Google Meeting with Trainee (Evaluators)

Result of Evaluation tool (Trainee)

Sample Evaluation Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of e-Learning Material

Qualification:
Unit of Competency:

Ginalyn Rodelyn Celestine Hanalee Dorothy Sean Roberto Irish Rose Marie AVERAGE
CRITERIA Japet Clacio
Gatus Gulano Luan Roque Luan Velasco Torres Ortizano Garrovillo RATING

1. Quality of Content
1.1.Is the material appropriate for
5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9
adults?
1.2.Are the learning objectives
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4.8
clear?
1.3.Is the content current, relevant,
5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.8
and accurate?
1.4.Is the content appropriate to the
needs of the targeted group of 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.8
learners?
2. Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-
Learning Tool

2.1.Does the material opportunities

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
for task-based learning?
2.2.Does the material present
options for meeting individual 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9
needs?
2.3.Does the material satisfy the
various teaching and learning 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9
styles?
2.4.Can the material be adapted to
meet the needs of the targeted 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
group of learners?
2.5.Does the content reflect current
5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9
and accepted methodology?

3. Ease of Use ( for Trainers and Learners)

3.1.Are the competencies and task

5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4.8
groups easily identified?
3.2.Does the material present
5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4.8
information in appealing ways?
3.3.Does the material provide
5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9
flexibility in its use?
3.4.Does the material support self-
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.9
directed learning?

Based on the result of the evaluation tool. The trainees rated the Electronic Learning Module almost Outstanding
which refers to a positive result and a synonymous acceptance if implemented.
Result of Evaluation tool (Validators)
Sample Evaluation Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of e-Learning Material

Qualification:
Unit of Competency:

Angeline Dada Roy

CRITERIA Validator 4 Validator 5 AVERAGE RATING
Catiis Roderos Roderos
1. Quality of Content
1.1.Is the material appropriate for adults? 5 5 5 5
1.2.Are the learning objectives clear? 4 5 5 4.666666667
1.3.Is the content current, relevant, and
5 5 5 5
accurate?
1.4.Is the content appropriate to the needs of
5 5 5 5
the targeted group of learners?

2. Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool

2.1.Does the material opportunities for task-

5 5 5 5
based learning?
2.2.Does the material present options for
5 5 5 5
meeting individual needs?
2.3.Does the material satisfy the various
5 5 5 5
teaching and learning styles?
2.4.Can the material be adapted to meet the
5 5 5 5
needs of the targeted group of learners?
2.5.Does the content reflect current and
5 5 5 5
accepted methodology?

3. Ease of Use ( for Trainers and Learners)

3.1.Are the competencies and task groups

4 5 5 4.666666667
easily identified?
3.2.Does the material present information in
4 5 5 4.666666667
appealing ways?
3.3.Does the material provide flexibility in its
5 5 5 5
use?
3.4.Does the material support self-directed
5 5 5 5
learning?

Link of Google drive Recorded Meeting:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E1jqfNso9_w_LIWnwHTVHVYF43UroTwo/view?usp=sharing
Screen Shot of alpha testing samples.