Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDUSTRY REPORT
BY CARLOS MARTIN-RIOS
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3
FOREWORD
Hotels are increasingly challenged by emerging competitors and shifting
customer demands and expectations; Airbnb being just one example of The only way that hotels can prosper in a more
the former and Millennials of the latter. It is becoming clear that all of the
‘traditional’ players in hospitality will need to innovate in order to meet these
diverse economy is to invest in series of innovations
challenges. While some hotels recognize this, and even welcome it, others to create competitiveness.
do not. Their conclusions can be summarized briefly as: “The only way that
hotels can prosper in a more diverse economy is to cut costs relentlessly
and accept lower profit margins.”
Yes, the challenges are significant. But I couldn’t disagree more with that opinion. it is one of the least studied and understood industries of the economy.
At the same time, there are a number of outstanding examples of innovative Research to identify and investigate the relevance of novel forms of innovation
hotels, that have developed new businesses, created new services, adopted for hospitality to remain competitive is still needed. Investigating and
new management practices, engaged in collaborative and open innovation responding to this research gap is of paramount importance.
initiatives with customers, academic institutions and even competitors.
Not to be forgotten, green, eco-innovations are increasingly popular. Data from this report is the result of a research project sponsored by the Ecole
hôteliere de Lausanne (EHL) and the HES-SO, the University of Applied Sciences
Overall, there is a lot of interest among hoteliers and academics to ascertain Western Switzerland. EHL is considered by the industry to be the world’s best
how technological innovations and these so-called “non-technological hospitality management school. Between October 2016 and December 2017,
innovations” contribute to new and profitable revenue streams, and a over 2500 hotel professionals ranging from CEOs to hotel General Managers
competitive advantage. Very few academic studies have helped hotels better were contacted. We obtained a +/- 12% response rate. Data analysis has
understand the current state of hospitality innovation strategies – and evaluate resulted in a series of academic articles, professional publications as well
how complex innovations affect the firm’s overall utility, despite the critical as in working papers published by EHL.
importance of these issues. These are some of the issues addressed in this
report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY
CARLOS MARTIN-RIOS
Carlos Martin-Rios (PhD, Rutgers University) is an Associate professor of Human
Resources and Organizational Behavior, active in the field of innovation at the
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne (EHL, Switzerland)
He performs research that aims to understand and predict the factors that determine
innovation strategies in knowledge-intensive service firms at large and, in particular,
hospitality firms. Prof. Martin-Rios is the author or co-author of over 40 peer-reviewed
journal publications, over 15 articles in professional journals, 55 conference reports
and 19 invited talks, lectures and conference chairs.
Prof. Martin-Rios has worked and lived in the United States, Latin America, and Europe
and has been active in both institutional and private entrepreneurial activities, having
served as an advisor in launching innovation management programs and two
consulting companies.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
the adoption of innovative practices by global hospitality businesses and to
support the integration of innovation strategy into hospitality business strategy. VISION
Despite significant progress, hospitality innovation has arrived at a crossroads. Develop a practical innovation vision and framework that lays
the foundation for new innovation practices.
2
On one hand, hospitality corporate leaders in innovation remain a minority,
and are unevenly distributed across geographies and ownership structures.
On the other hand, a few standout companies are demonstrating BUSINESS CASE
that innovation can be a driver of renewal, efficiency and lasting business value. Prepare a clear business case for innovation in your
It’s one of the central dilemmas of hospitality innovation: few organization.
3
disagree with it in principle, but why doesn’t it happen more often?
VALUE-CREATION
Many independent hotel owners believe they do not have the resources
Communicate an innovative value-creation story to your
to develop their own innovation strategies. Several international multibrand
shareholders.
4
firms are better prepared to develop innovation strategies and to implement
a variety of innovative solutions.
STAKEHOLDERS
Short-term strategic thinking and cost-driven management practices Collaborate with a variety of stakeholders to mobilize resources,
represent hurdles to a broader implementation of innovation management acquire new knowledge and ideas, and drive strategic change.
in hotels.
6
hospitality innovation, we have identified seven evidence-based factors
that drive innovative business practices, regardless of size, ownership
structure or region.
EMBEDDEDNESS
Embed innovation organizationally through the establishment
of innovation managers, cross-functional teams, and clear targets.
7 MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS
Innovate on multiple dimensions of the firm’s business model
and processes: technology, service, organization,
sustainable management and marketing.
