Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
Copyright 0 1976 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.SA.
r's0 \
IL ~
~ ~~~\Pulse
V' Autolysin
Al!'60 60 -
Addition
cc~~~~~~~~N
Omirt
6 40 Continuous\
Minutes
20 40 0 20
,VV X I I I I
A. Continuous 0a B. Pulse
0o0
80- 0
0\ o *
0.P 8\.
o* 450
%6o~~~ N
14C o
0
40 \0
0
FIG. 4. Susceptibility of new and old cell wall to added autolytic activity in SLS-inactivated cell walls. A
culture of Nil5 was grown in 10 ml of medium containing 60 [14C]GlnAc to an OD of 0.23 before being
harvested by filtration. A second culture was grown in 10 ml of medium containing 60 pM [14C]GlnAc to an
OD of020 before being filtered, and the cells were suspended in 10 ml of medium containing 4 pM ['4C]GlnAc
(specific activity, 250 juCiIpmol). After 0.15 generations (3 min), the culture was harvested by filtration. An
identical amount of carrier cells (ca. 02 g, dry weight) was added to both samples of harvested cells, and SLS-
inactivated walls were prepared as described. 6.1 mg and 4.7 mg of cell wall from continuously (A) and pulse-
labeled (B) cells, respectively, were lysed by the addition of 0.2 ml of a soluble autolysate (20 mg of autolyzed
wallIml), prepared as described (13), in a total volume of 6.0 ml. The details of lysis conditions and
sampling are described in Materials and Methods. Insoluble radioactivity (0) and OD45 (-) values are shown
0
as a percentage of those at zero time plotted against time. All the values for pulse-labeled wall lysis have been
multiplied by 0.78 (i.e., 4.716.1) to obtain the rate of lysis at an equal autolysate concentration to that of the
continuously labeled cell wall lysis. One hundred percent radioactivity for (A) was 2.95 x 104 dpm/mg and
was 2.74 x 104 dpm/mg for (B).
1144 POOLEY J. BACTERIOL.
Minutes differences in the rate of solubilization of wall
of different ages might be explained by a time-
dependent maturation process in vivo. How-
ever, such a hypothesis would not explain the
immediate susceptibility in vitro of new wall.
0
.Q In addition, since any such process would be
arrested during wall isolation, this hypothesis
a
is not compatible with the uniform susceptibil-
ity shown by at least 90% of the wall in vitro
C5 (Fig. 4A and 5). I therefore believe that the lysis
curves shown in Fig. 6 indicate that there are
major differences in accessibility to externally
added autolytic activity of cell wall fractions of
different ages. The most accessible wall was
that two generations old, followed by newly
10 I 00 O 'C \ '
80 00
0~ ~ ~
0
I ~~~~~0
%6o ~~0%A 0
ODQ450 %
0O0.
45045 %~~~~~~
%
0 %
40 0~~~~
FIG. 6. Variation in susceptibility of cell wall material of different ages to autolytic attack in isolated SLS-
inactivated wall preparations. Nil5 was grown in 12 ml ofmedium containing 50 M GlnAc to an OD of0.19
before being filtered. The cells were suspended in 12 ml of medium containing 10 M ['4CJGlnAc (specific
activity, 170 juCil,umol). After 0.2 generations (4 min), 4 ml of the culture was filtered, and the cells were
mixed with carrier cells and SLS-inactivated walls prepared as described. The remaining 8 ml was filtered (at
4.5 min), the cells were suspended in 25 ml of unlabeled medium, and growth was allowed to continue.
Samples (10 ml) were filtered at one-half generation (10.5 min) (B) and two generations (41 min) (C) after
resuspension in nonradioactive medium. An equal amount ofcarrier cells (ca. 0.15 g, dry weight) was added
to all samples, and SLS-inactivated walls were prepared. A 6-mg amount of walls from all samples (A, B, and
C) were lysed by the addition of 0.16 ml of a preparation of soluble autolysate (20 mg ofautolyzed wallIml).
For details of lysis and sampling, see Materials and Methods. The insoluble radioactivity (0) and OD 450 (0)
as a percentage of zero time values are plotted against time. One hundred percent radioactivity was 1.25, 2.1,
and 2.2 x 104 dpm/mg of wall, for the samples isolated at zero time (A), at one-half (B), and at two generations
(C), respectively.
