t o r
herbivory o f t e n depend on the phenological s t a t e and physiological
c o n d i t i o n o f t h e p l a n t s a t t h e time. P l a n t s which a r e dormant a r e
u s u a l l y l e s s a f f e c t e d t h a n p l a n t s which a r e a c t i v e l y growing. A
stress occurring a t one t i m e o f the year may stimu l a t e reproduction
whereas a t another t i m e i t may re'tard it. The t i m i n g o f p a r t i c u l a r
management actions therefore may be as important as t h e i r magnitude
and t h i s needs t o be taken i n t o account i n management planning. In
t h i s regard i t i s c r u c i a l t o know what are the c r i t i c a l periods i n
l i f e c y c l e s o f key s p e c i e s and hou t h e s e m i g h t be a f f e c t e d by
d i f f e r e n t management actions.
Test
A t e s t o f t h i s h y p o t h e s i s would i n v o l v e v a r y i n g i n d e p e n d e n t l y t h e
t i m i n g and i n t e n s i t y o f events such as f i r e , herbivory o r a r t i f i c i a l
drought, and m o n i t o r i n g t h e e f f e c t s o f t h i s on t h e growth,
r e p r o d u c t i o n and s u r v i v a l o f i n d i v i d u a l s o f t h e key species. The
h y p o t h e s i s p r e d i c t s t h a t changes i n species p o p u l a t i o n s w i 11 be
determined more by the t i m i n g o f the event, i n r e l a t i o n t o c r i t i c a l
periods i n the species' l i f e cycle, than by i t s magnitude.
Hypothesis 5
Hypothesis 5(a)
An a l t e r n a t i v e t o H y p o t h e s i s 5 is: Chan es i n t h e r o o r t i o n s o f
a l a t a b l e and unpalatable s ecies depe&~ine*ix
-
&=O
herbi vory.
-- e
-l
t h e oheno oav I O t h e s o e c i e s-
x h x Z-
h a e v e - of
Implications
The u n d e r l y i n g p r i n c i p l e o f Hypothesis 5 i s t h a t i n systems
dominated by one s p e c i e s o f h e r b i v o r e (e.g. c a t t l e ) , se l e c t i v e
feedi ng by the herbivore changes the competi t i v e balance between t h e
preferred, palatable species and the unpalatable ones i n favour o f
t h e l a t t e r . T h i s e f f e c t i s t h o u g h t t o be more pronounced a t h i g h e r
g r a z i n g i n t e n s i t i e s . To c o u n t e r t h i s , a system o f c o n t r o l l e d
selective grazing i s o f t e n applied. The system i s based on l e n i e n t
use o f preferred species and no d e f o l i a t i o n o f the unpalatable ones,
and involves two main assumptions: ( i l t h a t production o f preferred
species i s s t i m u l a t e d by moderate defoliation; and ( i i ) t h a t i n t h e
absence o f d e f o l i a t i o n by g r a z i n g o r f i r e , u n p a l a t a b l e s p e c i e s
eventual ly become moribund and dec line. An a l t e r n a t i v e management
system, non-selective grazi ng, i s based on the opposi t e p r i n c i p le.
I t assumes t h a t moderate d e f o l i a t i o n is more d e t r i m e n t a 1 t o
unpalatable species than heavy u t i l i z a t i o n i s t o the palatable ones.
Accordingly, high grazing pressures are applied f o r b r i e f periods i n
o r d e r t o f o r c e t h e a n i m a l s t o graze b o t h t h e p a l a t a b l e and
unpalatable species.
I f a p p r o p r i a t e g r a z i n g s t r a t e g i e s a r e t o be d e f i n e d f o r d i f f e r e n t
savanna regions, i t i s e s s e n t i a l t h a t these d i f f e r e n t hypotheses and
t h e i r assumptions be tested across the range o f savannas. Managers
need t o know how the timing, i n t e n s i t y and frequency o f d e f o l i a t i o n
a f f e c t t h e g r o w t h and r e p r o d u c t i o n o f key Pasture species ( t h e s e
i n c l u d e b o t h s p e c i e s t h a t decrease and those t h a t i n c r e a s e under
grazing), and how t h i s i n t u r n influences t h e i r population dynamics
and i n t e r a c t i o n s .
