Professional Documents
Culture Documents
was there indeed such an island as the fabled Atlantis, were his works corrupt discourses?
Otherwise, did they secrete a bounteous hoard of ancient {even in Plato’s time} knowledge
waiting decoding? The ensuing data may cast some light on the subject thereby allowing the
reader to embrace or discard the hypothesis I invite the reader to peruse the enterprise and, as
is fit and proper, form their own educated opinion. I appeal for the reader to examine that,
which is to be disclosed with an unbiased, unfettered mind-set, free from childhood
indoctrination of installed unqualified paradigms Via prudent analysis with reference to the
dialogues of Plato {Timaeus 33-37… 43-45}, there will be established a series of numbers
with regard to the World Soul, as fashioned via the Creators hand {pertaining to the judgment
of Plato at least} This series of numbers, in my opinion, ought to contain 36 terms; by the
same token I designate the series of numbers as PWS {Plato’s World Series} Following the
creation of PWS, there being a residual fraction, the fraction being the ratio 256:243,
acknowledged as the musical scale, the Pythagorean Limma, I denote this 256:243 as the FP
{Fraction of Plato} seeing as it is within Timaeus of Plato, an additional, oft times
overlooked, ancient fraction being the Comma of Pythagoras {531441:524288} that I denote
as Comma
The dialogues of Plato contain a veritable Pandora’s Box of ancient knowledge brimful with
encoded clues, as to the factual accuracy we deal specifically with the dialogue within
Timaeus, this has long been a thorn in the side of Platonic experts, particularly the section
connected with the arrangement of the ostensible World Soul, {Timaeus 33-37…43-45} John
Michell, the esteemed author of the thought provoking: “The Dimensions of Paradise”
attributes 35 terms with an aggregate of 108551; Proclus produced 34 terms with an
aggregate of 105947
Plato maintains that the Creator obtained the three elements of the same, the other, and the
essence, and mingled them into one form. Mayhap the reader may well discern the manner by
means of which Plato’s works have mystified numerous for ages once the subsequent is
perused Via straightforward vocabulary PWS as revealed in Plato’s Timaeus {33-37
likewise 43-45} being created via the ensuing manoeuvre, commencing with a whole part,
there being no indication as to what the whole part should precisely correspond to, however
prudent analysis prises the door opening, maintain in mind simply pure number and naught
else given that the “Whole” via which PWS being formed, being: 46656 as indicated below
obviously 46656 is the amount of cubic inches in one cubic yard, therefore it is a rational
number, nevertheless the issue is subsequently raised: did the folk of Plato’s era employ
inches as we recognize them?
The “Whole” that Plato alludes to within Timaeus, I calculated to be 46656, concerning the
Greek Lambda, the letter l, forming the pattern
1
4 9
8 27
1 = 864
2 = 1728
3 = 2592
4 = 3456
9 = 7776
8 = 6912
27 = 23328
The 23328 x 2 = 46656, the 23328 is: 864 + 1728 + 2592 + 3456 + 7776 + 6912 The 23328
minus 12960 = 10368, this, as will be evidenced is the final PWS member, the 864, 1728,
2592, 3456, 7776, 6912 are likewise PWS members as will soon be evidenced
..........................................................................
The 864, 1728, 2592, 3456, 7776, 6912, 23328 comply with the following rules
{A} He took one part from the whole part = 1 {clearly we commence with 1}
{B} Then a second part, double the first part = 2 {clearly double the first part: 1 is 2}
{C} Then a third part, half as much as the second part and three times the first part = 3 {again
clearly 3}
{D} Then he took a fourth part, twice as much as the second part = 4 {2 x 2 = 4}
{G}Then a seventh part, twenty-seven times the first part = 27 {27 x 1 = 27}
Plato continues by itemising further divisions, the double and triple intervals filled by two
kinds of means, one kind E.G: 1 {one} and 4:3 in addition to 2 where the mean of 4:3 is one-
third of 1 more than 1 and one-third of 2 less than 2. The other being the kind of mean which
exceeds and is exceeded by an equal number, does the reader currently perceive why the list
be so thorny to procure, Plato’s ambiguous terminology does not assist to a great extent,
anyhow we continue the search He subsequently fills the intervals of 3:2, 4:3, and 9:8, so on
and so forth, leaving a fraction over expressed in the ratio 256:243, this ratio, as mentioned
earlier recognized within the musical sphere as the Pythagorean Limma Is it any surprise,
people develop disconcert, nonetheless the resolution is literally staring the reader in the face
{A} 3 ÷ 2 = 1.5
{B} 4 ÷ 3 = 1.333
{C} 9 ÷ 8 = 1.125
There is a need to identify the exact “portions” that Plato alludes to, I deduced the actual
portions to be as follows, commencing with, as indicated prior:
{A} He took one part from the whole part. = 1 {clearly we commence with 1}
I determined the first portion to be 3, one reason is that: the Whole: 46656 is 3 x 15552, that
is the end PWS term: 10368 x 1.5 obviously: 3 ÷ 2, there are additional reasons, nonetheless
far too convoluted to elucidate fully herein
Whilst the first portion is, as I present indeed 3, subsequently via following Plato’s ruling to
the letter the portions are straightforwardly deduced, for instance the first portion being 3,
moreover Plato’s instructions being that the second portion is double the first part.
