Undersluice Bay Design Report PDF

LIKHU KHOLA‐ A
HEP
Under sluice bay design
report

Prepared by Entura Hydro Tasmania India
Pvt Ltd ‐ Corporate identification number‐
U74140DL2006FTC156829
Unit 3A, 3rd Floor, Plot No. FC‐24, Film City,
Sector‐16A, Noida, District Gautam Budh
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh‐201301, India

Entura in Australia is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, and OHSAS18001.

©Entura. All rights reserved.
Entura has prepared this document for the sole use of the client and for a specific purpose, as expressly stated in the document. Entura
undertakes no duty nor accepts any responsibility to any third party not being the intended recipient of this document. The information
contained in this document has been carefully compiled based on the client’s requirements and Entura’s experience, having regard to
the assumptions that Entura can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. Entura may also
have relied on information provided by the client and/or other parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been
verified. Subject to the above conditions, Entura recommends this document should only be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated
in its entirety.

LIKHU KHOLA‐ A HEP ‐ Under sluice bay design report Revision No: 0

Document information
Document title LIKHU KHOLA‐ A HEP
Under sluice bay design report
Client organisation Numbur Himalayan Hydropower Private Limited
Client contact Sujan Ghimire/Subodh Paudel
ConsultDM number
Project Manager Kavish Bibra
Project number P513678
Revision history
Revision 0
Revision description
Prepared by Pradipta Kumar Swain
Reviewed by Abhay P Singh
Approved by Kavish Bibra
(name) (signature) (date)
Distributed to Sujan Ghimire Numbur Himalayan

Hydropower Private Limited
(name) (organisation) (date)


Contents
1. Under sluice bay 1
1.1 Purpose of the structure 1
1.2 Description 1
1.3 Design philosophy 4
1.4 Design drawings 5
2. Material properties 7
2.1 System of units 7
2.2 Materials 7
2.2.1 Structural concrete (M25) 7
2.2.2 Reinforcement steel 7
2.2.3 Backfill material 7
2.2.4 Foundation material 8
3. Geotechnical design data 9
4. Main undersluice bay 11

4.1 Loads and load combinations 11
4.1.1 Design loads 11
4.1.2 Load combinations 14
4.2 FEM (finite element analysis) 15
4.3 Main under sluice components design 15
4.3.1 Pier 15
4.3.2 Raft 16
4.3.3 Top slab 16
4.3.4 Breast wall 16
4.4 Reinforcement summary 16
5. Extended pier 17

5.1 Load & load combinations 17
6. Undersluice bay Stilling basin portion 21

6.1 Load & load combinations 21
7. References 23
v

Appendices
A Stress diagrams‐main under sluice bay
B Bending moment & shear force‐main under sluice bay
B.1 Raft
B.2 pier
B.3 Top slab
B.4 Breast wall
C Stress diagram –extended pier
D Bending moment & shear force‐extended pier
D.1 Raft
D.2 Stem
E Stress diagram –undersluice bay stilling basin portion
F Bending moment & shear force‐ undersluice bay stilling basin portion
F.1 Raft
F.2 Stem
Annexure
List of figures
Figure 1.1: Under sluice bay top plan 2
Figure 1.2: Cross section of main undersluice bay 2
Figure 1.3: Undersluice bay section in stilling basin 3
Figure 1.4: Under sluice longitudinal section 3
Figure 1.5: extended pier plan 4
Figure 1.6: Extended pier section with top at EL1451.0 4
Figure 4.1: Hydrostatic pressure‐water level at EL1451.0 12
Figure 4.2: Hydrostatic pressure‐water level at EL1453.75 12
Figure 4.3: active earth pressure‐saturated 13
Figure 4.4: uplift below raft‐Normal case 13


Figure 4.5: Three dimensional Strand7 model of main undersluice Structure 15
Figure 5.1: 3D model of extended pier 18
Figure 7.1: Brick stress contour sYY 25
Figure 7.2: Brick stress contour sZZ 25
Figure 7.3: Brick stress contour sXX 26
Figure 7.4: Design bending moment‐raft 27
Figure 7.5: Design shear force‐raft 27
Figure 7.6: design bending moment‐pier 28
Figure 7.7: design shear force‐pier 28
Figure 7.8: design bending moment‐top slab 29
Figure 7.9: design shear force –top slab 29
Figure 7.10: design bending moment‐breast wall 30
Figure 7.11: design shear force –breast wall 30
Figure 7.15: design bending moment‐raft 32
Figure 7.16: design shear force ‐raft 33
Figure 7.17: design bending moment‐stem 35
Figure 7.18: design shear force‐stem 35
vii

