Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. PRIMARY SOURCES
B. Reports
Appellate Body Report, 2001
Comments on the department’s proposed modification to the arm-length test for
242
antidumping proceedings (67 fed.reg.53339)
Government of India, India and the WTO, The monthly Newsletter of Ministry of
Commerce (various issues), Ministry of Commerce: New Delhi.
243
Panel Report, Guatemala – Anti-Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland
Cement from Mexico (Guatemala CementI), WT/DS60/R
Report of the panel, United States – Anti dumping and Countervailing Measures
on Steel Plate from India, WT/DS/206/R, 28.6.2002.
Report of the panel, United States – Section 129 (c)(1) of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, WT/DS221/R, 15.7.2002.
244
WTO Compilation of Issues and Proposals Identified by Participants in the
Negotiating Group on Rules.TN/RLW/143 (22 August, 2003).
WTO: Antidumping Issues in the Doha Development Agenda CRS Report for
Congress RL 32810 (December 6, 2005)
A. Books
A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, INDIA 2020: A VISION FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
(1998) Penguin Books, India.
245
Bhagirah Lal Ds, WTO AGREEMENTS DEFICIENCIES, IMBALANCES &
REQUIRED CHANGES (1998) Zed Books, Malaysia.
G.K.Chadha, WTO AND THE INDIAN ECONOMY (2001) Deep and Deep
publishers, Delhi.
Homi Katrak, THE WTO & DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (2004) Palgrave, New
York
246
District Small Industries Association, CODISSIA)(2001)
(www.codissia.com/document/Anti%20Dumping%20Duty%-%20Publication.pdf)
S.K.Bijlani, WHAT DOES GATT MEAN FOR INDIA (1996) Doaba House, Delhi.
Sandeep Chauhan, GATT TO WTO (2001) Deep & Deep Publication, Delhi.
247
T.N. Srinivasan and Suresh D.Tendulkar, REINTEGRATING INDIA WITH THE
WORLD ECONOMY (2003); Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Vibha Mathur, WTO AND INDIA – DEVELOPMENT AGENDA FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY (2005); New Century Publications, New Delhi.
Vinai Singh (eds), WTO AND INDIA: A CRITICAL STUDY AND ITS FIRST
DECADE (2002); New Era law Publications, New Delhi.
B. Articles
248
Areeda Phillips and Donald F.Turner, “Predatory Ppricing and related practices
under Section 2 of the Sherman Act” Vol. 88(4) Harvard law Review Page No.
697 (1975).
Benjamin H. Liebman, “ITC Voting Behavior on Sunset Reviews” Vol. 140 (3)
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Page No. 446 (2004).
Chad P. Bown, “The WTO and antidumping in Developing Countries” Vol. 20(2)
Economics and Politics Page no. 255 (2008).
Daniel K. Tarullo, Paved with Good Intentions: The Dynamic Effects of WTO
Review of Anti-Dumping Action 2(3) World Trade Review 373 (2003).
Gunnar Niels and Adriaan ten Kate, Antidumping policy in developing countries:
Safety valve or obstacle to free trade? Vol.22 European Journal of Policitcal
Economy Page No. 618 (2006).
Gunnar Niels and Adriaan ten Kate, Antidumping policy in developing countries:
Safety valve or obstacle to free trade? Vol.22(3) European Journal of Political
249
Economy, Page No. 618 (2006).
Jamesh P. Durling and Thomas J. Prusa, The trade effects associated with an
antidumping epidemic: The hot-rolled steel market, 1996-2001 22 European
Journal of Political Economy 675 (2006).
Jorge Miranda, “Should antidumping laws be dumped?” Vol. 28 Law and Policy
in International Business 56 (1996).
250
K.D.Raju, “The WTO Appellate Body Reports on Anti-Dumping: A Critical
Review” Vol.44 Indian Journal of International Law Page No. 260 (2004).
Mathew Tharakan, “Is Anti-dumping here to stay?” Vold. 22 The world Economy
Page No. 179 91996).
