Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper describes the development, comparison and validation of both 2-D and 3-D models of the
electroplating process in which the current density distribution, generated using the Finite Element Method
(FEM), is used together with Faraday's law of electrolysis to determine the local plating depth. Prior to work
on industrial components, a preliminary investigation was undertaken on the electroplating of a square
copper cathode (work piece) with a parallel lead anode of identical shape. The results described here show
good agreement, particularly in 3-D and are considered to validate the model sufficiently for it to be used for
electroplating tooling design.
Keywords
Electroplating, FEM, modelling
4 VALIDATION EXPERIMENTS
Prior to modelling the industrial components, a preliminary
investigation was undertaken on the electroplating of a
40mm square copper cathode (work piece) with a 40 mm
square lead anode located directly opposite and parallel
to each other in a relatively large tank of electrolyte. The
results of this preliminary work are presented in this
paper. The objectives were to compare the results from a
3-D FE model of the plated work piece with that of a 2-D
FE model of the plating deposited on the work piece's
central axis and to compare these against real plated
depths using as near identical conditions as possible.
Although the electric field between the electrodes is 3-D in
shape, it was considered essential to establish whether a
simple 2-D model could be used for tool design purposes.
Figure 1: 2-D and 3-D simulated plating depths (60mm).
Figure 3: 2-D orthogonal curvilinear squares.
6 DISCUSSION
A 2-D model is essentially a slice of unit thickness through
the real 3-D system. The model represented in the X-Y
plane, is assumed to have unit depth in the Z direction. It is
as if the model could be extended to infinity in both the +Z
and -2 directions without change in its shape. It follows that
for a 2-D model to be representative of the real system it is
necessary that the section of the real system does not F L > Flow line
change in the Z direction. In the X-Y plane of a 2-D model it
can be shown that the potential and current flow lines
intersect at right angles. Figure 5: The electric field between the electrodes.
Results from the FE tests showed that close to the Away from the centre of the electrode, particularly toward
electrodes the flow lines were virtually normal to the the corners, 2-D modelling accuracy reduces significantly.
electrode surfaces and consequenuy in this region flow Because of the limitations of 2-D models, further research
tubes have constant cross-sectional area (A,). Away from into industrial components is to be based on 3-D models.
the surface of the anode, the flow lines diverge, reach a
point of maximum separation at mid-distance between the 7 CONCLUSIONS
electrodes, and then converge to the cathode. Because of The 3-D nature of the current flow between the electrodes
this 3-dimensional effect, the cross-sectional area of a tube has been shown to reduce the electrical resistance and
A, will change along its length, producing a commensurate increase the current for the same applied potential in the
length wise variation in current density J (//A,). The voltage 3-D electroplating model as compared to I - D and 2-D
gradient (and therefor the current density J) is greatest at models. This results in higher 3-D current density values
the electrode surface, and least at mid-distance. These across the work surface particularly at the corners and
considerations apply even to the flow tube lying on the axis restricts the 2-D model to use in situations that are
of symmetry; consequently current flow through it cannot be towards 2-D in reality. The 3-D electroplating model that
determined from an application of the simple I - D form of has been developed shows reasonably good agreement
Ohm's Law. with the profile of the real plated surface and with the
For any arbitrary electrode separation distance L, the depth of the plate deposited and will be used, in future
voltage does not fall linearly from anode to cathode. research, to model real industrial electroplating set ups.
Because flow tubes have their smallest cross-section near
the surface, the voltage gradients and current densities are 8. AC KN0W LEDGEMENTS
greatest in this region. It should be noted that near the The authors would like to thank EPSRC for their support
surface, even if the geometry of a flow tube could be in carrying out this research.
considered to be a simple I - D cylinder, the voltage
difference across such a cylinder is unknown, being a REFERENCES
function of the 3-D field at a distance from the surface. Thus,
for finite values of L, the surface current density cannot be Budman E., 1998, Zinc alloy plating - yesterday, today
determined from a simple I - D calculation. FE results from a and tomorrow, Technical Paper - SME. FC, Vol.FC98-
test on the 3-D model, for an electrode spacing of 100 mm, 20, p19, ISSN 0161-1844.
are shown in Figure 6 below. The voltages are measured Snyder D.L., 1997, Electroplating nickekhromium for
along the axis of the model, and depart from linearity in a the automotive industry, Metal Finishing, Vol 95, No 8,
characteristic S-shaped manner. The characteristic shape of pp 29-33, Elsevier Science, ISSN 0026-0576.
the axial voltage distribution shown in Figure 6 is Celis J.P. and Fransaer J., 1997, Composite coatings -
independent of the particular value of L selected for the FE new insights leading to improved process control,
test. It should be pointed out that provided the voltage Trans Ins Metal Finishing, Vol 75, No 3 pp118-121,
gradient can be obtained from such a curve, the current ISSN 0020-2967.
density can be calculated from Ohm's Law. Funatani K. et Al, 1995, Engine performance
improvements, Automotive Engineering, Jan, Vol 103,
Decreasing the separation distance L decreases the overall NO 1, ~ ~ 1 5 - 2SAE
0 , USA, ISSN 0098-2571.
resistance of a flow tube and increases the current / passing Hammam T., 1997, Tin coating techniques for copper-
through it. At the surface, both current density and voltage based alloys - the effects on friction wear and electric
gradient are increased as L is reduced. In the limit when L properties, Electric Contacts - Proc Ann Holm Conf on
approaches zero, the field between the electrodes is so Electric Contacts, pp201-211, IEEE, ISSN 0361-4395.
constrained that over most of the surface (away from the Podlaha E.J., Landolt D., 1998, Electrodeposition of
edges) flow lines are straight and normal to the surface. molybdenum alloys, Proc 127thAnn Meet of Minerals
Potential surfaces lie parallel to the electrode surface. For Metals and Materials SOC,USA, Feb 16-19, pp 39-48.
this case, the field between the electrodes is I - D with Lee T.Y.T., 1996, Application of a CFD tool in
voltage falling linearly from anode to cathode. Current designing a fountain plating cell for uniform bump
density away from the edges can be determined from the 1- plating of semiconductor wafers, IEEE Trans Comps,
D form of Ohm's Law. These points were confirmed by a Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Feb,
test with an electrode spacing of 20 mm, which showed the VOl19, NO 1, ~ ~ 1 3 1 - 1 3IEEE,
7 , ISSN 1070-9894.
field between the electrodes to be almost entirely I-D, as Hardisty H., Mileham A.R. 8, Shirvani H., " A finite
described. element model of the Electrochemical Machining
Process", Annals of CIRP Vol. 42/1/1993, pp 201-204,
ISBN 3 905 277 19 0.
Hardisty H., Mileham A.R. 8, Shirvani H., Theoretical
and computational investigation of the electrochemical
machining process for characteristic cases of a
stepped moving tool eroding a plane surface, Proc I
Mech E, Part B Jo of Eng Manf, Vol. 211, pp 197-210,
1997, ISSN 0954-4054.
Mileham A.R., Hardisty H., Shirvani H., Clifton D.A.,
Simulating the electrochemical machining (ECM)
process - a die design aid, Proc of Int Conf on Design
and Production of Dies and Molds, CIRP, Istanbul,
Turkey, 19-21 June 1997, pp 163-168, ISBN 975 429
Distance from cathode - rnrn
106 3.
ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive,
Canonsburg, PA 15317, USA.
Figure 6: Voltage and current density distribution between
electrodes (negative indicates behind cathode).