Future scenarios
In terms of future scenarios, hospitality firms that will invest on a range of There is an excellent opportunity for a formal innovation strategy for hotels
innovations will be better suited to increase competitiveness and reduce worldwide. In the short to medium term, innovation is what will determine
their productivity gap. The simple adoption of technological innovations alone the productivity performance and competitiveness of hospitality companies,
is not sufficient to gain competitiveness; the full benefit of those technologies whether independent hotels or national or multinational hotel chains. With an
is only achieved if they are accompanied by a cluster of related innovations in ever increasing pace of competition in a highly convoluted industry, the costs
organization, customer and supplier relationships, and a redesign of existing of inaction will be considerably higher than initially believed. The choice hotels
business models. Still, many companies will find it difficult to get the creativity need to make is to innovate or face the painful process of obsolescence and
skills and innovation mechanisms they need. Companies for which innovation irrelevancy.
remains elusive will find it difficult to obtain good results and to handle the
innovation requirements.
With an ever increasing pace of competition in a highly convoluted industry, the costs of inaction will be considerably higher
than initially believed. The choice hotels need to make is to innovate or face the painful process of obsolescence and irrelevancy.
KEY FACTS
Innovation in firms and performance measures comparison
Survey respondents:
TYPE OF PROPERTY
on
Luxury Upscale Midscale Budget
CEOs & Directors of European Luxury 500 employees
or less
50% ROI (return
established
on investment)
before 1999
ROA (return
Have implemented
on assets) innovations
technological
Area/business division 34.1%
firms 30.5%
& upscale 25.1% 10.3%
71% 59% 65% 64.6% 74%
40.3% 89.7% 62%
100% 72%
Innovation level in firms is
2.6 .9 8.8
Innovation in firms and performance measures
Low 1 comparison
Medium High Sales10growth Bed occupancy
High vs low innovative firms 2011-2016:
High innovative firms report significantly positive differences in ROI, ROA, sales growth and occupancy rates.
30.3
28.2
59
% 58
% ROI
48
% S
.2 .8 .3
50%
40
ROI (return ROA (return 30
on investment) on assets) 20 B
ROI (return ROA (return Sales growth Bed occupancy 10
on investment) on assets) ROA
40.3% Innovation in firms is: Low Medium High
ROA (return
on assets)
Innovation level in firms is
Low Medium High Sales growth Bed occupancy
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne ehl.edu REPORT | MAY 2018 7
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 - BEST PRACTICES | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3
SECTION 1.
INNOVATION STRATEGIES
AND BEST PRACTICES
Hospitality innovation management is one of the most salient topics in In Peter Druker’s words “Unexpected failure may be an equally important
international hospitality, tourism and travel management, both at the source of innovation opportunities”.
academic and practitioner level.
Most innovative firms, however, especially the successful ones, put in play
For many, innovation is equated with technology, and only scientists and a conscious, purposeful innovation strategy that combines different
engineers bring new technologies to life. Yet, innovation can occur in many innovation practices.
avenues that have little or nothing to do with technology or science. Service
firms, including hospitality firms, can and often do innovate their service According to Schumpeter’s theory of innovation, a firm’s innovation strategy
offerings, customer experiences and business processes and models. and, hence, its innovation intensity covers both technological and non-tech-
nological areas. Our definition of innovation strategy in hospitality firms
The most comprehensive and widely accepted definitions of innovation are includes combinations of a range of innovative activities encompassing
offered by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development technological innovations—including service, technology and process inno-
(OECD) and the U.S. Department of Commerce. These definitions make vations, as well as non-technological innovations—management methods,
reference to complex forms of innovation. It is important to note that innova- organization, strategic and marketing innovations.
tion is not necessarily successful and tied to growth. According to the Oslo
Manual (OECD, Statistical Office of the European Union) innovative firms often Firms with a formally defined innovation strategy often attempt complex
fail to generate economic returns from their innovations. forms of innovation, which results in high innovation intensity.
Despite the importance of the relationship between different combinations It reflects the extent to which hospitality firms have a well-defined and
of innovation initiatives and organizational effectiveness, innovation strategy ambitious innovation strategy in place (firms with high innovation intensity)
and innovation intensity have not been the focus of much research in the or a less-defined, more modest innovation strategy (firms with medium
hospitality field. innovation strategy).
• How and to what extent is innovation activity the response to changes Just under 10% of firms in our study have high innovation intensity. The vast
in the external environment? majority of firms have low (40%) and medium (50%) levels of innovation
intensity.
