Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PART A.
Santiago Alvarez.
Katipunan and the
Revolution:
Memoirs of a
General. Ateneo
de Manila
University
Press.2003
(translated by
Carolina
Malay-Ocampo)
Seeds of
Discontent in
Agoncillo, Teodoro
A. (2002). The
Revolt of the
Masses: The Story
of Bonifacio and
the Katipunan,
Quezon City:
University of the
Philippines Press.
1
PART B.
Primary Source:
Secondary Source:
2
INSTRUCTIONS:
This activity is a comparative analysis paper of the primary and secondary sources on what had happened during the Tejeros convention. Read the assigned articles before answering the given
comparative matrix, do this with your partner.
NOTE: Copying of answers is strictly prohibited, this exercise requires you to answer using your own idea. Your instructor can immediately identify copied works so beware.
PART A.
- Answers for the author, date of the event, objective of the event and persons involved are OBVIOUSLY in the readings.
- For the main argument column, write two to three sentences on what is the main idea or thought forwarded by the reading in relation to what had happened during the Tejeros
Convention.
- For the bias column, identify what is/are the bias(es) committed by the author in his account for the said event. If necessary, support your argument(s) with the statements found in the
readings.
PART B.
- Write at least two to three advantages and disadvantages of using primary and secondary accounts of the Tejeros Convention.
- For conclusion and implication write a paragraph summarizing the ideas found in the two sources (compare and contrast their ideas) as well as the implications of what had happened to
the convention on the subsequent revolutions. Finally, relate the rivalry between Magdalo and Magdiwang to our current political environment.
DEADLINE: