NLIU LAW REVIEW

FEEDBACK FORM

Manuscript Code: <U(158)L>

Area of Law: <Sedition Law>
General Comments:

<Accepted. While generally good, the author's grammar and language use could b

Grammar/Language
[Does the author use correct grammar? Is the author’s language clear and compelling? Does the
author avoid making use of sentences that are difficult to follow?]

The author's grammar and language use are generally good, but some sentence structure complexity
hinders readability. For example, in the abstract, the phrase "such is the way colonial practices are
embedded within the local culture" could be rephrased for clarity. Throughout the article, there are
instances of repetitive phrases like "nevertheless" and "however" that can be reduced for smoother
reading. Further, some sentences have typographical errors, missing spaces, or other minor issues. A
thorough proofreading of the article is necessary to correct these issues and ensure a polished final
product.

Structure/Logical Coherence
[Does the author outline the structure of his work and proceed systematically? Is the author’s
approach the correct approach to the research question? Has the author been able to link different
parts of his/her argument together logically?]

The article follows a logical structure and effectively outlines the historical background, challenges,
and solutions related to the Sedition Law. The author's approach to addressing the research
question is appropriate, and the article flows smoothly from one section to another. Using headings
for each section helps maintain a clear structure and ensures that different parts of the argument
are linked together logically.
Contribution to Existing Literature
[What is the author’s contribution to the subject? Has the author built on the existing literature on
the subject in such a way as to contribute something new? Has the author explained something in a
novel way?]

The author makes a significant contribution to the subject matter by providing a comprehensive
analysis of the Sedition Law's history and its relevance in contemporary India. The discussion on the
balance between Judicial Activism and the Legislative Role is particularly insightful. The article
succeeds in explaining complex concepts in a novel and accessible way, making it valuable to both
experts in the field and a broader readership.

Contemporary Relevance
[Does the subject matter relate to an issue in the past year? Has the subject matter been linked to
the present day in any way if it is not of contemporary significance?]

The subject matter of the article is of contemporary relevance, especially given the recent cases and
debates surrounding the Sedition Law in India. The author effectively connects the historical context
to present-day issues, highlighting the importance of revisiting and reforming this law in light of
current socio-political scenarios.

Referencing and research

[How well-researched is the article? Has the author used references to support his/her arguments in
the right places? Has the author avoided redundant referencing? What is the quality of the
references?]

The article is well-researched and appropriately references relevant cases and scholars to support
the arguments presented. Using references enhances the credibility of the article and provides
readers with additional resources for further exploration. However, there are instances where the
author could improve the quality of references by providing more detailed citations, including
publication dates and specific sources.