• How and to what extent do different innovation strategies take place
internally in hospitality firms? Innovation intensity ranges by ownership structure from 6.3% among
independent firms to 2.5% for corporate ones and just 0.4% for leased and
• Do hospitality firms differ in their capacity to foster and implement franchised ones. Among innovators alone, innovation intensity is naturally
innovation activity? higher, but especially among independent firms (65%) and corporate firms
(26%) compared to just 4.3% for leased and franchise ones.
Innovation Intensity
Innovation intensity is a composite measure of innovation initiatives and is
used to rank hospitality firms according to their innovativeness.
We calculated overall innovation intensity for each participating firm.
NON-TECHNOLOGICAL
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
INNOVATION
Marketing strategy/
methods
66 6 99 9 88..88
8.8
1122.1.2. 1100.1.0.
6 9 8.8
12. 10.
30.3
30.3
42.9
42.9
28.2
28.2
30.3
42.9
28.2
55995 9
%% 59
.2
%
55885 8
%% 58
.8
% 48
.3
%
44884 8
%%
..22. 2 ..88. 8 ..33. 3
Management
New principle challenging
management orthodoxy
Organizational
New method in undertaking
Product/service business practices
New way of serving customers and workplace organization
to create greater value
Non
-te
l
ch
Technologic
Marketing
nolo
Market attractiveness,
pricing architecture,
INNOVATION
gical
distribution channels
Process
New production
or delivery method ew
N
p r a c ti c e s
Business model
Create/adapt/renew
value creation
New external relationships
Seek and leverage ideas
Environmental sustainability
from partners, customers, and
Initiatives with a strong
individuals external to the firm
sense of environmental awareness
72%
friendliness, components or sub-systems
22.
4
Top executives and senior managers agree on the need to strengthen
the industry’s ability to continuously adapt and innovate by facilitating
30.3
28.2
investment in new technologies and continuously adapting to new
technological capabilities.
% 59
.2
% % 58
.8 3
%
.5
% 3. %48
.3
%
4
Despite the importance of technology advancement, these firms do not 53 53 5
.4 .4
obtain significantly higher results in overall customer retention and average
bed occupancy rate. Investment in new technologies should be strengthened
through a combination of several forms of innovation. New technology Product/service innovation Process innovation
or technical solutions are useless unless guests are informed as to their
availability and the most effective way of using them.
18
the introduction of a new management
.4
.4
22
22
.4
.4
42.9
28.2
42.9
42.9
% % % into the organization that tends to
improve effectiveness or performance
% % % %
48
% %
59 58
.2 .8 .3
3 3 44 44 of that
4 organization.
4
4
.8 .8 8.3 8.3
.8
.8
18
18
value generated by staging experiences that create lasting memories for the
consumer. Consumers increasingly desire unique, memorable and immersive
30.3
28.2
experiences when it comes to acquiring services. Hospitality companies face
the opportunity to revamp their marketing strategies by offering unique
% % %
service and engagement of customers in a manner that creates indelible
experiences. % 59
.2
% 58
.8
54
% 54
% 48
.3
4 7. 4 7. .6 .6
5 5
Business model innovation
Strategic innovations consist of critical innovations that relate to the Marketing innovation Business model innovation
formulation of a business model. According to the Harvard Business Review
(HBR) article «Reinventing your business model,» authored by Christensen,
Johnson and Kagermann, these innovative actions refer to the economic
architecture, business planning and execution, customer segments, customer Innovation in firms is: Low Medium High
relations and the market development for value added end-products.
88 99
303. 0.
64%64%
64%
66 6
12.. .
8 9 30.
9
8.8 Suppliers of equipment, materials,
10.
.6
49
49
components, or software
49
22.
22.9
229 .9
30.3
42.9
28.2
%% %%
46
.2 .8 2 .3
Universities or other higher
.4
42
33%
.
46
4 6.
2 2 education institutions
.4
.4
4 24 2
33%
33%
.
innovation innovation
New innovation practices
& sustainability External relations innovation
ext. relation Innovative external relationships
Between 2011-2016, 31% of firms invested heavily
innovation
innovation
Innovation in firms is: Low
innovation
Medium
innovation
High in developing innovative external relationships
&&sustainability
sustainability ext.
ext.relation
relation
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne ehl.edu REPORT | MAY 2018 19
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 - BEST PRACTICES | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3
Environmental sustainability
Environmental sustainable innovation encompasses sustainable values,
6
management of sustainable development, eco-innovation, new management 42. 19
10. 6
6 8.8
12.
and technologies of environmental sustainability (conservation, saving
.6
energy/water, recycling, green growth, etc.).
