You are on page 1of 3

J. Anat.

(2002) 201, pp527–529

Book reviews
Blackwell Science, Ltd

Craniofacial Development, Growth and Evolution. By Chapter 3 is a useful and well illustrated account of
Murray C. Meikle. (Pp364; £95 hardback; 207 illustra- cartilage and bone, though it is a pity that endo-
tions; ISBN 0 9542338 0 8.) Diss, Norfolk: Bateson chondral ossification is described only for long bones.
Publishing. 2002. The endochondral mammalian skull base is not well
covered in the book as a whole, though there is a nice
A textbook on craniofacial biology is long overdue, and photomicrograph of the spheno-occipital synchon-
this book represents a remarkable achievement. The drosis in the chapter on the chondrocranium. I was
field is vast, and could have been approached and surprised to read in Chapter 3 that ‘skeletogenesis … is
organized in many different ways. Murray Meikle is always associated with an epithelium and a basement
Professor of Orthodontics at Guy’s, King’s and St membrane’. This is surely not true for the limb bones,
Thomas’ Hospitals Medical and Dental School, and the which develop from mesenchymal condensations and
book emphasizes the author’s clinical dental context. are specifically excluded from the area close to the
Indeed, the flyer enclosed in my review copy promotes surface ectoderm. In chapter 10, section 8.1, bone is
it as ‘the book orthodontists, plastic and maxillofacial described as ‘the normal product of mesenchyme in
surgeons, otolaryngologists and paediatric dentists the absence of an inducer’; I don’t think this statement
have been waiting for.’ Although a clinical salary may is true either, though it may be valid for neural crest-
be necessary to afford ownership of a personal copy, this derived mesenchyme that has already undergone some
book will be a useful resource for a much wider group, restriction of potential. These inconsistencies are a
including geneticists and basic scientists working in the product of the vast amount of literature that has been
field of craniofacial development and anomalies. surveyed for this book. No single author can be an
The chapter headings summarize the book’s cover- expert in all of the fields covered, but he should
age: early craniofacial development, cell adhesion in perhaps not rely too trustingly on the validity of his
craniofacial morphogenesis, the biology of skeletal source material.
tissues, development of the face, the pharynx and its Because the first chapters of the book cover basic
derivatives, the chondrocranium, the membranous craniofacial developmental biology, including accounts
neurocranium, the nasomaxillary complex, the mandible, of genetically modified mouse models, it was hard to
development of the dentition. Chapter 2 was written get a sense of the author’s own voice. But he comes
with a co-author, J. R. Sandy; it is mainly a tutorial/ into his own in the last three chapters, which are
review on adhesion molecules that is competently written with authority and personal involvement. In all
written and beautifully illustrated but not well anchored chapters, though, Meikle gives a historical context that
within the book as a whole. A much more concise intro- is informative and entertaining, though he comes close
duction to this material would have sufficed, with to apologising for this in the Preface. I appreciated
further information in the sections where the relevance the potted biographies of major historical figures at
of its inclusion is clear. Some of the molecules mentioned the end of each chapter. In addition, there are historical
in this chapter are never encountered again; Eph– anecdotes embedded within the text that humanize
ephrin interactions, of major importance in the segre- some of the factual data. We learn that acceptance
gation of neural crest cell populations, are omitted. of the concept of neural crest was delayed by rigid
The other co-authored chapter, the membranous adherence to the germ layer theory. Criticism by the
neurocranium (with Robert D. Evans), is one of the Anatomical Society in 1920 delayed publication of
most successful chapters in the book, providing an work reporting the neural crest cell origin of the first
introduction to this topic easily accessible to 3rd year arch mesenchyme by J. P. Hill and his research student
science and medical undergraduates. Katherine Watson until 1958, after Hill’s death in 1954

© Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002


528 Book reviews

and the publication of Hörstadius’ monograph on the growth of the mandible is spread between at least
neural crest in 1950. Julia Platt had similar problems three chapters, making it easy for readers specifically
with her heretical 1883 publication demonstrating an looking for material on this topic to miss relevant informa-
ectodermal origin of the mesenchyme that forms the tion that is not included in the chapter on the
visceral arch cartilages and dentine – she failed to mandible. These problems are partially overcome by the
obtain an academic position in the US or Europe and excellence of the index. However, the repetition in part
‘turned to civic work’. I can’t help feeling that in the derives from the multiplicity of sources, and there has
late 19th century her discovery of the ‘mesectoderm’ been little attempt to reconcile differences between
(her term) might have been a convenient excuse for them. Inconsistencies include the bone differentiation
excluding a pioneering woman from the academic point made above; a 5th pharyngeal arch is listed in
community. Chapter 1, whereas the pharynx chapter explains the
The strengths of this book are its breadth of cover- reasons, based on homology, that there isn’t a 5th arch.
age (molecular genetics to morphometry) and the There is a similar inconsistency in the terminology, e.g.
time-scale of its literature sources (I loved the com- premature closure of the cranial vault sutures is called
ment, summing up the author’s view of the controversy synostosis and stenosis in different parts of the text,
on the human premaxilla, ‘personally I’m with without explanation or correlation.
Goethe’). The colour illustrations are a major feature, These weaknesses could no doubt have been ironed
and have strengths and weaknesses (given that there out if Professor Meikle had spent another year on the
are 207 of them, this is hardly surprising). Excellent book, and only marginally detract from the major
photographs from original papers and specimens achievement this work represents.
have been obtained through a large number of personal Gillian M. Morriss Kay
contacts, and many illustrations redrawn in familiar University of Oxford
textbooks are refreshingly reproduced here from the
originals. Some of the drawings accompanying the
historical notes are stunning – did von Baer himself Oral Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, 3rd edition.
make the beautiful drawings of chick development? The By B. K. B. Berkovitz, G. R. Holland and B. J. Moxham.
weaknesses are largely in the redrawn diagrams, espe- (pp. xii + 378; fully illustrated in colour and black and
cially those showing individual cells: the single-layered white; £44.99 paperback; ISBN 0 7234 3181 7.) Oxford:
epithelia of early embryos are shown as double or Elsevier Science, 2002
worse (the pseudostratified epithelium of the otic pit is
drawn as four-layered) and nowhere is the epithelial– As many readers of the Journal of Anatomy are aware,
mesenchymal transition of the emigrating neural crest the number of anatomy teachers is declining rapidly.
properly illustrated. The solid colours used to illustrate Unless they are directly concerned with provision of
early morphogenetic events in chapter 1 are preferable dental courses, they may not be so conscious that the
to the incorrect cellular detail of the same events shortage of expertise in the field of oral biology is even
drawn by a different hand in chapter 2. The picture I more acute. Irrespective of the paucity of dedicated
disliked the most, on the grounds of failure of com- teaching staff, oral biology is an absolute requirement
munication, is the diagram purporting to illustrate the for dental students and still has to be taught. The
IHH–PTHrP interaction in the epiphsis of long bones – it release of a new edition of this book is timely. It will
looks like a tube of differently coloured smarties rather be an absolute godsend to those new to the subject as
than differently shaped and clearly aligned cells. The well as bringing experienced oral biology teachers up
puzzled reader should turn the page to see the cellular to date.
detail illustrated in a drawing first published in 1848. In previous incarnations, this book had the subtitle ‘A
The other weaknesses of the book are a product of colour atlas and textbook.’ It is still a comprehensive
the complexity of the topic. The organization is not atlas packed with about 900 colour photographs and
always logical, and sometimes repetitive. Experimental micrographs of excellent quality. They are drawn from
work on the skull vault is covered in the chapter on the authors’ own extensive collections and from those
the nasomaxillary complex instead of with the mem- of other teachers and researchers throughout the
branous neurocranium; material on development and dental world as well as from journal articles and reviews.

© Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002


Book reviews 529

The authors are generous with their acknowledge- useful, I would have preferred them to have been
ments to these other sources. The new edition is, how- integrated in the relevant context rather than tacked
ever, now more like a textbook than its predecessors on to each chapter. Dental students are as notorious as
were. Formerly, the text was largely in the form of their medical counterparts for their rapid acquisition
extended figure legends. In the new edition, the text is of the ‘Do we need to know this for the exams?’ syn-
overt with reference to corresponding figures; the drome. Integration would have reinforced the clinical
extensive figure legends still retain their place where application of the contents rather than implying that
they augment the text. the clinical application was an afterthought.
The book is well written with clear subheadings There are one or two other imperfections in what is,
providing comprehensive coverage of each topic. As well overall, an excellent product. Some of the teeth photo-
as the expected descriptions of the chemical and phys- graphed from all angles to display their morphology
ical properties, structure, function and development have incomplete roots; the experienced can spot this
of the dental and periodontal tissues, oral mucosa and immediately but as it is not explained in the accom-
salivary glands, the book also covers relevant perioral panying legends, it could be confusing to the tyro. In
gross anatomy including the temporomandibular joint, some of the electron micrographs, the labelling gets
tooth morphology, occlusion of teeth and develop- lost against the background. This is nitpicking, but
ment of the dentitions. In addition, the book starts I searched in vain for the arrows on Fig. 9.63, for
with a section on the in vivo appearance of the oral example. This was one of the few illustrations where I
cavity, a subject that receives scant coverage in other did have difficulty, a remarkable achievement given
texts covering the same areas. The atlas format lends the profusion of pictures.
itself to this topic whereas the black and white illustra- Multiple copies of ‘Berkovitz, Holland and Moxham’
tions or line drawings, which publishers of low-volume should be on the library shelves of all dental schools
sale books dictate, cannot convey the appearance of and a copy should sit resplendently on the desk of any
the living mouth so dramatically. For this section alone, oral biology teacher; but will the students buy it? At
this book is worth reading by anyone who has to teach almost £45 it exceeds by 50% the publishers’ present
medical students or other health science subjects psychological barrier of £30 over which students will
such as speech and language therapy students where think more than twice about buying a book. If students
this information is just as important to their future view this book as a short-term means to an end then
clinical practice. Other highlights are the photographs they may feel it is too expensive (though one only
of stunningly detailed dissections with nerves and blood has to look at the quality to see why it costs as much
vessels coloured for clarity and the beautiful illustra- as it does), and they may not invest. If they look on
tions of tooth pulp morphology where photographs of this book as a resource and reference for future
sectioned teeth are paired with colour line drawings, studies and clinical dental practice then it is worth
the clearest exposition of this topic I have come across. every penny.
Each chapter is completed by a section headed Martin Atkinson
‘Clinical considerations’. Although these summaries are University of Sheffield

© Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002

You might also like