RESOLUTION (14-2019)PRECINCT NO.

0002B

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of CARLITA R. GACIS

whose name was included in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B of Barangay
San Jose, Municipality of Tagapul-an, Province of Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the cases wa called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or

absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

CARLITA R. GACIS - ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Jose,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE-PETITIONER
-NONE-
 RULING OF THE COURT:

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B of
Brgy. San Jose, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

The Community Tax Certificate of respondent where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent were left
must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form
required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an,
Samar failed to sign the same.

WHEREFORE, and in the light of the foregoing discussions, the

petition is DENIED. Let the name of respondent CARLITA R. GACIS remain the
the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B in Brgy. San Jose, Municipality of Tagapul-
an, Samar.

SO ORDERED.
Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

MYRNA MOLINTAS-CLEMENS
Presiding Judge
ELECTION CASE NO. 15-2019 (Precinct No. 0002B)

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of thirty four (34) voters
whose names were included in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B of Barangay
San Jose , Municipality of Tagapul-an, Province of Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the cases wa called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or

absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

RESPONDENTS WHO WERE PRESENT

1. Rowena B. Acar
2. Michael M. Borado
3. Boboy A. Bulan
4. Jecilda C. Compracion
5. Danilo A. David
6. Melowin A. Marquez
7. Gaudencio A. Monsanto
8. Ricky S. Payao
9. Sheryl M. Payao
10. Nelmar D. Rosal
 11.Nestor D. Rosal, Jr.
12.Nestor A. Rosal
13.Roweno A. Rosal
14.Mylen G. Vallente

The remaining twenty (20) failed to appear.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE - RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Jose,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”);

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE-PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT:

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B of
Brgy. San Jose, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the same.

The failure of one of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictitious nor
that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as documentary
evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2”
and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties,
the court accords them full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

WHEREFORE, and in the light of the foregoing discussions, the

petition is DENIED. Let the names of the above-named thirty four (34) respondents
remain the the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0002B of Brgy. San Jose, Municipality
of Tagapul-an, Samar.

SO ORDERED.
Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

MYRNA MOLINTAS-CLEMENS
Presiding Judge
Election Case No. 16-2019 (precinct No. 0018A) Mataluto

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of three (3) voters

whose names were included in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of Barangay
Mataluto , Municipality of Tagapul-an, Province of Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the case was called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or
absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

PRESENT

1. Neneta Abria
 2. Richard P. Manocal

ABSENT

Ancito Ando

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE - RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Jose,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”);

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE-PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT:

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the same.

The failure of one of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2”; and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the
performance of their duties, the court accords them full faith and credist unless
proven otherwise.

WHEREFORE, and in the light of the foregoing discussions, the

petition is DENIED. Let the names of the above-named three (3) respondents
remain the the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A in Brgy. Mataluto, Municipality
of Tagapul-an, Samar.

SO ORDERED.

Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

MYRNA MOLINTAS-CLEMENS
Presiding Judge
Election Case No. 17-2019

RESOLUTION

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of three (3) voters

whose names were included in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of Barangay
Mataluto , Municipality of Tagapul-an, Province of Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the case was called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or
absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

PRESENT
1. Lenil A. Arroyo
2. Joel B. Diomangay
3. Marilyn B. Diomangay
4. Mark Joseph Q. Manalo
5. Sulpicio A. Padasas

ABSENT
 1. Dionesio Arma
2. Mengel Arma
3. Raymund B. Arma
4. Jessie N. Cedillo
5. Jessie R. Dela Cruz
6. Hebelisa U. Develos
7. Renold D. Evangelista
8. Salvador D. Grona
9. Ian C. Medina
10. Mark A. Padasas

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT-

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

At the summary hearing, the court conducted a brief examination of the

respondents who were present. The result showed the following:
 The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of
Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the same.

The failure of some of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2” and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance
of their duties, the court will accord them full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Respondents-------- who appeared during the summary hearing could not

properly name the barangay where they are supposed to reside, hence, the court holds
that they are not bona fide residents thereof. Their failure to name the barangay
where they are purportedly residents belie their assertions that they are bona fide
residents thereof.

WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing discussions, the court

PARTYLY GRANTS the petition. Let the names of respondents be striken off from
the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B. The names of the other respondents must
remain in the List of Voters of Precint No. 0018B of Brgy. Matuluto, Municipality of
Tagapul-an, Samar for reasons stated earlier.

SO ORDERED.

Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

MYRNA MOLINTAS-CLEMENS
Presiding Judge
 ELECTION CASE NO. 18-2019

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of eleven (11) voters

who were included in the List of Voters in Precinct 0022B of Brgy. Nipa,
Municipality of Tagapul-an, Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the case was called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or
absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

PRESENT
1. Ana Rose P. Delis
2. Rommel P. Delis
3. Robelyn A. Gencono
4. Kenneth D. Pagaduan
5. Ruel B. Sardonola
6. Cristea R. Yabao

ABSENT
 1. Angelica O. Dave
2. Wilvenissa C. Guilleno
3. Melvin D. Manalo
4. Marivic A. Pacala
5. Sonia Q. Vicente

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT-

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar did not affix her signature thereon.

The failure of some of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2” and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance
of their duties, the court will accord them full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing discussions, the court

hereby DENIES the petition. Let the names of the above-named respondents remain
in the List of Voters of Precint No. 0022B of Brgy. Nipa, Municipality of Tagapul-an,
Samar.

SO ORDERED.

Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
 31.
32.

Election Case No. 19-2019

RESOLUTION

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of six (6) voters in the List
of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the case was called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or
absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

PRESENT

Rodolfo B. Padasas, Jr.

ABSENT

1. John Patrick Rance Bantasa

2. Rene S. Canaway
3. Rene Ramilo Cordova
 4. Allen V. Develos
5. Jovan S. Medina

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy.

Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of
Households, Respective Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted
by the TASK FORCE CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued
by the Municipal Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE
COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT-

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar did not affix her signature thereon.

The failure of some of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2” and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance
of their duties, the court will accord them full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
 WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing discussions, the court
hereby DENIES the petition. Let the names of the above-named respondents remain
in the List of Voters of Precint No. 0019A of Brgy. Mataluto, Municipality of
Tagapul-an, Samar.

SO ORDERED.

Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

ELECTION CASE NO, 20-2019

RESOLUTION

For resolution is this Petition for Exclusion of twenty five (25) voters
whose names were included in the List of Voters in Precinct No. 0013B of Brgy.
Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

ANTECEDENT FACTS

On February 1, 2019, the Liberal Party (Party for brevity), thru its
representative, filed this petition seeking the exclusion of the above-named
respondents from the Voter’s List in the precinct where they were registered. The
Party cites as sole ground the fact that respondents are not bona fide residents of the
barangay where they desire to vote in the forthcoming local and national elections
scheduled on May 13, 2019.

A copy of the Petition, Notices of Hearing and Subpoenas for the

Summary Hearing on February 12, 2019 were issued to all named respondents with
instructions to the court process server to serve the Subpoenas personally and the
Notices of Hearing posted in conspicuous places ( Barangay Hall and Waiting Shed)
in the barangays subject of this Petition.

A summary hearing of this case was called on February 12, 2019. Atty.
Maricar R. Lucero formally entered her appearance as counsel for the respondents
while the Party was represented by Atty. Joseph Dinoy as collaborating counsel of
Atty. Maria Bernadette V. Sardillo.

