You are on page 1of 17

BIBILIOGRAPHY

I. PRIMARY SOURCES

A. Acts and Amendments

Agreements on Implementation of article VI of the General Agreement on Tariff


and Trade, 1994

Anti-dumping Rules [Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection


of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury0
Rules, 1995]

Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and collection of Anti-dumping Duties


on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1994)

Imposition and collection by Ministry of Finance

Investigations and Recommendations by Designated Authority, Ministry of


Commerce

US Anti-dumping Act, Title VII of the Tariff Act 1930

US Trade Act, 1984

B. Reports
Appellate Body Report, 2001
Comments on the department’s proposed modification to the arm-length test for

242
antidumping proceedings (67 fed.reg.53339)

CSR Report RL 32060, THE WTO:THE DOHA DEVELOPMENT AGENDA,2008

Dispute settlement, N document UNCTAD/EDM/Misc.232/Add.14 (2003).

Doha work programme Ministerial Declaration WT/MIN (05)/DEC (Dec 18,


2005)

Doha WTO Ministerial declaration :WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1(2001)

GATT Panel Report Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton


Yarn from Brazil adopted by ADP Committee, October 30,1995, ADP/137
42S/17.

Government of India, India and the WTO, The monthly Newsletter of Ministry of
Commerce (various issues), Ministry of Commerce: New Delhi.

A. (2002a), “Proposals on Anti-dumping Agreement”. Submitted by India,


WTO Document No.TN/RL/W26 (17 October, 2002).
B.(2002b), “Proposals on Implementation related Issues and Concerns”,
Submitted by India, WTO Document No. TN/RL/W/4(25 April,2002) Government
of US (2006), “Foreign Trade Barriers”, ‘India’,pp.300 – 14.
C.(2003), “Anti-dumping Actions in the Area of Textiles and Clothing:
Proposal for a Specific Short-Term Dispensation in Favour of Developing
Members Following Full Integration of the Sector into GATT 1994 from January
2005”, Submitted by India, WTO Document No.WT/GC/W/502 (14 July, 2003).
D. (2004), “Annual Report of Directorate General of Anti-dumping and
Allied Duties-2003-04”, Ministry of Commerce: New Delhi.
E. (2005), “Dumping Duties on Shrimp from India, Thailand Under
Review”, April 25,

243
Panel Report, Guatemala – Anti-Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland
Cement from Mexico (Guatemala CementI), WT/DS60/R

Panel Report, US Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Seamless


Stainless Steel Hollow Products from Sweden, 1990 ADP/47.

Report of Panel, European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of


Cotton Type Bed Linen from India, WT/DS 141/R, 30/10/2000.

Report of the panel, United States – Anti dumping and Countervailing Measures
on Steel Plate from India, WT/DS/206/R, 28.6.2002.

Report of the panel, United States, - Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Hot


Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/R,28.2.2001.

Report of the panel, United States – Final Dumping Determination on Softwood


Lumber from Canada, WT/DS264/R, 13.4.2004.

Report of the panel, United States – Section 129 (c)(1) of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, WT/DS221/R, 15.7.2002.

Report of the panel, United States – Sunset Review of anti-dumping Duties on


Corrosion Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan, WT/DS244/R,
14.8.2003.

TIFAC Report, January 28, 2007

US- sunset review of Antidumping Duties, US WT/DS244 (January 16,2003)

World Trade organization, “WTO Annual Report” (Various issues),


WTO:Geneva.

244
WTO Compilation of Issues and Proposals Identified by Participants in the
Negotiating Group on Rules.TN/RLW/143 (22 August, 2003).

WTO Negotiating Group on Rules,TN/RL/W/13 (July 8,2002)

WTO Negotiating Group on Rules,TN/RL/W/138 (July 17,2003).

WTO Negotiating Group on Rules,TN/RL/13 (July 19,2005)

WTO Negotiating Group on Rules,TN/RL/W/143 (August 23,2003)

WTO: Antidumping Issues in the Doha Development Agenda CRS Report for
Congress RL 32810 (December 6, 2005)

WTO: Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN (01)/DEC/1 (November 14,2001)

----------------(1998), “India, Trade Policy Review, WTO:Geneva.


----------------(2005), “Update of WTO Dispute Settlement Cases”, No.
WT/DS/OV23
----------------(2002), “India, Trade Policy Review, WTO:Geneva.
----------------(2007), “India, Trade Policy Review, WTO:Geneva.