Figure 7.22: design bending moment‐raft 38
Figure 7.23: design shear force‐raft 38
Figure 7.24: design bending moment‐stem 39
Figure 7.25: design shear force‐stem 39
List of tables
Table 2.1: structural concrete M25 7
Table 2.2: reinforcement steel Fe500 7
Table 2.3: backfill material 7
Table 2.4: foundation material 8
Table 4.1: load combinations‐main undersluice bay 14
Table 4.2: Reinforcement summary 16
Table 5.1: load combinations‐extended pier 17
Table 6.1: load combinations‐undersluice bay stilling basin portion 21


1. Under sluice bay
1.1 Purpose of the structure
Under sluice bay is provided on the left bank and is located adjacent to the overflow weir. It is a
gated structure with breast wall provided above EL 1445.30. Vertical lift gate proposed has a opening
of size 4.0m (w) x 3.8m (h). Stilling basin is located downstream of the main undersluice structure.
Top level of the piers on both sides of the stilling basin portion is at EL 1447.0. Similarly the pier is
extended upstream and infront of the Intake structure to facilitate discharge into the intake and
through undersluice when gates are open. Top level of the extended pier is fixed at EL1451.0. Main
purpose of the undersluice bay is as following.
 Facilitate discharge of part of the design flood if required
 Flushing of bed load during flood.
 Maintaining silt/debris free in front of the Intake by operating the gate intermittently or as per
operation manual.
1.2 Description
Proposed under sluice opening can discharge maximum 122 cumecs for reservoir water level at
EL1453.75, which is the maximum water level. Top level of the structure is fixed at EL1455.0 with a
freeboard of 1.25m. Gate shall be operated from the top slab at EL 1453.75. Total length of the
structure is 7.0m, which includes two no’s of 1.5m wide pier and 4m wide clear bay. Length of the
structure along the flow is 19m. Invert level of the under sluice is fixed at EL 1441.50. Breast wall is
provided to restrict the height of the gate to 3.8m. All the components of the main under sluice
structure such as raft, piers, breast wall, top slab are fixed to each other to make it behave as single
unit.
Undersluice bay consists of main undersluice bay structure, upstream extended pier and
downstream stilling basin with piers on both sides. Undersluice bay is reinforced concrete structure
constructed out of concrete of grade M25. To reduce erosion due to flow of high velocity of silt laden
water, top surface is laid with 500mm (minimum) thick high performance concrete og grade M60.
The structure is founded on river bed material having safe bearing capacity of 250kn/m2. Adjacent
structures Intake on the left and spillway on the right are not connected to under sluice, however the
joints between them are proposed to be provided with two layers of waterstops. All hydraulic
calculation have been presented in hydraulic report. This report includes analysis and design of the
components of the under sluice bay structure.
Some of the sketches of the under sluice bay are presented below.
1

Figure 1.1: Under sluice bay top plan
Figure 1.2: Cross section of main undersluice bay
2

Figure 1.3: Undersluice bay section in stilling basin
Figure 1.4: Under sluice longitudinal section
3

Figure 1.5: extended pier plan
Figure 1.6: Extended pier section with top at EL1451.0
1.3 Design philosophy
Main under sluice structure including top slab, raft, piers and breast wall, undersluice bay in stilling
basin portion and extended pier have been analysed against all possible external loads. The results of
analysis obtained for different components of the structure have been used to design the
components by limit state method. Flexural and shear reinforcement have been calculated against
maximum bending moment and shear force for each component of the structure by using in house
spread sheets.
4

1.4 Design drawings
Concrete drgs:‐EHTLKA‐DD‐C‐W‐101, 102, 103 & 105
Reinforcement drgs: EHTLKA‐DD‐C‐W‐204, 205 & 206
5

2. Material properties
2.1 System of units
The design is presented in units defined in the standard ISO 1000. SI units and their recommended
multiples are applied.
2.2 Materials
2.2.1 Structural concrete (M25)
Table 2.1: structural concrete M25
S. No. Property Value