Consequently, 3 x 2 = 6, this therefore is the second portion, so on and so forth. Moreover 3 +
6 + 9 + 12 + 27 + 24 + 81 = 162, the 162 divided by the 1.125 = 128, quite obviously half of
256 {the FP combo: 256:243}
Similarly, the Whole 46656 ÷ 1.5 ÷ 1.333 ÷ 1.125 = 20736 this being: 2 x 10368, the 10368
will be the termination PWS member, the 20736 ÷ 2, seeing as we have attained 128, which
as stated is half of 256 an FP component Equally the 9841.5 this being 1.5 x 6561, the 6561
being 1.333 x 4920.75 this being: 1.125 x 4374, the 4920.75 x FP = 5184, the 6561, 4374,
5184 in addition to the above 2187 obviously PWS terms to be, therefore currently the PWS
comprises of: 2187, 4374. 5184, 6561, 10368, at this time we seek out the additional
members to create 36 in all
……………………………..
In the interim, a dissimilar era, diverse culture, the Chinese: I-Ching {Book of Changes}
indicates the Pattern of the Field {The Well} as:
146
297
358
Employing the three rows as a whole number: 146297358 to locate the Plato-Timaeus:
“Whole”: 46656 moreover the “missing” number 10 of 10987654321
There most certainly is a requirement to attain 36 terms in view of the fact that Plato’s
emphasis on the duodecimals is of paramount importance, furthermore symbolically
indispensable, the deduced portions {A} = 3 {B} = 6 {C} = 9 {D} = 12 {E} = 27 {F} = 24
{G} = 81, must, primarily, be multiplied by the attained 128 {256 ÷ 2} therefore
{A} 3 x 128 = 384, this evidently being the commencing number of PWS
{F} 24 x 128 = 3072 {the 384 + 768 + 1152 + 1536 + 3456 + 3072 = 10368}
{G} 81 x 128 = 10368, this will be the very last PWS member
The produced numbers: 384, 768, 1152, 1536, 3456, 3072 and 10368 are, by means of my
methodology, members of PWS obviously it terminates in the company of 10368
It now calls for the first number 384 to be multiplied by Plato’s ratio as indicated prior,
namely: 9:8 {1.125} the reader will observe multiplications by not merely 1.125, furthermore
by the FP {256:243} 1.333 and 1.06787109375 this is the FP multiplied by the Comma. The
rationale why these factors are utilised occupied a considerable amount of research and
experimentation, far too convoluted to clarify fully herein, subsequently PWS at this time
compromises of the aforementioned: 2187, 4374. 5184, 6561, 10368 {last member}: as well
as these obtained: 384, 768, 1152, 1536, 3456, and 3072
Hence in numerical order: 384, 768, 1152, 1536, 2187, 3072, 3456, 4374, 5184, 6561, 10368
at this time we boast 11 PWS members in all, likewise as we observe prior the: 864, 1728,
2592, 3456, 7776, 6912 are all PWS members My initial compiled list, in reality, comprised
only 35 terms, therefore I shall demonstrate a methodology that I employed to attain the 36th
{9216} the strategy differs from the norm, nonetheless I consider it to be legitimate,
moreover I shall endeavour to validate the findings, anywise, observe the developments
