Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C C A A L Q: For Tentative Publication in Volume X, Issue X, 20XX Reviewed By: John Doe
C C A A L Q: For Tentative Publication in Volume X, Issue X, 20XX Reviewed By: John Doe
INITIAL REVIEW
1. CONTENT
2. COHERENCE
The argument flows smoothly. There is no as such inconsistency in the flow of
arguments. The conclusion goes well with the article. However, there are a few sub-
sections where the article loses its pace.
3. RELEVANCE
An Ethiopian has authored this article. There have been very few instances when
anything is written on the African jurisprudence of Constitution. Therefore, it is
highly relevant.
4. LANGUAGE
The language used is very simple. It is very easy to understand. He has elaborated a
lot of things which seems like a lecture. But holistically, it is satisfactory.
1
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW QUARTERLY
5. STRUCTURE
It is a well-structured article. The article is properly separated into sections and sub-
sections. There are instances when arguments are not that well-structure in the sub-
sections.
6. ORIGINALITY
The idea as well as the content is original. (Open Source) Dicey’s and Stephenson’s
books need to be checked for plagiarism.
7. DECISION
Accepted. However, I think that the article can be published but only after he cites all
the sources. The article has to be trimmed. There are a few other changes that are
possible regarding the structure.