Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vladimir Rosas
To cite this article: Vladimir Rosas (2020): Underground Media in Chile: Counterpublics
in Dictatorship and Democracy, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, DOI:
10.1080/10509208.2020.1764321
Article views: 20
Introduction
On October 5th, 1988, a groundbreaking development happened in Chile.
General Augusto Pinochet called for a plebiscite to whether allow him to
rule the country for eight more years in addition to the 15 year-long dicta-
torship he led or return to democracy. Unlike the referendum for the
Constitution of 1980, now there would be a registry of voters, and political
campaigns on media. Chileans took to the ballot box and voted ‘no’, setting
the scene for an open election to occur by 1989, which would include the
traditional fare, such as opposition candidates running for presidency, pol-
itical pluralism and elections for a new legislature in Congress, an institu-
tion that remained closed since the coup September 11th, 1973.
Opportunities to rebuild the country seemed to be appearing everywhere,
which was enormously motivating for those who wanted Pinochet to step
down. Finally, the opposition coalition—Concertaci on de Partidos por la
Democracia—won the 1989 presidential and parliamentary elections.
Pinochet did not continue in the presidency, but he kept his role of
Commander in Chief of the Army until 1998. Thus, the events of 1989 rep-
resented a mere glimpse of a young democracy that was subsequently
unable to deal with the remnants of the previous regime, including a series
of laws designed to reinforce precise authoritarian mechanisms and institu-
tions, arranged under Pinochet’s influence (Garret on Merino, 1995, 148).
This unbalance was not only evident in political terms; it could also be
seen in the audiovisual media, which failed to give a voice to those who
had been oppressed during the dictatorship, with the ‘media establishment’
that had been drawn up under Pinochet’s rule remaining intact
(Sorensen, 2009).
The impact on audiovisual media during the Chilean dictatorship was
devastating. One of the first actions Pinochet assumed after having
Vladimir Rosas is a Chilean journalist, film critic and independent researcher. Rosas is an associate professor on
Experimental Media at the Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano, Santiago, Chile, and has been an
associate professor on Film Esthetics and Language in Universidad Cat olica de la Santısima Concepci
on (Chile)
and Universidad San Sebastian (Chile). Rosas received his MA Film and Screen Studies at Goldsmiths, University
of London, and is currently undertaking a PhD in Film and Television Studies at the University of Warwick.
ß 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 R. VLADIMIR
Method
I have selected a comparative method to investigate how the opportunities
and limitations of alternative media have changed following the introduc-
tion of new forms of media, especially considering the impact across differ-
ent historical periods. In his book ‘Alternative media’, Chris Atton drew up
a typology of alternative and radical media that consisted of six elements,
which can be divided into two categories: products and processes. The
4 R. VLADIMIR
method used in this research, therefore, considers these two main catego-
ries under the names of Production and Distribution.
First of all, the Production category will consider both the product (the text)
and the people who produce it. For the former, the text will be analyzed in
terms of representational strategies, the primary focus here, and the manner
they work to construct an oppositional sphere through the text. The strategies
of Trilogıa de la Insurreccion Laboral and Teleanalisis will be assessed and com-
pared, with their historical contexts considered, as well as how they depict their
subject. For the latter, the analysis will address the production agency, whether
it is collective or solitary, and the reasons behind the chosen strategy. Finally,
as an overarching matter, the discussion will look at finance. Funding is a crit-
ical factor that determines how these projects get produced, and it is an essen-
tial part of this comparison, also affecting the next category.
Regarding Distribution, I will analyze the material infrastructures of cir-
culation for both scenarios, and the potentials of these strategies within
their historical context. The analysis of the distribution strategies also pays
attention to the diverse types of text circulation, for example, public film
screenings, or individual viewings. In this regard, and in spite of the avail-
ability of the alternative media, consumers of this type of media tend to
represent a selective part of the population (Sorensen, 2009, 7). This is true
in both examples and helps to shape the oppositional public, a situation
that will be explained further in this article.
The primary sources of the comparative study will be the episodes of
Teleanalisis and the three documentaries from the Cordones Audiovisuales
trilogy, with particular attention given to El Piquete del 5–6 when examin-
ing the barriers to coverage. These audiovisual artifacts have provided the
tools for textual analysis, allowing me to establish many of the characteris-
tics drawn under the Production category.
In the case of Teleanalisis, I have paid attention to the shift in its visual
style during its time of airing. Another substantial source is an undergradu-
ate thesis written by Jose Luis Navarrete Rovano and Rodolfo Andres
Garate Cisternas (2002), that includes a discussion between the Teleanalisis’
members regarding the financing of alternative media under Pinochet’s
regime. Finally, I interviewed three people who were directly involved in
the creative and production aspects of this project in order to clarify spe-
cific concerns on production strategies and the distribution scheme. Their
testimonies were valuable and reflected the importance of their work in
opening up a space for an oppositional public. That being said, it must be
mentioned that a comparison of the interviewees’ testimonies with the
research work done by Navarrete Rovano and Garate Cisternas reveals the
fallibility of the memories of the team members. After all, they were discus-
sing a project they were involved in more than 30 years ago5.
