WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
1. GENERAL
ZONES field was discovered in 1973 with the Exploration well ZONES 1, and the appraisal well ZONES 2. 9 wells were drilled
during the first drilling campaign in 1976/77 (Ba-03 to Ba-11). The development of the Carbonate Gas Reservoir was completed
in 1982 with the drilling of last 3 wells. Since its initial development in 1976, ZONES has produced over 1.13 TCF. Currently,
the gas production is trough the Compression System.
At this time fifteen wells had been drilled, 13 of which are producing, one (ZONES 1) was shut-in and abandoned to prevent
water production and other (ZONES 10) had been abandoned due to mechanical difficulties during drilling operations.
2. GENERAL WELL AND LICENCE DATA
2.1 Well Name ZONES 17
2.2 Type Of Well Development
2.3 Block No
2.4 Objectives - Primary: ZONES Limestone
Secondary: N/A
Planned TD 5,148.3 ft
(m TVSS):
2.5 Reservoir Fluid Gas
2.6 Preferred Spud Date December 2011
2.7 Minimum Hole Size 8.5 inch
2.8 Total Depth 10,028 ft
2.9 Final well Status Productor
2.10 Timewriting Code
2.11 BOD issue revision No 3.0
3. WELL LOCATION
3.1 Seismic Reference (Line /
Sp-Cdp)
3.2 Surface Location Northing: 1,785,743.19 m
Easting: 1,147,372.32m
Zone Bogota Main
3.3 Surface Tolerance 10 m
3.4 Water Depth 0
3.5 Reference Datum MSL
4. TRAJECTORY AND TARGET TOLERANCE
4.1 Target
Name M SS depth Coordinates (Size / Shape /
Orientation)
ZONES Limestone 5148.3 ft X: 1,147,783.9 m
Y:1,787,011.2 m
4.2 Comments
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 1 of 6 30/08/13
WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
5. PROGNOSED FORMATION TOPS
No. Depth Var. Chrono Formations Lithology Fracture Pressure Pore Pressure
MSL (M) Strat.
1 5148.3 ft ZONES Limestone 900 psi
Limestone
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
5.1 Comments
The only one Formation Top clearly defined according with Geology information is the ZONES Limestone
6. TEMPERATURE AND FORMATION DATA
Temperature Definition of Derivation
Gradient 2.095 Deg c/100m 0.0115 ºF/ft
Seafloor 33.0 Deg C 91.33ºF
Static Formation Temp At Td 66.7 Deg C 152ºF
Primary Objective Formation
Permeability 50 MD
Porosity 27 %
Pore Pressure 0.4341 S.G. 0.188 psi/ft
Frac Gradient 1.20 S.G. 0.52 psi/ft
Formation Pressure At Top Of Target 947.4 PSI
Formation Temperature At Top Of Target 64.4 Deg C 148ºF
Secondary Objective Formation
Permeability MD
Porosity %
Pore Pressure S.G.
Frac Gradient S.G.
Formation Pressure At Top Of Target PSI
Formation Temperature At Top Of Target Deg C
7. WELL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
(y/n) Note: the importance of data gathering has been ranked - Rank
4=not needed, 3=nice to have, 2=important, 1=essential at
1-2-3-4
all costs
7.1 TOP HOLE REQUIREMENTS Section Required
Objectives Comments Ranking
Mudlogging Unit Yes 3
SWC/Ditch Cuttings Yes Every 50 ft Just the sets the MME requires 3
Electric Logging No The size of the hole is too big and the Logs 1
resolution will be not good.
Coring No 1
MWD/LWD Yes SS will be necesary to correlation with the second 3
well
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 2 of 6 30/08/13
WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
7.2 SURFACE HOLE REQUIREMENTS 17-1/2” Hole – 13-3/8” Casing at 2000’ MD Section Required
Mudlogging Unit Yes 1
SWS/Ditch Cuttings Yes Every 50 ft Just the sets the MME requires 1
Electric Logging No 3
1. Casing Drilling section. No Logs possibles 2
Coring No 4
MWD/LWD No Casing Drilling section. No Logs possibles 1
7.3 INTERMEDIATE 1 HOLE REQUIREMENTS 12-1/4” Hole – 9-5/8” casing at 8500-9000’ MD Section Required
Mudlogging Unit Yes 1
SWS/Ditch Cuttings Yes Every 20 ft Just the sets the MME requires 1
Electric Logging No 2
1. High angle well (Avoid WL logs) 1
2. 1
3. 1
4. 1
Coring No 1
MWD/LWD Yes GR-RES-SONIC 1
7.4 INTERMEDIATE 2 HOLE REQUIREMENTS Section not Required
Mudlogging Unit Yes 1
SWS/Ditch Cuttings Yes 1
Electric Logging No 1
1. 1
2. 1
3. 1
4. 1
Coring No 1
MWD/LWD Yes Min requirements for LWD are GR/RES/Sonic. 1
Optionally the team will evaluate the need for
Neutron/Density in Phase 3
7.5 PRODUCTION HOLE REQUIREMENTS Section Required
Mudlogging Unit Yes 1
SWS/Ditch Cuttings Yes Every 10ft Just the sets the MME requires 1
Electric Logging No 1
1. 1
Coring No 1
MWD/LWD Yes GR-RES Geonavegation 1
Flowback / Drill stem tests Yes It is planned to flowback/clean-up the well prior to 1
shutting in and moving the drilling rig.