Apologetic if I appear patronising for all seems evident, notice though how the number 2
likewise the term : second crops up continually, likewise heed the fact that whole numbers
are produced on the extreme right, moreover from what source they stem, nonetheless we
promptly resume, and I trust the reader may possibly comprehend my somewhat awry
judgement
……………………………
Forming PWS
Given that the Whole is 46646, likewise the Pythagorean Limma is: 256:243 we find that:
4.6656 x 256 = 1194.3936, we will perceive PWS terms appear, likewise musical scale
“numbers” materialise, the options are numerous, nonetheless these examples will suffice for
the time being, the denoted as: W {World-Soul}
W ÷ 384 = 3.1104
W ÷ 432 = 2.7648
W ÷ 486 = 2.4576
W ÷ 512 = 2.3328
W ÷ 576 = 2.0736
W ÷ 768 = 1.5552
W ÷ 864 = 1.3824
W ÷ 972 = 1.2288
W ÷ 1024 = 1.1664
W ÷ 1152 = 1.0368
W ÷ 1296 = 0.9216
W ÷ 1458 = 0.8192
W ÷ 1536 = 0.7776
W ÷ 1728 = 0.6912
W ÷ 1944 = 0.6144
W ÷ 2048 = 0.5832
W ÷ 2187 = 0.546133333 x 9 = 4.9152
W ÷ 2304 = 0.5184
W ÷ 2592 = 0.4608
W ÷ 2916 = 0.4096
W ÷ 3072 = 0.3888
W ÷ 3456 = 0.3456
W ÷ 3888 = 0.3072
W ÷ 4096 = 0.2916
W ÷ 4374 = 0.273066667 x 9 = 2.4576
W ÷ 4608 = 0.2592
W ÷ 5184 = 0.2304
W ÷ 5832 = 0.2048
W ÷ 6144 = 0.1944
W ÷ 6561 = 0.182044444 x 9 = 1.6384
W ÷ 6912 = 0.1728
W ÷ 7776 = 0.1536
W ÷ 8192 = 0.1458
W ÷ 8748 = 0.136533333 x 9 = 1.2288
W ÷ 9216 = 0.1296
W ÷ 10368 = 0.1152
I ought to demonstrate at least one analysis method I undertook to validate PWS as detailed
prior, the process to procure the members being to multiply the initially produced 384, 768,
1152, 1536, 3456, and 3072 {not 10368, since this is the termination member} repeatedly by
1.5, 1.333 and 1.125 The instant the multiplication process produces a number greater than
10368, this is the termination point, and irregular numbers indicate that we should
discontinue the calculations, as will be evidenced. Likewise we disregard the numbers we
previously obtained that comprise the not quite middle stage of PWS, given that we no more
than boast 11, moreover we require 36 for a complete PWS
{A} 384 x 1.5 = 576 x 1.5 = 864 x 1.5 = 1296 x 1.5 then= 1 x 944 x 1.5 = 2916 x1.5 = 4374
x 1.5 = 6561 x 1.5 = 9841.5, we therefore terminate with the number 6561 as a PWS
member, since the produced 9841.5 is irregular {although 9841.5 is 8748 x 1.125}
{B} 384 x 1.333 = 512 x 1.333 = 682.666, likewise we terminate with 512, as a PWS
member
{C} 384 x 1.125 = 432 x 1.125 = 486 x 1.125 = 546.75, likewise we terminate with 486; as a
PWS member, given that the produced 546.75 is irregular, this will be the modus operandi
throughout
{C2} 768 x 1.125 = 864 x 1.125 = 972 x 1.125 = 1093.5 terminate with 972
{A3} 1152 x 1.5 = 1728 x 1.5 = 2592 x 1.5 = 3888 x 1.5 = 5832 x 1.5 = 8748 x 1.5 = 13122
terminates with 8748.
{B3} 1152 x 1.333 = 1536 x 1.333, = 2048 x 1.333 = 2730.666 terminate with 2048.
