Professional Documents
Culture Documents
p depends on:
- the local Ca2+ transient (which depends on the number and kinetics of CaV channels
at the active zone and their distance from the primed vesicle, the AP shape, the Ca2+
buffer and the Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms at the active zone)
- the affinity of the Ca2+ sensor
Depression
PSPs (mV)
In general at a given synapse, mechanisms leading to short-term increase of
synaptic efficacy (potentiation and/or facilitation) and to short-term decrease of
synaptic efficacy (depression) coexist. The observed short-term plasticity depends
on which mechanism prevails, and this depends on the details of the presynaptic
activity (AP frequency, neuromodulation) and on the specific synapse.
Facilitation + PTP
Presynaptic APs: + depression
at time 0: train of APs
at 10 Hz for 10 sec
preceded and followed
by control APs at 1 Hz
Evidence:
1. Linear relationship between facilitation and [Ca2+]in (measured with fluorescent dyes)
2. Exogenous buffers EGTA e BAPTA reduce the facilitation
Mechanisms underlying facilitation
The facilitation depends on the residual Ca2+ (first hypothesized by Katz and Miledi , 1968)
Evidence:
1. Linear relationship between facilitation and [Ca2+]in (measured with fluorescent dyes)
2. Exogenous buffers EGTA e BAPTA reduce the facilitation
But:
increase of residual Ca2+ per AP (about 1 uM) is too small to explain the increase
in Prelease (cf up to 5 times facilitation of the EPSP at the 2° AP), assuming that
residual Ca2+ acts on the Ca-sensor for rapid release (synaptotagmin).
In fact, if [Ca]rest + [Ca]loc (100 nM +20 uM) is the [Ca] at the Ca-sensor that induces release in response
to the first AP, and [Ca]rest + [Ca]loc + [Ca]res (100 nM + 20 uM + 1 uM) is the [Ca] that induces release in
response to the 2° AP, considering the dependence of release on [Ca]4, one calculates a 20% increase of
release (much smaller than that observed up to >10 times).
Mechanisms underlying facilitation
The facilitation depends on the residual Ca2+ (first hypothesized by Katz and Miledi , 1968)
Evidence:
1. Linear relationship between facilitation and [Ca2+]in (measured with fluorescent dyes)
2. Exogenous buffers EGTA e BAPTA reduce the facilitation
But:
increase of residual Ca2+ per AP (about 1 uM) is too small to explain the increase
in Prelease (cf up to 5 times facilitation of the EPSP at the 2° AP), assuming that
residual Ca2+ acts on the Ca-sensor for rapid release (synaptotagmin).
Ca2+ binding to CaM mediates both Ca-dependent facilitation (due to Ca2+ binding at C terminal of
CaM) and Ca-dependent inactivation (due to Ca2+ binding at CaM N-terminal) of CaV2.1 channels.
Intracellular BAPTA eliminates both Ca-dependent faciliatation and inactivation, whereas EGTA
eliminates only Ca-dependent inactivation-Ca binds more rapidly to C- than N-terminal of CaM.
The two lobes of CaM interact differently with the two CaM binding sites at the C terminal of CaV2.1
channels
nCaS are similar enough to displace CaM from shared binding sites in the C terminus of CaV2.1
channels, but different enough to confer distinct form of regulation
The differential expression and different actions of nCaS on CaV2.1 channels at different synapses
may contribute to the different short-term synaptic plasticity properties
In KO mice, synaptic
transmission (EPSC amplitude
elicited by the 1st AP) is not
much impaired because the
CaV2.2 channels compensate
the lack of CaV2.1 channels
(i.e. substitute CaV2.1 at the
active zones). However,
interaction with CaM (nCaS)
does not lead to facilitation of
the CaV2.2 channels, and
hence they cannot
compensate the lack of
CaV2.1-dependent facilitation
of the EPSC in KO mice
Also augmentation and PTP depend on residual Ca
Other Ca2+ effectors mediate PTP: e.g. PKC (which has been shown to
increase the affinity of the Ca-sensor in Calyx of Held and also to
increase the open probability of presynaptic CaV channels).