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 5
Literature Review
The primary focus of this research is to analyze how the media operated in
the public sphere and its existence as a form of underground media. The
analysis is, therefore, grounded on three writings: Nancy Fraser’s concept
of subaltern counterpublics; Michael Warner’s circulation of discourse
within the counterpublics; and finally, Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge’s
construction of the proletarian public sphere, taking into account its sys-
tematic negation, and how people that are excluded from the mainstream
create their own collective experiences.
Nancy Fraser criticized Habermas’ idea of a unified, all-inclusive public
sphere for being inaccurate and undesirable (Sorensen, 2009, 16). She, as
well as Negt and Kluge, point out that Habermas refers mostly to the bour-
geoisie, and she proposes instead that there are multiple spheres. ‘The bour-
geois public was never the public. On the contrary, virtually
contemporaneous with the bourgeois public there arose a host of competing
counter-publics, elite women’s public, and working-class publics’ (Fraser,
1990, 61). Regarding these many public spheres, Fraser ‘propose[d] to call
these subaltern counterpublics in order to signal that they are parallel discur-
sive arenas where members of subordinated social groups invent and circu-
late counter-discourses to formulate oppositional interpretations of their
identities, interests, and needs’ (1990, 67).
Michael Warner explained in his essay ‘Publics and Counterpublics’ that
a concrete public may come into being concerning the text and its circula-
tion (Warner, 2005, 66), with ‘a public [being] a space of discourse organ-
ized by nothing other than discourse itself’ (2005, 67). The public is
embodied in the circulation of texts throughout time and creates a social
space where the public can interact. This characteristic is not exclusive to
counter-publics, but what differentiates it from a more general public is its
dominancy and its role in power relations. For Warner, ‘a counterpublic
maintains at some level, conscious or not, an awareness of its subordinate
status. The cultural horizon against which it marks itself off is not just a
general or wider public but a dominant one’ (2005, 119). Throughout his
essay, Warner discusses the seven factors that define a public, emphasizing
6 R. VLADIMIR
of the printing houses, or refusal from newspaper store owners who did
not want to risk getting into trouble by association.
Since the Pinochet regime controlled broadcasting signals, alternative
audiovisual projects had to rely on new video technology. The independent
theater group Ictus launched in 1978 an underground media project, Ictus
TV, consisting of video recordings of plays and fictional short films, which
were later screened in community centers, mostly in working-class sectors
of Santiago (Li~nero, 2010, 26).
It was within this context that Teleanalisis emerged as an audiovisual
version of the magazine Analisis, which was also part of Emision6. The
cameraman Dragomir Yankovic and the psychologist Jorge Leiva, members
of the Christian Left movement, approached Analisis’ editor Juan Pablo
Cardenas in 1984 to propose the video recording of the magazine’s inter-
view (under the Conversando con … —‘Talking with … ’—section). Having
agreed on the idea, Cardenas commissioned the journalist Fernando
Paulsen to lead the project, and he called on Augusto G ongora to take
charge of Teleanalisis (Garate and Navarrete, 2002, 51–55). The active link
between the two forms of media meant that journalists worked for both
Analisis magazine and Teleanalisis, with double the workload of a trad-
itional journalist.
During the dictatorship, creating a regular TV news report was consid-
ered a reckless idea. Indeed, all previous efforts to create audiovisual con-
tent had focused on isolated products, such as documentaries or video
essays, to avoid the chances of being tracked by the secret police (CNI)7.
Fernando Acu~ na, one of the producers of Teleanalisis, expressed Pinochet
as having deep concerns regarding television: ‘There was a certain freedom
for newspapers and radios during the dictatorship, although those media
could face closure. However, regarding audiovisual, Pinochet’s advisors told
him not to allow it, recalling it as one of the reasons Nixon lost the elec-
tion after Americans saw the atrocities of the Vietnam War on TV. TV is
the most influential media’8.
The first episode of Teleanalisis was released in October 1984, and it
included two reports, which portrayed events neglected by dominant media
back then, namely Jornada por la Vida, and La protesta de Septiembre. The
first item detailed a day of prayer and peaceful demonstration called by the
Catholic Church, and the second addressed the environment prior to a civil
protest. As Li~ nero pointed out, Teleanalisis represented a shift in video
making, highlighting the importance of journalism and its creators’ yearn-
ing for a TV news report rather than a militant documentary (Li~ nero,
2010, 62–63). These first two reports were indicative of the journalistic style
that Teleanalisis went on to develop. The show directly addressed socially
disadvantaged groups, making them relatable to people through the
8 R. VLADIMIR
This was a public undermining of police authority, but the union leader
argued that police officers were in fact from the same working-class back-
ground as the supermarket workers on strike. In the second scene, Evelyn,
another union leader, supports weaker union cells at various Walmart-
Lider branches across Santiago. She took charge of a branch closure,
encouraged the consumers to buy from alternative supermarkets, and even
confronted the private guards and branch manager, defending the legal
background of the strike. By presenting this sequence of events, Dennis
was able to delve into the construction of the counterpublic union worker
space. This was a space where dominant power could be confronted in
reality, and not just in a symbolic sense, such as in the Teleanalisis reports
described above. ‘I feel that Juan Carlos [the union leader with the mega-
phone] was empowered by his role of leader and well-informed of what he
can and cannot do. He knew the legal boundaries of a strike. I have seen
him in the past educating workers and students on how to deal
with strikes”11.