{C3} 1152 x 1.125 = 1296 x 1.125 = 1458 x 1.125 = 1640.25 terminates with 1458
{A4} 1536 x 1.5 = 2304 x 1.5 = 3456 x 1.5 = 5184 x 1.5 = 7776 x 1.5 = 11664 terminates
with 7776
{C4} 1536 x 1.125 = 1728 x 1.125 = 1944 x 1.125 = 2187 x 1.125 = 2460.375, terminates
with 2187
{A5} 3456 x 1.5 = 5184 x 1.5 = 7776 x 1.5 = 11664 terminates with 7776
{B5} 3456 x 1.333 = 4608 x 1.333 = 6144 x 1.333 = 8192 x 1.333 = 10922.666 terminates
with 8192
{C5} 3456 x 1.125 = 3888 x 1.125 = 4374 x 1.125 = 4920.75 terminates with 4374
{A6} 3072 x 1.5 = 4608 x 1.5 = 6912 x 1.5 = 10368 obviously terminating in 6912 in view of
the fact that 10368 as expressed being the “cut-off” point
{C6} 3072 x 1.125 = 3456 x 1.125 = 3888 x 1.125 = 4374 x 1.125 = 4920.75 terminates with
4374
Within the foregoing we disregard any numbers previously unearthed, the PWS member list
prior being: 384, 768, 1152, 1536, 2187, 3072, 3456, 4374, 5184, 6561, 10368
Please note that on two occasions we terminated with 8748 in {A2} and {A3} in view of the
fact that this is a significant occurrence Amongst the foregoing, there are 35 dissimilar
numbers even though some experienced duplication, at the moment to locate the 36th number
We currently multiply every one of the end numbers E.G. the 6561 by the FP {256:243}, the
instant a number emerges that we did not earlier procure; this will be the elusive 36th
member. The numbers below are as they emerged during the above process
I.E in {A} 384 x 1.5 = 576 x 1.5 = 864 x 1.5 = 1296 x 1.5 = 1944 x 1.5 = 2916 x 1.5 = 4374 x
1.5 = 6561 x 1.5 = 9841.5, we therefore terminate with the number 6561 as a PWS member
Otherwise in {C6} 3072 x 1.125 = 3456 x 1.125 = 3888 x 1.125 = 4374 x 1.125 = 4920.75
terminates with 4374; therefore, again obviously, we terminated with 4374
{A} 384 x 1.5 = 576 x 1.5 = 864 x 1.5 = 1296 x 1.5 = 1944 x 1.5 = 2916 x 1.5 = 4374 x 1.5 =
6561 x 1.5 = 9841.5, we therefore terminate with the number 6561 as a PWS member, since
the produced 9841.5 is irregular, {although 9841.5 is 8748 x 1.125}
{B} 384 x 1.333 = 512 x 1.333 = 682.666, likewise we terminate with 512, as a PWS
member
{C} 384 x 1.125 = 432 x 1.125 = 486 x 1.125 = 546.75, likewise we terminate with 486; as a
PWS member, this will be the modus operandi throughout etc
As is obvious we gained: 6561, 512 and 486 subsequently discovered additional PWS
members as we progressed; at this time we multiply the entire by the FP {256:243} after that
some by the “Comma”
As indicated prior: “Please note that on two occasions we terminated with 8748 in {A2} and
{A3}” Likewise at present the whole numbers produced we already possess, all bar for the
two occasions wherein we produced 9216 within rows:
Therefore we have attained the 36th.term which is quite obviously 9216 in view of the fact
that the PWS end member is 10368, which is 1.125 x 9216, additional multiplications of 9216
will produce a number greater than 10368, therefore 9216 is obliged to be the penultimate
member of PWS
In numerical sequence with the newly obtained numbers, the full PWS is therefore
{1} 384 {2} 432 {3} 486 {4} 512 {5} 576 {6} 768 {7} 864 {8} 972 {9} 1024 {10} 1152.
{11} 1296 {12} 1458 {13} 1536 {14} 1728. {15} 1944 {16} 2048. {17} 2187 {18} 2304
{19} 2592 {20} 2916 {21} 3072 {22} 3456 {23} 3888 {24} 4096 {25} 4374 {26} 4608
{27} 5184 {28} 5832 {29} 6144 {30} 6561 {31} 6912 {32} 7776 {33} 8192 {34} 8748
{35} 9216 {36} 10368
Employing the ancient Hermetic dictum “As above-So below” disclosed in the Lament of
Asclepius “In Egypt all the operations of the powers which rule and work in Heaven have
been brought down to Earth below”
Please observe the result whilst we deduct the numbers {from the bottom up} from 10368,
for example: 10368 minus 9216 = 1152, next 10368 minus 8748 = 1620, etc
{1} 1152 {2} 1620 {3} 2176 {4} 2592 {5} 3456 {6} 3807 {7} 4224 {8} 4536 {9} 5184 {10}
5760 {11} 5994 {12} 6272 {13} 6480 {14} 6912 {15} 7296 {16} 7452 {17} 7776 {18}
8064 {19} 8181 {20} 8320 {21} 8424 {22} 8640 {23} 8832 {24} 8910 {25} 9072 {26}
9216 {27} 9344 {28} 9396 {29} 9504 {30} 9600 {31} 9792 {32} 9856 {33} 9882 {34}
9936 {35} 9984