As the case was called , the court endeavored to determine the presence or
absence of the respondents and required them to show proof of their identity. The
names of the respondents who appeared and who failed to appear are indicated below.
Additionally, for easy reference, the documents annexed to the Position Paper of
respondents are likewise indicated, thus:

PRESENT
 1. Jomar O. Alicando
2. Ansilmo D. Avanez
3. Salvador Caindoy
4. Imelda J. Caindoy
5. Jayson M. Lipogpog
6. Roxane Melendrez
7. Mocrisio Nunez, Jr.
8. Oscar E. Osabel
9. Arile Tabulao
10.Emily B. Tabulao
11.Virgilio Tabulao
12.Ronie M. Villarama

ABSENT

1. Clark D. Abalos
2. Lowie S. Aboga
3. Jomar O. Alicando
4. AJ G. Apelena
5. Jomar Rosales
6. Jerald M. Panilag
7. Fidel A. Mondino
8. Mary Ann Marteja
9. Joan May Lacbayen
10.Elizabeth Igloso
11.Esidro Bulandrina
12.Jose Arcana
13.Ambem Apelena
14.AJ Apelena
15.Lowie Aboga
16.Carlos D. Abalos

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy.

Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of
Households, Respective Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted
by the TASK FORCE CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued
by the Municipal Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE
COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-
 RULING OF THE COURT-

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents, including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of
Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same
manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnents in the List of Voters of Precinct No. ----of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The Community Tax Certificates of respondents where the “Place of

Birth” ; “Date of Birth” and “Sex” and other personal data of the latter were left
blank must be rejected outright as the issuance thereof was not in compliance with
the form required by law. Moreover, “Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of
Tagapul-an, Samar did not affix her signature thereon.

The failure of some of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2” and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance
of their duties, the court will accord them full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing discussions, the court

hereby DENIES the petition. Let the names of the above-named respondents remain
in the List of Voters of Precint No. ----- of Brgy. Labangbaybay, Municipality of
Tagapul-an, Samar.

SO ORDERED.

Sta. Margarita, Samar, March 11, 2019.

 33.
34.
35.
ELECTION CASE NO. 16-2019

PRESENT

Richard P. Manocal -He exhibited his Voter's ID

Neneta D. Abria

ABSENT

Anicito A. Ando

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto, ,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”);

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE-PETITIONER

– NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands. Annex “5”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same. Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, the court DENIES the
exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of Brgy.
Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part
of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of some of the respondents to appear during the hearing

despite due notice does not constitute prima facie evidence that the voter is fictititous
nor that he is a non-resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the
documentary evidences showing that they are residents of the barangay such as
Annexes “1”; “2” and “3”. Having been issued by public officials in the performance
of their duties, the court will accord them full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing discussions, the court

hereby DENIES the petition. Let the names of the above-named respondents remain
in the List of Voters of Precint No. 0018A of Brgy. Mataluto, Municipality of
Tagapul-an, Samar.
ELECTION CASE NO. 17-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0018B)

PRESENT

Joel B. Diomangay
Lenil a. Arroyo
Marilyn B. Diomangay
Mark Joseph O. Manalo
Sulpicio A. Padasas

ABSENT

Dionesio Arma
Mergel F. Arma
Raymond B. Arma
Jessiel C. Cedillo
Jessie Dela Cruz
Hebelisa A. Develos
Reynold D. Evangelista
Salvador B. Grona
Ian C. Medina
Mark Padasas

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “6”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

ELECTION CASE NO. 17-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0018B)

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

RULING OF THE COURT-

their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the

petitioner did not present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”,
the Community Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth”
-an, Samar.

Dionesio B. Arma- ABSENT

 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “5”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Mergel F. Arma – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “__ ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Raymond B. Arma – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “16 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “16”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Jessie N. Cedillo- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “14 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “14”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Hebelisa U. Develos – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “12”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Renold D. Evangelista- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “ 9”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “9”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Salvador B. Grona – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-
 RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “12”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Ian C. Medina – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “6”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

 Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0018B of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 18-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0022B)

Ana Rose P. Delis – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-
 RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “12”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Rommel P. Delis – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “13”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “13”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Robelyn A. Gencono – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “11 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “11”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 Kenneth D. Pagaduan – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “7 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “7”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Ruel B. Sardinola – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-
an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “6 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Cristea R. Yabao – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “4 ”.
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “4”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Angelica O. Dave – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “14”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “14”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Wilvenissa C. Guilleno – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “10 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “10”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Melvin D. Manalo – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “10 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “10”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Marivic A. Pacala – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “8 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “12”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Sonia Q. Vicente – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “5”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “5”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same deserve full
faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Kenneth D. Pagaduan- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “7 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “7”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 19-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0019A)

