Philosophy of language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not to be confused with Linguistic philosophy.

This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states a Wikipedia editor's
personal feelings about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style.
(May 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Philosophy of language explores the relationship between language and reality, in particular,
philosophy of language studies issues that cannot be addressed by other fields, like linguistics, or
psychology. Major topics in philosophy of language include the nature of meaning,
intentionality, reference, the constitution of sentences, concepts, learning, and thought.

The topic that has received the most attention in philosophy of language has been the nature of
meaning, to explain what "meaning" is, and what we mean when we talk about meaning. Within
this area, issues include: the nature of synonymy, the origins of meaning itself, and our
apprehension of meaning. Another project of special interest to philosophers of language is the
investigation into composition, or the question of how meaningful units of language are
composed of smaller meaningful parts, and how the meaning of the whole is derived from the
meaning of its parts.

Secondly, this field of study seeks to better understand what speakers and listeners do with
language in communication, and how it is used socially. Specific interests include the topics of
language learning, language creation, and speech acts.

Thirdly, the question of how language relates to the minds of both the speaker and the interpreter
is investigated. Of specific interest is the grounds for successful translation of words and
concepts into their equivalents in another language.

Finally, philosophers of language investigate how language and meaning relate to truth and the
reality being referred to. They tend to be less interested in which sentences are actually true, and
more in what kinds of meanings can be true or false. A truth-oriented philosopher of language
might wonder whether or not a meaningless sentence can be true or false, or whether or not
sentences can express propositions about things that do not exist, rather than the way sentences
are used.