Apart from the fact that a few of PWS terms re-emerge, the most important element being for
the reader to heed the commencing digits of all the above given that they form a numerical
pattern as follows: 11223344555666777888888899999999999, somewhat interesting
Likewise on view are numbers that will appear throughout this work such as:
{2} 1620 {7} 4224 {8} 4536 {13} 6480 {18} 8064 {24} 8910 {25} 9072 {29} 9504 etc
Without seeming facetious nor condescending, attempt the division of all the above by 666
{otherwise divisors-multiples of} to obtain further numerals of interest, one example in {29}
the 9504 divided by Mr. Nasty 666 = 14.270270, divide the end PWS member: 10368 by this
14.270270 to obtain 726.5454 and this multiplied by 3.259259 = 2368, which is Gematria
Jesus Christ The 3.259259 x 3.2323 {6080 ÷ 1881} = 10.54349794238…which is 10 x FP
{256:243}, likewise 9504 is 1.8 miles of 5280 feet, there are numerous options within the
foregoing, far too many to illustrate in one fell swoop One supplementary example only, the
3.259259 x 25920 = 84480, which is 20 x 4224 as observed within {7} above Likewise
84480 is 8.888 x 9504 moreover the 8.888 x 684 = 6080 the British Admiralty, or as I dub it:
“Sea” mile, etc
Gematria: Founder of the City: 1225, the ancient number of perfection: 10, the lunar, Yin-
Yang number: 1080, the GP base side length: 9072, the modern-day mile: 5280
The employed 1.00886565 x 1881 = 1897.6763, this is exactly 0.3121178125 Sea miles of
6080, the 0.3121178125 multiplied by the FP {256:243} then by the Tetractys total: 8436 x
81 = 224684.87392, that divided by the 1.00886565 will obtain exactly 222710.4 This
222710.4 divided by the Great Pyramid of Giza base perimeter of 3024 = 73.6476190 this
divided by the Rhind Papyrus “Pi” {256:81} of 3.160493827 = 23.30256696428571 that
divided by the Schooldays Pi {22 ÷ 7} of 3.142857 will obtain exactly 7.414453125, this
multiplied by 1228.8 = 9110.88 that minus the Great Pyramid of Giza base side length
{inches} of 9072 = 38.88, the 23rd PWS member is 3888, the 1228.8 pertains to the musical
scales. The Great Pyramid of Giza henceforth denoted as: GP
……………………………..
The 1st PWS member: 384 the Pythagorean Limma {256:243} denoted as FP the longer
value Egyptian foot of 1.152 increased to 1152
The 76950 divided by the Sea mile of 6080 = 12.65625 this is the musical scale: 81:64
increased given that 81 ÷ 64 = 1.265625 However 12.65625 x 128 = 1620, hence 12.65625
obtains: 486, 6480, 1296, 1944, and 2916 etc
……………………………..
Re the 0.888 the number 8 is cyclic in other words: 0.888 x 9 = 8, please note the product is
the next number in PWS. For example: the 1st:384 produces 432 {the 2nd}...the 432
produces 486 {the 3rd}...the 486 produces 512 {the 4th}, etc,
The above chart depicts an uncomplicated method to formulate PWS, as indicated prior, the
0.888 being the division of 8 by 9, and the product of dividing the {3} 486 by {4} 512 being:
0.94921875, the 0.94921875 multiplied by the FP {256:243} obtains 1 {one} Similarly the
1st PWS member: 384 ÷ 0.94921875 = 404.543209876, the cyclic 543209876 impels the
employ of the FP {Pythagorean Limma {256:243} component: 256 Consequently
404.543209876 x 256 = 103563.061728395, at this time the cyclic 061728395, contains
1728, the cubic inches in one cubic foot, likewise 1728 x 27 = 46656, which is the cubic
inches in one cubic yard; likewise as I established 46656 is the “Whole” as suggested within
Timaeus, nonetheless under no circumstances made known via the enigmatic Plato
Timaeus-Plato-Whole
As indicated prior, within Timaeus the “Whole” that I calculated to be 46656 is formed via
the Greek Lambda, {letter L}: like so: 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 9 x 8 x 27 = 46656 Nonetheless,
amongst numerous options, 46656 is 1728 x 27, as a result it follows that the above 1728
containing: 103563.061728395 x 46656 = 4831838208, which is the end PWS member:
10368 x 466033.777, which is one ninth of 4194304, this being, yet again amongst numerous
options the 10368 x 404.543209876 as we observe prior, therefore the permutations are
literally endless
In view of the fact that the 466033.777 is exactly 262144 x 1.777 which is the square root of:
