Evaluation of the Literature Review:

1. Relevance and Focus:

The literature review is relevant and focused on the topic of participation and language in
International Business. It clearly defines the concepts of participation and language ideologies
and provides detailed information on how these two factors interact within organizations. The
review remains focused on the chosen topic throughout, avoiding unnecessary tangents or
digressions.

2. Thematic Organization:

The review is well-organized thematically, with clear headings and subheadings that guide the
reader through different aspects of the topic. The use of headings such as "Language Ideologies,"
"Participation and language in IB," and "Summary of literature review" effectively signal the
organization of the review.

3. Signalled Organization in Introductory Paragraph:

The introductory paragraph clearly outlines the overall organization of the review and provides a
brief overview of the key topics that will be covered. This gives the reader a clear understanding
of the structure and flow of the review.

4. Up-to-date:

The review includes references to recent publications, indicating that the authors have consulted
the latest research on the topic. This demonstrates that the authors are aware of the current state
of knowledge in the field.

5. Critical:

The review critically evaluates the existing literature, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and
gaps in knowledge. This demonstrates the authors' ability to think critically about the research
and identify areas for further investigation. The review identifies the need to consider societal-
level factors such as language ideologies to understand the dynamics of inclusion, exclusion, and
participation in organizations.

6. Brought to a Close:

The review is brought to a close by summarizing the key findings and highlighting the research
gap that the authors aim to address. This provides a clear sense of closure and direction for the
study.

7. Research Gap:
The research gap arises naturally from the analysis of the existing literature. The authors identify
a lack of attention to the influence of societal-level factors such as language ideologies on micro-
level participation in organizations. This provides a clear justification for the proposed research
and demonstrates the need for further investigation in this area.

Overall:

This literature review is well-written, informative, and effectively addresses the key
characteristics of a good literature review. It provides a strong foundation for the proposed
research and demonstrates the authors' understanding of the relevant literature.