Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LIFE
1. Respecting human dignity means putting the individual human and his or her interests
before those of his or her possible descendants, social group or the like. This is laid down
in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights of 19 October 20051, whose
Article 3.2 reads: “The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over
the sole interest of science or society”, which reproduces Article 2 of the Oviedo
Convention2: “The interests and welfare of the human being shall prevail over the sole
interest of society or science”. Therefore, respect for human dignity would actually
require that we intervene in the human germline in order to preserve the interests of a
particular human being, disregarding the collective interest. According to that line of
reasoning, the value of human dignity actually prompts us to use genome editing for the
individual decisions.3 The individual dignity of an individual should prevail over the
dignity of the whole community. In the present matter, the decision of a person to
enhance his/her genes and acquire extraordinary traits is a dimension of his individual
dignity. Such gene enhancement will enhance the quality and dignity of human life and
thus must be respected irrespective of the interests of the society of the community as a
whole.
3
Rinie van Est et al., Rules for the digital human park: Two paradigmatic cases of breeding and
taming human beings—Human germline editing and persuasive technology 15 (2017).
3. Article 3 of the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human states that ‘the
human genome, which by its nature evolves, is subject to mutations. 4 According to the
Nuffield Council, if certain parts of the world became inhabitable because of air pollution
or climate change, genome editing could offer a remedy to this predicament by allowing
the introduction of characteristics that will fit future generations better for the conditions
4. With the help of human germline genome editing, desirable characteristics can be
improved in the living bodies by controlling the expressions of target genes. The
technology may be used not only to eliminate the mutations of life-threatening disorders
but also to enhance “human capabilities” such as intelligence and appearance. 6 This shall
enhance the dignity of human life to make him a better personality who can fit into this
world.
5. Safe heritable genome editing could indeed be regarded as beneficial to human dignity, in
the sense that it could maximally advance people's autonomy by avoiding the birth of
individuals with serious diseases that would entail more personal limitations than
6. The Counsel most humbly submits that the development of ‘Ujjeevan 2.0’ is encouraging
the scientific temper of the State of Alana by introducing the technology which will
enhance the dignity of human life and giving the unfortunate ones an opportunity to
upgrade their capabilities. Moreover, the value and quality of human life will be
4
Françoise Baylis & Lisa Ikemoto, The Council of Europe and the Prohibition on Human Germline Genome
Editing, 18 EMBO Reports 2084 (2017).
5
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, Statement on Gene
Editing, https://ec.europa.eu/research/ege/pdf/gene_editing_ege_statement.pdf (accessed July 19, 2019).
6
On Human Gene Editing: International Summit Statement, The National Academics of Sciences Engineering
Medicine (Dec. 3, 2015) , https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2015/12/on-human-gene-editing-
international-summit-statement.
improved by using this form of human germline genome editing for therapeutic and
developmental purposes.