3.160493827 this is the ancient “Pi” {256:81} as indicated via the Egyptian scribe: Ahmes
circa 1650: BCE upon the celebrated Rhind Papyrus However the 3.160493827 divided by 3
will regain Pythagorean Limma {256:243} Furthermore the 262144 x 2 = 524288 a Comma
of Pythagoras component {531441:524288} we often observe modern-day computers
exhibiting bytes of 262144 etc The Earth mean circumference of 24883.2 ÷ 4 = 6220.8 ÷ 7 =
888.6857142 However the Pythagorean Limma {256:243} components will obtain: 256 x
243 = 62208 which is 6 x 10368 the 36th and final PWS member, otherwise 62208 is 162 x
384 which is the 1st PWS member Hence the 888.6857142 divided by the “Limma”
{256:243} obtains 843.5571428 The Earth mean circumference of 24883.2 divided by the
843.5571428 = 29.49794238683…
It follows that 46656 is 8.64 x 5400, myriad avenues to follow, in view of the fact that the
5400 divided by the commencing: 888.6857142 = 6.0763888 that multiplied by
100.101558857142 = 608.256 this is the Roman furlong The NC Earth mean circumference
of 24883.2 ÷ 100.101558857142 = 248.5795454 which divided by the Egyptian foot of
1.14545 = 217.013888 which,, divided by the 6.0763888 = 35.714285 this multiplied by 28 =
1000
Likewise returning to the “Then 24883.2 divided by the 843.5571428 = 29.49794238683…
This 29.49794238683… x 21865001.142857 = 644972544, this is the NC Earth: 24883.2
multiplied by 25920, which is the Platonic year, conversely the 19th PWS member is 2592
Otherwise this 56.888 divided by the prior 6.0763888 = 9.362285714 which is one seventh of
exactly 65.536 that divided by a reduced Greek mile {5068.8} of 5.0688 = 12.9292 that
multiplied by exactly 0.61875 = 8, the NC{Numerical Canon} Earth to Moon distance:
237600 ÷ 0.61875 = 384000 obviously the 1st PWS member 384 increased
This 4831838208 too alike the Moon 35831808 as to be ignored, hence 4831838208 ÷
35831808 ÷ FP = 128, or 4831838208 ÷ 35831808 x 243 = 32768, ample options
……………………………..
The FP, as per norm, denotes the Pythagorean Limma {Fraction of Plato: 256:243}
Myriad combinations obtainable, we require now to establish how many times the factors:
1.333, 1.125, the FP, in addition to 1.06787109375 {FP x Comma} were employed within
the forming of PWS
Therefore, multiply all to view the product like so: the 1 x 1.333 x 18 x 1.125 x 12 x FP x 4 x
1.06787109375 = 1458, this being the 12th.term of PWS The exact 1.125 being FP x FP x
Comma {Comma of Pythagoras: 531441:524288} The FP, as indicated being the
Pythagorean Limma {256:243} the exact 1.06787109375 being FP x Comma, the 1.333
being the musical scale: 4:3 and more besides
The interval between C and D, 9:8 = 1.125, is called a major tone, while the interval between
D and E, 10:9 = 1.111, is called a minor tone however as we observe above, the exact 1.125
being FP x FP x Comma
The total via adding each and every one of the employed numbers
{35} 1.125… {34} FP… {33} 1.06787109375 etc, the sum being 38.49679302… that
multiplied by the Timaeus: Whole: 46656, obtains exactly 1796106.375
Conversely the total via multiplying each and every one of the numbers employed:
{35} 1.125… {34} FP… {33} 1.06787109375, etc, the sum being 1458, which is the 11th
PWS member which, moreover as will be perceived, 1458 is the 12th PWS member, namely:
1536 divided by the FP Moreover the 1796106.375 ÷ 1458 = 1231.8973765432098 that
multiplied by the FP component 243 obtains 299351.0625, which multiplied by tother FP
component 256 = 76633872, which is the 1796106.375 x 42.666 which is the FP component
256 ÷ 6
“10368 x 466033.777, this is one ninth of 4194304, this being, yet again amongst numerous
options, 10368 x 404.543209876…”
The above 1231.8973765432098 being the 404.543209876 multiplied by exactly
3.0451564788818359375 that multiplied by three times by the FP {256:243} component: 256
obtains exactly 51089248, this being the 1796106.375 x 28.444, which is one ninth of 256,
please make a note of the number of times a number will ends with a number 5, given that
whilst a number ends with the number 5 otherwise a 0 {zero} it is divisible by 5.
……………………………..
