Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Norma - ASTM e 1155 Procedure Floor Flatness PDF
Norma - ASTM e 1155 Procedure Floor Flatness PDF
Norma - ASTM e 1155 Procedure Floor Flatness PDF
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Sco
Scope
pe 3.1.2.1 Discussion—For the purposes of this test method,
1.1 This test method
method covers a quant quantitat
itative
ive method
method of mea- flatness
flatn ess will be meas
measured
ured by calcu
calculati
lating
ng curva
curvature
ture value, q,
suring floor surface profiles to obtain estimates of the floor’s betwee
bet ween n all 12-in.
12-in. rea
readin
dingg poi
points
nts separate
separatedd by 24 in. The
characteristic F F Flatness and F L Levelness Face Floor Profile curvature value is the difference between successive elevation
Numbers (F -Numbers)
-Numbers) using the inch-pound system of units. difffe
di fere
renc
nceses.. Th
Thee me
meanan anandd ststan
anda
dard
rd de
devi
viat
atio
ionn of al alll th
thee
curvature values for a given test section are then converted
NOTE 1—A complete metric companion to Te Test
st Method E 1155
1155 has acco
ac cord
rdin
ingg to th
thee eq
equauati
tion
onss in th this
is te
test
st me
meththod
od to ge gett th
thee
been developed, Test Method E
Method E 1155M;
1155M; therefore, no metric equivalents
dimensionless F F Flatness Number.
are shown in this test method.
3.1.3 floor profilometer —a —a Type
Type I dev device
ice (see 6.1.1)
6.1.1) that
1.2
1.2 The te text
xt of ththis
is te
test
st me
meth
thod
od re
refe
fere
rencnces
es nonote
tess an
and
d produces a continuous record of the elevation of a single point
footnotes that provide explanatory material. These notes and moving along a line on the floor’s surface.
footnotes (excluding those in tables and figures) shall not be 3.1.4 horizontal —level, normal to the direction of gravity.
considered as requirements of this test method. 3.1.5 inclinometer —a—a Type II device (see 6.1.2)6.1.2) that mea-
1.3 This sta
standa
ndardrd does not purport
purport to add
addreress
ss all of the sures the angle between horizontal and the line joining the two
safe
safety
ty co
conc
ncer
erns
ns,, if an
anyy, as
asso
soci
ciat
ated
ed wi
with
th it
itss us
use.
e. It is th
thee points of contact with the floor’s surface.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- 3.1.6 level—Horizontal, normal to the direction of gravity.
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- 3.1.6.1 Discussion—For the purposes of this test method,
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. levelness will be measured by collecting elevation differences
at points spaced 10 ft apart and that will be described by the F L
2. Referenced Documents
Levelness number (dimensionless).
2.1 ASTM Standards: 3.1.7 longitudinal differential floor profilometer , n —a Type
E 1155M Test Method for Determining F F Floor Flatness II device (see 6.1.2)
6.1.2) that produces a continuous record of the
and F L Floor Levelness Numbers [Metric] 2 elevation difference between two points moving along a line on
2.2 ACI Standard:
Standard: the floor’s surface, which two points remain separated by a
ACI 117-90 Standard Specifications for Tolerances for Con- fixed distance.
crete Construction and Materials 3 3.1.8 sample
sample measu
measurerement
ment line—a samp samplele meas
measurem
urement
ent
line shall consist of any straight line on the test surface along
3. Terminology
which measurements are taken, with the limitations listed in
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard: 7.3..
7.3
3.1.1 elevation —height, altitude, vertical location in space. 3.1.9 sign convention —where up is the positive direction;
Elevat
Ele vation
ion mea
measur
sureme
ements
nts are alwalways
ays mad
madee par
parall
allel
el to the down is the negative direction. Consequently, the higher the
direction of gravity. reading point, the more positive its h i value, and the lower the
3.1.2 flat —even,
—even, plane, homoloidal, free of undulation. reading
read ing point, the more nega tive its hi value. Similarly,
negative Similarly, the
elevation difference from a low point to a high point (that is, an
1
Thiss test method
Thi method is und
under
er the jurisdicti
jurisdiction
on of AST
ASTMM Com
Commit
mittee
tee E-6 on
uphill differe
difference)
nce) is posit
positive,
ive, whil
whilee the elev
elevatio
ation
n dif
differe
ference
nce
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.21 from a high point to a low point (that is, a downhill difference)
on Serviceability. is negative.
