You are on page 1of 4

[Downloaded free from http://www.jihs.in on Friday, August 14, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.

23]

Case Report

Phonetic Rehabilitation by Speech Therapy Following Lingual


Frenectomy
Priya Gopal Shetty, Ramya R. Iyer
Department of Public Health Dentistry, KM Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Abstract
A patient named Miss. Ayesha Saiyad, 18‑year‑old female, reported to the Department of Public Health Dentistry after undergoing lingual
frenectomy for ankyloglossia, in the Department of Periodontics. As she was tutoring school students, she wanted improved clarity of her
speech. Through postfrenectomy speech therapy sessions, we aimed to rehabilitate the patient’s phonetics and improve her confidence in
performing her work. Speech therapy sessions included counseling, motivation for improved speech outcomes and exercises to improve the
range of the tongue movements. In the first visit, after recording the chief complaint and speech assessment it was noted that the patient’s
speech was comprehensible. However, problems were observed during production of speech sounds such as/l/,/ll/,/th/,/tha/and/r/. The patient
was diagnosed with a phonetic articulation disorder. Subsequently, the patient was advised to undergo speech therapy sessions. The counseling
session was carried out and tongue protrusion and elevation exercises were demonstrated with the aid of the mirror. The patient was advised
to practice the same at home. The patient was recalled after 1 week. Counseling was given and tongue elevation exercise holding water in the
tongue was taught to the patient. While exercise and rolling of tongue were taught to improve tongue mobility. There was an improvement in
tongue protrusion by 2 mm postspeech therapy. The patient was able to touch the palate with her tongue with mouth open, postspeech therapy.
There was improvement in production of speech sounds/l/,/ll/,/th/,/tha/and/r/. The patient’s speech significantly improved after speech therapy.

Keywords: Lingual frenectomy, phonetic rehabilitation, social stigma, speech therapy, tongue exercise

Introduction therapy patients, with special emphasis on speech improvement


in postfrenectomy done on ankyloglossia patients under the
The tongue plays a major role in pronouncing the consonants
guidance of speech pathologist Mr. Vikas Kumar, Assistant
by making contact with specific parts of the oral cavity which
Professor Audiology and Speech‑Language Pathology, Dhiraj
are teeth, alveolar ridge, and hard palate.[1] Movement of the
Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth for 15 days.
tongue , such as, protrusion, elevation and grooving, with a
good range of mobility, is pivotal to sound production and The patient expressed that after frenectomy, her speech
flawless phonetics.[2] significantly improved, however, she needed professional help
to bring clarity in speech. The chief complaint of the patient
was recorded, preliminary speech assessment and tongue
Case Report movements were examined [Figure 1]. She was motivated to
The patient named Ayesha Saiyad, (case number: 1807090029) undergo speech therapy including tongue movements which
18‑year‑old female, was diagnosed with ankyloglossia were of significance in phonetics as well as intimacy functions.
Class  III  (according to Kotlow’s Classification)[3] in the On preliminary examination, it was noted that the patient’s
Department of Periodontics and after undergoing lingual
frenectomy reported to the Department of Public Health
Address for correspondence: Dr. Ramya R. Iyer,
Dentistry for counseling related to speech improvement. She Department of Public Health Dentistry, KM Shah Dental College
felt that her speech clarity needed to be improved, to pursue her and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
home tuitions more confidently. The principal investigator and E‑mail: ramya83_r@rediffmail.com
her guide had undergone training and observation of the speech
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to
Access this article online remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit
is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Quick Response Code:
Website: For reprints contact: WKHLRPMedknow_reprints@wolterskluwer.com
www.jihs.in
How to cite this article: Shetty PG, Iyer RR. Phonetic rehabilitation
by speech therapy following lingual frenectomy. J Integr Health Sci
DOI:
10.4103/JIHS.JIHS_42_19
2020;8:25-8.
Received: 09-Oct-2019 Revised: 10-Jan-2020 Accepted: 28-Mar-2020 Available Online: 30-Jun-2020

© 2020 Journal of Integrated Health Sciences | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 25


[Downloaded free from http://www.jihs.in on Friday, August 14, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.23]

Shetty and Iyer: Speech therapy postlingual frenectomy

speech was comprehensible. A list of words was prepared in domiciliary visit. Hence, the second session was arranged
the Hindi language as the patient was comfortable in Hindi. in the Department of Public Health Dentistry, wherein
During speech assessment, it was observed that patient counseling session and assessment of improvement in a
replaced the sound/l/and/ll/with the sound/da/, especially speech in pronunciation of sound/th/,/tha/,/l/,/ll/and/r/were
when the sound/l/was at the end of words such as “ladla.” carried out [Figure 4]. The exercise of holding water with the
The patient had difficulty in pronunciation of sound/th/and/ tongue [Figure 5], whistling exercise and rolling of tongue was
tha/when asked to speak the sentence “Thandi thaili leke aao” taught, the patient was advised to practice the exercises every
and was unable to roll tongue to pronounce the sound/r/as in day, and reinforcement was done through telephone once in a
American accent “river.” week over a period of 1 month. Photographs and videos were
taken from the patient after obtaining written consent.
The patient was diagnosed with speech sounds disorder
precisely phonetic  (articulation) disorder with distortion in At the 1  month recall visit, the speech of the patient had
production of sounds/th/and/tha/and substitution of sound/l/ improved and was able to pronounce sound/th/,/tha/,/l/,/
and/la/according to Bernthal et al.[4] classification of speech ll/and/r/with clarity. Unlike the previous visit, the patient
disorders. When the patient’s maximum tongue protrusion and was able to touch the palate with her tongue with mouth
maximum elevation were assessed, the patient was not able to open [Figures 6 and 7] and there was an improvement (2 mm)
touch her palate with the tip of the tongue. in tongue protrusion from 4.2 mm to 4.4 mm as measured from
corner of the mouth to tip of the tongue.
In the first speech therapy session, the patient was taught
the movements of tongue retraction, tongue protrusion and
tongue elevation with the aid of mirror [Figure 2] and lateral Discussion
movements of the tongue to the right and left corner of the Major deviations in the articulate structure of sounds change
mouth  [Figure  3]. The patient was advised to practice the phoneme structure of the sound and are noticed but slight
exercise for five times a day. deviations may go unnoticed as speech is still comprehensible.[5]
After 1 week, the second session was planned for a domiciliary In the present case, the patient did not have any difficulty
visit; but due to privacy concerns, the patient denied for a in pronunciation of lingua‑alveolar  (/t/,/d/,/n/) and fricative
(/s/and/z/) sounds as they can be produced with very slight

