Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brachistochrone Problem and It's Real-Life Application On Architecture
Brachistochrone Problem and It's Real-Life Application On Architecture
Khola Khan
The brachistochrone problem, which Galileo hypothesized first and was rediscovered by Johann
Bernoulli in 1697, was among the most important mathematics problems resolved. The word
brachistochrone, which comes from brachistos as a root, means shortest and time chrone, is
the least time curve. This problem is beautiful not only because of its simplicity, but also
because of its many solutions. We see some of the largest mathematical minds striving to learn
more skills for all through this issue. The problem of brachistochrone simply requires that A
reader finds a two-point line. The first postulate of Euclid says that there are two possible joints
always in the straight segment. This section of the line is of course the shortest path on the
Euclidean surface or the shortest distance between two points. What if we want the shortest
Point A
Point B
between point A and point B. What curve is such a string to limit the bead journey time with a
Point A
Point B
Initially, this question may seem like a simple reduction issue for the reader. Through this way,
all students of calculus understand the influence of calculus. Where a function must be kept to
a minimumf ( x ), the f ( x ) or f ' ( x ) derivative will gives the maximum and minimum points on
We first create a formula that uses this logic when a bead goes from A to B.
T = ∫ dt
For certain curve y(x), the ball rate could be set instantaneously
ds
v=
dt
Where is the difference in time and distance? Leaving the rearrangement of terms
ds
dt=
v
ds
T=∫
v
d s 2=√ dx 2 +d y 2
ds=dx . √1−¿ ¿
Next, the bead has to obey the energy legislation. We therefore realize that by contrasting the
U =m. gh
1
KE= m v 2
2
1
U =KE ∴ m. gh= . m. v 2
2
2 gh=v2
v=√ 2 gh
v=√ 2 gh
T = ∫ √ 1+¿ ¿ ¿
T=
1
.∫ √
1+ ( y ' )
dx
√2 g √y
It is obvious that conventional methods of calculations don't apply here when we look at
this equation. It's not only a single point that we want to reduce but a whole family of curves.
Although Newton's response to the challenge of Bernoulli was brilliant, the problem became
common by Euler who one night wrote evidence of the problem buildings. This problem led him
determine the maximum and minimum functions based on another function or curve. We use
the Euler-Lagrange Equation to resolve their basic Brachistochrone curve in this region. This is
what it says
∂F d ∂F
−
[ ]
∂ y dx ∂ y '
=0
2
F=
√1+( y ' )
√y
So we would assess
∂F d ∂F
=
∂ y dx ∂ y[ ]
Where P= y '. By assessing partial derivatives, we allow a constant evaluation of the derivative
Bernoulli, Newton, Lagrange and Euler must have shocked them when they come up with the
parametric equations. The cycloid is such a curve that mathematicians spoke fiercely of in the
18th century it was also known as the "Geometer Helen" and it is also described in the curve of
The cycloid is formed when a pen is connected to the edge of a circle as the circle is moved
forward in an x direction. Therefore, by studying a circle only, for such a curve we are able to
build parameter balances. During the regular cycles equations are x=r cos θ , y=r sin θ , If we
allow the circle to rotate at the bottom of the circle from a clockwise angle t, then for the
cycloid's parametric existence. So "t" can specify the number of radians that move around,
t
∆ x=2 πr .
2 πr
x=−r sin t+ rt
x=r ( t−sin t )
The only correction to be made is in this case, the central portion of the case is believed to be
not at (0, 0) but at (r, r) so that the bottom of the cycloid is located at the x axis. Hence So
y=r−r cos t
y=r (1−cos t )
continuation. The two curves are the identical, and there is no error.