Currentt edition approved
Curren approved March 10, 1996 1996.. Publi
Published
shed May 1996
1996.. Origin
Originally
ally
3.1.10 test section —a test section consists of any subdivi-
published
publis hed as E 1155 – 87. Last previous edition E 11511555 – 87.
2
Standardss , Vol 04.11.
Annual Book of ASTM Standard sion of the test surface with the limitations listed in 7.2 7.2..
3
Available
Available from American Concre
Concrete te Institu
Institute,
te, P.O. Box 1915
19150,
0, Detroit
Detroit,, MI
48219-0150.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved);
reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
3.1.11 test surface—on any one building level, the entire NOTE 2—When the traffic patterns across a floor are random, (as is
floor area of interest constitutes the test surface, with the generally the case) evaluation of the floor’s F F Flatness and F L Levelness
will necessarily involve a random sampling of the surface, since all of the
limitations listed in 7.1.
infinite potential profiles to be seen by the traffic can not possibly be
3.1.12 vertical—parallel to the direction of gravity. measured. In those instances when the traffic across a floor will be
3.2 Symbols: confined to specific paths, however, the requirement for random sampling
3.2.1 Ai—area of Test Section i. is eliminated, since the floor can indeed be inspected exactly as it will be
3.2.2 d i—difference in elevation (in inches) between read- seen by all of the traffic. In these special cases, rather than inferring the
ing points Pi and P i−1 (i $ 1). condition of the traffic paths from a random sample, it is far more useful
3.2.3 F f —Face F F Flatness Number (dimensionless). to measure each of the traffic paths directly using continuous recording
floor profilometer configured to run exactly in the traffic wheel paths. Such
3.2.4 F f i—composite F F Flatness Number for Test Section i .
direct simulation measurements eliminate the inherent uncertainties of
3.2.5 F l—Face F L Levelness Number (dimensionless). statistical sampling and provide profile information immediately appli-
3.2.6 F li—composite F L Levelness Number for Test Section cable to the correction of the surface in way of the future traffic.
i.
3.2.7 hi—elevation (in inches) of Reading Point P i ( i $ 0). 6. Apparatus
3.2.8 n j—number of reading points in Test Sample j (n j $ 6.1 Point Elevation Measurement Device :
12). 6.1.1 Type I Apparatus—If a Type II apparatus (see 6.1.2) is
3.2.9 N min—minimum number of 10-ft elevation difference not used for this test, then an apparatus capable of measuring
readings required per the test section. the elevations of a series of points spaced at regular 12-in.
3.2.10 qi—arithmetic difference (in inches) between eleva- intervals along a straight line on the floor surface shall be used.
tion differences d i and d i−1 (i $ 2). Examples of satisfactory Type I point elevation measurement
3.2.11 r x j—number of readings of Variable x obtained from devices include, but are not limited to the following:
Sample j . 6.1.1.1 Leveled Straightedge , with gage (for example, tri-
3.2.12 s x j—standard deviation of Variable x in Sample j. square, dial indicator, etc.) to measure vertical distance from
3.2.13 V x j—variance of Variable x in Sample j. the upper straightedge surface to floor.
3.2.14 zi—difference in elevation (in inches) between Read-
6.1.1.2 Leveled Straightedge , with graduated wedges or
ing Points Pi and Pi−10 (i $ 10).