Test
The t e s t o f these hypotheses can c a r r i e d o u t i n conjunction w i t h the
t e s t o f Hypothesis 4 by v a r y i n g i n d e p e n d e n t l y t h e i n t e n s i t y and
t i m i n g o f grazing, and m o n i t o r i n g changes i n t h e p o p u l a t i o n s o f
p r e f e r r e d and n o n - p r e f e r r e d species. Hypothesis 5 p r e d i c t s t h a t
pa l a t a b l e species are increasingly adverse ly affected by an increase
i n grazing i n t e n s i t y and t h a t t h i s favours the unpalatable species,
enabling them t o increase i n the sward. I n contrast, Hypothesis 5(a)
p r e d i c t s t h a t p l a n t s d e f o l i a t e d during the e a r l y growth period w i l l
be more s u s c e p t i b l e than those d e f o l i a t e d when t h e p l a n t s a r e
dormant o r have completed most o f t h e i r annual growth. Any changes
i n species composition which occur w i 11 be caused by differences i n
the time o f d e f o l i a t i o n r e l a t i v e t o the t i m e o f e a r l y p l a n t growth.
Hypothesis 6
Implications
P r i o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e ways i n w h i c h d i f f e r e n t species a r e
like 1y t o respond to p a r t i c u l a r management actions o r envi ronmenta 1
events i s c r u c i a l t o e f f e c t i v e management. An understanding o f the
main f e a t u r e s o f t h e l i f e h i s t o r y and p o p u l a t i o n b i o l o g y o f key
species is therefore necessary. For example, under what conditions
do d i f f e r e n t species e s t a b l i s h f r o m seeds, grow t o m a t u r i t y and
reproduce? What conditions cause the w i despread death o f individua 1s
o f a species? How a r e t h e s e processes a f f e c t e d by f i r e , grazing,
drought and i n t e r a c t i o n s w i t h other species? Related species do n o t
necessari l y respond i n the same way t o the same management action.
Test
The h y p o t h e s i s can be t e s t e d e i t h e r by i m p o s i n g on a community a
disturbance such as extreme d e f o l i a t i o n , o r removal o f woody plants,
o r by s t u d y i n g n a t u r a l d i s t u r b a n c e s such as extreme d r o u g h t and
m o n i t o r i n g t h e r e s u l t i n g changes i n abundance and biomass o f
p a r t i c u l a r species. The changes need t o be studied a t the population
l e v e l i n order t o understand the mechanisms involved. The species
chosen f o r s t u d y s h o u l d encompass species w i t h a w i d e a r r a y o f
c o n t r a s t i n g l i f e h i s t o r y a t t r i b u t e s and, where p o s s i b l e , known
d i fferences i n response t o the p a r t i CU l a r d i sturbance.
Since t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p s , i f any, between species' l i f e h i s t o r y
a t t r i b u t e s and kinds o f change i n the abundance and biomass o f these
species a r e mu l t i v a r i a t e , p o s s i b l e a s s o c i a t i o n s can b e s t be
d i sp l a y e d t h r o u g h correspondence analysis. The hypothesis p r e d i c t s
t h a t the direction, magnitude and manner o f change w i 11 be s i m i l a r
i n species having s i m i l a r l i f e - h i s t o r y a t t r i b u t e s , whereas species
w i t h d i f f e r e n t a t t r i b u t e s w i 11 tend t o respond d i f f e r e n t l y .
Hypothesis 7
----
b -e-
The res onses o f savanna species t o stress can be pred5ct:d.
a ç i s O the'ir-fe h i s t o r y characi%- -
apopulation
on the
ioTogr
Imp 1i c a t i ons
E f f e c t i v e management depends o n b e i n g a b l e t o a s s e s s t h e
consequences o f d i f f e r e n t a c t i o n s and choose t h a t which comes
c l o s e s t t o g i v i n g t h e d e s i r e d r e s u l t . Since i t i s n o t f e a s i b l e t o
d e t e r m i n e empi r i c a 1 l y t h e response o f a 11 species t o e v e r y
management a c t i o n , sosie b a s i s is needed f o r b e i n g a b l e t o p r e d i c t
t h e p r o b a b l e responses o f t h e key species. I f t h i s can be done by
using information on the species' life-hi story a t t r i b u t e s , then the
p o t e n t i a l f o r e f f e c t i v e management w i 11 be g r e a t l y enhanced.