It is crucial to frame Dennis’ work around disadvantaged groups and
their struggle within a neoliberal context, shooting several short films that
were related to grassroots protest and political views. He explained that ‘In
October 2014, when I was walking through Santa Rosa street, I saw a strike
outside a building. I asked them what they were doing, and they answered
me they were about to vote for the strike. So, I went there the following
day, and I talked with the union leaders of SUBUS12. I told them about my
previous work in documentary filmmaking and unions and proposed to
them to cover the strike. I had a positive answer from them, later in
November from the people of Aperrando, Aperrando, and finally from the
union of Walmart-Lider in December. It was pretty quick’13.
In order to comprehend the context Dennis developed his discourse, and
how this played a vital part in representational strategy, attention needs to
be paid to how dominant media continued to neglect underprivileged
groups, even after the return to democracy. In his PhD dissertation ‘The
Media in the Chilean Transition to Democracy: Context, Process and
Evaluation (1990–2000)’, Antonio Castillo explained that ‘while the military
regime played a central role in the formation of a highly concentrated
media system; the governments of the transition [did] not develop any pol-
icy to reverse such a situation’ (2006, 195). This helped the dominant
media consolidate its presence in the public ground to the detriment of
alternative media projects. These forms of media were ‘unable to compete
in the non-regulated and highly commercial media environment, [therefore
they] were forced to close their operations leaving a profound vacuum in
the Chilean communication system’ (2006, 200). Television was subject to
transformation when it was opened up to private enterprise in the final
10 R. VLADIMIR
months of the dictatorship (Tironi and Sunkel, 2000, 186), becoming more
commercially-orientated and dependent on advertising, which encouraged
to create less critical and more entertaining content toward the end of the
1990s. No longer owned by the universities, a process of delegation
occurred in which the ownership of most audiovisual media transferred to
private enterprises. Negt and Kluge created their Theory of Delegation for
the educational arena, although it also applies for media: ‘Whereas the state
looks for effective ways of preventing the participation of left-wing groups
in the educational system, it reveals itself to be ‘liberal’ toward the privat-
ization of infrastructures of the educational and scientific sphere [ … ] by a
private educational sector that is not even geared to public interests” (1993,
70). Here, new private media owners pursued private interests that were
represented by access to massive audiences and advertisement possibilities,
reinforcing the dominant ideology, and pushing other social actors away
from nationwide coverage.
All of this was the result, in audiovisual terms, of what Sara C. Motta
wrote regarding the changing role of the Chilean Socialist Party, the PSCh,
and subsequently, the Concertacion14 Coalition. Once a counter-hegemonic
political party of the working class, it became a party of the hegemonic
state apparatus under the name of ‘modernization’: ‘The role the PSCh, as
part of the Concertacion, has played in relation to the working classes has
been one of co-opting, delegitimizing or silencing the political agency of
their subaltern base’ (2008, 318). Motta also quoted Chilean sociologist
Tomas Moulian, who commented that ‘Other choices, especially those that
present themselves as critical or alternatives to the struggle for institutional
political power, have no access, or minimal access, to political and symbolic
opportunities’ (2008, 318). This process of co-optation explains why those
in counterpublic spheres were hesitant about inheriting these elites of
the past.
In 2011, secondary and university student unions, motivated by the pro-
found neoliberal policies on education, demonstrated against the govern-
ment and demanded changes in the educational system (Cabalin, 2012).
Renato Dennis argued that this movement ‘helped the country to become
more involved in politics, allowing the appearance of more alternative
media. People [in social movements] wanted to express themselves, and the
mainstream media was not giving them enough coverage, or they were
focusing mostly on the riots that followed the peaceful protests’15.