shims to measure vertical distance from lower straightedge
4. Summary of Test Method surface to floor.
6.1.1.3 Optical Level , with vernier or scaled target.
4.1 Straight lines are marked at various locations on the
6.1.1.4 Laser Level, with vernier or scaled target.
floor surface. Point elevations are then measured at regular
6.1.1.5 Taut Level Wire, with gage to measure vertical
12-in. intervals along each line. The elevation differences
distance from wire to floor.
between all adjacent reading points are calculated, and a
6.1.1.6 Floor Profilometer .
straight line approximation to the surface profile along each
measurement line is produced and evaluated for consistency 6.1.2 Type II Apparatus—If a Type I apparatus (see 6.1.1) is
with visual observation of the floor surface. not used for this test, then an apparatus capable of measuring
4.2 The arithmetic differences between all adjacent 12-in. the elevations of a series of points spaced at regular 12-in.
elevation differences and the elevation differences between all intervals along a straight line on the floor surface shall be used.
points separated 10 ft are then calculated. Estimates of each Examples of satisfactory Type II point elevation measurement
test section’s floors F F Flatness and F L Levelness F -Numbers devices include, but are not limited to the following:
are obtained through statistical analyses of these calculated 6.1.2.1 Inclinometer , having 12-in. contact point spacing.
profile values. Finally, the F -Numbers for each test section are 6.1.2.2 Longitudinal Differential Floor Profilometer , having
combined to arrive at a composite set of F -Numbers for each 12-in. sensor wheel spacing.
test surface. 6.2 Ancillary Equipment :
6.2.1 Measurement Tape, graduated in feet.
5. Significance and Use 6.2.2 Chalk Line (or other means for marking straight lines
5.1 This test method provides statistical (and graphical) on the test surface).
information concerning floor surface profiles. 6.2.3 Data Recording Means—This procedure requires the
5.2 Results of this test method are used primarily to: recording of both verbal and numeric information. Examples of
5.2.1 Establish compliance of randomly trafficked floor satisfactory data recording means include, but are not limited
surfaces with specified F F Flatness and F L Levelness toler- to the following:
ances, 6.2.3.1 Manual Data Sheet .
5.2.2 Evaluate the effect of different construction methods 6.2.3.2 Magnetic Tape Recorder , (voice or direct input).
on resulting floor surface flatness and levelness, and 6.2.3.3 Paper Chart Recorder .
5.2.3 Investigate the curling and deflection of floor surfaces. 6.2.3.4 Direct Computer Input .
5.3 Results of this test method shall not be used to enforce
NOTE 3—Since the bias of the results obtained with this test method
contract flatness and levelness tolerances on those floor instal- will vary directly with the accuracy of the particular measurement device
lations primarily intended to support the operation of fixed- employed, all project participants should agree on the exact test apparatus
path vehicle systems (for example, narrow aisle warehouse to be used prior to the application of this test method for contract
floors). specification enforcement.
2
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
7. Organization of Test Area NOTE 4—Since construction joints are a discontinuity in the floor
surface, measuring across them would introduce statistical anomalies into
7.1 Test Surface—On any one building level, the entire floor this test method. Construction joints are therefore excluded from the
area of interest shall constitute the test surface. generation of F -Number statistics. However, since traffic will nevertheless
7.1.1 When this test method is used to establish compliance pass across many of the construction joints, a separate measurement and
of randomly trafficked floor surfaces with specified F F Flatness analysis of the joints may be required in order to provide a quantitative
and F L Levelness tolerances, each portion of the surface which measure of the roughness of the joints themselves. Some joints may never
has a unique specified set of tolerances must be treated as a see traffic, for example, those along a wall. The particular joints required
to be analyzed may be specified in contract specifications, along with a
separate surface.
maximum allowable value for q i.
7.2 Test Section —A test section shall consist of any subdi-
vision of a test surface satisfying the following criteria: 8. Procedure
7.2.1 No test section shall measure less than 8 ft on a side,
nor comprise an area less than 320 ft 2. 8.1 Record the name and location of the subject building;
the installation date of the subject floor; the subject floor’s
7.2.2 No portion of the test surface shall be associated with
specified F f and F l values; the make, model, and serial number
more than one test section.
of the test apparatus to be used; the date of the test; and the
7.2.3 When testing a concrete floor, no test section boundary
name of the individual making the test.
shall cross any construction joint.