Test
The t e s t o f t h i s h y p o t h e s i s i s s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f Hypothesis 6
except t h a t the avai l a b l e information on the l i f e - h i s t o r y o f the key
species i s used t o p r e d i c t c h a n g e s i n t h e i r abundance andbiomass
b e f o r e t h e e x p e r i m e n t i s c a r r i e d out. ( A t o u r c u r r e n t l e v e l o f
u n d e r s t a n d i n g i t i s l i k e l y t h a t t h e p r e d i c t i o n s w i 11 o n l y be
qualitative.) The t e s t i n v o l v e s making a comparison between these
predicted changes and those induced by the p a r t i c u l a r stress. I f the
observed changes d i f f e r f r o m those p r e d i c t e d then e i t h e r t h e l i f e
h i s t o r y a t t r i b u t e s o f a species a r e n o t good p r e d i c t o r s o f
population change o r our c u r r e n t understanding o f these a t t r i butes
and t h e i r e f f e c t s i s inadequate f o r making accurate predictions.
Hypothesis 8
Implications
Management actions which reduce the i n p u t o f water t o the s o i 1 (e.g.
by overstocking t o the p o i n t where trampling and compaction o f the
soi 1 r e s u l t ) , o r which increase the r a t e o f p l a n t water-use (e.g. by
f e r t i l i z a t i o n ) , may s h o r t e n t h e l e n g t h o f t i m e t h a t w a t e r i s
a v a i l a b l e t o plants. T h i s w i l l concentrate phenological types i n
time, r e s u l t i n g i n an e v e n t u a l r e d u c t i o n i n species d i v e r s i t y
t h r o u g h c o m p e t i t i o n and drought-induced m o r t a l i t y . Management
actions which might shorten the period o f s o i 1 water a v a i l a b i l i t y
would have t o be avoided.
Test
The h y p o t h e s i s can be t e s t e d by u s i n g r a i n - o u t s h e l t e r s and
i r r i g a t i o n t o keep constant the t o t a l amount o f water avai l a b l e t o
the p l a n t s whi l e varying the period o f avai l a b i l i t y . The hypothesis
p r e d i c t s that, under t h e same t o t a l amount o f p l a n t available water,
there w i 11 be marked changes i n d i v e r s i t y , i n c l u d i n g perhaps a loss
o f species, i n t h o s e s i t u a t i o n s where t h e p e r i o d o f w a t e r
avai l a b i lit y is sharp ly reduced. Species norina 1l y developi ng i n the
middle t o l a t e r a i n y season w i 11 be most susceptible, whi l e drought-
t o l e r a n t species w i 11 be favoured.
Hypothesis 9
The s t a b i l i t y
- o f savanna ecos stems, i n t e r m s o f t h e ca a c i t o f
t h e i r c o m D o n e n t s i ë d ë ? t h r o ~ so~~ ~ t u ance. r -gr-
iI
-
s t r o n ï y ;nf l u e n i t t h e d e g r-e e o ~ v ~ e n t cao ln s t r a i n t on
3-
a t a b l i s h m e n t an growth.
Implications
The main i m p l i c a t i o n f o r management i s t h a t where t h e process o f
recovery from stress o r disturbance i s slow, e i t h e r because o f t h e
s e v e r i t y o f the i n i t i a l stress o r disturbance, o r because o f strong
e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n s t r a i n t s on e s t a b l i s h m e n t and/or g r o w t h (e.g.
n u t r i e n t - p o o r s o i l s , l o w w a t e r a v a i l a b i l i t y , p o o r seedbed
conditions, etc.), subsequent events may occur which w i 11 a f f e c t the
e v e n t u a l outcome. Where these subsequent events are controllable,
managers would need t o ensure t h a t they a l l o w s u f f i c i e n t time f o r
t h e species t o r e c o v e r b e f o r e these o t h e r pressures a r e imposed.
Where subsequent events are uncontrollable and unpredictable, then
t h e i n t e n s i t y and t i m i n g o f management a c t i o n s would have t o be
a d j u s t e d so t h a t t h e p l a n t s c o u l d r e c o v e r i n t h e s h o r t e s t t i m e
possible.