Indeed, media coverage of social movements on mainstream networks
focused on riots, violence and enforced stereotypes, rather than dealing
with the movements’ aims16. Locally, this was clear in newspapers such as
La Tercera and El Mercurio17, and has been explained by Llanos as being
politically motivated, in order to present social movements as a menace to
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 11
publics. It is precisely in the dialectic between these two functions that their
emancipatory potential resides’ (1990, 68). In Teleanalisis’ episodes, this is
represented by how dominant media have neglected underprivileged peo-
ple, and also through the empowerment of counterpublic members and the
depiction of their self-organization. This self-organization aimed to create
an awareness of the material conditions that many underprivileged groups
faced daily and how a common strategy would provide an answer to con-
front those inequalities. The report Combiatiendo el hambre (February-
March 1985) showed the solidarity amongst women who collectively
cooked to feed their families in the slums of North and East Santiago. It
also portrayed interviews with the women in charge of organizing these
ollas comunes22, in order to uncover a solution to their unemployment and
poverty (Bilbao and Ramırez, 2017, 93). This acted as a model of liberating
communication, and it was theoretically grounded by the Brazilian philoso-
pher Paulo Freire, who influenced the creation of alternative media in
Latin America through his theory of conscientization. Clemencia Rodrıguez
stated that ‘Freire believed that certain communication strategies based on
democratic interaction, human dignity, solidarity, and empathy could liber-
ate communities from their state of alienation, passivity; and silence’ (2003,
180). Freire’s thinking permeated Latin American grassroots video projects
and empowered ordinary people to overcome their neglect by the dominant
media. This has also been the case in Cordones Audiovisuales, with the self-
organization of the counterpublic demonstrated through the union con-
fronting business owners. Kirsten Sehnbruch argued that unions in Chile
were weakened after 20 years of center-left governments, which saw an
‘increasing degree of employment flexibilization that has accompanied this
process of insertion [of the Chilean economy] into globalized and highly
competitive markets’ (2012, 10). Since unions are portrayed as weak, union
workers and their demands are not usually a subject in mainstream media
in Chile. Therefore, the Trilogıa de la Insurreccion Laboral is an example of
Freire’s terms in practice.
Rephrasing Habermas, it is possible to state that during Pinochet’s
regime there was a (unique) public sphere, but instead of ‘the dictatorship
of the bourgeoisie’ (Negt and Kluge, 1993, 55), there was a dominant class
who held and led the public sphere, made up of the oligarchy who sup-
ported the coup in 197323. The control of this public sphere was enforced
by repressive means such as curfews, the imprisonment of opponents, and
more subtly by media control. This (single) public sphere would remain
relevant in the transition toward democracy due to unchanged media own-
ership, and it would be enforced through the neglect of underprivileged
groups and their demands, and ultimately the removal of political discus-
sion on screen. Sunkel and Geoffrey (2001, 147) have explained that
14 R. VLADIMIR
toward Freire’s claim. This enabled it to address the issues and interests of
its audience, involving active participation from the viewer, and in this
case, the oppositional public. In Moreno’s case, it exercised the displacing
of the hegemony of the image-producer, making the subject active in their
own discursive construction.
Beyond Atton’s framework, which considers production and distribu-
tion, Atkinson also incorporated Jennifer Rauch’s idea of the audience’s
interpretation within alternative media interaction. In this respect,
‘alternative media is not so much an issue of content or organizational
practices of production, as much as it is the interpretative strategies
through which audiences read it’ (Atkinson 2010, 17, 40). The subjects
addressed represent the audience, and in the case of Teleanalisis, many
of their episodes were able to meet the concerns of the subaltern coun-
terpublics. Therefore, the audience participates in the production process
by providing the guidelines on what the production team might address,
taking into consideration the audience’s interest–that is, the interests of
the counterpublic. In the context of the technological gap of the 1980s,
alternative media producers were symbolically appointed by the oppos-
itional public as they possessed the means to create a new kind of
media, allowing the audience to actively participate, as described by
Moreno and used in El Agua Bajo el Cielo. However, this task should
not be understood as a moral duty or a tacit mandate, but instead as
how specific circumstances—the availability of means–can allow a spe-
cific group of people—the producers of content—to provide the oppos-
itional public access to an unheard voice.
The strategies employed by Teleanalisis, including engaging with the
community directly, were not without their technological difficulties. By
the time the Cordones Audiovisuales’ documentaries were filmed in 2014,
however, video technology had been made available for the masses. In the
words of Michael Chanan, ‘one of the reasons digital video makes a differ-
ence is that production can be achieved in highly economic budgets by
small, agile units with highly flexible skills and working practices.’ (Michael
Chanan, 2007, 9) This allowed Dennis not only to move across the strikes
more efficiently but also to let the subject carry the camera and tell their
own story, such as in a video diary format. This technique was used in El
Piquete del 5–6 in a scene where the union leaders held the camera in a car
and passed it to Vikingo, a unionized Walmart-Lider worker who was
tasked with physically repelling the guards in case of confrontation.
Vikingo explained his role to the camera while the rest of the members in
the car talked to each other in the background about planning the closure
of the branch they were about to visit. Dennis justified this creative deci-
sion in both representational and discursive terms: ‘I do not believe in the
16 R. VLADIMIR
that would enable the creation of alternative media that is not financially
dependent (2007, 279–280). The differences between the two forms of alter-
native media are apparent, with Teleanalisis being a journalistic job, with
its staff being paid and working in rented office spaces. Cordones
Audiovisuales, meanwhile, embraced an activist stand that saw the money
being used mainly for editing purposes, with the crew receiving little reim-
bursement. As Dennis explained, in the case of ‘El piquete del 5–6 people
financed the documentary with a number between 200 and 300 lucas
($200.000 and $300.000 CLP35), which I used to pay the editor. The money
went to production, to editing and a few other expenses’36. In a hyper lib-
eralized economy, underground media is forced to find creative ways to
fund its existence, since ‘under capitalism, without money, alternative
media production rests on the self-exploitation of media producers, low-
cost production techniques and the usage of alternative distribution chan-
nels’ (Sandoval and Fuchs, 2010, 143). This is more visible in Dennis’ case,
since he is the director, screenwriter, cameraman and producer.