7.3 Sample Measurement Line—A sample measurement NOTE 5—When this test is used to evaluate the compliance of a new
line shall consist of any straight line on the test surface concrete floor with contract flatness and levelness specifications, the
satisfying the following criteria: timeliness of the test vis-a-vis the date of the floor’s installation is of
7.3.1 No sample measurement line shall measure less than critical importance. Since most concrete floors will change shape signifi-
cantly within a few days after installation, owing to inevitable shrinkage
11 ft in length.
and deflection, the American Concrete Institute (see ACI 117-90) now
7.3.2 No portion of any sample measurement line shall fall requires that specified concrete floor tolerances be checked within 72 h
within 2 ft of any slab boundary, construction joint, isolation after floor installation in order to ensure that an accurate gage of the
joint, block-out, penetration, or other similar discontinuity. surface’s “as-built” shape is assessed.
7.3.2.1 Exception—Shrinkage crack control joints formed
8.2 Lay out the test surface.
either by partial depth sawcuts or by partial depth inserts shall
be ignored. 8.2.1 Divide the entire test surface into test sections. Assign
a different identification number to each test section, and
7.3.2.2 Exception—If the area to be excluded from mea-
record the locations of all test section boundaries.
surement exceeds 25 % of the test section area, then the 2-ft
boundary exclusion shall not apply. 8.2.2 Within the restrictions described in 7.3, 7.6, and 8.2.3,
7.3.3 Measurement lines may not be placed parallel to each determine the number and location of all sample measurement
other closer than 4 ft. lines to be used in each test section. Assign a different
7.4 Ty pe I Tes t S am ple ( Me as ure d Wit h Typ e I identification number to each sample measurement line, and
Apparatus)—A Type I test sample shall consist of not less than record the locations of all sample measurement line starting
twelve sequential point elevation measurements made at regu- and stopping points. Mark or otherwise physically delineate
lar 12-in. intervals along a single sample measurement line. each sample measurement line on the test surface.
7.5 Type II Test Sample (Measured With Type II 8.2.3 The sample measurement lines within each test sec-
Apparatus)—A Type II test sample shall consist of not less tion shall be arranged so as to blind the test results (to the
than eleven sequential measurements of the elevation differ- extent possible) to any surface profile anisotropies resulting
ences between adjacent reading points spaced at regular 12-in. from the floor’s method of construction. Accomplish this by
intervals along a single sample measurement line. distributing the sample measurement lines uniformly across the
7.6 Minimum Number of z i Readings Per Test Section —The entire test section and either:
number (or length) of Type I or Type II test samples to be 8.2.3.1 Orienting all lines at 45° to the longest construction
collected within each test section shall be sufficient to yield (in joint abutting the test section, (not corner-to-corner diagonals)
aggregate) not less than N min individual measurements of zi, (see Fig. 1), or
where N min is calculated as follows: 8.2.3.2 Placing equal numbers of lines of equal aggregate
N min 5 2= A ~320 # A # 1600! (1)
length both parallel to and perpendicular to the longest test
section boundary. See Fig. 1.
5 A /30 ~ A . 1600!
8.2.3.3 When the short dimension (width) of the slab being
where: measured is less than 25 ft, all measurement lines must be 45°
A = test section area, ft2. diagonals in accordance with 8.2.3.1.
