The petitioner Schlumberger Asia Services Limited had filed a writ petition challenging the registration process for certain vendors by the respondent Union of India and others. However, during the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the Registration Committee had now prepared a format for application and the petitioner had submitted an application in that format. Therefore, the petitioner did not wish to press the petition currently but reserved the right to approach the court in the future if needed. The court then disposed of the petition along with the pending application.
The petitioner Schlumberger Asia Services Limited had filed a writ petition challenging the registration process for certain vendors by the respondent Union of India and others. However, during the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the Registration Committee had now prepared a format for application and the petitioner had submitted an application in that format. Therefore, the petitioner did not wish to press the petition currently but reserved the right to approach the court in the future if needed. The court then disposed of the petition along with the pending application.
The petitioner Schlumberger Asia Services Limited had filed a writ petition challenging the registration process for certain vendors by the respondent Union of India and others. However, during the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the Registration Committee had now prepared a format for application and the petitioner had submitted an application in that format. Therefore, the petitioner did not wish to press the petition currently but reserved the right to approach the court in the future if needed. The court then disposed of the petition along with the pending application.
SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Akila Agarwal, Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey and Ms. Sanskriti Sidana, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Ms. Roshini Namboodar and Mr. R.V. Prabhat, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Advocate for the ONGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
ORDER % 27.08.2020
HEARD THROUGH VIDEOCONFERENCING
1. Mr. Kaul, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner
submits that there have been some developments after the last date of hearing, i.e., 24.8.2020 inasmuch as the Registration Committee has prepared a format and declared it on 24.8.2020 itself and the petitioner has submitted an application in the said format. He therefore states that for the present, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition. However, the petitioner reserves its right to approach the court for relief in the future, if so advised.
W.P. (C) 5554/2020 Page 1 of 2
2. Leave as prayed for is granted. The present petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.