You are on page 1of 2

GNLU LAW REVIEW

EVALUATION FORM
Code No: 80
Title of the Article: Discarding Originalism in the Context of Reservation System in
India
General Comments:While the overall article is well-written, I don’t think it worth
publishing.

Scoring guidelines:
1-4 = Poor | 5-7 = Average | 8-10 = Good

Grammar/Language
Marks 8/10
[What kind of language does the author use and how is his/her grammar?]
The language used is standard and proper. It is also easily comprehensible and
grammatically accurate.

Structure/Logical Coherence
Marks 5/10
[What is the aim of the article? Has the author developed a structure which will help him
achieve his aim? Overall, how is the analysis and structure?]
The structure of the article is good and proper. The author has however, not developed a
definite structure which would assist him/her in realizing the aim of the article. The analysis
is average.

Contribution to Existing Literature


Marks 4/10
[What is the author’s contribution to the subject? What is original about the article?]
The author has provided an overview of the development of reservation system in India.
However, the author has not properly put forth his own analysis, since it is essential that some
sort of analysis and interpretation is done on such a broad and wide topic. The content mainly
has a descriptive tone, however no proper interpretation.

Contemporary Relevance
Marks 6/10
[If the subject matter is relevant to the present day? If yes,please explain how]
The subject-matter is relevant and contemporary. However, the lack of interpretation done in
by the author diminishes its novelty and quality.

Referencing and research


Marks 6/10
[Has the author used references to support his/her arguments in the right places? Has the
author correctly cited the references used? What is the quality of the references?]
The author has missed references in some of the parts of the article. The references used to
support his argument are satisfactory. The references have been correctly cited, however, its
quality can be improved upon by the author.

Whether recommended for publication


No.

You might also like