7.7 Construction Joints —Where construction joints are re- 8.3 Collect Type I or Type II test samples, or both, from
quired to be measured, periodic measurements of the 24-in. each test section sufficient (in aggregate) to satisfy the mini-
curvature qi shall be taken, transverse to and centered on the mum z i reading requirement prescribed in 7.6. No upper limit
construction joint. At least one qi measurement shall be taken is placed upon the number of test samples that may be collected
on each straight section of joint, with a maximum interval from a single test section. All data collected on all survey lines
between measurement locations not to exceed 10 ft. These measured in a given test section shall be incorporated into the
measurement locations shall be recorded. calculations of F -Numbers. Data shall only be excluded when
3
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
it can be demonstrated that the test apparatus reported inaccu- 9.3 Calculate the difference in elevation between all adja-
rate values or that the test procedure of this test method was not cent reading points:
followed. In the event that data is excluded, the entire survey 9.3.1 If analyzing a Type I test sample, calculate the
line shall be considered unusable; no single measurement of d i , elevation differences, d i, between all adjacent reading points as
qi, or zi may be excluded. follows:
8.3.1 Subdivide each sample measurement line into 12-in.
d i 5 hi 2 hi21 ~in.! (3)
long intervals. The points marking the ends of these 12-in.
intervals are the sample reading points. Designate the starting where:
point of each sample as P 0 and then sequentially number each i $1.
successive reading point down the sample measurement line as Each Type I Test Sample j will therefore result in ( n j − 1)
P1, P2, P3, etc. calculated d i values. Whenever Point Pi is higher than Point
8.3.2 For each test sample, measure and record in sequence: Pi−1, the value for d i will be positive. Conversely, whenever
8.3.2.1 If a Type I apparatus is used, the elevations (in Point Pi is lower than Point Pi−1, the value for d i will be
inches) of all sample reading points, or negative.
8.3.2.2 If a Type II apparatus is used, the differences in
9.3.2 If analyzing a Type II test sample, designate all d i
elevation (in inches) between all adjacent sample reading
values in accordance with 9.1.2.1.
points.
9.4 For each Test Sample j , calculate the profile curvatures,
qi, between all reading points separated by 24 in. as follows:
9. Calculation
qi 5 d i 2 d i21 ~in.! 5 hi 2 2 3 hi21 1 hi22 ~in.! (4)
9.1 Calculate the elevations of all reading points:
9.1.1 If analyzing a Type I test sample, designate the where: i $ 2.
elevation measurements collected at Reading Points P0, P 1, P2, Each test sample will result in ( n j − 2) calculated qi values.
. . . Pi, etc. as h0, h 1, h2, . . . hi, etc. A positive qi value will denote a trough, while a negative qi
9.1.2 If analyzing a Type II test sample: value will denote a crest .
9.1.2.1 Designate the elevation difference measurements
9.5 For each Test Sample j, calculate the elevation differ-
collected between Reading Points P0 and P1, and P2 and P3,
ences, zi, between all reading points separated by 10 ft as
and . . . P i−1 and Pi, etc. as d 1, d 2, d 3, . . . d i, etc.
follows:
9.1.2.2 Let h0 = 0.
9.1.2.3 Calculate the elevations, hi, of all reading points as zi 5 hi 2 hi210 ~in.! (5)
follows: where:
hi 5 hi21 1 d i ~in.! (2) i $10.
where: Each test sample will result in ( n j − 10) calculated z values.
i$ 1. A positive zi value will denote an uphill change in elevation
9.1.2.4 Each Type II test sample will therefore result in n j from Pi−10 to Pi, while a negative zi value will denote a
calculated hi values. downhill change in elevation from P i−10 to P i.
9.2 Produce a straight line graph between each of the n j 9.6 For each Test Sample j , calculate the mean, q ij, of all ( n j
calculated hi values. This is a straight line approximation of the − 2) qi values.
floor surface profile. Evaluate each straight line profile ap- 9.6.1 Add all (n j − 2) qi values in Sample j as follows:
proximation subjectively to confirm that it appears to represent n j21
the actual floor surface profile. This serves as a subjective ( qi 5 q2 1 q3 1 q4 1 . . . 1 qn 21 ~in.!
j
(6)
i52
quality control check to ensure that no gross anomalies are
present in the data before reporting the results of this test 9.6.2 Divide this sum by (n j − 2) to obtain the mean value of
method. the q i values in Sample j as follows:
4
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
n j21 4.57
( qi
i52
F f j 5
~3·S qi 1 |q̄ i j|!