30.3
28.2
There is a considerable proportion of firms reporting a strong investment in
eco-innovation. Some 80% of firms indicated that they were investing heavily
% % %
%
in eco-innovation. Developing sustainable business is an ecological, economic 59 58 48
.2 .8 .3
and social issue.
This also holds true for sustainability innovations as firms seek cost-reduction
and soft-performance (image, brand and reputation) benefits. These drivers 4 0. 8
might hamper the implementation of certain forms of environmental inno-
vations, particularly, innovations perceived to be expensive and having only
indirect soft-performance benefits. Sustainable eco-innovation
Environmental
Innovation in firms is: Low Medium High
sustainability
Environment
Bearable Viable
Low Medium
Sustainable
High
Social Economic
Equitable
SECTION 2
SIX HURDLES
TO HOSPITALITY INNOVATION
WHICH OF THE 6 INNOVATION SCENARIOS WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE NEAR FUTURE?
STRATEGIC PLANS
SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3
Grow Sustain
SCENARIO 4 SCENARIO 5 SCENARIO 6
OPERATIONAL PLANS
Despite their lack of investment in innovation, roughly half the non-innovators Although there is a degree of consensus among executives that outsourcing
still expect that innovation will not be problematic in the future. Yet, close to 30% of innovation activities will not be relevant for the industry, opinions may be
of these firms believe that in the future they will engage even less than currently divided about the underlying reasons. Top innovators may favor in-house inno-
in non-technological innovation and green, sustainable innovations. vation regardless of cost, whereas in the case of non-innovators it might be due
to the lack of formal innovation strategy and practices.
In contrast, companies taking a bolder, more far-sighted approach to innovation
are on the opposite trajectory: aligning the organization around the require- A closer look at the differences in perception between the most innovative
ments for success. Their balanced portfolio of innovative efforts – including
91 87
firms and the non-innovators 91the six scenarios shows positive
regarding
technological, non-technological and sometimes green, eco-innovations – rein- statistically significant differences in all six future scenarios.
forces their innovation strategy.
61 65
35
42 26
33 33
16 23 17 5
91 87 91
65 52 44
61
35 55
42 26 49
33 33
23 5 12 13 29 9 27
16 17 4 19
0 17 0
52 44
High innovators Non-innovators
55
Scenario = Strategic Technological
49
Non-technological Sustainable Creative workplace Elusive Outsourced
12 13 29 9 27
Ecole hôtelière
17 de 4 Lausanne 19
ehl.edu REPORT | MAY 2018 24
0 0
40
20
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 - FUTURE SCENARIOS | SECTION 3
0
Technological Technological
100 100
80 80
60 60
Outsourced 40 Outsourced 40
Strategic Strategic
20 20
0 0
Elusive Elusive
6 9 8.8
12. 10.
30.3
42.9
28.2
Non-technological Non-technological
59
% 58
% Creative 48
%
.2 .8 .3
Creative workplace
Sustainable Sustainable
workplace
Results are particularly revealing regarding firms engaged in business and the highest innovation intensity. Not surprisingly, companies actively en-
model innovation. Although only 19% of the companies are currently gaged in business model innovation have the highest scores in every single
reformulating their business model, as seen in the previous section, innovation activity.
they are also the companies with the most complex innovation strategy
Six questions about business model innovation: Most likely future scenarios of innovation
for business model innovators (%)
2 Outsourced Strategic
What novel
activities could
help satisfy those
5 83
needs?
How will value
1 3
be created
for each
25
What customer How could the stakeholder?
50 75
needs will the activities be Elusive
Technological
new business linked in novel
model address? ways? 6
What revenue 67 54
4 models can be
adopted to
Who should complement the
perform the business model?
activities?
What novel
95
Sustainable Non-technological
Source: Amit, R. & Zott, C.
(2012) Creating value through
governance
business model innovation. arrangements
Creative
Sloan Management Review,
Spring.
can be found? workplace
87 91 9 78
13 22
Scenario 1. Strategic innovation
Over 75% of executives think innovation will be more strategic in the future.
One leading factor: In terms of innovation activities, highly innovative firms High intensity High intensity High intensity
have typically engaged in non-technological innovation. technological non-technological new innovations
innovation innovation (open & eco-innovation)
50 61 44
13 13 22
37 Unlikely 26
Likely Most likely
33
3 87 66
10 13
87
88
Building capabilities based on technological innovation (%)
50 61 44
13 13 22
37 26 33
33 39 28
17 28
50 17 44 44
3 87 66
10 13
87
88
27 26 17
39
30 26
43 48 44
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne ehl.edu REPORT | MAY 2018 29
14.3 42.9 42.9
87 91 9 78
13 22
50 61 44
13 13
Scenario 5. Elusive innovation Pre 1970-1999 30 70 22
37 26 33
For mature organizations, innovation remains difficult. These hotels must figure out how
to budget resources devoted to innovation, who encourage innovative thinkers, break 2000-2017 20 80
away from the main operations, find new solutions and test concepts.