Nevertheless, there were problems with De la Sala de Clases a la Lucha de
Clases, as there was no funding plan. Therefore its post-production was
forced to stop many times37.
As with the work of Teleanalisis, the funding source and the expected
representational strategy were also able to blur the purpose of alternative
media in creating an oppositional public. As in Teleanalisis’ Evangelical
Church item, Dennis also faced issues with how information was presented.
In the closing of his film A Fierro, the outcome of the strike was described
during the midst of a meeting of workers/bus drivers from Santiago’s pub-
lic transport system. Dennis commented: ‘I feel this documentary did not
show what really happened. Months later, I found out that many of the
agreements reached during the strike negotiations were not fully imple-
mented. I showed a victorious ending in that documentary as they achieved
what they were looking for … The union financed the documentary, so it
was subject to their leaders’ approval. It was not about censorship, but
ultimately the triumph the union said they achieved was not real’38. Dennis
decided later to add a corollary at the end of A Fierro, which detailed that
the ‘general feeling on the strike’s outcome is that it did not fulfill all work-
ers’ demands. However, union strength in this strike is a triumph for syn-
dicalism and workers organizations for future negotiations, hopefully, with
better results for worker’’.
Group Comedia have cited the British example of how the alternative
press ‘has failed to create any secure economic foundation for its continued
existence” (1984, 98–99), especially on a long-term basis. The sector is in a
state of precariousness, with the financing of alternative media potentially
dependent on the same methods as dominant media, which would see its
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 19
Distribution
The material infrastructures of circulation present both in Teleanalisis and
Cordones Audiovisuales did not need their content to be spread in order to
reach the nation. Besides, this media’s goal, especially in the cases analyzed
here, is to reveal what dominant media neglects about counterpublics and
therefore to develop a discourse attractive enough to discuss, in political
and in agitational terms. Thus, despite different times and technological
developments, there was a shared spirit behind getting a discourse circula-
ted–namely, to overcome the infrastructures of dominant media distribu-
tion through alternative means, preferably at a low cost. However, since
disadvantaged groups lack the resources of dominant groups, ‘no product
of the alternative press can ever hope to reach circulation figures compar-
able with its mainstream counterparts.’ (Atton, 2002, 39).
Following Atton’s typology, a number of elements can be found in the
process of alternative media; the distributive use, the transformed social
relations, and the transformed communication process (2002, 27). While
these three elements are outside of the product itself, its construction can
be fed in part from the last two elements. Nevertheless, in this article, dis-
tribution will be understood as a whole category, and it is used in order to
establish whether or not is possible to see if a recognizable public space
can be created through the circulation of texts.
Distribution here considers Fraser’s concept of stratified societies, which
are ‘societies whose basic institutional framework generates unequal social
groups in structural relations of dominance and subordination’ (1990, 66).
This concept is drawn upon in the section Representational Strategies
regarding the subject, and it details their depiction and involvement in
trading with the image-maker. It works here to describe the social charac-
teristics of the counterpublic sphere, and it is used to demonstrate when
20 R. VLADIMIR
the circulated text has, in terms of power relations within the same group,
been able to highlight how ‘the proliferation of subaltern counterpublics
means a widening of discursive contestation’ (Fraser, 1990, 67). A particu-
lar audience is one of the definitions Michael Warner used to explain what
the public is (among many others), which in the case of the counterpublic
is also defined as a ‘self-organized space by discourse’ (2002, 75).
Therefore, horizontality, which is primarily acknowledged throughout this
article as referring to the strategies that underground media use to produce
texts, could also be applied to distribution, as its circulation plan does not
reflect the vertical strategies that dominant media applies in developing a
network dependent on passive spectatorship.
Teleanalisis took advantage of video technology as a tool for overcoming
censorship, but also because of its nascent massiveness–at least, amongst
organizations. This strategy was inspired by the experience of the Ayatollah
Khomeini’s communication strategy during his exile in Paris. Fernando
Paulsen, Teleanalisis’ first director, explained that ‘[The Sha] had imported
copy machines for Iranian public offices. Therefore, he had developed a
strong technological network based on copy machines, which was assessed
by the Ayatollah. So, after [the Ayatollah] made his speech, it was transmit-
ted via phone, transcribed and later photocopied in all public offices. Next
day, the Ayatollah’s message had reached all of Iran. He used his oppo-
nent’s technology for his own purposes’ (Paulsen interviewed by Garate
and Navarrete, 2002, 59). This idea is supported by Sorensen (2009), who
mentions Anabelle Sreberny-Mohammadi and Ali Mohammadi’s claim of
spearheading the photocopy plan, and how it was used to oppose state-
controlled television in Iran (25). As mentioned, during the 1980s, video
technology was imported from the United States to Chile, and it helped
create an emerging consumption of tapes in the marketplace during the
last years of the dictatorship.