We want to solve the time a cycloid takes to fly at this point, as defined in the above equation.
x1
1 1+ y '2
T= .∫
√2 g 0 y √ dx
dy 2 r− y
dx
=
√ y
Replacing this with the equation for travel time
√
2r−y
T=
1
.∫
x1 1+ (√ y ). 1
√2 g 0 y 2r − y
√ y
dy
y=2 r− y
√
y ( x1 )
1 y
¿ . ∫ . dy
√2 g 2 r− y
0
y.
y
y ( x1 )
1 2r 1
¿
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ .
y 2 r− y
dy
y (x1 )
1 2r
T=
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ y (r − y)
dy
y=r ( 1−cos t )
y (x1 )
1 2r
T=
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ 2 2
−1.[ ( r− y ) −r ]
dy
¿ r 2 cos2 t−r 2
¿ r 2 (cos 2 t−1)
¿−r 2 sin2 t
y (x1 )
1 2r
T=
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ −1.−r 2 sin 2 t
dy
y ( x1 )
1 √ 2 r dy
¿T=
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ r . sint
dy =r sint dt
Such that
t ( y ( x1 ) )
1 √ 2 r .r sin t dt
T=
√2 g
. ∫
0 √ r . sin t
t ( y ( x1 ) )
1
T= . ∫ √ 2r dt
√2 g 0
r
T=
√ g
.t
Since "t" and "r" are variables for a Brachistochrone curve parametric equation, we can
Any debate about the importance of mathematical computer technology should possess the
capacity to address more practical applications. We are firmly in agreement and yet a question
is valid only when performed in a vacuum and when we don't know how friction it is! It is
important for students not to leave our classes wrongly due to the situation in which we apply.
Is that an important problem for this? What happens if the Brachistochrone model has kinetic
friction or air resistance? The simulation of Mathematica allows the user to use a frictional
coefficient and see its effect on every curve during the descent period. A typical friction
coefficient is less than or equal to 0,1 and should be denoted as "u." A cycloid ending on (r, 2)
with an average of 3% is slower than a friction-free cycloid. Although kinetic friction seems to
have little influence on travel, the question is still how the form of the fastest curve affects the
friction of the Brachistochrone problem model. Is the cycloid the fastest possible curve? If a
new quickest curve is present, is it the first time steeper or less than the cycloid below or
above? Physical intuition alone can play a key role in answering certain qualitative questions.
The solution used in the kinetic friction has substantial graphic characteristics and a fascinating
cycloid generalization. It is useful to begin by motivating the effects of including friction that
graphical and physical insight suggests. The solution can be derived or simply graphically
presented in the comparison with other curves, depending on the distance level.
The friction force should be proportionate to the normal part and act in the negative tangential
direction of the bead weight. The regular accelerator component also contributes with the
curvature of the path to the frictional force. We usually ignore that part of the friction in our
first discussions and derivative work with students on a differential equation course. Students
know the weight of inclined physical aircraft more and usually this is challenging enough. The
more realistic solution, however, can be graphically displayed and the reason why differs from
the cycloid or the new Brachistochrone by using a simpler friction model can be interesting
has the added advantage that a solution is found in a preliminary differential equation while the
motion equation remains complete. Let us develop qualitative insight in simple physical
analysis, before proceeding with the solution derivation, that is to say, let us compares the
friction forces against no friction, when we know that the solution shape is a cycloid. The
friction force is less in the steep points of a curve with a negative curvature of zero, with a
vertical tangent to a horizontal tangent of full weight. Since, heuristically speaking, the lessons
learned from the classical Brachistochrone problem are that steepness is primarily important,
this suggests that steepness (versus the length of the path) is given more weight now, and the
optimal curve that still has to have a vertical tangent is little steeper or under the cycloid.
Because the normal speed part is proportional to the square, the opposite would be expected if
the friction model includes the acceleration part. If the steeper starts, the latter part of the path
Example of real life problem on application d solving the area bounded by two curves
o≤t
Area under the curve of VA(t) and VB(t) gives distance between A and b at time t
VA(t)
VB(t)
t0
t
Distance=∫ ¿¿
0
During this stage only gravity is used by the train and the fact that its potential energy is
transformed to film energy when the train drops to a height can be analyzed.