Figure 1: Counselling
Figure 2: Demonstration of sound production with the aid of a mirror

Figure 3: Lateral tongue movement Figure 4: Tongue elevation assessment

26 Journal of Integrated Health Sciences  ¦  Volume 8  ¦  Issue 1  ¦  January-June 2020


[Downloaded free from http://www.jihs.in on Friday, August 14, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.23]

Shetty and Iyer: Speech therapy postlingual frenectomy

It has been recommended by Segal et al.[6] and Steehler et al.[7]


that, to improve the mobility of the tongue, the patients have
to practice nonspeech oral‑motor exercises.[6,7] Accordingly,
favorable outcomes could be appreciated in our patient’s
phonetics and extent of tongue protrusion and elevation after
the patient continuously practiced tongue exercises.
Chinnadurai et al.[8] reported that speech concerns were the
second most prevalent outcome described in the ankyloglossia
literature. A  longitudinal study reported that there is an
improvement in articulation after frenectomy treatment, but
the benefits of fluent speech warranted phonetic rehabilitation
in postfrenectomy patients.[8]
In our study, the patient was unwilling for domiciliary
counseling sessions. This reflects on the fact that there could
Figure 5: Holding water in the mouth be a stigma attached to undergoing speech therapy. Hence,
care should be taken regarding the respect of privacy in speech
therapy.[9]
The prognosis of speech therapy for individuals after
frenectomy is solely based on the self‑interest of an
individual.[2] Speech therapy should be an integral part of the
treatment plan in patients indicated for lingual frenectomy due
to ankyloglossia. Phonetic rehabilitation in this case not only
restored speech function but also limited social embarrassment
and vocationally rehabilitated the individual.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate
patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her
consent for her images and other clinical information to be
reported in the journal. The patient understands that name
and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made
Figure 6: Preoperative tongue elevation to conceal the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Acknowledgement
1. Authors acknowledge the guidance of Dr. Vikas Kumar,
Speech Pathologist, Assistant Professor (ENT Department
of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Dheeraj
Hospital, Vadodara) for his guidance
2. We also thank the Dr.  Dhwani Vyas  (Periodontist)
for timely referral of case for phonetic rehabilitative
management
3. We also thank Faculty of Department of Public Health
Dentistry and Department of Periodontics, KM Shah
Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, for
their support.
Financial support and sponsorship
Figure 7: Postoperative tongue elevation Nil.

tongue elevation and can be generated with little distortion


Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
even if the tongue tip is held down. However, the alveolar ridge
requires to be elevated in the production of linguo‑alveolar
sound/l/l/, lingua‑palatal sound/r/and lingua‑dental sound/th/
References
1. Jain  CD, Bhaskar  DJ, Agali  CR, Singh  H, Gandhi  R. Phonetics in
tongue tip.[2] Hence in the present case, the patient had difficulty dentistry. Int J Dent Med Res 2014;1:31‑7.
in the production of those sounds. 2. Sudarsan S, Iyer VH. A comprehensive treatment protocol for lingual

Journal of Integrated Health Sciences  ¦  Volume 8 ¦ Issue 1 ¦ January-June 2020 27


[Downloaded free from http://www.jihs.in on Friday, August 14, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.23]

Shetty and Iyer: Speech therapy postlingual frenectomy

frenectomy with combination of lasers and speech therapy: Two case and treatment of ankyloglossia: Methodologic review. Can Fam
reports. Int J Laser Dent 2015;5:12‑21. Physician 2007;53:1027‑33.
3. Kotlow  LA. Oral diagnosis of abnormal frenum attachments in 7. Steehler  MW, Steehler  MK, Harley  EH. A  retrospective review of
neonates and infants: Evaluation and treatment of the maxillary and frenotomy in neonates and infants with feeding difficulties. Int J Pediatr
lingual frenum using the erbium: YAG Laser. M. J  Ped Dent Care Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1236‑40.
2004;10:2004. 8. Chinnadurai  S, Francis  DO, Epstein  RA, Morad  A, Kohanim  S,
4. Bernthal J, Bankson N, Flipsen P. Articulation and Phonological Disorder: McPheeters  M. Treatment of ankyloglossia for reasons other than
Speech Sound Disorder.  7th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2009. p. 8. breastfeeding: A systematic review. Pediatrics 2015;135:e1467‑74.
5. Ostapiuk B. Tongue mobility in ankyloglossia with regard to articulation. 9. Cabbage  KL, Farquharson  K, Iuzzini‑Seigel  J, Zuk  J, Hogan  TP.
Ann Acad Med Stetin 2006;52 Suppl 3:37‑47. Exploring the overlap between dyslexia and speech sound production
6. Segal LM, Stephenson R, Dawes M, Feldman P. Prevalence, diagnosis, deficits. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018;49:774‑86.

28 Journal of Integrated Health Sciences  ¦  Volume 8  ¦  Issue 1  ¦  January-June 2020

You might also like