Teleanalisis was produced on tape, and it was impossible to broadcast it
through traditional means or rent it out on tape from a video store.
Instead, a clandestine distribution network was created. The person put in
charge of this task was Cristian Cruz, who developed a network of sub-
scribers who were provided with a VHS tape containing Teleanalisis’ latest
episode (Li~ nero, 2010, 60). An essential number of Teleanalisis’ subscribers
were local NGOs who had the chance to access the tapes for free and on
request (Garate and Navarrete, 2002, 59), a strategy that helped spread the
message among oppositional publics in the early stages. Expanding on this,
Cristian Cruz explained that there were ‘300 subscribers which meant 300
places where Teleanalisis was being screened. Plus, we also had a rental sys-
tem for different organizations or students. We also borrowed movies that
had been banned in Chile, like Missing39‘(Cruz interviewed by Garate and
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 21
have been replicated across unions, high schools, and community centers
in Santiago, with communal moments occurring when the circulation of
the text enables people to participate in a reflexive process during the post-
screening talk. Michael Warner explored these examples of social discus-
sion that creates the counterpublic: ‘Between the discourse that comes
before and the discourse that comes after, one must postulate some link.
Furthermore, the link has a social character; it is not mere consecu-
tiveness in time, but a context of interaction’ (2005, 62). That social
character can be found in the exchanges between participant members
from other counterpublics (using a broader meaning of this term), and
how they have regarded the subjects depicted in the trilogy. According
to Dennis, all three documentaries were first shown to the unions
involved, but the workers already held ‘preexisting views’ toward the
films. A growing active audience related to social injustices of any
kind–namely, any subaltern counterpublic–can widen the reflexive circu-
lation of the texts.
However, the online platforms where Dennis uploads his films help him
to pursue a more decentralized scheme. Also, uploading his documentaries
is a strategy that subsequently seeks to generate an archive of labor strug-
gle. ‘I have the feeling these works are always present. Although these
works were seen when I released them, they can be watched by a special-
ized audience, students, scholars … I feel they are works which will be val-
ued throughout time, like a memory. I feel they are not currently valued in
that way’44.
Screenings that include group meetings for discussions are a common
strategy in distributing alternative media because it allows for a more
intimate dialog amongst the members of an audience both during, and
after, the screening. The (not so) public screenings of Teleanalisis were
held by a number of subscribed NGOs and the Vicariate of Solidarity,
which helped to distribute more copies of Teleanalisis to their branches
across Chile. Unlike Cordones Audiovisuales, the stakes were higher for
viewers of these films, with participants risking prosecution.45
As well as distributing VHS copies on a monthly basis, the team behind
Teleanalisis were also interested in producing their own screenings, similar
to the Ictus’ experience.46 This was possible thanks to the financial support
of the Italian Cooperation Agency COSV, which allowed the team to
acquire a mobile exhibition unit in mid-1989 (after the October 1998 pleb-
iscite that was lost by Pinochet). The unit was used in the regions of
Santiago and Valparaiso in order to spread Teleanalisis’ work, which by
that time was widely known among Pinochet’s opponents. Therefore, it had
a more discursive meaning, since they did not apply for a permit to set up
the unit in the public space. According to Fernando Acu~ na, ‘we arrived in
24 R. VLADIMIR
Conclusion
Chile has experienced a slow transition from a dictatorship to a democracy.
The process can be defined by Modonesi’s Gramsci-inspired concept of
Passive Revolution, which explains how Center or Center-Left governments
in South America prioritize political stability over pluralist speech, espe-
cially when the local aristocracy remain alongside military power. This path
‘involve[d] a process of modernization pushed forward from above, which
partially and carefully recognizes demands coming from those positioned
below; through this process, the state managers guarantee the passivity and
silence of the popular movements rather than their complicity’ (cited in
Webber, 2016, 1859–1860). Thus, after 1990, the new democratic govern-
ment managed to push counterpublics to the side, taking their support
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 25
Notes
1. As explained at the beginning of the Introduction, Augusto Pinochet called for a
referendum to ask the people if he could remain in power. The options were Si and
No (Yes and No). The Si campaign was headed by the government, while the
opposition led the No campaign. This campaign also considered a 20-minute-long
political broadcast, 10 minutes each, called Franja. This was the first time the
opposition could access mainstream media. A fictional feature film about this
campaign was released in 2012 called ‘No’ directed by Pablo Larrain, starring Gael
Garcıa Bernal and Luis Gnecco, and which was nominated for an Academy Award.
2. ‘The Clinic’ is a satirical weekly-newspaper created after Augusto Pinochet’s
indictment and arrest in London on October 10th, 1998. ‘The Clinic’ was named after
London Clinic’s sign above the main door, the place where Pinochet remained
hospitalized until he was transferred to Virginia Waters.