Close to 70% of hospitality firms report low or moderate levels of uncertainty Unikely Likely
3 87 66
regarding the future of innovation in their organizations. There is a significant 10 13
relationship between pursuing innovative solutions and uncertainty toward innovation. 87
Moreover, results suggest a strong association between organizational innovation,
88
business model innovation and overall uncertainty about innovation in the future. Innovation will remain elusive (%)
33 39 28
17 28
50 17 44 44
50 Future outsourcing
61 innovations (%) 44
13 13 22
37 26 33
Top innovators
26.1 30.4 43.5
Scenario 6. Outsourcing innovation
Mid innovative
There is not a clear sense of urgency among executives for outsourcing innovation firms 14.3 42.9 42.9
activities. 3 87 66
10 13
87
Non-innovators
5.6 39.6 55.2
The more innovation they do, the higher their likeliness to outsource any innovation 88
activity in the future. Outsourcing is more related to technological innovation. More
precisely, close to 70% of firms doing technological innovation answered positively
to the question of whether they will engage in innovation outsourcing in the future.
Unlikely Likely Most likely
33 39 28
17 28
50 17 44 44
Outsourcing scenario (%)
27 26 17
39
30 26
43 48 44
30 70
High intensity High intensity High intensity
technological non-technological new innovations
innovation innovation (open & eco-innovation)
20 80
Unlikely Likely Most likely
Executives are not rushing to outsource
innovation activities
SECTION 3
HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY TODAY
Board member
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS
CEO
Area or business Region
Professional
YEARprofil
OF
7 division Director 58.7
21.4 .2
ESTABLISHMENT
Board member 20.2
YEAR OFCEO Hotel General Manager / 12.1
Director of a Department
ESTABLISHMENT
78.9%
9.3
37.7
Area or business 1
7
21.4 .2
% division Director
7.2
1
19.3
4.
3
YEAR OF Director of a Department 1.8
18.4
31.4
37.7
.3
ESTABLISHMENT
% 41
%
80.7%
%
18.4
1
4.
3
31.4
Year 3 0
19. .3
% .9
%
3
41
of establishment
62
.3
%
30 90
.1 %
.9 9.9 Number
80.7%
20
62
Pre 1970 2000-2009 .2
est.
18.4
.3
9.9%
% .1 % of employees
31.4
90 2
1970-1999 2010-2017 9.9
3.
16.1
20
% 1970-1999
5.8
0.
2%
Pre 1970 2000-2009 7.2
.2 < 49 500-4
7.2
16.1 74%
1 0. 3
30 2010-2017 50-499 50
%
3.2
.9 5.8
10 . 2
62 .1 % 50-99 10
.3
%
90
9.9 20 7. < 49
.2 2 100-249 25
74%
23.3
1 0. 3
9.9%
50-499 >500
%
Pre 1970 2000-2009 2
250-499
Type
TYPE of property 5 3.8
3.
OF PROPERTY
16.1
5.8 2 0. 2
1
0.
2%
1 0. 3
50-499 500-999
% 100-249
2 0. 2
23.3
50-99 1000-2499
Luxury Upscale Midscale Budget
23.3 5 3 . 8 100-249 250-499
2500-4999
34.1% 30.5% 25.1% 10.3% 250-499 >5000
5 3.8
64.6% 89.7% 100%
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FIRM PERFORMANCE AND SUCCESS FACTORS
We used subjective performance measures to assess firm performance that was 20% higher than that of their competitors. Close to 15% are in
and success factors, including ROI, ROA, customer retention, sales growth the fourth quartile with customer retention and ROI exceeding 75% of all
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
and bed occupancy rate. About 50% of top and senior managers in the study competitors. Only 5% of executives report their firm’s ROI is less than that
reported return on investment (ROI) greater than approximately 45% of all of their competitors.
competitors in their main market segment and return on assets (ROA)
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Please rate how well your company has performed relative to all other competitors in the main market segment over the last year:
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
Example: If you believe that your sales growth is greater than
approximately 45% of all competitors in your principal served 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
market segment, rate yourself a 5 for the sales growth.