1 Concrete Grade M25
2 Concrete Modulus 25 GPa
3 Poisson’s ratio 0.2
5 Unit weight (reinforced) 24 kN/m3
2.2.2 Reinforcement steel
Table 2.2: reinforcement steel Fe500

1 Steel Grade Fe500
2 Steel Modulus 200 GPa
2.2.3 Backfill material
Backfill material should be self draining and cohesion less. Properties of the material considered are
presented below.
Table 2.3: backfill material
S.No. Parameter Values

1 Unit weight 20 kN/m3
2 Angle of internal friction 30°
3 Active Earth pressure coeff. 0.33
7

2.2.4 Foundation material
Foundation material is consisted of river borne material which is matrix of sand and boulders. Safe
bearing capacity of the foundation is considered as 250kn/m2. Accordingly modulus and poisson’s
ratio of the strata has been worked out by the standard formula as given in Bowles book and
adopted values are presented below.
Table 2.4: foundation material

2 Modulus 150Mpa
3 Poisson’s ratio 0.25
8

3. Geotechnical design data
The foundation of Likhu khola A undersluice structure is kept on the overburden. The foundation
strata (overburden) is made up of gravel/boulders in sandy matrix. The terrace was earlier
investigated through drill holes up to 25 m depth and no bedrock has been encountered. Thus, it is
apprehended that the foundation strata would be overburden comprising loose sand admixed with
gravels, boulders and pebbles of calcium sillicates, phyllite, schist etc.
The engineering property of these type of materials is assumed to be cohesion less with low angle of
internal friction. Further, the material is expected to be very permeable. From visual examination of
the material the following engineering parameter may be considered:
Cohesion (C) = 0
Angle of internal friction (Ø) = 30ᴼ
Safe bearing capacity = 250kn/m2
9

4. Main undersluice bay
4.1 Loads and load combinations
4.1.1 Design loads
Following loads and forces are considered for the design of Under sluice Structure:
 Dead load
 Live load
 Hydrostatic pressure
 Active earth pressure
 Uplift pressure
 Earthquake load
4.1.1.1 Dead load
It consists of self‐weight of the structure including the weight of end piers, intermediate piers, raft,
top slab and wall etc. Dead load is applied in the strand7 as gravity load considering density of
concrete as 24kn/m3.
4.1.1.2 Live load
A uniformly distributed live load of 10 kN/m2 is assumed to be acting on the top slab.
4.1.1.3 Hydrostatic pressure
Hydrostatic pressure is calculated corresponding to the full supply level of 1451.0 and high flood level
of 1453.75. Figure below presents hydrostatic pressure diagram for A) Full supply level and B) High
flood level. Hydrostatic pressure varies linearly from top to bottom as shown in the figures.
11

Figure 4.1: Hydrostatic pressure‐water level at EL1451.0
Figure 4.2: Hydrostatic pressure‐water level at EL1453.75
4.1.1.4 Active earth pressure
Active earth Earth pressure is applied on left abutment/pier upto top of the backfill (EL. 1445.5 m). It
is proposed to use self‐draining material for the backfill. The properties of the backfill material used
for design is presented in the table above.
12

Figure 4.3: active earth pressure‐saturated
4.1.1.5 Uplift
Results of subsurface flow analysis has been used for calculation of uplift pressure. Linearly varying
pressure from upstream to downstream acts below the raft. Uplift is different for both normal and
flood case.
Figure 4.4: uplift below raft‐Normal case
4.1.1.6 Earthquake load
Nepal is located in high‐risk seismic zone. Therefore, it is considered that Project site is located in
Zone – V seismic zone (most severe earthquake zone as per IS 1893‐2016). Accordingly, seismic
parameters for zone V has been adopted for the design of the Under sluice structure.
Following values of seismic coefficients have been adopted for the design of Under sluice structure
Horizontal seismic coeff. ah = 0.22
13