3. Nevertheless, in Chilean media it is common for the Copper Industry workers’ strikes
to receive a lot of attention, since the country has been the world’s top copper
producer for over 30 years, and almost 50% of the country’s exports come from
copper-related products. It is common to see Copper Industry strikes portrayed in
dominant media in terms of the damage they cause to the nation’s economy.
4. Underground press. (2006). In P. H. Collin (Ed.), Dictionary of publishing and
printing (3rd ed.). London, UK: A&C Black. Retrieved from https://search.
credoreference.com/content/entry/acbpublishing/underground_press/0?institution
Id=1872
28 R. VLADIMIR
5. One of the intended interviewees for this research, Augusto G ongora, was diagnosed
with Alzheimer in 2017 and kept the news a secret. He recently went public about his
illness in late July 2018. Others, like Manuel Puerto, who took part in Teleanalisis’
distribution scheme, or Dragomir Yankovic, who brought the idea of video making to
Teleanalisis, have died.
6. Emision was a publishing house anchoring Analisis magazine and Teleanalisis.
7. CNI or Central Nacional de Informaciones (National Centre of Informations) was
Pinochet’s intelligence service between 1977 and 1990.
8. Interview with Fernando Acu~ na, June 29, 2018.
9. The prime example of this type of TV was 60 Minutos (60 Minutes), broadcasted by
TVN from 1977 to 1988.
10. Vicariate of Solidarity was a human rights organization of the Chilean Catholic
Church during Pinochet’s regime. Its best-known leader was Cardinal Ra ul
Silva Henrıquez.
11. Interview with Renato Dennis, July 31, 2018.
12. SUBUS is one of the transport groups that operate in Santiago’s public
transport system.
13. Interview with Renato Dennis, July 3, 2018.
14. Concertacion was a political coalition integrated by Socialists, Radical Social
Democrats and Christian Democrats that organized opposition to Pinochet in
institutional terms and ruled Chile after Pinochet left office, between 1990 and 2010.
15. Interview with Renato Dennis, July 3rd, 2018.
16. An example on this in English can be found in The Guardian’s coverage: https://
www.theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/05/chile-student-protests-violence
17. El Mercurio is the most influential newspaper in Chile. During Allende’s government
between 1970 and 1973, El Mercurio was a platform for the destabilization of
Allende’s politics by the US Foreign Policy (Alvear and Lugo-Ocando, 2016).
18. GOPE (Grupo de Operaciones Especiales; Special Task Force) is the high-risk wing of
the Chilean police force. It is widespread in Chile to call GOPE for a bomb scare
when a group of people seeks disruption.
19. Interview with Renato Dennis, July 31, 2018.
20. Palın is a traditional sport played by the Mapuche people in southern Chile with
cultural purposes. It is similar to hockey.
21. Interview with Rodrigo Moreno, July 26, 2018.
22. Ollas comunes were self-organized soup kitchens which, according to Chilean
anthropologist Clarisa Hardy, were created in the context of poverty to overcome low
salaries. Although relevant during Pinochet time, they first appeared after the Great
Depression in Chile between 1930 and 1932.
23. Negt and Kluge’s definition considers a developed industrial society such as the
German one. However, the reframing within the Chilean context bears in mind the
lack of industrialism in the national economy, which was mostly composed of
agricultural landowners.
24. Interview with Fernando Acu~ na, June 29, 2018.
25. Interview with Marcelo Ferrari, August 1, 2018.
26. Interview with Rodrigo Moreno, July 26, 2018.
27. Tomas, regarding educational buildings, refers to the act of students occupying the
building (the department or faculty) and preventing professors or administrative
personnel from entering it. It is a common pressure measure amongst students
in Chile.
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 29
Work Cited
Alvear, F. J., & Lugo-Ocando, J. When Geopolitics Becomes Moral Panic: El Mercurio and
the Use of International News as Propaganda Against Salvador Allende’s Chile
(1970–1973). Media History, 22, no. 1 (2016): 1–19.
Atkinson, J. D. 2010. Alternative media and politics of resistance: A communication perspec-
tive. New York: Peter Lang.
Atton, C. 2002. Alternative Media. London: SAGE.
30 R. VLADIMIR
Azkanius, T. 2012. Radical Online Video: YouTube, Video Activism and Social Movement
Media Practices. (PhD diss). Lund Studies in Media and Communcation, 17.
Bailey, O. G., B. Cammaert, and N. Carpentier. 2007. Understanding alternative media.
Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bilbao Carcamo, J., and N. Ramırez Baeza. “Television y construcci
on de memorias: el caso
de las mujeres pobladoras de Santiago Oriente, en Teleanalisis y Sabados Gigantes
(1985–1987).” Goliardos, Revista estudiantil de Investigaciones Historicas (2017) 88–95.
Bowers, S. R. “Pinochet’s Plebiscite and the Catholics: The Dual Role of the Chilean
Church.” World Affairs 151, no. 2 (1988): 51–58.
Cabalin, C. “Neoliberal Education and Student Movements in Chile: Inequalities and
Malaise.” Policy Futures in Education 10, no. 2 (2012): 219–228. doi:10.2304/pfie.2012.10.
