Statistics

riwayat plasenta
plasenta previa previa riwayat sc mioma uteri
N Valid 86 86 86 86
Missing 0 0 0 0
Percentiles 25 20 20 20 20
50 20 20 20 20
75 20 20 20 20

Frequency Table

plasenta previa
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ya 11 12.8 12.8 12.8
tidak 75 87.2 87.2 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

riwayat plasenta previa

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ya 14 16.3 16.3 16.3
tidak 72 83.7 83.7 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

riwayat sc
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ya 18 20.9 20.9 20.9
tidak 68 79.1 79.1 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0

mioma uteri
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ya 6 7.0 7.0 7.0
tidak 80 93.0 93.0 100.0
Total 86 100.0 100.0
 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
riwayat plasenta previa *
86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%
plasenta previa
riwayat sc * plasenta previa 86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%
mioma uteri * plasenta previa 86 100.0% 0 .0% 86 100.0%

riwayat plasenta previa * plasenta previa

Crosstab

plasenta previa

ya tidak Total
riwayat plasenta previa ya Count 13 1 14
Expected Count 12.2 1.8 14.0
% within riwayat plasenta previa 92.9% 7.1% 100.0%
tidak Count 62 10 72
Expected Count 62.8 9.2 72
% within riwayat plasenta previa 86.1% 13.9% 100.0%
Total Count 75 11 86
Expected Count 75.0 11 86.0
% within riwayat plasenta previa 87.2% 12.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .478a 1 .089
b
Continuity Correction .065 1 .009
Likelihood Ratio .542 1 .061
Fisher's Exact Test .083 .030
Linear-by-Linear Association .473 1 .092
N of Valid Casesb 86
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.075 .087 -.685 .495c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.075 .087 -.685 .495c
N of Valid Cases 86
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for riwayat plasenta
3.477 .056 .057
previa (ya / tidak)
For cohort plasenta previa = ya .514 .071 3.704
For cohort plasenta previa =
178 .908 1.281
tidak
N of Valid Cases 86

riwayat sc * plasenta previa

Crosstab

plasenta previa

ya tidak Total
riwayat sc ya Count 7 11 18
Expected Count 2.3 15.7 18.0
% within riwayat sc 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%
tidak Count 4 64 68
Expected Count 8.7 59.3 68.0
% within riwayat sc 5.9% 94.1% 100.0%
Total Count 11 75 86
Expected Count 11 75.0 86.0
% within riwayat sc 12.8% 87.2% 100.0%
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.900a 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 1199 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 11.288 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.739 1 .000
b
N of Valid Cases 86
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .402 .126 4.024 .000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .402 .126 4.024 .000c
N of Valid Cases 86
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for riwayat sc (ya /
10.182 2.549 40.677
tidak)
For cohort plasenta previa = ya 6.611 2.172 20.125
For cohort plasenta previa =
.649 .447 .943
tidak
N of Valid Cases 86
mioma uteri * plasenta previa

Crosstab

plasenta previa

ya tidak Total
mioma uteri ya Count 3 3 6
Expected Count .8 5.2 6.0
% within mioma uteri 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
tidak Count 8 72 80
Expected Count 10.2 69.8 80.0
% within mioma uteri 10.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Total Count 11 75 86
Expected Count 11 75.0 86.0
% within mioma uteri 12.8% 87.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.006a 1 .005
Continuity Correctionb 4.821 1 .028
Likelihood Ratio 5.440 1 .020
Fisher's Exact Test .026 .026
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.913 1 .005
b
N of Valid Cases 86
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .77.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .305 .159 2.936 .004c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .305 .159 2.936 .004c
N of Valid Cases 86
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
 Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for mioma uteri (ya /
9.000 1.550 52.266
tidak)
For cohort plasenta previa = ya 5.000 1.775 14.084
For cohort plasenta previa =
.556 .249 1.241
tidak
N of Valid Cases 86
 Data Checlist
No Plasenta Previa Riwayat Riwayat SC Mioma
Plasenta Previa Uteri
1 2 1 1 2
2 2 2 2 2
3 1 1 2 1
4 2 2 2 2
5 2 1 2 2
6 2 2 2 2
7 2 2 2 2
8 2 1 2 2
9 1 2 1 2
10 2 2 2 2
11 2 1 2 2
12 2 2 2 2
13 2 2 1 2
14 2 2 2 2
15 2 1 2 1
16 2 2 2 2
17 2 2 2 2
18 2 1 2 2
19 2 2 2 2
20 2 2 2 2
21 1 2 1 2
22 2 2 2 2
23 2 2 1 2
24 2 1 2 2
25 2 2 2 2
26 2 2 2 2
27 2 1 2 2
28 2 2 2 2
29 1 2 1 2
30 2 2 2 2
31 2 1 1 2
32 2 2 2 2
33 2 2 2 2
34 1 2 1 2
35 2 2 2 2
36 2 2 2 2
37 2 2 2 2
38 2 2 2 2
39 2 2 1 2
40 2 2 2 2
41 2 2 1 1
42 2 2 2 2
43 2 2 2 2
44 2 2 2 2
45 2 2 2 2
46 2 2 2 2
47 2 1 1 2
48 1 2 2 1
49 2 2 2 2
50 2 2 2 2
51 2 2 1 2
52 2 2 2 2
53 2 2 2 2
54 2 2 2 2
55 2 2 2 2
56 1 2 1 2
57 2 1 2 2
58 2 2 2 2
59 1 2 2 2
60 2 2 2 2
61 2 2 2 2
62 2 2 2 2
63 2 2 2 2
64 2 2 2 2
65 1 2 1 2
66 2 2 2 2
67 2 2 1 2
68 2 2 2 2
69 2 1 2 1
70 2 2 2 2
71 2 2 2 2
72 2 2 2 2
73 1 2 2 1
74 2 2 2 2
75 2 2 1 2
76 2 2 2 2
77 2 2 1 2
78 2 2 2 2
79 2 2 2 2
80 1 2 1 2
81 2 2 2 2
82 2 2 2 2
83 2 2 2 2
84 2 2 2 2
85 2 2 2 2
86 2 1 2 2