II. SECONDARY SOURCES

A. Books

A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, INDIA 2020: A VISION FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
(1998) Penguin Books, India.

Bhagirah Lal Das, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION – A GUIDE TO THE


FRAMEWORK FOR INTERNATINAL TRADE (2007) Zed Books, UK.

245
Bhagirah Lal Ds, WTO AGREEMENTS DEFICIENCIES, IMBALANCES &
REQUIRED CHANGES (1998) Zed Books, Malaysia.

Brink Lindsey and Daniel J. Ikenson, ANTIDUMPING EXPOSED: THE


DEVILISH DETAILS OF UNFAIR TRADE LAW, Cato Institute (2003)

G.K.Chadha, WTO AND THE INDIAN ECONOMY (2001) Deep and Deep
publishers, Delhi.

Homi Katrak, THE WTO & DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (2004) Palgrave, New
York

J. Michael Finger, ANTIDUMPING: HOW IT WORKS AND WHO GETS HURT


(1993)
(www.ideas,repec.org/a/inecon/v37y1994i1-2p128-131.html).

Jacob Viner, DUMPING: A PROBLEM IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE, 1923


(Reprinted in part from the Journal of political economy and the University
Journal of Business).

John W. Evans, THE KENNEDY ROUND IN AMERICAN TRADE POLICY:THE


TWILIGHT OF THE GATT? (1973)
(http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v1y1973i6p75-75.html).

Judith Czako el al, A HANDBOOK ON ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATIONS


(2003)
(www.icai.org/icairoot/overview/lib_services/recent2.jsp)

Mitsuo Matsushita, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO), LAW


PRACTICE, & POLICY (2003) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

No author, HAND BOOK ON ANTI-DUMPING (Published by : The Coimbatore

246
District Small Industries Association, CODISSIA)(2001)
(www.codissia.com/document/Anti%20Dumping%20Duty%-%20Publication.pdf)

P.V.Sharma, NEW TRADE POLCIY (2004-2009) & WTO REGIME (2005)


Kanishka Publishers, Delhi.

Patrick Low, TRADING FREE:THE GATT AND US TRADE POLICY (1993)


Twentieth Century Fund Press, New York.

Patrick F.J.Macrory et al, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: LEGAL,


ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2005) Springer-Verlag, New York

Ravindra Pratap, INDIA AT THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM


(2004). Manak Publication, Delhi.

Robert E.Hudec, THE ADEQUACY OF WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT


REMEDIES (2002) Worldbank, Washington, D.C.

Rupa Chanda, INDIA AND GATTS 2000-NEGOTIATING STRATEGIES AND


DOMESTIC REFORMS(2001). Published by Indian Council for Research on
International Economic Relations

S.B.Verma, WTO & DEVELOPMET OPPPORTUNITIES (2005) Deep & Deep


Publication, Delhi.

S.B.Yadav (ed), A DECADE OF WTO AND INDIAN ECONOMY (2006) Sumit


Enterprises, Delhi.

S.K.Bijlani, WHAT DOES GATT MEAN FOR INDIA (1996) Doaba House, Delhi.

Sandeep Chauhan, GATT TO WTO (2001) Deep & Deep Publication, Delhi.

247
T.N. Srinivasan and Suresh D.Tendulkar, REINTEGRATING INDIA WITH THE
WORLD ECONOMY (2003); Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

Van Bael et al ANTI-DUMPING AND OTHER TRADE PROTECTION LAWS


(2004); Kluwer law International;
(http://books.google.com/books?
id=iaQQ3ncwuEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=ANTI-
DUMPING+AND+OTHER+TRADE+PROTECTION+LAW&sig=GI6N
LaxDW68li7FDLW6HxMqb8g)

Vibha Mathur, WTO AND INDIA – DEVELOPMENT AGENDA FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY (2005); New Century Publications, New Delhi.

Vinai Singh (eds), WTO AND INDIA: A CRITICAL STUDY AND ITS FIRST
DECADE (2002); New Era law Publications, New Delhi.

Yagnaswami Sundara Rajan (ed), EMPOWERING INDIANS:WITH ECONOMIC,


BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY STRENGTHS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST
CENTURY (2002); by Har-Anand Publications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

B. Articles

Aditya Bhattacharjea, “Predation, protection and the public interest” Economic


and Political Weekly 4327 (2000)

Alan O.Sykes, “The Safeguards Mess: A critique of WTO Jurisprudence” Vol.


2(3) World Trade Review Page 261 (2003).