Vertical seismic coeff. av = 2/3 x ah = 0.15
4.1.1.7 Dynamic increment of earth pressure
Dynamic increment of earth pressure is calculated as per Indian Standard, cl. 8.1 of IS: 1893 – 1984.
4.1.2 Load combinations
Following load combinations have been adopted for the design of main undersluice bay.
Table 4.1: load combinations‐main undersluice bay
Combination Combination type Loads and Partial Load Factors (F) Remarks

no.
(As per Table 18 of IS 456 & cl.6.3 IS 1893)
Load Description (F)
1 Construction case DL Dead load 1.5 No water in Reservoir
EP Earth pressure (sat) 1.5
2 Normal case DL Dead load 1.5 Water level at FSL 1451.0
LL Live load 1.5
UP Uplift 1.5
WP Hydrostatic pressure 1.5
3 Normal case + DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at FSL 1451.0
Earthquake
LL Live load 1.2
UP Uplift 1.2
EQ Earthquake 1.2
DYN EP dynamic 1.2
increment
4 High flood case DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at MWL 1453.75
LL Live load 1.2
EP Earth pressure (sub.) 1.2
UP Uplift 1.2
14

4.2 FEM (finite element analysis)
Main under sluice structure is modelled as three dimensional solid finite element model in strand7.
All the components such as raft, piers, breast wall and top slab are modelled to the actual dimension.
However the curved portion at the upstream end of the piers are not modelled to avoid complicated
model. The structure is founded on the river borne material. The left bank of the under sluice is filled
with compacted backfill up to EL1445.50. On the right bank movement of the structure is restrained
by the spillway. FEM 3‐D model is presented below.
Figure 4.5: Three dimensional Strand7 model of main undersluice Structure
4.3 Main under sluice components design
Under sluice structure primarily consists of piers, raft, top slab and breast wall. Each component is
designed based on the results of Strand 7 FEM analysis. All the components of under sluice are
designed by Limit state method conforming to IS456:2000.
Output of Strand 7 is presented in Appendix. Typical reinforcement calculations are presented as
Annexure. Design summary of each components of the under sluice structure are presented below.
4.3.1 Pier
Pier is subjected to earth pressure and seismic load in addition to self‐weight and forces transferred
from adjacent components. Earth pressure is considered saturated during normal operation and
submerged up to EL1444.50 during flood. Accordingly submerged earth pressure is applied on the
pier for flood case. Thickness of the pier is 1500mm.
Design forces (bending moment and shear force) are derived from Strand 7 cut section tool and
reinforcement worked out as per IS456:2000 using in house spread sheets. Reinforcement of 20T @
150mm c/c have been provided on both faces vertically and 20T @ 150mm c/c horizontally..
15

4.3.2 Raft
Raft is subjected to uplift, seismic load in addition to self‐weight and forces transferred from adjacent
components. Thickness of the raft is 1500mm.
150mm c/c have been provided on both faces across the flow and 20T @ 150mm c/c along the flow.
4.3.3 Top slab
Top slab is subjected to live load, seismic load in addition to self‐weight and forces transferred from
adjacent components. Thickness of the top slab is 500mm.
4.3.4 Breast wall
Breast wall is subjected to hydrostatic load, seismic load in addition to self‐weight and forces
transferred from adjacent components. Thickness of the breast wall is 850mm.
4.4 Reinforcement summary
Summary of reinforcement details is presented below.
Table 4.2: Reinforcement summary
S. No. Main under sluice Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

component
1 Raft Across the flow Each 20 150
Along the flow 20 150
2 Piers Vertical Each 20 150
Horizontal 20 150
3 Top slab Across the flow Each 16 150
4 Breast wall Horizontal Each 20 150
Vertical 16 150
16

5. Extended pier
Extended pier is 1.5m thick and resting over 2m thick raft. Top of the pier is proposed at EL1451.0.
Main purpose of the pier is to divide the flow and facilitate flow into the intake.
5.1 Load & load combinations
5.1.1 Design loads
Following loads and forces are considered for the design of the Structure:
 Dead load
 Uplift pressure
 Earthquake load
All the loads list above are explained in chapter 4. Only specific loads are explained below.
5.1.1.1 Hydrostatic pressure
Net force on the stem due to Hydrostatic pressure during normal case is zero. However during flood
case 2m differential load has been considered which may arise due to turbulence and layout of the
headworks.
5.1.1.2 Uplift
Uplift load has been calculated by Khosla theory and presented in hydraulics report. Average uplift
5.0 m of water head or 0.049kn/m2 uplift pressure acts below raft for normal case.
Table 5.1: load combinations‐extended pier

no.
2 Normal case DL Dead load 1.5 Water level at FSL 1451.0 on
both sides
UP Uplift 1.5
17