John Patrick Rance Bantasa- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “9 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “9”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Rene S. Canaway- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “4 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “4”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Rene Ramilo Cordova – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “8 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “8”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Allen V. Develos-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “7”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.
 Jovan S. Medina – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “6 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Rodolfo B. Padasas -ABSENT

 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “5 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “5”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0019A of
Brgy. Mataluto, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 20-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0013B)

Clark D. Abalos- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “4”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “4”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Lowie S. Aboga – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Mataluto,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Jomar O. Alicando – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “5 ”.
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “5”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

AJ G. Apelena- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “6”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “6”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Ambem P. Apelena – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “7 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “7”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Jose Arcana – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “8 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “8”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Ansilmo D. Avanez – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “9 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “9”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Esidro O. Bulandrina – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “10”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Salvador A. Caindoy – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “11”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “11”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Imelda J. Caindoy – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “12 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “12”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Langbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Elizabeth P. Igloso – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “13 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “13”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Joan Mae A. Lacbayen- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

 Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Jayson M. Lipogpog – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbabay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “15”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “15”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Mary Ann B. Marteja- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbabay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “16 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “16”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Roxane B. Melendres – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “17”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “17”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbabay, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 Fidel A. Mondino – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “18 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “18”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Mocrisio B. Nunez, Jr. - PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “19”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “19”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Oscar E. Osabel – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Jerald M. Panilag – ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “21 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “21”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
 Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Jomar B. Rosales-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex
“3”). .

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
deserve full faith and credit unless proven otherwise.

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-

an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “7 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0022B of
Brgy. Nipa, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Ariel B. Tabalao – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “24 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “24”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Emily B. Tabulao – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “23 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-
 RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “23”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Virgilio L. Tabulao-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “23 ”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “23”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Camilo T. Teja- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
Community Tax Certificate marked as Annex “26”.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays. Annex “26”, the Community
Tax Certificate of respondent which left blank the “Place of Birth” ; “Date of Birth”
and “Sex” and other personal data of respondent must be rejected outright as the
issuance thereof was not in compliance with the form required by law. Moreover,
“Ledie R. Sumbise”, Municipal Treasuer of Tagapul-an, Samar failed to sign the
same.
Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice
does not constitute prima evidence that he voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-
resident. The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences
showing that they are residents of the place such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” .
Having been issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same
enjoy presumption of regularity in their issuance and must deserve full faith and
credit unless proven otherwise.

Ronnie M. Villarama-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stays.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
 ELECTION CASE NO. 21-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0014A)

Alejandro C. Alvarez- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Ely T. Canete- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Joseph J. Pepito-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 22-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0017A)

Fernando M. Abigan- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Fernando M. Abigan- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Reo B. Abigan-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Joel A. Agodo-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Rina A. Agodo- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Noel D. Agodo- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Nancy A. Alemana – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Jojo S. Arizobal- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Romeo R. Arogante-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Elsa A. Arpon-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Welmar D. Atindido-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Freddie L. Ebina – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

RINE G. FUENTES-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Armando Jiminis-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Roberto Noynay- PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Roberto Noynay-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Rose P. Abuda-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jeraldine T. Araneta-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rose P. Abuda-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jeraldine T. Araneta-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rose P. Abuda-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Ronelyn C. Dacuro-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Raymund C. Garcia-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

John Roque L. Limpin-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Vicente Noynay- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Julia B. Olendan-ABSENT
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 23-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0017B)