Angelika Eymann and Ludger Schuknecht “Antidumping Policy in the European


Community: Political Discretion or Trchnical Determination” Vol.8(2) Economics
and Politics Page 111 (1996).

248
Areeda Phillips and Donald F.Turner, “Predatory Ppricing and related practices
under Section 2 of the Sherman Act” Vol. 88(4) Harvard law Review Page No.
697 (1975).

Benjamin H. Liebman, “ITC Voting Behavior on Sunset Reviews” Vol. 140 (3)
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Page No. 446 (2004).

Bibek Debroy and Debashis Chakraborty,ANTI-DUMPING: GLOBAL ABUSE OF


A TRADE POLICY INSTRUMENT, Academic Foundation (2007)

Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson, “Reforming the Antidumping Agreement:A


Road Map for WTO Negotiations”, Cato Institute’s Center for Trade Policy
Studies, No. 21(2002)

Bruce A. Blonigen, “Evolving discretionary practices of US antidumping activiy”


Vol. 39 (3) Canadian Journal of Economics Page No. 874 (2006).

Chad P. Bown, “The WTO and antidumping in Developing Countries” Vol. 20(2)
Economics and Politics Page no. 255 (2008).

Claude E. Barfield, “Anti-dumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics” Vol.


28(5) The World Economy Page 719 (2005).

Daniel K. Tarullo, Paved with Good Intentions: The Dynamic Effects of WTO
Review of Anti-Dumping Action 2(3) World Trade Review 373 (2003).

Gunnar Niels and Adriaan ten Kate, Antidumping policy in developing countries:
Safety valve or obstacle to free trade? Vol.22 European Journal of Policitcal
Economy Page No. 618 (2006).

Gunnar Niels and Adriaan ten Kate, Antidumping policy in developing countries:
Safety valve or obstacle to free trade? Vol.22(3) European Journal of Political

249
Economy, Page No. 618 (2006).

Holden Merle, “Antidumping: A Reaction to Trade Liberalization or Anti-


Competitive?” Vol.70 (5) The South African Journal of Economics Page No. 912
(1996).

Hsin Huang et al, “The Role of Economic Analysis in Determining Injury-


Causality 29” The Canadian Journal of Economics Page no.S 406 (1996).

Hylke Vandenbussche and Maurizio Zanardi,“The Chilling Effects of Ant


idumping Law Proliferation”(2007)

Ivo Van Bael, Anti-Dumping Enforcement: An Overview of Current Problems 1


(1) European Journal of International Law 118 (1990).

J. Michael finger, Dumping and antidumping: the rhetoric and reality of


protection in industrial countries. 7 World Bank Research Observer, 121 (1992).

Jamesh P. Durling and Thomas J. Prusa, The trade effects associated with an
antidumping epidemic: The hot-rolled steel market, 1996-2001 22 European
Journal of Political Economy 675 (2006).

James P. Durling, “Deference,But Only When Due:WTO Review of anti-


Dumping Measures” 6(1) Journal of International Economic Law 125 (2003).

Jamesh R. Cannot J., “Simplification of antidumping Actions: Efficiency at What


Price?” Vol. 25 Law and Policy in International Business Page No. 28 (1993)

Jorge Miranda et al, “The International Use of Antidumping: 1987-199, 32”


Journal of World Trade, Page No. 5 91998).

Jorge Miranda, “Should antidumping laws be dumped?” Vol. 28 Law and Policy
in International Business 56 (1996).
250
K.D.Raju, “The WTO Appellate Body Reports on Anti-Dumping: A Critical
Review” Vol.44 Indian Journal of International Law Page No. 260 (2004).

Mathew Tharakan, “Is Anti-dumping here to stay?” Vold. 22 The world Economy
Page No. 179 91996).

Mathew Tharakan, “Political economy of contingent protection” 105 (433) The


Economic journal Page No. 1550 (1995).

Mathew Tharakan, “Storm signals: an analysis of the trade policy review of the
European communities” Vol. 29 (10) World Economy Page No. 1301 (2006).

Maurizio Zanardi, Antidumping: a problem in International Trade, Vol. 22


European Journal of Political Economy, Page No. 591 (2006).

Maurizio Zanardi, “Antidumping: what are the numbers to discuss at Doha?” Vol.
27 The World Economy Page No. 403 (2004).

Merle Holden, “Antidumping: A reaction to trade liberalisation or


anticompetitive?” Vol. 70 (5) The South African Journal of Economics Page No.
912 (2002).

Michael Knetter and Thomas Prusa, Macroeconomic factors and antidumping


filings: evidence from four countries 61, Journal of International Economics 1
(2003).

Michael O. Moore, “Antidumping reform in the WTO: A pessimistic appraisal”


Vol.12 (3) Pacific Economic Review Page No. 357 (2007).

Michael O. Moore, “Antidumping reform in the WTO: a pessimistic appraisal”


Vol. 12 (3) Pacific Economic Review Page No. 357 (2007).

251
Michael P. Gallaway et al, “Welfare costs of the U.S. Anti-dumping and
countervailing duty laws” Vol. 49(2) Journal of International Economics Page
No. 211 (1999).

Michael Trebilcock, “Critiquing the Critics of Economic Globalization” Vol.1


Journal of International Law and International Relations Page No. 213 (2005).

Michael Webb, “The Ambiguous Consequences of Anti-Dumping Laws” Vol.30


Economic Inquiry Page No. 437 (1992).

Mildred A. Hastbcka, Valuation of Technology Intangibles for Transfer Pricing:


Time for Industry Initiatives? Vol. 5 Tax Notes International Page No. 34 (2003).

Murigi Wanja Catherine,” The development ofa successfulanti-dumping regime


in kenya “available at http://etd.uwc.ac.za
/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2175/Murigi_LLM_2013.pdf?sequence=1

Nandana Baruah, “An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Anti-dumping


Behaviour in India Vol.30(7) The World Economy Page No. 1170 (2007).

Peter Didier, The WTO Anti Dumping Code and EC Practice. Issues for Review
in Trade Negotiations Vol. 35 (1) Journal of World Trade Page No. 33 (2001).

Pieteer J. Kuijper, “The conclusion and implementation of the Uruguay Round”


Vol. 6 (1) European Journal of International Law Page No. 222 (1995).

Richard Dale, “Anti-Dumping Law in a Liberal Trade Order, Vold. 80 (4)


Michigan Law Review Page No. 988 (1982).

Richard H. Steinberg, Judicial lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive,


Constitutional, and Political Constraints Vol. 98 (2) The American Journal of

252
International Law Page No. 247 (2004).

Robert E. Baldwin, “The Political Economy of Reforming the Anti-dumping


Laws” Vol. 28 (5) The World Economy 745 (2005).

Robert M. Feinberg and Kara M. Reynolds, “The Spread of Antidumping


Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filing” Vol.72 (4) Southern Economic
Journal Page No. 877 (2006).

Robert M. Feinbergh and Kara M. Reynolds. Tariff Liberalisation and Increased


Administrative Protection: Is There a Quid Pro Quo? Vol. 30 (6) The World
Economy Page No. 948 (2007).

Robert W. McGee, “Some thoughts on anti-dumping laws: utilitarianism, human


rights and the case for repeal” Vol.96 (5) European Business Review Page No.
27 (1996).

Staiger, Robert and Guido Tabellini, “Do GATT rules help governments make
domestic commitments?” Page No. 11 Economics and Politics 109 (1999).

T.P.Bhat, “Spread of Anti-Dumping Containment and Reform” Vol. 39 (2) Foreign


Trade Review Page No. 65 (2004).

Thomas J Prusa and Susan Skeath, “The economic and strategic motives for
antidumping filings” Vol. 138 (3) Weltwirtschaftliches Page No. 389 (2002).

Tran Viet Dung,”Anti dumping, competition and the wto system –implication for
vietnamese legal reform” available at
http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstream/handle/10635/16025/TranVietDung-
PhD-Law-Antidumping.pdf?sequence=1 accessed on june 23, 2012.

Vermulst, Edwin, “The 10 Major Problems With the Anti-dumping Instrument

253
European Community” Vol. 39 (1) Journal of World Trade Page No. 105 (2005).

Xavier Martinez-Giralt and Pedro Luis Pita Barros, “On the Effects of Anti-
dumping Legislation” Vol.29(1) Regional Science and urban Economics Page
No. 53 (1999).

C. Working Papers

Alexander Roitinger, “Antidumping Reforms, Trade Policy Flexibility and


Compensation” SSRN Working Paper No. 18 (2002).

Aradhana Agarwal, “The WTO Antidumping Code: Issues for Review in Post-
Doha Negotiations” ICRIER Working Pager Page No. 99 (2003).

Aradhana Aggarwal, “Anti-dumping law ans practice: an Indian perspective”


ICRIER Working Paper No. 85 (2002).