Test
The hypothesis can be tested by comparing the patterns o f vegetation
change ( s p e c i e s composition, r e l a t i v e abundance, p r o d u c t i o n o f
s e l e c t e d s p e c i e s ) a f t e r d i s t u r b a n c e (e.g. a r t i f i c i a 1 drought) on
s i t e s which d i f f e r i n t h e i r s u i t a b i lity f o r p l a n t growth. The
h y p o t h e s i s p r e d i c t s t h a t where c o n d i t i o n s a r e u n f a v o u r a b l e f o r
establishment and growth, the subsequent i n t e r v e n t i o n o f events such
as f i r e , herbivory, o r f u r t h e r drought w i 11 cause greater m o r t a l i ty
and changes i n species c o m p o s i t i o n and production, t h a n w i 11 t h e
same events, occurring a t the same time, on more favourable sites.
Hypothesi s 10
I f disturbed. savanna ecosvstems t e n d t o r e t u r n t o t h e i r f o r m e r
composition -
o r production.
Hypothesis 10(a)
An a l t e r n a t i v e . t o Hypothesis 10 i s : -+
Stabi lit i s n o t a major y--
f e a t u r e o f savannas. D i s t u r b a n c e - i nduce c h a n g e s i n s p e c i e s
com o s i t ' n and p r o d u c t i v i t y - a r e accomodated & s t r z t u r a l and
&dju~,ments --
w i t h i n the community. Autogenic recovery doeS
n o t occur.
--
Implications
The concept o f s t a b l e e q u i l i b r i a i s c e n t r a l t o much c u r r e n t
ecological theory and application. I t s relevance i n the context o f
savanna dynamics can be questioned, e s p e c i a l l y i n v i e w o f t h e
s t o c h a s t i c n a t u r e o f most o f t h e d r i v i n g variables, t h e
interactiveness and n o n - l i n e a r i t y o f many o f the processes, and the
r e s u l t i n g contingency o f many o f t h e i r effects. Yet the concept i s
w ide l y app 1i e d i n savanna management. F o r instance, a t t e m p t s by
managers t o reverse undesi rab l e changes i n vegetati on composition o r
p r o d u c t i v i t y caused by, f o r example, overstocking, involve removing
the cause o f the disturbance and r e s t i n g the disturbed area.
Test
Both hypotheses can be tested i n the same experiment by disturbing
a d j a c e n t areas t o d i f f e r e n t degrees (e.g. removing d i f f e r e n t
proportions o f woody biomass) and monitoring the resu l t i n g changes
i n species composition and production. Hypothesis 10 predicts t h a t
c o m p o s i t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n w i 11 e v e n t u a l l y r e t u r n t o t h e i r pre-
d i s t u r b a n c e leve ls, w i t h t h e t i m e taken b e i ng p r o p o r t i o n a 1 t o t h e
magnitude o f t h e disturbance. On t h e o t h e r hand, Hypothesis 10(a)
predicts t h a t an area, once disturbed, w i 11 not show any consistent
tendency w r e t u r n w the original, predisturbance state unless i t
i s subsequently disturbed i n the opposite direction. The system w i 11
e i t h e r remain a t t h e p o i n t t o which i t was disturbed, o r undergo
f u r t h e r change i n the sane direction.
Hypothesis 11
The r e v e r s i b i l i t o f change i n p l a n t species composition and
P T o d u- d e r ~ l rye l a t e h --
t o t h e degree -
o f change --
i n so-7
physico-chemica 1 properties.
An a l t e r n a t i v e t o Hypothesis 11 i s : No i r r e v e r s i b l e chan e i n
r ecies con o s i t i o n wi11 occur wirhout a F n c u r y e n t and i o d t i q
d k @ - - - , ~ t i c ~ l a ~ a gs o l~1 p> h - ~F i h
~ro~erties.
Iap l i c a t i o n s
Large h e r b i v o r e s a r e o f t e n i m p l i c a t e d i n changes t o p l a n t s p e c i e s
composition and production, b o t h d i r e c t l y , as p a r t i a l l y s e l e c t i v e
consuiers, and i n d i r e c t l y , through t h e i r impact on soi 1 properties
and processes. These inc lude t r a m p l i ng and compaction, reducti ons i n
p l a n t and l i t t e r cover, and t h e i n p u t o f n u t r i e n r s i n dung and
u r i n e , a l 1 o f w h i c h have many i n t e r l i n k e d consequences (Table 2).
One i m p l i c a t i o n o f t h e s e hypotheses i s t h a t t h e d i r e c t e f f e c t s o f
l a r g e h e r b i v o r e s on long-term v e g e t a t i o n change a r e l i k e l y t o be
less important these i n d i r e c t effects.