2.219
Castillo, A. 2006. The Media in the Chilean Transition to Democracy: Context, Process and
Evaluation (1990–2000). Accessed May 6, 2012. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.
au/. islandora/object/uws%3A3652/datastream/PDF/view
Chanan, M. 2004. Cuban cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chanan, M. 2007. The Politics of Documentary. London: BFI.
Comedia. “The Alternative Press: The Development of Underdevelopment.” Media, Culture
& Society 6, no. 2 (1984): 95–102.
Diamond, L. “Liberation Technologies.” Journal of Democracy 21, no. 3 (2010): 69–83.
Fraser, N. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of.” Social Text,
25/26 (1990): 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240
Garate, R., and J. L. Navarrete. 2002. Teleanalisis: El registro no oficial de una epoca.
(Diss). Universidad Diego Portales.
Garreton Merino, M. A. “Redemocratization in Chile.” Journal of Democracy 6, no. 1
(1995): 146–158. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0009
Herrscher, R. (2019, December 12). Chile desperto, es momento de que despierte el period-
ismo. Accessed May 6, 2012. https://www.nytimes.com/es/2019/12/12/espanol/opinion/
medios-protestas-chile.html.
Kn€ odler-Bunte, E., S. Lennox, and F. Lennox. “The Proletarian Public Sphere and Political
Organization: An Analysis of Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge’s the Public Sphere and
Experience.” New German Critique, 4 (1975): 51–75. doi:10.2307/487817
Labbe, P. S. L. “Videoactivismo, denuncia y (contra) memorias.” Resistencia polıtica en los
colectivos documentales durante la dictadura chilena. Archivos de la Filmoteca 73 (2017):
139–156.
Leung, D. K., and F. L. Lee. “Cultivating an Active Online Counterpublic: Examining
Usage and Political Impact of Internet Alternative Media.” The International Journal of
Press/Politics 19, no. 3 (2014): 340–359. doi:10.1177/1940161214530787
Li~
nero, G. 2010. Apuntes para una historia del video en Chile. Santiago: Ocho Libros.
Llanos Reyes, C. 2015. Criminalizaci on mediatica de los movimientos sociales y la
protesta social en Chile. (Master diss). Universidad Alberto Hurtado de Chile. Retrieved
from: http://repositorio.uahurtado.cl/bitstream/handle/11242/8094/MESPLLlanos.pdf?se-
quence=1.
Milioni, D. L. “Probing the Online Counterpublic Sphere: The Case of Indymedia Athens.”
Media, Culture & Society 31, no. 3 (2009): 409–431. doi:10.1177/0163443709102714
Motta, S. C. “The Chilean Socialist Party (PSCh): Constructing Consent and Disarticulating
Dissent to Neo-Liberal Hegemony in Chile.” The British Journal of Politics and
International Relations 10, no. 2 (2008): 303–327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00294.x
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FILM AND VIDEO 31
Negt, O., and A. Kluge. 1993. Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the
Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rodrıguez, C. “The Bishop and His Star: Citizens’ Communication in Southern Chile.”
Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World Lanham: Rowman
and Littlefield. (2003): 177–194.
Rodrıguez, C., and P. D. Murphy. “The Study of Communication and Culture in Latin
America: From Laggards and the Oppressed to Resistance and Hybrid Cultures.” Journal
of International Communication 4, no. 2 (1997): 24–45. doi:10.1080/13216597.1997.
9751853
Sandoval, M., and C. Fuchs. “Towards a Critical Theory of Alternative Media.” Telematics
and Informatics 27, no. 2 (2010): 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2009.06.011
Sunkel, G. and E. Geoffroy. 2001. Concentracion economica de los medios de comunicacion.
Santiago: Ediciones Lom.
Sehnbruch, K. (2012). Unable to Shape the Political Arena: The Impact of Poor Quality
Employment on Unions in Post- Transition Chile, Dev-out Working Paper Series, No. 4
Pages1-32
Sorensen, K. 2009. Media, Memory, and Human Rights in Chile. Berlin: Springer.
Stern, S. 2006. Battling for Hearts and Minds: Memory Struggles in Pinochet’s Chile
1973–1988. Durham: Duke University Press.
Tadeo Fuica, B., and E. Ramırez Soto. “Punk” Use of Video in Latin America: Audiovisual
Resistance and Rebellious Youth in Chile and Uruguay.” Quarterly Review of Film and
Video 32, no. 8 (2015): 712–727. doi:10.1080/10509208.2015.1061879
Tironi, E., and G. Sunkel. “The Modernization of Communications: The Media in the
Transition to Democracy in Chile.” Democracy and the Media: A Comparative
Perspective 22, (2000): 165–194.
Traverso, A., and T. Crowder-Taraborrelli. 2015. El documental polıtico en Argentina, Chile
y Uruguay. Santiago: Ediciones Lom.
Warner, M. 2005. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone.
Webber, J. R. “Evo Morales and the Political Economy of Passive Revolution in Bolivia,
2006–15.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 10 (2016): 1855–1876. doi:10.1080/01436597.
2016.1175296