Aradhana Aggarwal, “Impact of tariff reduction on exports: A quantitative


assessment of Indian exports to US”, ICRIER Working Papers Page no. 120
(2004).

Aradhna Aggarwal, “The WTO Anti-dumping agreement: possible reform


through the inclusion of a public interest clause ICRIER Working paper 142
(2004).

Bagwell, Kyle and robert W.Staiger, “Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral


Opportunism, and The Rules of GATT/WTO NBER” Working Pager 7071
(1999).

Bodhisattva Ganguli, “The Trade Effects of Indian Antidumpig Actions” State


University of New Jersey Working Paper (2005).

254
Brad Klein, “Designing De Minimis,”, Indiana Antidegradation Workshop (2008).

Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson, “Reforming the Antidumping Agreement: A


Road Map for WTO Negotiations” Cato Institute Centre for Trade Policy Analysis
Working Paper 21 (2002).

Brink Lindsey et al, “Seattle and Beyond: A WTO Agenda for the New
Millennium “ Cato Institute Centre for Trade Policy analysis Working Paper 7
(1999).

Brink Lindsey, “The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality” The Cato
Institute Trade Policy Analysis Pager 7 (1999).

Brink Lindsey, “The U.S. Antidumping Law: Rhetoric versus Reality” The Cato
Institute Trade Policy Analysis Pager 7 (1999).

Bruce A. Blonigen and Thomas J. Prusa, “Antidumping NBER” Working Paper


8398, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2001).

Chad P. Bown, “The World Trade Organizaton and Antidumping in Developing


Countries,” World Bank Policy research Working Paper 4014 (2006).

Dan Ikenson, “The Antidumping Epidemic: Causes, Victims, Implications and


Potential Solutions” Cato Institute Centre for Trade Policy Analysis Working
Paper 362 (2001).

Dan Ikenson, “Zeroing in: Antidumping’s Flawed Methodology Under Fire,” Cato
Institute Centre for Trade Policy Analysis Working Paper 11 (2004).

Hylke Vandenbussche et al, “Import Diversion under European Antidumping


Policy”, NBER Paper 7340 (1999).

255
Joel Mokyr, “Mercantilism, the enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution”
(Presented to the Conference in Honor of Eli F. Heckscher, May 2003).

Lessons for Kyrgyzstan’s WTO Experience for Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and


Uzbekistan SAPECA Project Working Group on Trade Second Session Berlin
(2007).

Michael O. Moore, “Commerce Department Antidumping Sunset Reviews : A


major Disappointment” George Washington University Occasional Paper Series
7 (2002).

Radhika Joshi, “Antidumping Regulations: A Boon or Bane” Centre for Civil


Society Working Paper 169 (2006).

Raj Krishna, “Antidumping in Law and Practice” World Bank Policy Research
Working Pager 1823 (1998).

Raj Krishna, “Antidumping in law and practice” World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper 1823 (1997).

Robert M. Feinberg and Kara Marie Reynolds, Friendly Fire? “The Impact of US
Antidumping Enforcement on US Exporters” Working Papers 4 (2006).

Robert W. McGee, Antidumping Laws as Weapons of Protectionism : Case


Studies from Asia SSRN working paper (2008).

Robert W. Staiger and Frank Wolak, “Differences in the Uses and Efects of
Antidumping Law Across Import Sources” NBER Working Paper 4846 (1994).

Thomas J. Prusa, “Cumulation and antidumping: A challenge to competition


NBER working paper 14 (1198).

256
Thomas J. Prusa, “On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping” National Bureau
of Economic Research Working Paper 7404 (2001).

Timothy Armstrong, “Fair Circumvention” SSRN Working Paper 8 (2008).

D. Websites

http://exim.indiamart.com
http://fds.oup.com/
http://home.gwu.edu/
http://internationalecon.com/
http://internationalecon.com
http://www.customs.gov.au/
http://www.fordschool.umich.edu
http://www.foreignaffairs.org
http://www.helplinelaw.com
http://www.indianembassy.org
http://www.indianmba.com
http://www.infodriveindia.com
http://www.twnside.org.
http://www.unctad.org/
http://www.vvg-law.com
http://www.worldtradelaw.net
http://worldtradelaw.net
http://www.zlea.org
www.antidumpingpublishing.com
www.centad.org
www.commerce.nic.in
www.unctad.org
www.wto.org

257
258

You might also like