Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/4331294
Master Plan for the Electricity Distribution Network of Istanbul European Side
CITATIONS READS
0 2,097
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Intelligent system for trading on wholesale electricity market (SMARTRADE) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdullah Nadar on 19 June 2015.
Abstract – This study presents the methodology, studies and voltage level for standardization and dispose the losses on
results of the electricity power distribution system master plan for both 34.5/10.5kV transformers and 10.5kV cable network [1].
the Istanbul City European Side. Mid-term demand projection The master plan study evaluates those regions either has to be
study made for the city based on the historical development, upgraded or remained as 10.5kV.
transformer loading measurements, municipality plans, and
constraints specific to the metropolitan are discussed. A
conservative planning solution for the next 5 years period is
proposed with additional suggestions based on the observations
and experience gained during on-site studies.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Load sliding
The most practical and economical solution is to
disconnect one (or more) transformer(s) from the feeder
which overloads in case of a contingency, and connect it to a
more convenient feeder, as illustrated in Fig. 6. In the scope
of the project, totally 135 of the distribution transformers in
the metropolitan were proposed to switch to another feeder to
relieve their existing supply feeders.
For congested regions, demand increase will not be due to
new developing areas. Hence a distribution network in the
area already exists. Essentially, load sliding is a more
economical solution compared to others if such a solution is
feasible. Only cabling investments are required to realize the
solution. However there are cases where a convenient feeder
does not exist or cabling route is not allowed to be excavated
Fig. 5. HV/MV Transmission Substations (i. KAYABASI & YENIKAPI
by municipality.
ST are the proposed HV/MV transmission substations, ii. Dark
regions correspond to urban regions)
The primary distribution feeder arrangement, as practiced Fig. 6. Feeder load sliding
in the large cities of Turkey, is based upon the simple open-
loop system where the feeder and loop components have B. Split of the feeder
sufficient reserve capacity to serve the load that may be
The second idea is to split the overloaded feeder into two
switched through loop switching (i.e. 50% loading). The
distinct feeders through the most convenient MV substation,
lower limit of the cable size is limited to 95 mm2 Cu because
as illustrated in Fig. 7. Only two of the feeders were proposed
the fault level chosen in the MV distribution systems is 16 kA
to be split due to the constraints of the network including
with the total fault clearing time of 1 sec at most. On the other
physical limitations of the substations (spacing constraints)
hand, as the load densities are high, voltage drop constraints
and too long cabling requirement.
are not critical and loading of cables is thermally limited [3].
Some of the critical feeders at the congested districts are
In upgrading of 10.5kV DTCs to 34.5kV level, the
compact Ring Main Units (RMU) should be the only option
due to building space constraints as the 10.5kV transformer
stations are relatively smaller than regular 34.5kV substations
[3]. The FAS integrated SCADA that already designed for
Fig. 7. Split of the feeder Istanbul requires installment of RMUs as well. Consequently,
the utilization of RMUs in the upgraded DTCs will enable the
C. Feeder installation inclusion of SCADA application without additional
replacement cost in the near future. Therefore, all of the
The most essential option is to install feeder(s) in order to
DTCs to be upgraded to 34.5kV level are proposed to be
relieve the overloaded feeders by switching some of the
equipped with compact RMUs in order to be ready for the
transformers that already supplied by the old feeder(s) to the
expansion of SCADA. The priority of the regions to expand
new feeder(s), as illustrated in Fig 8. The installation of
the SCADA was also determined in the scope of the project.
totally 41 feeders is proposed in the scope of the project
The DTCs closer to the 34.5kV supply rings that already
considering the constraints of DTCs (aging of assets, building
involve SCADA application were determined and given the
size, etc.).
priority.
IV. CONCLUSION
V. REFERENCES