Approximately 72 hours will be required. Facilities
will need to have flowlines, separation and
measuring equipment available for the flowback
period into the ZONES station. We will not use
DST equipment.
Side track No 1
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 3 of 6 30/08/13
WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
7.6 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Subsurface Formation Damage issues The old ZONES wells have historical information about stimulation
needs. The well is being considered to drill with MPD techniques to
minimize formation damage and drilling fluid losses in the Pay zone.
Formation Evaluation NO
No of Pressure Samples & NO
expected time per sample
No of PVT Samples & expected NO
time per sample
No of VSP stations NO
No of sidewall cores NO
Special core handling procedures NO
Proximity To Infrastructure NO
HES Environmental Sensitivity The ZONES field is in a Shoreline, and any spill will be very critical.
Working Conditions
Pollution NA
AHSV Anchoring NA
Weather High risk skin damage in summer season
High risk flooding and road problems in winter season
Facilities Well Positioning The Surface location was chosen to minimize the Sea impact
Rig Positioning
Well location
Wellhead Multidisciplinary workshop (Production, Facilities and Drilling)
reviewed and define the final wellhead
Wellhead
Seabed Conditions NA
Operations Well Productivity Well production test will be before to start the second well
Operating Life Jan 2022
Sand Production is not considered
Liquids Production 30 STB/D
Completion Requirements Monobore completion, T and P Bottom pressure
Data Acquisition Cutting samples, MWD surveys, LWD logs
Well Interventions The wells will be designed to incorporate SSSV, Temperature and
Pressure bottom hole gauges, landing nipples for future interventions.
SMART completion is not planned.
Corrosion Control Corrosion control in surface flow lines (Evaluation during Completion
design, possible Base log (CAST-V or Calipers, Images) for future
integrity evaluations)
Deliquefication It was evaluated and discarded regarding to the new wells position.
(Highest structural position).
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 4 of 6 30/08/13
WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
8. OFFSET DATA
Well Name ZONES Wells By ZONES Well Name ZONES By ZONES
Dist. / Dir From Well Same Field Dist. / Dir From Well
Water Depth Water Depth
Spud Date 1976 Spud Date 2005
Duration (Days) 20 Duration (Days) 25
9. POTENTIAL DRILLING HAZARDS
Rank*
1-2-3-4-5 Comments
9.1 Mooring
Site Data Collected N/A
Seabed Condition Within Anchor Pattern 1
Currents Exceeding 2 Knots 1
Soft Seabed Expected 1
Seabed Slope > 2deg 1
9.2 Shallow Gas 3
Justification Offset well data
9.3 Abnormal Pressures 2
Justification Reservoir Depleted 900 psi
Turbidites Presence ???
9.4 Dangerous Gases
H 2S 5
CO2 5
9.5 Faults No
Justification
9.6 Shallowest Closure 5
Justification
9.7 Lost Circulation
Seepage 1 Intermediate hole
Moderate Losses 4
Severe Losses 1 Surface hole (1100' - 1800' TVD)
Total Losses 2 Production hole
9.8 Differential Sticking 3
Justification ZONES Limestone
9.9 Wellhead
Top Soil Suitable For Driving / Jetting N/A
Conductor
9.10 Other N/A
1
1
*rank (1-2-3-4-5) 1=certain, 2=probable, 3=50/50, 4=possible, 5=impossible
Other comment
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 5 of 6 30/08/13
WELL BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
10. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Documentation To Support This Document
DD'S ZONES Offset Wells
E-mails communications from Geology and Reservoir.
11. APPROVALS
Responsible
Position Signed Date
Person
Asset Team Leader
Geophysicist
Drilling Superintendent
Drilling Engineer
Rev 3 (5th Oct 05) Page 6 of 6 30/08/13