3 Normal case + DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at FSL 1451.0 on

Earthquake both sides
UP Uplift 1.2
EQ Earthquake 1.2
4 High flood case DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at MWL 1453.75
on overflow weir side and
WP Hydrostatic pressure. 1.2
1451.75 on undersluice side.
(2m differential
head)
UP Uplift 1.2
Extended pier is modelled as three dimensional solid finite element model in strand7. All the
components such as raft and stem are modelled to the actual dimension. The structure is founded on
the river borne material. FEM 3‐D model is presented below.
Figure 5.1: 3D model of extended pier
Output of Strand 7 is appended in appendix. The reinforcement summary is presented below.
18

S. No. Extended pier Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

component
2 Stem Vertical Each 32 150
Horizontal 16 150
19

6. Undersluice bay Stilling basin portion
The bay is 4m wide flanked by piers each of 1.5m thick. Raft of the stilling basin varies from 2.5m to
1.5m. The structure is a reinforced concrete structure with concrete of grade M25. High performance
concrete of grade M60 is laid at the surface to resist possible erosion due to high velocity of silt laden
water.
6.1 Load & load combinations
6.1.1 Design loads
Following loads and forces are considered for the design of the Structure:
 Dead load
 Earthfill load
 Uplift pressure
 Earthquake load
All the loads list above are explained in chapter 4.1. Only specific load cases are described below.
6.1.1.1 Uplift
Uplift load has been calculated by Khosla theory and presented in hydraulics report. Uplift varies
from 3.37m to 2.14m of water head which comes out to be 2.755m of water head or 0.027kn/m2
uplift pressure below raft.
Table 6.1: load combinations‐undersluice bay stilling basin portion

no.
2 Normal case DL Dead load 1.5 No water on downstream.
Earth fill upto EL1445.5 on
EP Earth pressure(Sat) 1.5
left bank.
UP Uplift 1.5
21

3 Normal case + DL Dead load 1.2 No water on downstream.

Earthquake Earth fill upto EL1445.5 on
left bank.
UP Uplift 1.2
EQ Earthquake 1.2
4 High flood case DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at EL1444.5.
Earth fill upto EL1445.5 on
left bank.
UP Uplift 1.2
Sluice bay in stilling portion is modelled as three dimensional solid finite element model in strand7.
Components such as raft and stem are modelled to the actual dimension. The structure is founded
on the river borne material. FEM 3‐D model is presented below.
S. No. Under sluice bay stilling Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

basin portion component
22

2 Stem Vertical Each 25 150

Horizontal 25 150
7. References
IS 1893:1984 : “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Fourth Revision
“Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Part I – General
IS 1893:2002 :
Provisions for Buildings, Fifth Revision
IS 456:2000 : “Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete”, Fourth Revision
Bowles, foundation analysis and design
SP 16, design aids for reinforced concrete
23

Appendices
24

A Stress diagrams‐main under sluice bay
Figure 7.1: Brick stress contour sYY
Figure 7.2: Brick stress contour sZZ
25

Figure 7.3: Brick stress contour sXX
26

B Bending moment & shear force‐main under sluice bay
B.1 Raft

Figure 7.4: Design bending moment‐raft
Figure 7.5: Design shear force‐raft
27

B.2 pier
Figure 7.6: design bending moment‐pier
Figure 7.7: design shear force‐pier
28

B.3 Top slab

Figure 7.8: design bending moment‐top slab
Figure 7.9: design shear force –top slab
29

B.4 Breast wall

Figure 7.10: design bending moment‐breast wall
Figure 7.11: design shear force –breast wall
30

C Stress diagram –extended pier
31

D Bending moment & shear force‐extended pier
D.1 Raft
Figure 7.15: design bending moment‐raft
32

Figure 7.16: design shear force ‐raft
D.2 Stem
33

Figure 7.17: design bending moment‐stem
Figure 7.18: design shear force‐stem
35

E Stress diagram –undersluice bay stilling basin portion
36

F Bending moment & shear force‐ undersluice bay
stilling basin portion
F.1 Raft
37

Figure 7.22: design bending moment‐raft
Figure 7.23: design shear force‐raft
38

F.2 Stem
Figure 7.24: design bending moment‐stem
Figure 7.25: design shear force‐stem
39

Annexure
Reinforcement calculation‐main undersluice bay


Member pier Raft bridge Breast wall

Input data
Depth of the section mm 1500 2000 500 750
Factored Bending moment knm 372.643 562.80 56.92 231.75
Shear force kn 297.028 435.90 78.43 241.42
2
Concrete grade N/mm 25 25 25 25
2
Reinforcement steel N/mm 500 500 500 500
Cover to reinforcement mm 75 75 40 40
Dia of bar mm 25 25 25 25
Effective depth d mm 1412.5 1912.5 447.5 697.5
Main reinforcement
Factored bending moment knm 372.64 562.80 56.92 231.75
M u lim =0.133*fck*b*d^2 knm 6633.89 12161.71 665.85 1617.63
Factored bending moment < Limiting moment FBM < LM FBM < LM FBM < LM
To be designed as Single reinforced beam S R B S R B S R B
2
Mu/bd 0.18677 0.15 0.28 0.48
Required percentage of reo from table 3 of SP16 % 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.11
For thick structures >1000mm, depth considered is mm 250 250 500 750
Minimum required reinforcement in surface
zone(as per IS 3370-Part 2:2009) % 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Provided dia of bar mm 25 25 25 25
Spacing of bars mm 200 200 200 200
Reinforcement percentage in surface zone % 0.98175 0.98 0.98 0.98
ok, Provided reinforcement is more than min. reinforcement in surface zone
hence acceptable ok ok ok
2
Total sectional area of reo mm 2454.37 2454.37 2454.37 2454.37
Percentage of reinforcement % 0.17 0.13 0.55 0.35
ok, Provided reinforcement is more than min. & required reinforcement hence
acceptable ok ok ok


Shear reinforcement'
Factored shear force Kn 297.03 435.90 78.43 241.42
Depth at the section considered m 1.5 2 0.5 0.75
2
Shear stress N/mm 0.21 0.23 0.18 0.35
pt provided % 0.17376 0.13 0.55 0.35
b 16.7055 22.62 5.29 8.25
t 0.31075 0.27 0.51 0.42
2
Permissible shear stress sc N/mm 0.31075 0.27 0.51 0.42
Shear reinforcement
Not reqd.,as shear stress is less than permissible shear stress of concrete Not reqd. Not reqd. Not reqd.
Vs= V-tc*B*d kn -169.1 -106.46 -148.72 -53.20
Dia of stirrups mm 12 12 12 12
No of legs no 5 5.00 5.00 5.00
req Spacing of shear stirrups mm No No No No
provided spacing of stirrups 'cl 7.3.2 IS 13920 mm 200 200 200 200
No of rows of single legged stirrups
check for min shear
Asv/(b*sv)>0.4/(0.87*fy)
Max spacing mm 300 300 300 300
ok, provided shear reinforcement is more than minimum required ok ok ok

Transverse reinforcement
For thick structures >1000mm depth considered is mm 250 250 500 750
Minimum required reinforcement in surface zone(as per
IS 3370-Part 2:2009)/sectional area as per IS456:2000 % 0.35 0.35 0.12 0.12
Provided dia of bar mm 20 20 16 16
Spacing of bars mm 200 200 200 200
2
Total sectional area of reo mm 1570.8 1570.80 1005.31 1005.31
Reinforcement percentage in surface zone/sectional area % 0.63 0.63 0.20 0.13
ok, provided reinforcement is more than minimum required ok ok ok


Reinforcement calculation‐extended pier


Member stem Raft

Input data
Depth of the section mm 1500 2000
Factored Bending moment knm 440.19 914.29
Shear force kn 200.00 267.71
2
Concrete grade N/mm 25 25
2
Reinforcement steel N/mm 500 500
Cover to reinforcement mm 75 75
Dia of bar mm 20 20
Effective depth d mm 1415 1915
Main reinforcement
Factored bending moment knm 440.19 914.29
M u lim =0.133*fck*b*d^2 knm 6657.4 12193.52

FBM < LM FBM < LM
To be designed as S R B S R B
2
Mu/bd 0.21985 0.25
Required percentage of reo from table 3 of SP16 % 0.07 0.07
For thick structures >1000mm, depth considered is mm 250 250
zone(as per IS 3370-Part 2:2009) % 0.35 0.35
Provided dia of bar mm 20 20
Spacing of bars mm 150 150
Reinforcement percentage in surface zone % 0.84 0.84
ok ok
2
Total sectional area of reo mm 2094.4 2094.40
Percentage of reinforcement % 0.15 0.11


