HISTORICAL METHOD

Historical Sources
Historical Criticism

Ma. Florina Orillos-Juan, Ph.D.

Department of History
De la Salle University Manila
ma.florina.orillos-juan@dlsu.edu.ph
Reminder

 This powerpoint presentation may be

used as a reference but please make the
necessary acknowledgment and
documentation of your source.

2
Outline of Discussion

I. History as Reconstruction
II. The Historical Method
III. Historical Sources [Written and Non-
written; Primary and Secondary]
IV. Historical Criticism [External and
Intenal]

3
Introduction: History as Reconstruction

 thehistorian is many times removed

from the events under investigation

 historians rely on surviving records

4
Introduction: History as Reconstruction

 “Onlya part of what was observed in the

past was remembered by those who
observed it; only a part of what was
remembered was recorded; only a part of
what was recorded has survived; only a
part of what has survived has come to the
historian’s attention.”
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History
5
Introduction: History as Reconstruction

 “Only a part of what is credible has been

grasped, and only a part of what has been
grasped can be expounded or narrated by
the historian.”

 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History

6
What is the Historical Method?

 Historians
have to verify sources, to
date them, locate their place of origin
and identify their intended functions

7
In short, the Historical Method is…

 Theprocess of critically examining and

analyzing the records and survivals of
the past

 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History

8
Historical Sources
 Sources – an object from the past or
testimony concerning the past on which
historians depend in order to create
their own depiction of that past.
 Howell and Prevenier, From Reliable Sources an Introduction to Historical Method

 Tangible remains of the past

 Anthony Brundage, Going to Sources

9
Written Sources
1. Published materials
 Books, magazines, journals,
 Travelogue
 transcription of speech
2. Manuscript [any handwritten or typed record
that has not been printed]
 Archival materials
 Memoirs, diary
10
Non- written Sources
 Oral history
 Artifact
 Ruins
 Fossils
 Art works
 Videorecordings
 Audiorecordings
11
What are Primary Sources?
Testimony of an eyewitness

A primary source must have been

produced by a contemporary of the
event it narrates

Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History 12

What are Primary Sources?
A primary source is a document or
physical object which was written or
created during the time under study.

These sources were present during an

experience or time period and offer an
inside view of a particular event.
13
http://www.princeton.edu/~refdesk/primary2.h
What are Primary Sources?

Primary sources are characterized by

their content, regardless of whether
they are available in original format, in
microfilm/microfiche, in digital format,
or in published format.

http://www.yale.edu/collections_collaborative/primarysources/primarysources.html

14
Four Main Categories of Primary
Sources
1. Written sources
2. Images
3. Artifacts
4. Oral testimony
l

15
What are Secondary Sources?

A secondary source interprets and

analyzes primary sources. These sources
are one or more steps removed from
the event.
Secondary sources may have pictures,
quotes or graphics of primary sources in
them.
http://www.princeton.edu/~refdesk/primary2.html
16
What are Secondary Sources?

Examples:
History textbook
Printed materials (serials, periodicals
which interprets previous research)

17
Practical Example/Worksheet

Topic: Tejeros Convention

Primary Source: Santiago Alvarez’
account
Secondary Source: Teodoro Agoncillo’s
Revolt of the Masses

18
What is Historical Criticism?

In order for a source to be used as

evidence in history, basic matters about
its form and content must be settled

1. External Criticism

2. Internal Criticism

19
What is External Criticism?

The problem of authenticity

To spot fabricated, forged, faked

documents

To distinguish a hoax or misrepresentation

20
Tests of Authenticity

1. Determine the date of the document to

see whether they are anachronistic
e.g. pencils did not exist before the 16th
Century
2. Determine the author
e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History
21
Tests of Authenticity

3. Anachronistic style
e.g. idiom, ortography, punctuation
4. Anachronistic reference to events
e.g. too early, too late, too remote
5. Provenance or custody
e.g. determines its genuineness
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History 22
Tests of Authenticity

6. Semantics – determining the meaning of

a text or word
7. Hermeneutics –determining ambiguities

 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History

23
What is Internal Criticism?

The Problem of Credibility

Relevant particulars in the document – is
it credible?

Verisimilar – as close as what really

happened from a critical examination of
best available sources
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History 24
Tests of Credibility

1. Identification of the author

e.g. to determine his reliability; mental
processes, personal attitudes
2. Determination of the approximate date
e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History

25
Tests of Credibility

3. Ability to tell the truth

e.g. nearness to the event, competence of
witness, degree of attention
4. Willingness to tell the truth
e.g. to determine if the author consciously
or unconsciously tells falsehoods
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History
26
Tests of Credibility

5. Corroboration
i.e. historical facts – particulars which rest
upon the independent testimony of two or
more reliable witnesses
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History

27
Three Major Components to
Effective Historical Thinking

1. Sensitivity to Multiple Causation

2. Sensitivity to Context
3. Awareness of the interplay of
continuity and change in human
affairs

28