~dimensionless! (16)
q̄ i j 5 ~in.! (7)
n j 2 2
where:
9.7 For each Test Sample j , calculate the standard deviation S qi = standard deviation of the q i values in Sample j (from
S qj, of all (n j − 2) qi values. 9.7.3), and
9.7.1 Add the squares of all ( n j − 1) qivalues as follows: q̄ i j = absolute value of the mean of the qi values in Sample
n j21 j (from 9.6.2).
( qi2 5 q22 1 q32 1 q42 1 . . . 1 q2n 21 ~in.2!
i52 j
(8) 9.11 Calculate the composite F F Flatness Number estimate
for each test section by combining all of the F F Flatness
9.7.2 Multiply the sum of all ( n j − 2) qi values obtained in Number estimates obtained from the individual test samples
9.5.1 by the mean value of q ij, obtained in 9.5.2, subtract this within that test section.
product from the sum of the squares of all ( n j − 2) qi values 9.11.1 The following equation is used to combine the F F
obtained in 9.6.1, and divide this difference by ( n j − 3) to Flatness or F L Levelness F -Number estimates derived from
obtain the variance V qj, of the q i values in Sample j as follows: two different test samples into a single composite F -Number
n j21 n j21
estimate:
( qi 2 2 q̄ i i (
i52 52
qi j
V q j 5
n j 2 3
~in. 2! (9)
F j 1 k 5 F j·F k Œ r j 1 r k
r k ·F j2 1 r j·F k 2
(17)
9.7.3 Take the square root of the variance, V q j, of the qi where:
values in Sample j to obtain the standard deviation, S q j, of the F j+k = F -Number estimate derived by combining Samples
qi values in Sample j as follows: j and k ,
F j = F -Number estimate derived from Sample j,
S q j 5 =V q j ~in.! (10) F k = F -Number estimate derived from Sample k ,
9.8 For each Test Sample j , calculate the mean, z̄ i j, of all (n j r j = number of qi or zi readings in Sample j used to
− 10) zi values. derive F j, and
r k = number of qi or zi readings in Sample k used to
9.8.1 Add all (n j − 10) zi values in Sample j as follows:
derive F k .
n j21
9.11.2 Using the equation given in 9.11.1, calculate the
( zi 5 z10 1 z11 1 z12 1 . . . 1 zn 21 ~in.! j
(11)
i 5 10 composite F F Flatness Number estimate for each test section
9.8.2 Divide this sum by (n j − 10) to obtain the mean value by combining (iteratively) all of the flatness F -Number esti-
of z̄ i j of the zi values in Sample j as follows: mates obtained from the individual test samples within that test
n j21
section. The number of readings to be associated with each
( zi successive F F Flatness Number estimate, F j+k , will be the sum
i 5 10
z̄ i j 5 ~in.! (12) (r j + r k ).
n j 2 10
NOTE 6—Since F F Flatness Numbers may be combined only with other
F F Flatness Numbers, and F L Levelness Numbers may only be combined
9.9 For each Test Sample j , calculate the standard deviation,
with other F L Levelness Numbers, the complete description of any floor
S zj, of all (n j − 10) zi values. surface requires the identification of two separate and distinct values: F f
9.9.1 Add the squares of all ( n j − 10) zi values as follows: Flatness Number and F l Levelness Number.
n j21
9.11.3 Sample Problem Illustrating F-Number Combination
( zi2 5 z102 1 z112 1 z122 1 ... 1 z2 n j21 ~in.2! (13)
i 5 10 Procedure—Three test samples containing 40, 60, and 80
9.9.2 Multiply the sum of all (n j − 10) z ivalues obtained in readings respectively are collected from a certain test section.