The Egyptian foot 1.14545, The Egyptian cubit being: 1.71818, The Schooldays Pi {22 ÷ 7}
being: 3.142857, The Rhind Papyrus fraction being: 3.160493827
Numerous options remain, nonetheless we best move progress, since it creates not the
slightest difference the “numbers” are employed, nor the order, manner via which they are
employed, especially in view of the fact that the first division: 167772160 divided by 1.14545
= 146467758.730158, which is the Eye of Horus fraction {63:64} reversed, given that 64 ÷
63 = 1.015873 multiplied by exactly: 144179200 = 146467758.730158, the 144179200 to be
brief, is exactly 275 x 524288, a Comma {531441:524288} component Moreover as
indicated prior, 524288 multiplied by 320 will regain the 167772160, the Eye of Horus
fraction {63:64} obtains: 63 ÷ 64 = 0.984375 that multiplied by the reversed 1.015873 = 1
{one}
Via the foregoing, and forthcoming, all ancient and modern-day units of measure will be
obtained, whether they be units of, distance, time, area, volume etc, seeing as to paraphrase
Plato “all is number” The square root of Rhind Papyrus fraction “Pi” {256:81} of
3.160493827 is: 1.777, which for example is 16 ÷ 9, in addition to the “Rhind” is 3 x
1.053497942386831… which is the FP {256:243}
Thus initially we will divide the PWS by 1.777 afterwards we multiply PWS by 1.777,
furthermore observe numerous additional numbers of interest emerging, I will not pursue the
results, given that I am persuaded the reader is more than capable of perceiving the numerous
avenues, nevertheless I will supply a few numbers of note
{11} 1296 ÷ 1.777 = 729, this is the square root of the Comma component 531441
{23} 3888 ÷ 1.777 = 2187 this multiplied by the FP component: 243 = 531441
{24} 4096 ÷ 1.777 = 2304 this multiplied by the FP x 216 = 524288
At this time we multiply by 1.777 with, yet again a few numbers of note {I will only
underline the cycle number 7 within: {1} 384 x 1.777 = 682.666}
{1} 384 x 1.777 = 682.666 one third of 2048 the 16th member
{4} 512 x 1.777 = 910.222 one ninth of 8192 the 33rd member
The FP, as per norm, being the Pythagorean Limma {256:243} The Comma, as per norm,
being the Comma of Pythagoras {531441:524288} Whilst we construct the entire PWS
members in accurate progression, we will require “dropping” the numbers one row, for
instance within the first calculation we will observe:
{1} 384 x 1.125 = 432… {432 becomes the 2nd PWS member} The 1.125 will drop down to
the number {2} row like so
{2} 432 x 1.125 = 486…then: 1.125 x 1.125 = 1.265625 {486 the 3rd PWS member} The
1.265625 will drop down to the number {3} row like so
{3} 486 x FP = 512…subsequently: FP x 1.265625 = 1.333 {512 the 4th PWS member} the
1.333 drops down to the {4} row so on and so forth
As may be witnessed whole numbers are produced on the extreme right The 6144, 8192,
4096, 2187 and others on view were discarded or added to their lists by various eminent
personages in Platonic studies over the ages
Whole numbers were produced on the extreme right of the calculations in rows {5}, {9}, {12},
{17}, {20}, {21}, {25}, {28}, {30}, {34}, {35} for example as will be perceived row {34}
produced: 24 row{35} produced: 27, etc Therefore the row “numbers”: 5 + 9 + 12 + 17 + 20
+ 21 + 25 + 28 + 30 + 34 + 35 = 236
Units of measure
The 236 x 162 = 38232 which divided by 10368 {end PWS member} = 3.6875 this 3.6875
multiplied by 46656 {the Whole} will obtain exactly 172044 which divided by 384 {first
member} = 448.03125, the 448.03125 x FP = 472 which is obviously twice 236, another
example being 528 minus the 236 = 292 Furthermore 292 x 1.25 = 365 Gematria value:
Mithras, Abraxas Or 292 x 2 = 584 Maya Synodic period of Venus Or 292 x 5 = 1460 the
Sothic cycle Or 292 x 7.5 = 2190 Gematria value: Son of Man
……………………………..
On the other hand to obtain a sufficient Earth year in addition to a satisfactory Earth
Equatorial circumference we employ the prior 292 in the company of the Sea mile of 6080
the 9th PWS member 1024, the Grand Gallery sloping floor line length of 1881 {modern-day
inches} in addition to the average days in one month: 30, like so:
With reference to the aforementioned “being 528 minus 236 = 292” We will employ the
ancient maxim “As above-So below” such as 236 reversed is 632 therefore 632 minus 236 =
396 plenty of scope with regard to 396
On the other hand, 632 ÷ 236 = 2.677966101… that multiplied by the commencing: {236 x
162} of 38232 = 102384, which is, for example, 10368 x 9.875 that multiplied by 64 = 632
Subsequently 46656 ÷ 396 = 117.8181 which multiplied by the FP = 124.1212, which is 38.4
x 3.2323 which multiplied by the awe-inspiring Grand Gallery floor line length {modern day
inches} of 1881 obtains exactly 6080, which as illustrated, is the British Admiralty {as I dub
it “Sea”} mile.