Test
Since large herbivores are o f t e n i m p l i c a t e d i n changes t o both s o i 1s
and vegetation, one t e s t o f Hypotheses 11 and l l ( a ) could involve a
m u l t i f a c t o r i a l e x p e r i m e n t i n which ( i s i m u l a t e d grazing; ( i i )
t r a m p l i n g and compaction; and ( i ii)t h e a d d i t i o n o f excreta, a r e
v a r i e d s i n g l y and i n c o m b i n a t i o n t o c r e a t e a s e r i e s o f changes i n
the s o i 1 and vegetation a t a site. This would also a l l o w the e f f e c t s
o f these d i f f e r e n t disturbances t o be assessed independently o f each
other. Some o f t h e p r e d i c t e d changes a r e l i s t e d i n Table 2. Key
v a r i a b l e s which need m o n i t o r i n g i n c l u d e s u r f a c e s o i 1 compaction
and/or bu l k d e n s i ty, i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e , s o i 1 temperature, s o i 1
organic matter fractions, N and P m i n e r a l i z a t i o n rates, as ne11 as
changes i n p l a n t species composition, r o o t growth, and seed ling
establishment. These would be moni w r e d d u r i ng the d i sturbance and
a f t e r the treatments have been withdrawn, t o determine whether there
has been any recovery t o pre-treatrnent leve 1s.
The eventua 1 d i f f e r e n c e i n v e g e t a t i on "composition and p r o d u c t i o n
between t h e p r e - t r e a t m e n t and p o s t - r e c o v e r y periods, and t h e
r e l a t i o n s h i p o f t h e s e changes t o t h e degree o f change i n s o i 1
p r o p e r t i e s which has o c c u r r e d over t h e same p e r i o d , p r o v i d e s t h e
basic t e s t o f the hypotheses. Hypothesis 11 w i l l be i n v a l i d a t e d i f
t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n v e g e t a t i o n c o m p o s i t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n a r e
u n c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e d e g r e e o f change i n s o i 1 p r o p e r t i e s .
Hypothesis l l ( a ) w i l l be i n v a l i d a t e d e i t h e r i f t h e r e i s no
r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e amounts o f change i n the vegetation and i n
soi 1 properties, o r i f t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p i s p o s i t i v e and linear.
Hypothesi s 12
Imp 1i c a t i o n s
This hypothesi s has two major i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r t h e maintenance o f
s o i 1 f e r t i l i t y . F i r s t , t h e r e is an advantage i n mai n t a i n i n g
phenologica 1 and s t r u c t u r a 1 d i v e r s i t y i n savanna p l a n t communities.
Secondly, i t i s i m p o r t a n t t o m a i n t a i n those s o i 1 b i o l o g i c a l
processes which p r e v e n t o r r e v e r s e t h e l e a c h i n g o f n u t r i e n t s ,
especially where the soi 1s are well-drained and nutrient-poor. Woody
p l a n t s are c r u c i a l i n both instances since they produce substantial
amounts o f low q u a l i t y l i t t e r , which decomposes s l o w l y and
contributes t o a bui ld-up i n surface s o i 1 organic matter. They also
maintain a c t i v e r o o t growth and n u t r i e n t uptake i n the horizonta 1
and v e r t i c a l planes o f the soi 1 p r o f i le. The removal o f woody plants
from a savanna i s therefore l i k e l y t o cause considerable disturbance
w i t h long-term e f f e c t s on n u t r i e n t status o f the system.
Test
The hypothesis can be tested by compari ng n u t r i e n t cyc l i n g processes
i n savannas w i t h v a r y i n g p r o p o r t i o n s o f t r e e s and grass. The
f o l lowi ng processes need investigating: ( i t h e t i m i n g and q u a l i ty
o f d i f f e r e n t above- and below-ground organic matter inputs; ( i i1 the
decomposi t i o n rates o f these materials and the reçu l t i n g patterns o f
n u t r i e n t r e l e a s e ; ( i i i ) t h e e x t e n t o f n u t r i e n t immobi l i z a t i o n i n ,
and release from, soi 1 organic matter; and ( i v ) the seasonal p a t t e r n
o f n u t r i e n t uptake by the vegetation. The hypothesis p r e d i c t s t h a t
those communities which are less diverse, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n respect o f