Ernesto M. Abobo, Jr.-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Colita P. Calugungan-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Ronald B. Cinco -PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Junjun L. Dusal – PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Mark Eric A. Gerez-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Jeffrey Homeres-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Ariel A. Manuel-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Roy A. Martinez-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Ma. Cecilia Mondino-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Bartolome S. Nardo-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Alexander G. Rebise-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Grace M. Reyes -PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Paquito L. Tanguin-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Manilyn a. Tocayon-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Dominique D. Villena-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

Carmelita T. Ybanez-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Lilibeth A. Villamor-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Cristina A. Valeriano-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

 Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Alfredo P. Tanega-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Labangbaybay,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0013B of
Brgy. Labangbaybay, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Christian Tabungar- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Ma. Luzviminda Tabunar-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
 Dexter G. Sedol-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Melissa G. Roca-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Domingo S. Ranca-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Vicente A. Pabunan-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Antonio A. Otic-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rodolfo M. Navato, Jr.-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Florencio B. Nario-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy.Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Edna L. Majaras-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rudith B. Maceda-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Liza L. Limpin-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

John Paul L. Limpin-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Isabel Cesar Golen-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
Grego L. Delpinado-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Caridad O. DajeS – ABSENT

 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Iluminada O. Conise-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Celyn Catalan-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

 Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jay-ar C. Cadjon-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Joel B. Baoy -ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Stepanie P. Apdos-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
 Elisa T. Amantillo-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Malangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

John Antonio . Abuda-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Nicky B. Mista-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. Manlgangit,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0017B of
Brgy. Manlgangit, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 24-2019 (PRECINCT NO. 0026A)

Naneth V. Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026A of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 25-2019(PRECINCT NO. 0026B)

Jose Eron P. Mato-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.
 Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jose Marlon Oliverio-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jose B. Rabino-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rodolfo C. Recto-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Johnray Y. Tupas-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

 Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,
Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Joseph Y. Tupas-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

 -NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings,

for failure on the part of the petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the
issuance of said documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board
(ERB) of Tagapul-an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in
the same manner enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the
court hereby DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct
No. 0026B of Brgy.San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Moreno Y. Tupas-PRESENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jeson Y. Tupas- ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Joey O. Orario-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Rosalinda Mato-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Dulcesimo S. Marcos-ABSENT
 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Yolanda C. Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy.San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jomar Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

 Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Jetlord Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Erza B. Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.
 The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

Belfer B. Doguiles-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.
 Wendy C. Danao-ABSENT

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE- RESPONDENT

Certificate of Residency issued by the Brgy. Council of Brgy. San Vicente,

Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “1”); Comprehensive Survey of Households, Respective
Occupants, Livelihood, Occupation and Property conducted by the TASK FORCE
CLUP of Tagapul-an, Samar (Annex “2”); Certification issued by the Municipal
Assessor Engr. Severino Martirez, Jr. TASK FORCE COORDINATOR (Annex “3”).

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – PETITIONER

-NONE-

RULING OF THE COURT -

Annexes “1”, “2”, and “3” above were apparently issued in the
performance of public functions, thus, they enjoy the presumption of regularity in
their issuance by the court until disproved. Considering that the petitioner did not
present proof to rebut the same, the presumtption stands.

Accordingly and based on the foregoing findings, for failure on the part of the
petitioner to overcome the presumtion of regularity in the issuance of said
documents,including the action of the Election Registration Board (ERB) of Tagapul-
an, Samar which approved the application of registration which in the same manner
enjoys the presumption of regularity in its public functions, the court hereby
DENIES the exclusion of respondnent in the List of Voters of Precinct No. 0026B of
Brgy. San Vicente, Tagapul-an, Samar.

The failure of the respondent to appear during the hearing despite notice does
not constitute prima evidence that the voter is fictitious nor that he is a non-resident.
The court will consider other proofs such as the documentary evidences showing that
they are residents of the barangay such as Annexes “1”; “2” and “3” . Having been
issued by public officials in the performance of their duties, the same enjoy the
presumption of regulairity and thus, deserve full faith and credit unless proven
otherwise.

ELECTION CASE NO. 26-2019(PRECINCT NO. 0027A)