The 117.8181 being the Egyptian cubit of 1.71818 x 68.571428 that multiplied by 151.2 =
10368. The Great Pyramid base perimeter of 3024 being the 151.2 x 20, equally the
68.571428 x 7 = 480 the Great Pyramid intended height, also 117.8181 x 88 = 10368
Likewise a few multiples of the 396 being: 7920, 3168, 43560, 6336, etc .I am certain the
reader is more than able to envision the potential of the number 396 Since the number of
seconds in 24 hours 86400 ÷ 396 = 218.1818 which multiplied by 24.2 = 5280 {mile}, the
24.2 x 200 = 4840 {square yards in one acre} so on and so forth {Draconic Month
approximately 242 days}
In that case the ancient NC {Numerical Canon} Earth mean circumference 24883.2 being the
218.1818 x 114.048 pertaining to the NC Moon diameter 11404800 Likewise 218.1818 ÷
1.185185 = 184.0909, which multiplied by the 1881 obtains 346275, this is exactly
56.953125 x 6080, the 56.953125 x FP = 60 Then again the FP x 1881 x 4 = 7926.518518
although this is exactly 6688 x 1.185185 the Pythagorean Minor Third {32:27} we will
obtain a tolerable Earth Equatorial circumference via: 7926.518518 x Pi =
24901.892346321229…
Otherwise the Plato-Atlantis area minus the central shrine of 4561920000 divided by 400 =
11404800 It is meaningless attempting to elucidate the entire units produced given that the
majority are recognized to the reader, hence only in certain areas will I elucidate Likewise the
218.1818 being the 117.8181 x 1.851851 which multiplied by 0.64 = 1.185185, the 117.8181
x 220 = 25920, which is the Platonic Precession cycle, the 220 x 24 = 5280, the modern-day
mile
The above produced 236 x 46656 = 11010816 that is 10368 x 1062, which is 162 x 6.555,
which multiplied by 27 = 177, this 177 x 1.333 = 236 Likewise the 177 divided by the above
117.8181 obtains the factor 1.5023148148 which multiplied by 239760 = 360195, this
divided by the GP “top platform” perimeter of 2288 subsequently multiplied by 6656 {26 x
256} obtains: 1047840 this being the 236 x 4440 which is 6.666 x 666
As to the utilised 239760 there are numerous possibilities: for example we perceive a
resemblance to 20736 in addition to 20736 is 2 x 10368, the end PWS member, otherwise
20736 is 54 x 384, the first PWS member Therefore: 239760 ÷ 20736 = 11.5625 this
multiplied by 3.2 = 37 a number of significance to early Christianity in view of the fact that:
37 x 18 = 666, furthermore 37 x 40 = 1480 Gematria Jesus, in addition to 1480 is Gem: Son
of the Cosmos Otherwise 37 x 64 = 2368 Gem Jesus Christ
Alternatively the 239760 is 2.775 x 86400 the seconds in 24 hours, subsequently 2.775 x
13.333 = 37 On the other hand 239760 is 25920 x 9.25 subsequently 9.25 x 4 = 37 etc In that
case 207936 plus 31824 = 239760, the 207936 being the end PWS term 10368 x 20.0555 that
multiplied by 86400 = 1732800, which is the Platonic Precession cycle 25920 x 66.851851.
This being the musical scale Pythagorean Minor Third: {32:27} of 1.185185 x 56.40625,
which multiplied by the Comma component 524288 = 29573120, which is the 207936 x
142.222 which is the FP component 256 ÷1.8
Furthermore the 31824 is, purely as an example, the Grand Gallery sloping roof line length of
1836 x 17.333 in addition 17.333 x 0.75 = 13 that multiplied by 176 = 2288, the GP “top
platform” perimeter. With regard to the employed, 176, for example there are 1760 yards in
one mile of 5280 or else 176 x 2.25 = 396, as above
The square yards in one acre: 4840, the 18th PWS member 2304 Gematria: Only-begotten
son 1176 The 22nd PWS member: 3456 added to exactly 0.9999 obtains 3456.9999 This
3456.9999 ÷ 2304 = 1.500433984375 that added to 0.1176 will obtain a tolerable Phi of
exactly 1.618033984375
The 3456.9999 added to 1383.0001 = 4840 The 1383.0001 minus 1037 = 346.0001 this
added to 17.9999 = 364 the Maya temple steps {91 on all 4 sides} Or 346.0001 added to
18.9999 = 365 Abraxas, Mithras, Neilos {Nile} and so forth I trust the method will be
comprehensible to the reader, obviously no affront to the intelligence of the reader, it possibly
will my awry modus operandi that is not comprehensible, nonetheless here being the
calculations, nothing ventured, nothing gained, I assume