9.8.1 by the mean value, zi, obtained in 9.8.2, subtract this Analysis in accordance with 9.10 yields the following indi-
product from the sum of the squares of all ( n j − 10) zi values vidual sample F f estimates:
obtained in 9.9.1, and divide this difference by ( n j − 11) to Sample One:
obtain the variance, V z j, of the z i values in Sample j as follows: F f 1 = 20, and
r q 1 = number of q i readings in Sample One = 40.
ni21 n j21
9.9.3 Take the square root of the variance, V z j, of the zi Sample Three:
values in Sample j to obtain the standard deviation, S z j, of the F f 3 = 40, and
r q 3 = number of q i readings in Sample Three = 80.
zi values in Sample j as follows:
9.11.3.1 To combine these three individual sample results
S z j 5 =V z j ~in.! (15)
into a single composite F f estimate for the entire test section,
9.10 Estimate the F F Flatness Number, F f j, for each Test use the equation given in 9.11.1 by first combining the F f
Sample j as follows: estimates given for any two of the test samples, and then
5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
combining this interim F f result with the F f estimate from the where:
remaining sample as follows: r = total number of qi or zi readings used to calculate the
F -Number:
F F 1 1 2 5 F F 1·F F 2Œ r q1 1 r q2
r q2·F F 12 1 r q1·F F 22
(18)
F 2 Number 90 % Confidence Interval
F F 1 1 2 5 20·30 Œ 40 1 60
2
60·20 1 40·30 2
5 ~100 2 CI 90 % !·F /100 to ~100 1 CI 90 % !·F /100
9.15 Within each test surface, combine each test section’s
(24)
6
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
4.167 11.7 The results obtained with this test method will also
F l 5 (29)
S z vary with the precision and bias of the particular elevation
11.3 Since 99.73 % of all values in a normal distribution fall measurement apparatus employed. Instrument inaccuracies
within 63 standard deviations of the population mean, will always result in a lowering of the reported F -Numbers.
99.73 % of all q ireadings will have an absolute value less than
12. Precision and Bias
or equal to the following:
12.1 Precision—The repeatability standard deviation for
4.57
qi99.73 % 5 3~S q! 5 ~in.! (30) both F f and F l is less than 0.25.
F F
12.1.1 These values were obtained by conducting repeated
while 99.73 % of the z i readings will have an absolute value measurements of the same test section. For these within-
less than or equal to the following: laboratory tests, the same layout pattern was used, with the
12.5 same operators and apparatus. When operators and equipment
zi99.73 % 5 3~S z! 5 ~in.! (31)
F L models (of the same fundamental type of measurement appa-
ratus) are varied, but the layout pattern is retained, the
11.3.1 These 3(S ) values have been arbitrarily defined as the
repeatability standard deviation goes up to about 0.3. The small
dimensional limits that characterize a given F -Number. They
standard deviation obtained indicates that neither the operator
provide a simple means for giving the F -Numbers dimensional
nor the equipment model (within this particular type apparatus)
significance, that are greater than these 3( S ) values. It is
has a very significant influence on repeatability. The results do
incorrect, however, to think of F -Numbers as directly limiting
not vary widely with changes in F f and F l. Future versions of
the magnitudes of qi or zi. F -Numbers do not prohibit the
this test method will be published with precision and bias as
incidence of any specific qi or zi value; they only limit the
generated by using other measurement apparatus, when suffi-
percentage of all qi or z i readings that can have that value.
cient data can be made available.