Factored shear force Kn 200 267.71
Depth at the section considered m 1.5 2
2
Shear stress N/mm 0.14 0.14
pt provided % 0.14801 0.11
b 19.6114 26.54
t 0.28922 0.25
2
Permissible shear stress sc N/mm 0.29 0.29
Shear reinforcement
Not reqd. Not reqd.
Vs = V-tc*B*d kn -210.35 -287.64
Dia of stirrups mm 12 12
No of legs no 6.67 6.67
req Spacing of shear stirrups mm No No
provided spacing of stirrups 'cl 7.3.2 IS 13920 mm 150 150
check for min shear
Asv/(b*sv)>0.4/(0.87*fy)
Max spacing mm 300 300
ok, provided shear reinforcement is more than minimum required ok

For thick structures >1000mm depth considered is mm 250 250
Minimum required reinforcement in surface zone(as per IS 337% 0.35 0.35
2
ok ok


Reinforcement calculation‐Undersluice bay stilling basin portion
Member pier Raft
Input data
Depth of the section mm 1500 2000
Factored Bending moment knm 818.4 774.80
Shear force kn 255.8 444.20
2
Concrete grade N/mm 25 25
2
Reinforcement steel N/mm 500 500
Cover to reinforcement mm 75 75
Dia of bar mm 20 20
Effective depth d mm 1415 1915
Main reinforcement
Factored bending moment knm 818.40 774.80
M u lim =0.133*fck*b*d^2 knm 6657.4 12193.52

Factored bending moment < Limiting moment FBM < LM
To be designed as Single reinforced beam S R B
2
Mu/bd 0.40875 0.21
Required percentage of reo from table 3 of SP16 % 0.1 0.07
For thick structures >1000mm, depth considered is mm 250 250
zone(as per IS 3370-Part 2:2009) % 0.35 0.35
ok ok
2
Percentage of reinforcement % 0.15 0.11


Factored shear force Kn 255.80 444.20
Depth at the section considered m 1.5 2
2
Shear stress N/mm 0.18 0.23
pt provided % 0.14801 0.11
b 19.61 26.54
t 0.29 0.25
2
Permissible shear stress sc N/mm 0.29 0.29
Shear reinforcement
Not reqd. Not reqd.
Vs = V-tc*B*d kn -179.2 -135.80
Dia of stirrups mm 12 12
No of legs no 6.66667 6.67
req Spacing of shear stirrups mm No No
provided spacing of stirrups 'cl 7.3.2 IS 13920 mm 150 150
No of rows of single legged stirrups
check for min shear
Asv/(b*sv)>0.4/(0.87*fy)
Max spacing mm 300 300
ok ok
For thick structures >1000mm depth considered is mm 250 250
Minimum required reinforcement in surface zone(as
per IS 3370-Part 2:2009)/sectional area as per % 0.35 0.35
2
Reinforcement percentage in surface zone/sectional area % 0.84 0.84
ok ok


Undersluice Bay Design Report PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Undersluice Bay Design Report PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Distributed to Sujan Ghimire Numbur Himalayan

4. Main undersluice bay 11

5. Extended pier 17

6. Undersluice bay Stilling basin portion 21

7. References 23

S. No. Property Value

S. No. Property Value

S.No. Parameter Values

S. No. Property Value

Combination Combination type Loads and Partial Load Factors (F) Remarks

S. No. Main under sluice Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

Combination Combination type Loads and Partial Load Factors (F) Remarks

3 Normal case + DL Dead load 1.2 Water level at FSL 1451.0 on

Figure 5.1: 3D model of extended pier

S. No. Extended pier Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

Combination Combination type Loads and Partial Load Factors (F) Remarks

3 Normal case + DL Dead load 1.2 No water on downstream.

S. No. Under sluice bay stilling Direction Face Dia. (mm) c/c spacing (mm)

2 Stem Vertical Each 25 150

Member pier Raft bridge Breast wall

ok, provided shear reinforcement is more than minimum required ok ok ok

Member stem Raft

ok, provided shear reinforcement is more than minimum required ok

You might also like