A formula for a trip along any curve y = y(x) which is taken on the rolling coaster track should
derivative will (hopefully) be combined with this formula. In the absence of theoretical
f ( x , y , z )=xy−z =0 may remind you of a roller coaster. ) Create a parametrization r (t ) for the
roller coaster and show that r '(t ) is orthogonal to ∇ . f for all values t.
Solution:
Given that cylinder x 2+ y 2=4
f ( x , y , z )=xy−z =0
z=xy
2 sin 2t
r ( t )=¿
∂ ∂ ∂
∇f= ( xy−z ) i+ ( xy−z ) j+ ( xy −z ) k
∂x ∂x ∂x
∇ f =( y ) i + ( x ) j+ (−1 ) k
4 ( cos 2 t ) −4 cos 2t
¿0
Conclusion
Scientists who sit around, seek to think of something to find, are not exploring simple facts.
Instead, new lands of knowledge are created by using challenges and interesting problems.
Some mathematicians find it worth to explore individual fields in full, such as Hilbert, who
mentions the 23rd as "Future creation of calculus of variations" in his 23 namesake problems.
Nevertheless, I must say: more mathematics will be detected by a persistent desire for
curiosity, which is not due to a proverbial discipline student. What taught me the essence of
mathematics during this investigation? I shouldn't focus absolutely on what a textbook feeding
on sponge tells me but rather look at problems to develop my skills elsewhere. During my
"easy" search of Wikipedia one night, I found a range of posting, books, lectures, applications
for the physical world, and other non-traditional information sources, including my father's
project. By this discovery, I understand not nor, but now, more about the parametric equation's
component derivatives and the interconnection analysis computation and geometry. I also
know how to measure the variations in this area. I am not just a university student. During this
research Jarringly, I noticed that a whole week of frustrated head scratching and confusion in
commodity law and the coordinating law and the chain rule. In fact, when I want to improve my
skills, I will definitely turn to my trustworthy mathematics workbooks, but I will know
something that is one of the honeycombs of the cycloid, and satisfies the curve of tautochrone
Bibliography
[1] Barra, Mario. "The Cycloid." Educational Studies in Mathematics 6.1 (1975): 93-98. JSTOR. Web.
11 Oct. 2013.
[2] Haws, LaDawn, and Terry Kiser. "Exploring the Brachistochrone Problem." The American
Mathematical Monthly 102.4 (1995): 328-36. JSTOR. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
[3] Hilbert, David, and Maby W. Newson. "Mathematical Problems." Lecture. International Congress
of Mathematics. University of Paris, Paris. 8 Aug. 1900. Mathematical Problems by David Hilbert.
Clark University. Web. 09 Feb. 2014.
[4] Johnson, Nils P. "The Brachistochrone Problem." The College Mathematics Journal 35.3 (2004):
192. JSTOR. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
[5] Lawlor, Gary. "A New Minimization Proof for the Brachistochrone." The American Mathematical
Monthly 103.3 (1996): 242-49. JSTOR. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
[6] Nishiyama, Yutaka. "The Brachistochrone Curve: The Problem of Quickest Descent."
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 3rd ser. 82 (2013): 409-19. Academic
Publications. Academic Publications, LTD, 25 Sept. 2013. Web. 1 Feb. 2014.
[7] Porkess, R. J. E. "The Cycloid and Related Curves, Part 1." Mathematics in School 9.1 (1980): 18-
20. JSTOR. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
[8] Porkess, R. J. E. "The Cycloid and Related Curves, Part 2." Mathematics in School 9.2 (1980): 16-
18. JSTOR. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
[9] Roidt, Tom. "Cycloids and Paths: Why Does a Cycloid-constrained Pendulum Follow a Cycloid
Path?" Diss. Ed. John S. Caughman. Portland State University, 2011. Portland State University.
Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
[10]Stroyan, Keith D. "Fermat's Principle Implies Snell's Law." Calculus: Project 27. University of
Iowa, Mathematics Department, n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2013.
[11]Weisstein, Eric. "Tautochrone Problem." Wolfram MathWorld. Wolfram Research Inc., 10 Feb.
2014. Web. 13 Feb. 2014.