11.4 Since F -Numbers are derived directly from the qi and
12.1.2 The reproducibility standard deviation for F f is as
zi statistics, the accuracy of the composite and estimates
follows:
obtained in 9.10 and 9.12 will depend upon the following:
11.4.1 The degree to which the sample qi and z i distributions 10 | Cz|Cz 20 |Cz|Cz 30 |Cz|Cz 40 |Cz|Cz 50 |Cz|Cz 60 |Cz|Cz 70 |Cz|Cz 80
| 0.25 | 0.74 | 1.22 | 1.70 | 2.18 | 2.66 | 3.14 |
match the actual qi and zi distribution, and
11.4.2 The total number of sample qi and z i readings used to 12.1.2.1 These values were also obtained by having various
estimate the means and standard deviations of the entire, testing agencies across the United States conduct repeated
infinite qi and z i populations. measurements of the same test section, in this case, always
11.5 As the size of a sample increases, so does the prob- with different layout patterns. The larger resulting standard
ability that the sample’s statistics will accurately represent deviations obtained indicate that variation in line placement is
those of the entire population. Confidence in the ability of a the dominant factor in obtaining differing values of F f . In
certain size sample to estimate the statistics of an entire general, precision of results is best at the lower F f values, and
population is expressed in terms of confidence intervals. The decreases with increasing F f -Number. It should be noted that
90 % confidence interval calculated in 9.13 is a direct measure the data used to generate this precision and bias statement was
of the degree of statistical uncertainty that will be associated generated through the use of many different instruments, all of
with each F -Number estimate obtained with this test method. which were one of three different models of one Type II
This 90 % confidence interval may be interpreted as follows: instrument. Although several other devices have been used at
11.5.1 Given a sample size of r readings, nine times out of various times to collect data for this test method, no compara-
ten the actual F -Number of the floor will fall between plus or tive data is available from any of these devices. Future versions
minus CI 90 % percent of the F -Number estimate obtained with of this test method will be published with precision and bias as
this test method. generated by using other measurement apparatus, when suffi-
cient data can be made available.
11.6 The F -Number estimate obtained in 9.9 or 9.11 is the
12.1.3 The reproducibility standard deviation for F l is as
midpoint of a range of possible F -Numbers characterizing the
follows:
test section with some known probability. The width of each
such F -Number range will vary directly with the confidence 10 | Cz|Cz 20 |Cz|Cz 30 |Cz|Cz 40 |Cz|Cz 50 |Cz|Cz 60 |Cz|Cz 70 |Cz|Cz 80
level demanded and inversely with the number of sample | 0.70 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 2.75| 2.0 | 2.9 | 4.5 |
readings used to compute the midpoint estimate. The probabil- 12.1.3.1 One way to interpret these results is to state the
ity that a particular range will actually contain the true expected or probable error, that is equal to 0.6746 times the
F - Number of the floor increases as the width of the range standard deviation. For example, when measuring a floor
increases. Likewise, the greater the number of sample readings whose known true F f value is 15, 50 % of the time it is
used to estimate the range midpoint, the greater the probability expected that the test result be greater than 15.23 or less than
that the true F -Number of the floor will be near that midpoint. 14.77, and 50 % of the time, one would expect the deviation to
be within this range. Another way to interpret the precision
NOTE 8—Since it is impossible to be certain of the exact F F Flatness or
F L Levelness Number of any floor (no matter how many readings are
results is to look at the 95 % reproducibility limits, that are 2.8
taken, some statistical uncertainty will always exist), report the results of times the standard deviation. In this case, 95 % of the time, the
this test method as a range of possible F -Numbers at the prescribed 90 % measured result will fall between 14.05 and 15.95. This test
confidence level. method contains an estimate of the 90 % confidence limits, that
7
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
E 1155 – 96 (2001)
are required to be provided in any report with the test result 12.2 Bias—The procedure in this test method has no bias
(see section 9.13 and Section 10). As the F -Number goes up because the values of F f and F l are defined in terms of this test
(either F f or F l) the uncertainty regarding the true value also method.
rises, because much smaller errors can create the same amount
of difference in the test result. For example, when measuring a 13. Keywords
floor whose known true F f value is 35, 50 % of the time it is
expected that the test result be greater than 36.1 or less than 13.1 F f ; F F Flatness; F l; F L Levelness; floor; floor profile;
33.9, and 50 % of the time, it is expected that the deviation be floor profilometer; F -Number
within this range, and 95 % of the time, the measured result
will fall between 30.5 and 39.5.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
8
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Aug 1 13:17:44 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by