6.3
6.3
6.3
5.4
5.4
5.8
5.8
7.2
7.2
9.0
6
3.6
5.4
5.4
9.0
9.0
8
8.5
3.6
3.6
3.
6.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
.5
7
5. 5.
.0
9.
11.
11.
6 .6 10 108. 8.
9.4 16. 16 .3 .31 1 8 8 4 7
.4 .4 5.8 5.8 6.
22 226.3 6.3
ROI ROI 3.6 ROA
38.6.1 ROA
8.1
26.5 26.5
4.5
73.5%
73.5%
9.0 5.4 5.4 3.6
9.0 9.0
9.9 9.9 17.5
14.8 14.8
%
5.8
% % % %
6.7 6.7
5.4
% % %
.8%
.8%
14.182 14.812 7
.9 %
.6.6 7.6
66
66
.6 8 8
65
9.
0
9.
0 5. 5.
13
%
.8
.8
.2
10
.0
13.
13.
15.
15.
17.9
33
194.0
14.8
5.8
5.8
7.6
6.7
67..67
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
9.0
4.5
4.5
9
.8
7
52 52
.9 % .9 %
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Return on investment Return on assets Overall customer Sales growth Average bed
(ROI) (ROA) retention occupancy rate
0% 1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100%
ANY PERFORMANCE:
COMPANY PERFORMANCE:COMPANY PERFORMANCE:
COMPANY
COMPANY PERFORMANCE:
PERFORMANCE:
COMPANY PERFORMANCE:COMPANY PERFORMANCE: COMPANY PERFORMANCE:
COMPANY PERFORMANCE:
ON RETURN
INNVESTMENT
ON INNVESTMENT
(ROI) (ROI)
RETURN ON RETURN
ASSETS
OVERALL (ROA)
ON ASSETS
CUSTOMER
OVERALL (ROA)
CUSTOMER
RETENTION RETENTION SALES GROWTH AVERAGE
SALES GROWTHBED OCCUPANCY RATE
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne 0%
ehl.edu
1-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100% REPORT | MAY 2018 34
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3 - TODAY
Markets 2014-2016
MARKET STRATEGY
Over half the companies operate in international markets, 36% in
national markets and 25% in local markets. In terms of their global
strategy, companies roughly split with regard to global integration
or local adaptation of activities: 37% focus on global integration
and 52% on local adaptation or responsiveness – the ability
to adapt to the local environment, to adjust to cultural differences
and to meet the specific needs of local customers. Local/regional
Local/regional
Local/regional National
National
National International
International
International
24.7%
24.7%24.7% 35.9% 35.9%
35.9% 55.2%
55.2%
55.2%
MARKET
MARKET
STRATEGY
MARKET
STRATEGY
STRATEGY
37.7% 51.6%
37.7%
51.6%
50.1%
37.7%
51.6%
81.6%
37.7%
21.1 23.8
50.1%
50.1%
81.6%
81.6%
21.1 21.1 23.8
16.6
16.6 16.6 27.8
27.8
More than half the companies
operate in international markets 31.4
31.4 31.4 30
30
and follow a local adaptation 18.8
18.8 18.8 13
13 13
strategy 8.1
8.1 8.1 3.6
3.6 3.6
2.7
2.7 0.9
0.9
% %
2.7 0.9
1.3
1.3 % 1.3 % 0.9
0.9 % 0.9
COMPANYPERFORMANCE:
COMPANY PERFORMANCE: COMPANY PERFORMANCE: COMPANYPERFORMANCE:
PERFORMANCE:
COMPANY COMPANY P
AVTHGLOBAL INTEGRATION
AVTHGLOBAL INTEGRATION AVTHGLOBAL INTEGRATION AVTHE COMPANY`S COMMITMENT TO
Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne ehl.edu AVTHE COMPANY`SREPORT
COMMITMENT
AVTHE TO
COMPANY
| MAY 2018 35
OFACTIVITIES
OF ACTIVITIESIS
ISHIGH
HIGH OF ACTIVITIES IS HIGH LOCALADAPTATION
ADAPTATIONOF
OFACTIVITIES
ACTIVITIES ISHIGH
HIGH
LOCAL IS
LOCAL ADAPTATION
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3 - TODAY
COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT
Hospitality firms face increasing disruption from competitors, intermediaries, We asked executives to rate how much they disagree or agree with six
technological firms, and customers themselves. As the industry embarks elements characterizing the business environment and conditions in the
on a highly uncertain decade it is important to understand the causes primary markets they serve, including market competitive intensity, price
and solutions to these recent disruptive forces. competition, competitive moves or market dynamism, the collaborative
economy (including increased competition from firms such as Airbnb),
By understanding the forces affecting the industry and the alternative competition from OTAs (web-based distribution channels and search engine
solutions coming from innovative practices, hospitality firms will be able companies), technological turbulence and, finally, new generational tur-
to make more informed decisions. For senior management in the hospitality bulence related to younger customers’ (millennial generation) tendency to
industry it helps to better understand and evaluate not only hospitality have service-related needs that are different from existing customers.
companies but also the way competitors (OTAs, collaborative economy
firms, other stakeholders) deal with disruption.