Mathew Tharakan, “Storm signals: an analysis of the trade policy review of the
European communities” Vol. 29 (10) World Economy Page No. 1301 (2006).
Maurizio Zanardi, “Antidumping: what are the numbers to discuss at Doha?” Vol.
27 The World Economy Page No. 403 (2004).
251
Michael P. Gallaway et al, “Welfare costs of the U.S. Anti-dumping and
countervailing duty laws” Vol. 49(2) Journal of International Economics Page
No. 211 (1999).
Peter Didier, The WTO Anti Dumping Code and EC Practice. Issues for Review
in Trade Negotiations Vol. 35 (1) Journal of World Trade Page No. 33 (2001).
252
International Law Page No. 247 (2004).
Staiger, Robert and Guido Tabellini, “Do GATT rules help governments make
domestic commitments?” Page No. 11 Economics and Politics 109 (1999).
Thomas J Prusa and Susan Skeath, “The economic and strategic motives for
antidumping filings” Vol. 138 (3) Weltwirtschaftliches Page No. 389 (2002).
Tran Viet Dung,”Anti dumping, competition and the wto system –implication for
vietnamese legal reform” available at
http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstream/handle/10635/16025/TranVietDung-
PhD-Law-Antidumping.pdf?sequence=1 accessed on june 23, 2012.
253
European Community” Vol. 39 (1) Journal of World Trade Page No. 105 (2005).
Xavier Martinez-Giralt and Pedro Luis Pita Barros, “On the Effects of Anti-
dumping Legislation” Vol.29(1) Regional Science and urban Economics Page
No. 53 (1999).
C. Working Papers
Aradhana Agarwal, “The WTO Antidumping Code: Issues for Review in Post-
Doha Negotiations” ICRIER Working Pager Page No. 99 (2003).
254
Brad Klein, “Designing De Minimis,”, Indiana Antidegradation Workshop (2008).
Brink Lindsey et al, “Seattle and Beyond: A WTO Agenda for the New
Millennium “ Cato Institute Centre for Trade Policy analysis Working Paper 7
(1999).
Brink Lindsey, “The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality” The Cato
Institute Trade Policy Analysis Pager 7 (1999).
Brink Lindsey, “The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality” The Cato
Institute Trade Policy Analysis Pager 7 (1999).
Dan Ikenson, “Zeroing in: Antidumping’s Flawed Methodology Under Fire,” Cato
Institute Centre for Trade Policy Analysis Working Paper 11 (2004).
255
Joel Mokyr, “Mercantilism, the enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution”
(Presented to the Conference in Honor of Eli F. Heckscher, May 2003).
Raj Krishna, “Antidumping in Law and Practice” World Bank Policy Research
Working Pager 1823 (1998).
Raj Krishna, “Antidumping in law and practice” World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper 1823 (1997).
Robert M. Feinberg and Kara Marie Reynolds, Friendly Fire? “The Impact of US
Antidumping Enforcement on US Exporters” Working Papers 4 (2006).
Robert W. Staiger and Frank Wolak, “Differences in the Uses and Efects of
Antidumping Law Across Import Sources” NBER Working Paper 4846 (1994).
256
Thomas J. Prusa, “On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping” National Bureau
of Economic Research Working Paper 7404 (2001).
D. Websites
http://exim.indiamart.com
http://fds.oup.com/
http://home.gwu.edu/
http://internationalecon.com/
http://internationalecon.com
http://www.customs.gov.au/
http://www.fordschool.umich.edu
http://www.foreignaffairs.org
http://www.helplinelaw.com
http://www.indianembassy.org
http://www.indianmba.com
http://www.infodriveindia.com
http://www.twnside.org.
http://www.unctad.org/
http://www.vvg-law.com
http://www.worldtradelaw.net
http://worldtradelaw.net
http://www.zlea.org
www.antidumpingpublishing.com
www.centad.org
www.commerce.nic.in
www.unctad.org
www.wto.org
257
258