Minutes plies that it has bound a higher concentration of
100 10 20 30 40 enzyme, a result expected for a superficial
layer. However, the rate of release of radioac-
tivity relative to overall wall lysis for newly
80 incorporated wall is slower than that of wall
two generations old. This may partly reflect the
physical state of the cell wall preparation. The
inner surface may have bound a lower concen-
60 "x0.D450 tration of added enzyme because of reduced
_ accessibility relative to the outer surface, in
view of the many long, relatively intact tubes
40 present in the cell wall preparation.
1tt4c I believe that the explanation for the differ-
20 I added to a large excess (ca. 0.35 g, dry weight) of
FIG. 7. Lysis of SLS-inactivated cell wall isolated unlabeled carrier cells, and SLS-inactivated walls
from a continuously labeled culture of Nil5 after two were prepared. A 6.0-mg amount of walls was lysed
generations of growth in unlabeled medium. The by the addition of 0.20 ml of a cell wall autolysate (20
growth medium contained 55 pM ['4CJGlnAc (spe- mg of wall/mI) in a total volume of 6.0 ml. Lysis was
cific activity, 5.5 pJAilmol). The culture was filtered measured as described in Materials and Methods.
at an OD of 0.2 after six generations of growth on The OD 450 (0) and insoluble radioactivity (0) as
labeled medium. The cells were suspended at an OD percentage of zero time values are plotted against
of 0.06 and allowed to grow in the chase medium for time; 100% radioactivity was 2.7 x 104 dpmlmg
two generations (40 min) before being refiltered and per ml.
f. , ~
1146 POOLEY J. BACTERIOL.
ent patterns of release of wall of different ages and new wall throughout the cell wall layer
found in this study lies in the geometry of the (Fig. 9A), or with new and old wall distributed
cell wall layer. The present results are consist- in a single, discrete anular band (Fig. 9B), or
ent with a pattern of flow of cell wall material even with multiple bands (Fig. 9C) oriented
during growth (shown schematically in Fig. 8) around either axis of the rod. However, the pref-
in which pulse-labeled mucopeptide, initially erential binding of autolytic activity to old wall
incorporated at or near the membrane, passes is consistent with a higher surface concentra-
out through the thickness of the cell wall layer, tion of old wall (Fig. 9D). If this interpretation
only reaching the outer surface one and one- is correct, it has considerable implications for
half generations after incorporation, largely in the conclusions drawn from the many attempts
the form of a layer. The proposed arrangement to determine the pattern of insertion of new cell
(Fig. 8) of cell wall of different ages also pro- wall material during surface growth in bacilli.
vides an explanation for the failure of pulse- It is implicit in current ideas of how the bacte-
labeled wall to be turned over in the parent for rial cell surface grows that it is possible to
one and one-half generations if turnover is re- distinguish newly synthesized wall from older
s
__________ ____________ ____________ ---cell wall
4-pulse :_i____
________ .
/-%|~memnbrane
4-cytoplasm
0 3' 2gen.
FIG. 8. Schematic model for the position of pulse label within the cell wall layer, at various times (zero,
a
one-half, and two generations) during growth after pulse incorporation.
VOL. 125, 1976 AGE-DETERMINED LAYERS IN THE CELL WALL 1147
wall by some suitable labeling procedure, by LITERATURE CITED
autoradiography (2, 10), or by means of fluores- 1. Boothby, D., L. Daneo-Moore, M. L. Higgins, J. Coy-
cein-labeled antibody (5, 6, 8). Such procedures ette, and G. D. Shockman. 1971. Turnover of bacte-
have been used most clearly in streptococcal rial cell wall peptidoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 248:2161-
2169.
species (6) to show a clear distribution of zones 2. Briles, E. B., and A. Tomasz. 1970. Radioautographic
of old and new wall. However, extension of evidence for equatorial growth in gram positive bac-
these methods to the bacilli has failed to yield a teria. J. Cell. Biol. 47:786-790.
single unambiguous answer (4, 5, 7, 8, 12). The 3. Chaloupka, J. 1967. Synthesis and degradation of sur-
face structures by growing and non-growing Bacillus
arrangement of the cell wall proposed in this megaterium. Folia Microbiol. 12:264-273.
work suggests that it is not possible to regard 4. Chung, R. L. 1967. Autoradiographic studies of bacte-
the entire wall thickness lying between the rial cell wall replication. I. Cell wall growth in the
membrane and the outer surface as being syn- presence of chloramphenicol. Can. J. Microbiol.
13:341-350.
thesized within a fairly small fraction of a gen- 5. Chung, R. L., R. Z. Hawirko, and P. K. Isaac. 1964.
eration and which segregates as a discrete unit Cell wall growth ofBacillus cereus and Bacillus meg-