25.6%
25.6%
35.9%
35.9%
21.5%
19.3%
21.5%
19.3%
10.8 13.9 4 13.9 4 8.1 8.1
.8 14.8 22 17.5 22 17.5 11.2 11.2
29.1 29.1 33.6 30.9 33.6 30.9 19.7
MARKET DYNAMISM
4
11.2 11.2 11.2
% %
17.5
12.1 12.1 14.8 14.8
24.2
21.5%
7.2 3.1 9.4 3.1 9.4 19.3 19.3
28.7%
28.7%
% % % 30.9 %
%
2
1
3 4.9 2
1
3 1.3 1
2 1.83 1.3 1
2 1.8
3 9.4 % 9.4
How much people agree with the statement? Disagree Totally agree
8.1
9.4
19.3
11.2
28.7% 19.3%
17
%
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 | SECTION 3 - TODAY
Executives in our study agree very strongly with the negative effect of and top managers view the global environment favorably. Close to 70% of
technological turbulence, OTAs and the so-called ‘Millennial effect’ on their senior business leaders describe the competitive environment as somewhat
sources of competitive advantage. Price competition is also perceived as an disruptive. Finally, slightly over 25% of them rank the global environment as
extremely important source of disruption. In contrast, a large proportion of highly disruptive and uncertain.
executives consider that market dynamism and industry-level competitive
intensity have lower impact on their business environment.
Interestingly enough, only three out of every ten leaders surveyed believe
that increased competition from collaborative firms such as Airbnb has a
negative impact on their operations and profitability. Overall, only 4% of senior
45.3%
18.8 6 4
25.
45.3%
18.8
46.6%
46.6%
20.6%
20.6%
17.9 17.9 4.5 4.5
26.5 25.
6 4
1.8
9.422.4 9.4
9.4
12.1
4
0.3 10.3 22.4
4
4
9.
17.5
6
9.
? 3.1?
6
6.3 13.93.1? ? 13.9 21.5%
% 1.8 % 4 0.9 %
% 4 24.2
0.9
30.9
%%
%
Low Medium H
Low Medium High
OTAs: Technological turbulence: Millennial 18.8
generation: Uncertainty
45.3%
“Competition from web-based “It is very difficult to forecast “Younger customers tend of global
25. competitive
6 4
26.5
distribution channels and where the technology in hospitality to have service-related needs environment
search engine companies reduce
OTA’S EFFECT OTA’S EFFECT
traffic to our own distribution
will be in the next two to
TECHNOLOGICAL
three years” TURBULENCE TECHNOLOGICAL TURBULENCE
those of our
13.5
27.8
that are MILLENIAL
different from
existing customers”
?
channels” MILLENIAL 9.4 %
4
9.
6
3.1
0.9 %
COLLABORATIVE E
How much people agree with the statement? Disagree Totally agree Low Medium High
8.1
9.4
19.3
11.2
28.7% 19.3%
17
%
HOSPITALITY INNOVATION REPORT SECTION 1 | SECTION 2 - FUTURE SCENARIOS | SECTION 3
CONCLUDING REMARKS
This industry report has offered insight into several important aspects of This is the rationale of this Industry Report, the Workshops on Hospitality
the challenges facing the hospitality industry. Innovation held at EHL and the academic and professional articles
published. At these events, and through the corresponding white papers,
Designing sound innovation strategies and deploying practical innovation we bring together leaders and experts from around the world to look at how
activities is key to a healthy hospitality economy –and we believe that innovation strategy and innovation practices may play out in general, and
hotels have to reach higher maturity levels to advance this discussion. in hospitality services in particular.
What this innovation strategy will look like is very much an open question. We hope you have found this paper useful, and would be delighted to
Nevertheless, our research shows that it has to be demand-led, inclusive, continue the discussion.
sustainable, and open to external collaborations. By harnessing the poten-
tial of both technological and non-technological forms of innovation, hotels
can develop a strategy that is, technically-speaking everything it needs to
be (see: rebrand.ly/Hospinnov-03).
We are also confident that with the right level of commitment and
collaboration, the journey towards a professionalization of the innovation By harnessing the potential of both technological
activity in hotels is feasible, economically viable and managerially possible. and non-technological forms of innovation,
Furthermore, we believe there is an opportunity to create a new market for
innovation collaboration among businesses and external partners—
hotels can develop a strategy that is,
consulting firms, universities, research institutes, and entrepreneurial technically-speaking, everything it needs to be.
ventures—that does not exist today.
Hospitality innovation
ehl.edu | rebrand.ly/Hospinnov-04
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank a number of people who contributed their considerable community, and we want to acknowledge their participation:
expertise to the creation of this industry report. We conducted research with
senior executives in the hospitality industry including Rezidor President and Dr. Cathy Enz, Cornell University, School of Hotel Administration
CEO Federico González Tejeda, Accor’s Yves Lacheret, Frank Lavey and Yves Ms. Marie Forestier, Hotel Bon Rivage
Givel from Hyatt, and Michael Levie CEO of Citizen M.
Mr. Oscar Herrera, CIO Lopesan Group
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the EHL marketing and Mr. Mathieu Jaton, CEO Montreux Jazz Festival Foundation
academic staff, including Meloney Brazzola, Myriam Mcalinden, Andrew Bren- Mr. Alain Kropf, Hotel Royal Savoy
ner, Alycia Couvreu De Deckersberg, and Teofil Ciobanu. We are particularly
Mr. Jean-Philippe Lallement, EPFL Innovation Park Foundation
grateful to the faculty who talked to us about hospitality innovation, Christine
Demen Meier, Steffen Raub and Igor Sekulic. Mr. Frank Lavey, Senior VP Global Operations Hyatt Hotels
Mr. Eugenio Minvielle, President and Founder INNIT International
Also, in March 2017, a Workshop on Hospitality Innovation led by Professor
Ms. Anne Sophie Pic, Chef Maison Pic
Martin-Rios was conducted at the Ecole hôtelière de Lausanne that included
the following international leaders from the global strategic and innovation Mr. Fernando Polo, CEO Territorio Creativo
Finally, we would like to acknowledge the contribution of SEIM (seim-mc.com) founder Noelia Ruiz who supervised the data collection process
and provided feedback and guidance during fieldwork, and of Heidi Weber, Azmut Creative Design, who coordinated the design of this industry report.
REFERENCES
Birkinshaw, J. & Mol, M (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, July.
Retrieved at: https://shop.sloanreview.mit.edu/store/how-management-innovation-happens
Christensen, C., Johnson, M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, December.
Retrieved at: https://hbr.org/2008/12/reinventing-your-business-model
D’Emidio, T., Dorton, D., & Duncan, E. (2015). Service innovation in a digital world. McKinsey Quarterly, February.
Retrieved at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/service-innovation-in-a-digital-world
de Jong, M. & van Dijk, M. (2015). Disrupting beliefs: A new approach to business-model innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, July.
Retrieved at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/disrupting-beliefs-a-new-approach-to-bu-
siness-model-innovation
Erhardt, N., Martin-Rios, C. & Heckscher, C. (2016). Am I doing the right thing? Rituals as institutional learning mechanisms for organizational culture
in restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59: 31-41
Retrieved at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027843191630113X
Martin-Rios, C. & Erhardt, N. (2017). Small business activity and knowledge exchange in informal interfirm networks. International Small Business Journal, 35.
Retrieved at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0266242616667540
Pine J. & Gilmore, J. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, July-August.
Retrieved at: https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy
EHL prides itself on possessing and continuing to expand a large network of For additional details on collaboration opportunities and to find out more
partnerships with key strategic actors in education and the hospitality industry. about how EHL can tailor projects and opportunities to your specific
EHL does this in a variety of ways, most importantly through collaborative needs contact us:
opportunities for companies and organizations to become actively engaged
with the deep pool of talent that EHL enjoys through its existing students and partnership@ehl.ch
faculty, as well as via its vast external network.
EHL is dedicated to supporting and driving the continued growth and innovation expertise of our faculty to support your projects and talent development needs.
in the hospitality industry. Working alongside the industry to develop knowledge Faculty members are consistently among the best in their respective fields, with
and address practical issues faced by today’s professionals, EHL is committed PhDs from top universities, strong industry relations and experience, and they
to making an active contribution to the regeneration of the industry. EHL offers are regularly recognized with awards and honors from external institutions.
numerous opportunities for your organization to tap into the vast experience and